Obicetrapib on top of maximally tolerated lipid-modifying therapies in participants with or at high risk for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: rationale and designs of BROADWAY and BROOKLYN.

BACKGROUND: Obicetrapib, a novel, selective cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) inhibitor, reduces low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), LDL particles, apolipoprotein (Apo) B, and lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] and increases high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) when added to statins with or without ezetimibe. By substantially reducing LDL-C, obicetrapib has the potential to lower atherogenic lipoproteins in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) or heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HeFH) whose LDL-C levels remain high despite treatment with available maximally tolerated lipid-modifying therapies, addressing an unmet medical need in a patient population at high risk for cardiovascular events. METHODS AND RESULTS: BROADWAY (NCT05142722) and BROOKLYN (NCT05425745) are ongoing placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized Phase III trials designed to examine the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of obicetrapib as an adjunct to dietary intervention and maximally tolerated lipid-modifying therapies in participants with a history of ASCVD and/or underlying HeFH whose LDL-C is not adequately controlled. The primary efficacy endpoint was the percent change in LDL-C from baseline to day 84. Other endpoints included changes in Apo B, non-HDL-C, HDL-C, Apo A1, Lp(a), and triglycerides in addition to parameters evaluating safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics. BROADWAY also included an adjudicated assessment of major adverse cardiovascular events, measurements of glucose homeostasis, and an ambulatory blood pressure monitoring substudy. A total of 2,532 participants were randomized in BROADWAY and 354 in BROOKLYN to receive obicetrapib 10 mg or placebo (2:1) for 365 days with follow-up through 35 days after the last dose. Results from both trials are anticipated in 2024. CONCLUSION: These trials will provide safety and efficacy data to support the potential use of obicetrapib among patients with ASCVD or HeFH with elevated LDL-C for whom existing therapies are not sufficiently effective or well-tolerated.

Toxicological safety assessment of HempChoice® hemp oil extract; a proprietary extract consisting of a high concentration of cannabidiol (CBD) in addition to other phytocannabinoids and terpenes derived from CannabissativaL.

HempChoice® Hemp Oil Extract (Geocann, LLC) is an extract of the aerial parts of hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) primarily comprised of 55-75% cannabidiol (CBD), 1-15% other phytocannabinoids and 1-15% terpenes. The results of multiple safety studies demonstrated that it was non-mutagenic in an Ames and mammalian cell micronucleus. test and was well tolerated in a 14-day range-finding study at dose levels up to 96.03. mg/kg BW/day. In the 90-day study, no HempChoice® Hemp Oil Extract-related significant changes were noted in weekly BW, daily BW gain, food consumption, functional observational battery or motor activity assessment. In addition, no HempChoice® Hemp Oil Extract related mortalities, abnormal clinical observations and ophthalmological changes were reported. Some HempChoice® Hemp Oil Extract-related changes were reported in the hematology and clinical chemistry parameters evaluated. These changes were not outside the normal range and were considered reversible during the 28-day recovery period. No macroscopic findings were reported, and histopathological changes related to HempChoice® Hemp Oil Extract exposure were limited to adaptive changes in the liver which were not observed in the recovery group animals. The no observed adverse effect level (NOAEL) for HempChoice® Hemp Oil Extract was determined to be 185.90 mg/kg BW/day in male and female Sprague-Dawley rats.

