Disparate potential for readmission prevention exists among inpatient and outpatient procedures in a minimally invasive surgery practice.

BACKGROUND: Administrators have focused on decreasing postoperative readmissions for cost reduction without fully understanding their preventability. This study describes the development and implementation of a surgeon-led readmission review process that assessed preventability. METHODS: A gastrointestinal surgical group at a tertiary referral hospital developed and implemented a template to analyze inpatient and outpatient readmissions. Monthly stakeholder assessments reviewed and categorized readmissions as potentially preventable or not preventable. Continuous variables were examined by the Student's t test and reported as means and standard deviations. Categorical variables were examined by the Pearson χ2 statistic and Fisher's exact test. RESULTS: There were 61 readmission events after 849 inpatient operations (7.2%) and 16 after 856 outpatient operations (1.9%), the latter of which were all classified as potentially preventable. Colorectal procedures represented 65.6% of readmissions despite being only 37.2% of all cases. The majority (67.2%) of readmission events were not preventable. Compared to the not-preventable group, the potentially preventable group experienced more dehydration (30.0% vs 9.8%, P = .045) and ileostomy creation (78.6% vs 33.3%, P = .017). The potential for outpatient management to prevent readmission was significantly higher in the potentially preventable group (40.0% vs 0.0%, P < .001), as was premature discharge prevention (35.0% vs 0.0%, P < .001). CONCLUSION: The use of the standardized template developed for analyzing readmission events after inpatient and outpatient procedures identified a disparate potential for readmission prevention. This finding suggests that a singular focus on readmission reduction is misguided, with further work needed to evaluate and implement appropriate quality-based strategies.

Open preperitoneal ventral hernia repair: Prospective observational study of quality improvement outcomes over 18 years and 1,842 patients.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to describe progressive evidence-based changes in perioperative management of open preperitoneal ventral hernia repair and subsequent surgical outcomes and to analyze factors that affect recurrence and wound complications. METHODS: Prospective, tertiary hernia center data (2004-2021) were examined for patients undergoing midline open preperitoneal ventral hernia repair with mesh. "Early" (2004-2012) and "Recent" (2013-2021) groups were based on surgery date. RESULTS: Comparison of Early (n = 675) versus Recent (n = 1,167) groups showed that Recent patients were, on average, older (56.9 ± 12.6 vs 58.7 ± 12.1 years; P < .001) with a lower body mass index (33.5 ± 8.3 vs 32.0 ± 6.8 kg/m2; P = .003) and a higher number of comorbidities (3.6 ± 2.2 vs 5.2 ± 2.6; P < .001). Recent patients had higher proportions of prior failed ventral hernia repair (46.5% vs 60.8%; P < .001), larger hernia defects (199.7 ± 232.8 vs 214.4 ± 170.5 cm2; P < .001), more Center for Disease Control class 3 or 4 wounds (11.3% vs 18.6%; P < .001), and more component separations (22.5% vs 45.7%; P < .001). Hernia recurrence decreased over time (7.1% vs 2.4%; P < .001), as did wound complication rates (26.7% vs 13.2%; P < .001). Comparing respective multivariable analyses (Early versus Recent), wound complications were associated with panniculectomy (odds ratio [95% confidence interval]: 2.9 [1.9-4.5], P < .001 vs 2.1 [1.4-3.3], P < .01), contaminated wounds (2.1 [1.1-3.7], P = .02 vs 1.8 [1.1-3.1], P = .02), anterior component separation technique (1.8 [1.1-2.9], P = .02 vs 3.2[1.9-5.3], P < .01), and operative time (per minute: 1.01 [1.008-1.015], P < .01 vs 1.004 [1.001-1.007], P < .01). Diabetes (2.6 [1.7-4.0], P < .01) and tobacco (1.8 [1.1-2.9], P = .02) were only significant in the early group. In both groups, recurrence was associated with wound complication (8.9 [4.1-20.1], P < .01 vs 3.4 [1.3-8.2]. P < .01) and recurrent hernias (4.9 [2.3-11.5], P < .01 vs 2.1 [1.1-4.2], P = .036). CONCLUSION: Despite significant increased patient complexity over time, detecting and implementing best practices as determined by recurring data analysis of a center's outcomes has significantly improved patient care results.

Nationwide increase in component separation without concomitant rise in readmissions: A nationwide readmissions database analysis.

BACKGROUND: The use of component separation technique (CST) in complex abdominal wall reconstruction (AWR) increases the rate of primary musculofascial closure but can be associated with increased wound complications, which may require readmission. This study examines 3-year trends in readmissions for patients undergoing AWR with or without CST. METHODS: The Nationwide Readmissions Database was queried for patients undergoing elective AWR from 2016-2018. CST, demographic characteristics, and 90-day complications and readmissions were determined. CST versus non-CST readmissions were compared, including matched subgroups. Standard statistics and logistic regression were used. RESULTS: Over the 3-year period, 94,784 patients underwent AWR. There was an annual increase in the prevalence of CST: 4.0% in 2016; 6.1% in 2017; 6.7% in 2018 (P < .01), which is a 67.5% upsurge during that time. Most cases (82.3%) occurred at urban teaching hospitals, which had more comorbid patients (P < .01). The yearly 90-day readmission rate did not change: 16.0%, 18.2%, and 16.9% (P = .26). Readmissions were higher for CST patients than non-CST patients (17.1% vs 15.7%), but not in the matched subgroup (17.0% vs 16.4%; P = .41). Most commonly, readmissions were for infection (28.3%); 14.3% of readmitted patients underwent reoperation. Smoking, morbid obesity, diabetes, chronic lung disease, urban-teaching hospital status, and increased length of stay increased the chance of readmission (all P < .05). CONCLUSION: From 2016 to 2018, the use of CST increased 67.5% nationwide without an increase in readmissions. As we look toward clinical targets to reduce risk of readmission, modifiable health conditions, such as smoking, morbid obesity, and diabetes should be targeted during the prehabilitation process.

Complicated Diverticular Disease.

The modern management of colonic diverticular disease involves grouping patients into uncomplicated or complicated diverticulitis, after which the correct treatment paradigm is instituted. Recent controversies suggest overlap in management strategies between these two groups. While most reports still support surgical intervention for the treatment of complicated diverticular disease, more data are forthcoming suggesting complicated diverticulitis does not merit surgical resection in all scenarios. Given the significant risk for complication in surgery for diverticulitis, careful attention should be paid to patient and procedure selection. Here, we define complicated diverticulitis, discuss options for surgical intervention, and explain strategies for avoiding operative pitfalls that result in early and late postoperative complications.

Impact of Multidisciplinary Audit of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS)® Programs at a Single Institution.

BACKGROUND: As Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) programs expand across numerous subspecialties, growth and sustainability on a system level becomes increasingly important and may benefit from reporting multidisciplinary and financial data. However, the literature on multidisciplinary outcome analysis in ERAS is sparse. This study aims to demonstrate the impact of multidisciplinary ERAS auditing in a hospital system. Additionally, we describe developing a financial metric for use in gaining support for system-wide ERAS adoption and sustainability. METHODS: Data from HPB, colorectal and urology ERAS programs at a single institution were analyzed from a prospective ERAS Interactive Audit System (EIAS) database from September 2015 to June 2019. Clinical 30-day outcomes for the ERAS cohort (n = 1374) were compared to the EIAS pre-ERAS control (n = 311). Association between improved ERAS compliance and improved outcomes were also assessed for the ERAS cohort. The potential multidisciplinary financial impact was estimated from hospital bed charges. RESULTS: Multidisciplinary auditing demonstrated a significant reduction in postoperative length of stay (LOS) (1.5 days, p < 0.001) for ERAS patients in aggregate and improved ERAS compliance was associated with reduced LOS (coefficient - 0.04, p = 0.004). Improved ERAS compliance in aggregate also significantly associated with improved 30-day survival (odds ratio 1.04, p = 0.001). Multidisciplinary analysis also demonstrated a potential financial impact of 44% savings (p < 0.001) by reducing hospital bed charges across all specialties. CONCLUSIONS: Multidisciplinary auditing of ERAS programs may improve ERAS program support and expansion. Analysis across subspecialties demonstrated associations between improved ERAS compliance and postoperative LOS as well as 30-day survival, and further suggested a substantial combined financial impact.