Ziltivekimab for Treatment of Anemia of Inflammation in Patients on Hemodialysis: Results from a Phase 1/2 Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Patients with CKD who are on hemodialysis are hyporesponsive to erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) because of anemia of inflammation. Interleukin-6 (IL-6) induced hepcidin expression is a key mediator of such inflammation. METHODS: This phase 1/2, placebo-controlled trial assessed effects of ziltivekimab, a novel anti-IL-6 ligand antibody, in patients on hemodialysis with rs855791, a single nucleotide polymorphism of the TMPRSS6 gene that is hypothesized to heighten susceptibility to IL-6-mediated inflammatory effects. After a screening period documenting stable ESA and iron dosing, we randomized 61 patients with elevated IL-6 (≥4 pg/ml) to receive placebo or ziltivekimab (doses of 2, 6, or 20 mg), administered intravenously every 2 weeks for 12 weeks during hemodialysis. ESA dose adjustments were allowed after 4 weeks. We analyzed safety and effects on inflammation, iron metabolism, serum albumin, and anti-drug antibodies. RESULTS: No patient experienced dose-limiting toxicity. Four patients (two each in the 6- and 20-mg cohorts) died of a treatment-emergent adverse event. Compared with patients receiving placebo, those receiving ziltivekimab experienced significantly greater reductions of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, serum amyloid A, and fibrinogen from baseline to end of treatment. Median ESA usage decreased by 15,000, 15,000, or 33,000 IU/wk per patient in the 2-, 6-, and 20-mg ziltivekimab cohorts, respectively, compared with no change in the placebo group. We also noted significant dose responses for decreased ESA resistance index and increased serum iron, total iron binding capacity, transferrin saturation, and serum albumin. CONCLUSIONS: Ziltivekimab significantly improved markers of inflammation, reduced ESA requirements, and increased serum albumin in patients on hemodialysis with inflammation and hyporesponsiveness to ESA therapy. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRY NAME AND REGISTRATION NUMBER: Study to Assess the Safety, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacodynamics of Multiple Doses of COR-001, NCT02868229.

Effect of High-Dose Omega-3 Fatty Acids vs Corn Oil on Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events in Patients at High Cardiovascular Risk: The STRENGTH Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: It remains uncertain whether the omega-3 fatty acids eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) reduce cardiovascular risk. Objective: To determine the effects on cardiovascular outcomes of a carboxylic acid formulation of EPA and DHA (omega-3 CA) with documented favorable effects on lipid and inflammatory markers in patients with atherogenic dyslipidemia and high cardiovascular risk. Design, Setting, and Participants: A double-blind, randomized, multicenter trial (enrollment October 30, 2014, to June 14, 2017; study termination January 8, 2020; last patient visit May 14, 2020) comparing omega-3 CA with corn oil in statin-treated participants with high cardiovascular risk, hypertriglyceridemia, and low levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C). A total of 13 078 patients were randomized at 675 academic and community hospitals in 22 countries in North America, Europe, South America, Asia, Australia, New Zealand, and South Africa. Interventions: Participants were randomized to receive 4 g/d of omega-3 CA (n = 6539) or corn oil, which was intended to serve as an inert comparator (n = 6539), in addition to usual background therapies, including statins. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary efficacy measure was a composite of cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, coronary revascularization, or unstable angina requiring hospitalization. Results: When 1384 patients had experienced a primary end point event (of a planned 1600 events), the trial was prematurely halted based on an interim analysis that indicated a low probability of clinical benefit of omega-3 CA vs the corn oil comparator. Among the 13 078 treated patients (mean [SD] age, 62.5 [9.0] years; 35% women; 70% with diabetes; median low-density lipoprotein [LDL] cholesterol level, 75.0 mg/dL; median triglycerides level, 240 mg/dL; median HDL-C level, 36 mg/dL; and median high-sensitivity C-reactive protein level, 2.1 mg/L), 12 633 (96.6%) completed the trial with ascertainment of primary end point status. The primary end point occurred in 785 patients (12.0%) treated with omega-3 CA vs 795 (12.2%) treated with corn oil (hazard ratio, 0.99 [95% CI, 0.90-1.09]; P = .84). A greater rate of gastrointestinal adverse events was observed in the omega-3 CA group (24.7%) compared with corn oil-treated patients (14.7%). Conclusions and Relevance: Among statin-treated patients at high cardiovascular risk, the addition of omega-3 CA, compared with corn oil, to usual background therapies resulted in no significant difference in a composite outcome of major adverse cardiovascular events. These findings do not support use of this omega-3 fatty acid formulation to reduce major adverse cardiovascular events in high-risk patients. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02104817.

Efficacy and Safety of Alirocumab in High-Risk Patients With Clinical Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease and/or Heterozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia (from 5 Placebo-Controlled ODYSSEY Trials).