Recurrent incisional hernia repairs at a tertiary hernia center: Are outcomes really inferior to initial repairs?

BACKGROUND: Recurrent ventral hernia repairs are reported to have higher recurrence and complication rates than initial ventral hernia repairs. This is the largest analysis of outcomes for initial versus recurrent open ventral hernia repairs reported in the literature. METHODS: A prospective, institutional database at a tertiary hernia center was queried for patients undergoing open ventral hernia repairs with complete fascial closure and synthetic mesh placement. RESULTS: A total of 1,694 open ventral hernia repairs patients were identified, including 896 (52.9%) initial ventral hernia repairs and 798 (47.1%)recurrent ventral hernia repairs. Recurrent ventral hernia repair patients were more complex: older (P = .003), higher body mass index (P < .001), higher American Society of Anesthesiologists class (P < .001), incidence of diabetics (P = .003), comorbidities (P < .001), and larger hernia defects (133.3 ± 171.9 vs 220.2 ± 210.0; P < .001). Recurrent ventral hernia repairs also had longer operative times (161.6 ± 82.4 vs 188.2 ± 68.9 minutes; P < .001), increased use of preoperative botulinum toxin A injection (4.3% vs 10.1%; P = .01), components separation (19.2% vs 39.5%; P < .001), and panniculectomy (20.3% vs 35.8%; P < .001). The overall hernia recurrence rate was 4.4% at a mean follow-up of 36.6 ± 45.5 months. Between the initial ventral hernia repairs and recurrent ventral hernia repairs, the hernia recurrence rates were equivalent (4.2% vs 4.7%, P = .63). Rates of wound infection, seromas, hematomas, mesh infections, and wound related reoperations (P > .05) were nonsignificant. CONCLUSION: At a tertiary hernia center, despite higher-risk patients, larger hernia defects, and increased components separation in recurrent ventral hernia repairs, early recurrence rates, wound complications, and reoperations are similar to initial ventral hernia repairs.

Prehabilitation in Frail Surgical Patients: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: Frailty is a customized marker of biological age that helps to gauge an individual's functional physiologic reserve and ability to react to stress and is associated with increased postoperative morbidity and mortality. In order to mitigate frailty preoperatively, the concept of prehabilitation has entered the forefront which encompasses multidisciplinary interventions to improve health and lessen the incidence of postoperative decline. The purpose of this study is to investigate the impact of prehabilitation on postoperative outcomes in frail, surgical patients. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was performed by two independent researchers according to PRISMA guidelines. Inclusion criteria were (1) a randomized controlled trial, case-control or observational study; (2) prehabilitation intervention; (3) frailty assessment; and (4) surgical intervention. RESULTS: There were five articles included in the review. Evaluation of these articles demonstrated prehabilitation may improve operative outcomes in frail surgical patients. There were no assessments as to whether prehabilitation was cost-effective although it was feasible. Prehabilitation programs should include elements of exercise, nutrition, and psychosocial counseling. Frailty should be assessed with a validated index in surgical patients who may undergo prehabilitation. CONCLUSION: Prehabilitation in frail surgical patients may be the appropriate process through which providers can lessen operative risk. Currently, however, there is little evidence supporting the use of prehabilitation in this population with only five studies identified in this systematic review. More randomized controlled trials are clearly needed.

Outcomes of open abdomen versus primary closure following emergent laparotomy for suspected secondary peritonitis: A propensity-matched analysis.

BACKGROUND: Optimal management following index laparotomy is poorly defined in secondary peritonitis patients. Although "open abdomen" (OA), or temporary abdominal closure with planned relaparotomy, is used to reassess bowel viability or severity of contamination, recent studies demonstrate comparable morbidity and mortality with primary abdominal closure (PC). This study evaluates differences between OA and PC following emergent laparotomy. METHODS: Using the Premier database at a quaternary care center (2012-2016), nontrauma patients with secondary peritonitis requiring emergent laparotomy were identified (N = 534). Propensity matching for PC (n = 331; 62%) or OA (n = 203; 38%) was performed using variables: Mannheim Peritonitis Index, lactate, and vasopressor requirement. One hundred eleven closely matched pairs (PC:OA) were compared. RESULTS: Five hundred thirty-four patients (55.0% female; mean age, 59.6 ± 15.5 years) underwent emergent laparotomy. Of the OA patients, 136 (67.0%) had one relaparotomy, while 67 (33.0%) underwent multiple reoperations. Compared to daytime cases, laparotomies performed overnight (6 pm-6 am) had more temporary closures with OA (42.8% OA vs. 57.2% PC, p = 0.04). When assessing by surgeon type, PC was performed in 78.7% of laparotomies by surgical subspecialties compared to 56.7% (p < 0.0001) of acute care surgeons. After propensity matching, OA patients had increased postoperative complications (71.2% vs. 41.4%, p < 0.0001), mortality (22.5% vs. 11.7%, p = 0.006), and longer median length of stay (13 vs. 9 days, p = 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Open abdomen was performed in 38.0% of patients, with one-third of those requiring multiple reoperations. Complications, mortality rates, and costs associated with OA were significantly increased when compared to PC. Given these findings, future studies are needed to determine appropriate indications for OA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic/care management, level IV.

MELD-Na Score as a Predictor of Anastomotic Leak in Elective Colorectal Surgery.

BACKGROUND: For cirrhotic patients awaiting liver transplantation, the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease Sodium (MELD-Na) model is extensively studied. Because of the simplicity of the scoring system, there has been interest in applying MELD-Na to predict patient outcomes in the noncirrhotic surgical patient, and MELD-Na has been shown to predict postoperative morbidity and mortality after elective colectomy. Our aim was to identify the utility of MELD-Na to predict anastomotic leak in elective colorectal cases. METHODS: The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program targeted colectomy database was queried (2012-2014) for all elective colorectal procedures in patients without ascites. Leak rates were compared by MELD-Na score using chi-square tests and multivariate logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: We identified 44,540 elective colorectal cases (mean age, 60.5 y ± 14.4, mean body mass index 28.8 ± 6.6 kg/m2, 52% female), of which 70% were colon resections and 30% involved partial rectal resections (low anterior resections). Laparoscopic approach accounted for 64.72% while 35.3% were open. The overall complication and mortality rates were 21% and 0.7%, respectively, with a total anastomotic leak rate of 3.4%. Overall, 98% had a preoperative MELD-Na score between 10 and 20. Incremental increases in MELD-Na score (10-14, 15-19, and ≥20) were associated with an increased leak rate, specifically in partial rectal resections (3.9% versus 5.1% versus 10.7% P <0.028). MELD-Na score ≥20 had an increased leak rate when compared with those with MELD-Na 10-14 (odds ratio [OR] 1.627; 95% confidence interval [CI] [1.015, 2.607]). An MELD-Na score increase from 10-14 to 15-19 increases overall mortality (OR 5.22; 95% CI [3.55, 7.671]). In all elective colorectal procedures, for every one-point increase in MELD-Na score, anastomotic leak (OR 1.04 95% CI [1.006, 1.07]), mortality (OR 1.24; 95% CI, [1.20, 1.27]), and overall complications (OR 1.10; 95% CI [1.09, 1.12]) increased. MELD-Na was an independent predictor of anastomotic leak in partial rectal resections, when controlling for gender, steroid use, smoking, approach, operative time, preoperative chemotherapy, and Crohn's disease (OR 1.06, 95% CI [1.002, 1.122]). CONCLUSIONS: MELD-Na is an independent predictor of anastomotic leak in partial rectal resections. Anastomotic leak risk increases with increasing MELD-Na in elective colorectal resections, as does 30-d mortality and overall complication rate. As MELD-Na score increases to more than 20, restorative partial rectal resection has a 10% rate of anastomotic leak.