Patients with previous atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and/or heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HeFH) are at high risk of future cardiovascular events. Despite maximally tolerated doses of statins, many patients still have elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of alirocumab in patients with ASCVD and/or HeFH on a maximally tolerated dose of statin (rosuvastatin 20 or 40 mg, atorvastatin 40 or 80 mg, or simvastatin 80 mg, or lower doses with an investigator-approved reason) ± other lipid-lowering therapies from 5 placebo-controlled phase 3 trials (52 to 78 weeks). Patients with (n = 2,449) and without (n = 1,050) ASCVD were pooled from the FH I, FH II, HIGH FH, LONG TERM, and COMBO I trials. Patients with HeFH with (n = 575) and without ASCVD (n = 682) were pooled from all trials except COMBO I. High-intensity statins were utilized in 55.7% to 59.0% and in 72.4% to 87.6% of the ASCVD and the HeFH groups, respectively. Efficacy end points included LDL-C percent change from baseline to week 24 stratified by alirocumab dose. Mean baseline demographics and lipid levels were comparable in alirocumab- and placebo-treated patients. LDL-C reductions from baseline at week 24 ranged from 46.6% to 51.3% for alirocumab 75/150 mg and from 54.1% to 61.9% for alirocumab 150 mg in ASCVD and HeFH groups and were sustained for up to 78 weeks. LDL-C reductions with alirocumab were independent of ASCVD and/or HeFH status (interaction p value >0.05). Concordant results were observed for other lipids analyzed. The overall safety in the subgroups analyzed was similar in both treatment arms. Injection-site reactions were observed more frequently with alirocumab versus placebo.

Management of lipoprotein X and its complications in a patient with primary sclerosing cholangitis.

Lipoprotein X (LpX) is an abnormal lipoprotein found in conditions such as lecithin:cholesterol acyltransferase deficiency and cholestatic states (e.g., primary biliary cirrhosis and primary sclerosing cholangitis). Management of severe hypercholesterolemia due to LpX with drugs and physical removal methods is not well established in the literature. A case is discussed of a 51-year-old woman who presented with multiple electrolyte abnormalities, xanthomas and neuropathy found to be secondary to LpX in the setting of primary sclerosing cholangitis. This case highlights that oral medications, including statins, may be insufficient to normalize lipid levels or improve clinical symptoms of LpX and presents therapeutic plasma exchange as a safe and effective therapeutic option to treat the morbid sequela of LpX hyperlipidemia.

ETC-1002: a future option for lipid disorders?

ETC-1002 is a new investigational low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C)-lowering agent (Esperion Therapeutics, Inc.). ETC-1002 is a dicarboxylic acid derivative with a novel mechanism of action targeting two hepatic enzymes--adenosine triphosphate-citrate lyase (ACL) and adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase (AMPK), inhibiting sterol and fatty acid synthesis and promoting mitochondrial long-chain fatty acid oxidation. This agent is currently in phase II clinical research. Available data report that ETC-1002 significantly decreased LDL-C levels (up to 32%) in both patients with normal and elevated baseline levels of triglycerides. Such beneficial effect is superior to currently approved non-statin lipid lowering agents. The levels of apolipoprotein B (apoB) and non-high density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C) were also reduced with beneficial effect on other cardiometabolic factors such as inflammatory markers, blood pressure and body weight. Although, the safety and tolerability of ETC-1002 needs to be confirmed in ongoing and future, larger studies, this agent has, so far, been generally safe and well tolerated. This novel, oral, once-daily, small molecule may lead to effective LDL-C lowering treatment in hypercholesterolaemic subjects who are statin intolerant or as add-on therapy in those who are unable to reach the LDL-C goals despite being on statin therapy. This agent might not only exert lipid-lowering related benefits, but also favourable cardiometabolic effects.

Potential impact of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors on cardiovascular pathophysiology in type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Cardiovascular (CV) disease remains the major cause of mortality and morbidity in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). The pathogenesis of CV disease in T2DM is complex and multifactorial, and includes abnormalities in endothelial cells, vascular smooth muscle cells, myocardium, platelets, and the coagulation cascade. Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors are a newer class of agents that act by potentiating the action of glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide. This review summarizes CV disease pathophysiology in T2DM and the potential effect of DPP-4 inhibitors on CV risk in patients with T2DM. Preclinical and small observational studies and post hoc analyses of clinical trial data suggest that DPP-4 inhibitors may have beneficial CV effects. Some effects of DPP-4 inhibitors are GLP-1 dependent, whereas others may be due to GLP-1-independent actions of DPP-4 inhibitors. Analyses of major adverse CV events occurring during clinical development of DPP-4 inhibitors found no increased risk of CV events or mortality and even a potential reduction in CV events. Two large CV outcome trials have been completed and report that saxagliptin and alogliptin did not increase or decrease adverse CV outcomes in patients with T2DM and CV disease or at high risk for adverse CV events. More patients in the saxagliptin group than in the placebo group were hospitalized for heart failure, and there was a similar numerically increased risk of hospitalization for heart failure with alogliptin; however, the risk was not significantly greater compared with placebo. Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors may affect some of the pathologic processes involved in the increased CV risk inherent in T2DM.

Use of microsomal triglyceride transfer protein inhibitors in patients with homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia: translating clinical trial experience into clinical practice.

Homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HoFH) is associated with severe hypercholesterolemia and premature cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. The most frequent cause of HoFH is loss of function mutations in the gene for the low-density lipoprotein receptor, resulting in reduced clearance of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol from the circulation. Patients with HoFH have attenuated responsiveness to lipidlowering therapies such as statins, cholesterol absorption inhibition, and bile acid binding resins because of impaired LDL receptor expression. Lomitapide is a novel microsomal triglyceride transfer protein inhibitor that does not depend on the ability to upregulate LDL receptors on the surface of hepatocytes. Lomitapide reduces production of apolipoprotein B-containing lipoproteins, significantly reduces serum levels of LDL cholesterol, and is approved for use in patients with HoFH in the United States and the European Union.

Prognostic value of normal regadenoson stress perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance.

BACKGROUND: Regadenoson is a vasodilator stress agent that selectively activates the A2A receptor. Compared to adenosine, regadenoson is easier to administer and results in fewer side effects. Although extensively studied in patients undergoing nuclear perfusion imaging (MPI), its use for perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) is not well described. The aim of this study was to determine the prognostic value of a normal regadenoson perfusion CMR in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease. METHODS: Patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease were prospectively enrolled to receive perfusion CMR (Philips 1.5 T) with regadenoson. Three short-axis slices of the left ventricle (LV) were obtained during first pass of contrast using a hybrid GRE-EPI pulse sequence (0.075 mmol/kg Gadolinium-DTPA-BMA at 4 ml/sec). Imaging was performed 1 minute after injection of regadenoson (0.4 mg) and repeated 15 minutes after reversal of hyperemia with aminophylline (125 mg). Perfusion defects were documented if they persisted for ≥ 2 frames after peak enhancement of the LV cavity. CMR was considered abnormal if there was a resting wall motion abnormality, decreased LVEF (<40%), presence of LGE, or the presence of a perfusion defect during hyperemia. All patients were followed for a minimum of 1 year for major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) defined as coronary revascularization, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and cardiovascular death. RESULTS: 149 patients were included in the final analysis. Perfusion defects were noted in 43/149 (29%) patients; 59/149 (40%) had any abnormality on CMR. During the mean follow-up period of 24 ± 9 months, 17/149 (11.4%) patients experienced MACE. The separation in the survival distributions for those with perfusion defects and those without perfusion defects was highly significant (log-rank p = 0.0001). When the absence of perfusion defects was added to the absence of other resting CMR abnormalities, the negative predictive value improved from 96% to 99%. CONCLUSION: Regadenoson perfusion CMR provides high confidence for excellent prognosis in patients with normal perfusion.

Efficacy and safety of a novel dual modulator of adenosine triphosphate-citrate lyase and adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase in patients with hypercholesterolemia: results of a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trial.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess the lipid-altering efficacy and safety of ETC-1002 in subjects with hypercholesterolemia. BACKGROUND: ETC-1002 is a small molecule that modulates pathways of cholesterol, fatty acid, and carbohydrate metabolism and may have therapeutic benefits in treating hypercholesterolemia and other cardiometabolic risk factors. METHODS: This multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trial evaluated patients (n = 177) with elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) (130 to 220 mg/dl), who were stratified by baseline triglycerides (not elevated [<150 mg/dl] or elevated [150-<400 mg/dl]) and randomized to receive 40, 80, or 120 mg of ETC-1002 or placebo once daily for 12 weeks. Outcomes included changes in LDL-C (primary endpoint), other lipids, and cardiometabolic risk factors; and safety. RESULTS: ETC-1002 40, 80, and 120 mg lowered least-squares mean ± SE LDL-C levels by 17.9 ± 2.2%, 25.0 ± 2.1%, and 26.6 ± 2.2%, respectively, versus a reduction of 2.1 ± 2.2% with placebo (all, p < 0.0001); LDL-C lowering was similar between the subgroups with nonelevated and elevated triglycerides. ETC-1002 also lowered non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C), apolipoprotein B, and LDL particle number (all, p < 0.0001) in a dose-dependent manner; HDL-C and triglyceride levels were relatively unchanged. Post-hoc analyses suggest that ETC-1002 may have favorable effects on other cardiometabolic risk factors. The ETC-1002 and placebo groups did not demonstrate clinically meaningful differences in adverse events or other safety assessments. CONCLUSIONS: ETC-1002 significantly lowered LDL-C levels up to 27% across a broad range of baseline triglycerides and was generally safe and well tolerated. ETC-1002 has a novel mechanism of action and may be useful for reducing LDL-C. (A Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of ETC-1002 in Subjects With Elevated Blood Cholesterol and Either Normal or Elevated Triglycerides; NCT01262638).