Combination oral and mechanical bowel preparations decreases complications in both right and left colectomy.

BACKGROUND: Before elective colectomy, many advocate mechanical bowel preparation with oral antibiotics, whereas enhanced recovery pathways avoid mechanical bowel preparations. The optimal preparation for right versus left colectomy is also unclear. We sought to determine which strategy for bowel preparation decreases surgical site infection (SSI) and anastomotic leak (AL). METHODS: Elective colectomies from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program colectomy database (2012-2015) were divided by (1) type of bowel preparation: no preparation (NP), mechanical preparation (MP), oral antibiotics (PO), or mechanical and oral antibiotics (PO/MP); and (2) type of colonic resection: right, left, or segmental colectomy. Univariate and multivariate analyses identified predictors of SSI and AL, and their risk-adjusted incidence was determined by logistic regression. RESULTS: When analyzed as the odds ratio compared with NP, the PO and PO/MP groups were associated with a decrease in SSI (PO = 0.70 [0.55-0.88] and PO/MP = 0.47 [0.42-0.53]; P < .01). Use of PO/MP was associated with a decrease in SSI across all types of resections (right colectomy = 0.40 [0.33-0.50], left colectomy = 0.57 [0.47-0.68], and segmental colectomy = 0.43 (0.34-0.54); P < .01). Similarly, use of PO/MP was associated with a decrease in AL in left colectomy = 0.50 ([0.37-0.69]; P < .01) and segmental colectomy = 0.53 ([0.36-0.80]; P < .01). CONCLUSION: Mechanical bowel preparation with oral antibiotics is the preferred preoperative preparation strategy in elective colectomy because of decreased incidence of SSI and AL.

Cancer Center Volume and Type Impact Stage-Specific Utilization of Neoadjuvant Therapy in Rectal Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant chemoradiation reduces local recurrence in locally advanced rectal cancer, and adherence to national and societal recommendations remains unknown. OBJECTIVE: To determine variability in guideline adherence in rectal cancer treatment and investigate whether hospital volume correlated with variability seen. DESIGN: We performed a retrospective analysis using the National Cancer Database rectal cancer participant user files from 2005 to 2010. Stage-specific predictors of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radiation use were determined, and variation in use across hospitals analyzed. Hospitals were ranked based on likelihood of preoperative therapy use by stage, and observed-to-expected ratios for neoadjuvant therapy use calculated. Hospital outliers were identified, and their center characteristics compared. RESULTS: A total of 23,488 patients were identified at 1183 hospitals. There was substantial variability in the use of neoadjuvant chemoradiation across hospitals. Patients managed outside clinical guidelines for both stage 1 and stage 3 disease tended to receive treatment at lower-volume, community cancer centers. CONCLUSIONS: There is substantial variability in adherence to national guidelines in the use of neoadjuvant chemoradiation for rectal cancer across all stages. Both hospital volume and center type are associated with over-treatment of early-stage tumors and under-treatment of more invasive tumors. These findings identify a clear need for national quality improvement efforts in the treatment of rectal cancer.

The effect of hospital volume on resection margins in rectal cancer surgery.

BACKGROUND: We hypothesized that after controlling for case-mix differences, the rates of positive resection margin after rectal cancer surgery vary substantially in the United States and that high-volume hospitals have lower margin positivity rates. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients treated with oncologic resection for stage I-III rectal cancer were selected from the 1998-2010 National Cancer Data Base. Hierarchical regression models were used to calculate risk- and reliability-adjusted positive margin rates and hospital level variability in positive margin rates using Empirical Bayes techniques. RESULTS: A total of 113,113 patients were treated at 1446 hospitals. The mean overall risk- and reliability-adjusted positive margin rate was 7.3%. High-volume hospitals did not have a lower rate of adjusted margin positivity (7.4%, P = 0.75). When both case mix and hospital volume differences were factored into the model, variability in margin positivity rates increased by 9.8%, implying that referral to high-volume hospitals alone would not improve margin positivity rates. CONCLUSIONS: Rectal cancer margin positivity rates vary substantially in the United States, despite adjusting for differences in case mix. These results support standardization of surgical technique and pathologic assessment as part of a broader initiative that identifies and refers patients to higher performing hospitals rather than simply to higher volume hospitals.