Emerging low-density lipoprotein therapies: Targeting PCSK9 for low-density lipoprotein reduction.

Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) is a protein secreted by the hepatocyte that regulates the surface expression of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) receptors by targeting them for lysosomal degradation. Statins enhance PCSK9 synthesis, an effect that blunts the LDL-cholesterol (-C)-lowering effectiveness of statins. Loss-of-function mutations in the PCSK9 gene produce life-long low levels of LDL-C and reduce cardiovascular risk. Monoclonal antibodies to PCSK9, which mimic the effects of genetic mutations by inhibiting PCSK9, are in clinical trial development. Two different commercial development programs have demonstrated significant success in lowering LDL-C in phase 1 and 2 trials with similar agents: REGN727/SAR236553 (REGN727) and, more recently, AMG 145. When administered subcutaneously at doses ranging from 50 to 150 mg every 2 weeks or 200 to 400 mg every 4 weeks, these agents produced similar dose-responses in LDL-C lowering. In hypercholesterolemic patients, LDL-C reductions ranged up to 60%, and, as would be expected, an even greater response was reported for statin-treated hypercholesterolemic patients-up to 70% decrease. LDL-C has typically shown a gradual increase after the nadir as monoclonal antibodies are cleared from the circulation. Results to date indicate that the PCSK9 monoclonal antibody approach appears safe, well-tolerated, and profoundly lowers LDL-C levels while also favorably altering apolipoprotein B, triglycerides, lipoprotein (a), and high-density lipoprotein-C. It is expected to meet an important clinical need for patients unable to achieve adequate LDL-C-lowering with currently available therapies.

Diagnosis and treatment of familial hypercholesterolaemia.

Familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH) is an autosomal dominant genetic disorder, associated with elevated levels of low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C), which can lead to premature cardiovascular disease. Early diagnosis of FH is important to prevent morbidity and mortality. Familial hypercholesterolaemia is usually diagnosed using clinical characteristics, such as family history, and cholesterol levels; however, genetic testing may provide a definite diagnosis of FH by detecting a pathological mutation. Current guidelines highlight the importance of reducing LDL-C levels in patients with FH. Statins are the current standard treatment for the majority of these patients, and have been shown to be effective in reducing the incidence of cardiovascular heart disease in patients with FH. Nevertheless, many FH patients do not achieve their target LDL-C levels; as such, new treatment options are required to decrease LDL-C levels beyond those currently achieved. There are currently several new classes of pharmacotherapy under investigation to control LDL-C levels. These include agents which modify LDL-C production, such as inhibitors of apolipoprotein B, or those which affect LDL-C catabolism, such as inhibition of pro-protein convertase subtilisin/kexin 9, a protein which is responsible for the degradation of the LDL receptor. Therapies which raise high-density lipoprotein cholesterol are also being evaluated. In this article, we consider the diagnosis of FH and the goals of therapy and review the current and potential future treatment options for patients with FH.

Cardiovascular risk factors in a patient with diabetes mellitus and coronary artery disease: therapeutic approaches to improve outcomes: perspectives of a preventive cardiologist.

In patients with diabetes mellitus (DM), a cardiovascular event is of critical concern because of the impact on long-term survival. Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of death for patients with DM, which makes the modification of risk factors in the patient with DM and CVD a primary focus of the preventive cardiologist. Management of this patient population should include pharmacologic interventions, such as antidyslipidemics (mainly statins) and oral anti-DM (or insulin) agents, as well as diet control, physical exercise, and smoking cessation. It is hoped that focus on the ABCs of treatment--hemoglobin A(1c), blood pressure, and cholesterol-lipid profile--along with ongoing and future studies on the effects of these interventions will help to reduce the significant morbidity and mortality from microvascular and macrovascular complications in these high-risk patients with DM.

HDL and CETP Inhibition: Will This DEFINE the Future?

OPINION STATEMENT: The premature stopping of the AIM-HIGH (Atherothrombosis Intervention in Metabolic Syndrome with Low HDL/High Triglycerides: Impact on Global Health) study due to futility has called into question the clinical value of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) increases. The failure of estrogen therapy in the HERS (Heart and Estrogen/progestin Replacement Study) trial and the cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) inhibitors torcetrapib (in the ILLUMINATE [Investigation of Lipid Level Management to Understand Its Impact in Atherosclerotic Events] trial) and, most recently, dalcetrapib in the dal-OUTCOMES trial has cast doubt on the "HDL-raising hypothesis" for providing additional benefits on top of statin therapy. The AIM-HIGH trial was designed to equalize low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels between the two treatment groups while the niacin arm would have a higher HDL-C. The study population included patients with low HDL-C and cardiovascular disease (CVD); because this population has a high residual risk for CVD on statin therapy, these patients were most likely to benefit from the niacin HDL-C-raising effect. These findings are disappointing because clinicians have used extended-release niacin to treat patients with low HDL-C because niacin has demonstrated benefit in earlier reported studies in conjunction with statins and other drugs, as observed in the Cholesterol Lowering Atherosclerosis Study (CLAS) and the HDL-Atherosclerosis Treatment Study (HATS). In the Coronary Drug Project, niacin alone was shown to reduce myocardial infarction, stroke, and the need for coronary bypass surgery. Niacin does not increase the number of HDL particles to the same extent it raises HDL-C. Niacin alters the composition of HDL, making the particle larger, which is similar to the effects of CETP inhibition on HDL. Both niacin and CETP inhibitors decrease the catabolism of HDL, thereby increasing the size of the HDL particle and raising HDL-C. Dalcetrapib, which does not decrease LDL-C while raising HDL-C, was recently discontinued from clinical development due to a interim analysis that determined that the study was futile. Anacetrapib, which markedly increases HDL-C while also significantly lowering LDL-C, remains in clinical development, with a large cardiovascular end point trial currently enrolling 30,000 high-risk patients. For now, the goal remains the achievement of LDL-C and non-HDL targets, and low HDL-c remains a significant independent risk factor, but there is insufficient evidence that raising HDL-C will provide a clinical benefit.

Cardiovascular effects of glucagonlike peptide-1 agonists.

Type 2 diabetes mellitus is acknowledged as a major risk factor for the development of cardiovascular disease (CVD). Advancing treatment options for person with diabetes beyond glucose control to prevent microvascular and macrovascular complications and ultimately have an impact on CVD development holds great significance for the growing number of persons with diabetes. Glucagonlike peptide-1 (GLP-1) is an incretin secreted in response to nutrient ingestion that inhibits glucagon secretion and gastric emptying, resulting in reduced postprandial glycemia. GLP-1 has insulinomimetic, insulinotropic, and antiapoptotic properties. GLP-1 agonists (exenatide and liraglutide) are a class of drugs approved for the treatment of diabetes that have significant cardiovascular (CV) effects. These CV effects potentially provide an opportunity for clinicians to address the multifactorial issues involved in the increased CV morbidity and mortality associated with diabetes. This article presents an overview of the CV effects of GLP-1 agonists, highlighting implications for the management of patients with diabetes and heart disease.

Peripheral artery disease, biomarkers, and darapladib.