Operative Variability Among Residents Has Increased Since Implementation of the 80-Hour Workweek.

BACKGROUND: The ACGME instituted duty hour restrictions in 2003. This presents a challenge for surgical residents who must acquire a medical and technical knowledge base during their training. Although the effect of work hour limitations on operative volume has been examined, no study has examined whether duty hour reform has had an effect on operative volume variability. STUDY DESIGN: The ACGME operative log data of graduating general surgery residents from 1992 to 2015 were examined. Residents with the most and fewest total major cases were identified and case logs, learning styles, and evaluations were analyzed. Statistical analysis was performed using linear regression analysis, chi-square test, Student's t-test, and Wilcoxon rank sum test. Significance was defined as p < 0.05. RESULTS: One hundred and thirty-five residents graduated from 1992 to 2015. No change in overall operative volume was seen after the 2003 duty hour reform, however, there was an increase in operative variability. In addition, there was an increase in the variability of total major cases between the resident completing the most and fewest cases per class (183.3; p = 0.02) after the start of work hour restrictions. The residents who graduated with the highest operative volume were more likely to be action-based learners (odds ratio = 6.81; 95% CI, 2.84-16.34; p < 0.001) and received superior evaluation scores. CONCLUSIONS: After the implementation of the 80-hour workweek, we found a significant increase in operative variability. This might suggest a growing disparity in the operative experience among surgical residents and, consequently, a varying quality of graduating residents. Programs should therefore consider using learning styles and developing competency-based training curricula to ensure equitable training among all trainees.

Laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy: Are all laparoscopic techniques created equal?

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic colectomy has been associated with improved postoperative pain control, earlier return to work, and shorter hospital stays compared to open colectomy. However, there are varied technical approaches to laparoscopic resections. We therefore sought to determine whether the straight laparoscopic approach was associated with shorter length of stay compared to hand-assisted and laparoscopic-assisted techniques for sigmoid colectomies. METHODS: A retrospective review of laparoscopic sigmoid colectomies performed by five colorectal surgeons from 2010 to 2014 was performed. Approaches were defined as: (1) straight laparoscopic if colon mobilization, inferior mesenteric artery transection and intra-corporeal anastomosis were performed laparoscopically, (2) hand assisted if a hand port was utilized to assist with mobilization and vessel transection, and (3) laparoscopic assisted if only the colon mobilization was performed intra-corporeally. Poisson regression was performed to determine the impact of surgical technique on LOS while controlling for differences in patient factors. RESULTS: A total of 191 patients were identified with 71 straight laparoscopic, 57 hand-assisted, and 63 laparoscopic-assisted cases. Substantial variability in choice of surgical technique was seen across surgeons. Patient populations were similar, with the exception of hand-assisted procedures being more often used in obese patients. Unadjusted average postoperative days to discharge were 3.6 days for straight laparoscopic and 4.1 and 4.0 days for hand-assisted and laparoscopic-assisted approaches, respectively. While controlling for factors associated with longer hospital stay, the straight laparoscopic approach was associated with a 14 % shorter stay compared to laparoscopic-assisted colectomy and a 15 % shorter stay compared to hand-assisted colectomy. The straight laparoscopic approach was also associated with earlier return of bowel function compared to other approaches. CONCLUSIONS: The straight laparoscopic approach to sigmoid colectomy is associated with substantially shorter postoperative stay and earlier return of bowel function when compared to hand-assisted and laparoscopic-assisted techniques. When technically feasible, the straight laparoscopic approach is preferred.