OBJECTIVE: Subjects with peripheral artery disease (PAD) are at increased risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, perhaps in part, related to increased levels of inflammation, platelet activity, and lipids. We therefore sought to investigate the relationship between PAD and levels of inflammatory, platelet, and lipid biomarkers and the treatment effect of darapladib, a novel lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A(2) (Lp-PLA(2)) inhibitor. METHODS: This is a post hoc analysis of the 959 patients with coronary disease or their risk equivalent receiving atorvastatin who were randomized to receive darapladib or placebo to examine the effects of an Lp-PLA(2) inhibitor on the biomarkers of cardiovascular risk. We conducted an exploratory analysis evaluating the levels of biomarkers in subjects with PAD (n = 172) compared with those without PAD (n = 787). RESULTS: After adjustment for age, sex, smoking, body mass index, and diabetes, subjects with PAD had greater levels of matrix metalloproteinase-9 (between group comparisons 22%, 95% confidence interval [10-31], P < .01), myeloperoxidase (12% [2-20], P = .01), interleukin-6 (13% [4-21], P = .01), adiponectin (17% [7-26], P < .01), intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (7% [2-11], P < .01), osteoprotegrin (6% [1-10], P = .02), CD40 ligand (15% [1-28], P = .04), high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (17% [1-31], P = .04), and triglycerides (11% [0.2-21], P = .05). No significant difference was detected for Lp-PLA(2) activity, P-selectin, urinary 11-dehydrothroboxane B2, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol between subjects with and without PAD. Darapladib produced highly significant inhibition of Lp-PLA(2) activity when compared with placebo at weeks 4 and 12 (P < .01) in patients with and without PAD. CONCLUSIONS: Subjects with PAD had elevated levels of matrix metalloproteinase-9, myeloperoxidase, interleukin-6, adiponectin, intercellular adhesion molecule-1, osteoprotegrin, CD40 ligand, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, and triglycerides compared with those without PAD. Darapladib, a novel Lp-PLA(2) inhibitor, was equally effective in reducing Lp-PLA(2) activity levels in subjects with and without PAD.

A systematic review of bile acid sequestrant therapy in children with familial hypercholesterolemia.

Familial hypercholesterolemia, which arises as a result of a mutation in the low-density lipoprotein (LDL) receptor gene, is characterized by elevated levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), regardless of dietary and lifestyle modifications. Pharmacological therapy is often required to adequately control the elevated LDL-C levels associated with familial hypercholesterolemia. However, children with this genetic condition present many challenges for physicians, who must weigh the benefits of lipid-lowering therapy against the risks associated with the various treatment options. Furthermore, because familial hypercholesterolemia is a chronic condition, children will likely require long-term lipid-lowering therapy. As such, the potential effect of pharmacological treatment on development is of paramount importance in this population. Bile acid sequestrants represent a unique treatment option for children with familial hypercholesterolemia in that these agents are not systemically absorbed but rather exert their lipid-lowering effects via binding to bile acids within the gastrointestinal tract. A literature search was performed to identify clinical data related to the use of bile acid sequestrant therapy in children (< 18 years of age) with familial hypercholesterolemia. Studies published in English between 1990 and December 2010 that were retrieved from MEDLINE and EMBASE were included in this systematic review. In total, five clinical studies were identified that evaluated bile acid sequestrant monotherapy, whereas two studies were identified that evaluated combination therapy with a bile acid sequestrant and low-dose statin. This review summarizes the clinical data regarding the efficacy and safety of bile acid sequestrants in this specialized population.

Update on CETP inhibition.

Cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) plays an important role in reverse cholesterol transport and the maintenance of cholesterol homeostasis. The consequences of CETP activity are influenced by triglyceride (TG) levels. When TG levels are increased, CETP promotes transfer of cholesteryl esters to VLDL and the generation of atherogenic dyslipidemia. Combined activities of CETP and hepatic lipase in the presence of TG-rich lipoproteins generate small, dense HDL and LDL particles. Inhibition of CETP may reduce the risk of atherosclerosis in patients with dyslipidemia. Decreasing CETP activity has consistently inhibited atherosclerosis in animal models. Three small-molecule CETP inhibitors, dalcetrapib, torcetrapib, and anacetrapib, have been or are being tested in phase 3 clinical studies. All three demonstrated potentially beneficial effects on the lipid profile in patients with dyslipidemia. Imaging studies with torcetrapib failed to show an effect on atherosclerosis in humans, probably because of the off-target effect on the RAAS. Preclinical evidence suggests that dalcetrapib seems to lack the off-target adverse effects on the RAAS that potentially caused the clinical development of torcetrapib to be halted. The lack of adverse effects on the RAAS remains to be confirmed in phase 3 studies with dalcetrapib. CETP inhibition as a therapeutic strategy remains a valid option to be tested with a CETP inhibitor that does not share torcetrapib's off-target effects.