Interictal intracranial EEG asymmetry lateralizes temporal lobe epilepsy.

Patients with drug-resistant temporal lobe epilepsy often undergo intracranial EEG recording to capture multiple seizures in order to lateralize the seizure onset zone. This process is associated with morbidity and often ends in postoperative seizure recurrence. Abundant interictal (between-seizure) data are captured during this process, but these data currently play a small role in surgical planning. Our objective was to predict the laterality of the seizure onset zone using interictal intracranial EEG data in patients with temporal lobe epilepsy. We performed a retrospective cohort study (single-centre study for model development; two-centre study for model validation). We studied patients with temporal lobe epilepsy undergoing intracranial EEG at the University of Pennsylvania (internal cohort) and the Medical University of South Carolina (external cohort) between 2015 and 2022. We developed a logistic regression model to predict seizure onset zone laterality using several interictal EEG features derived from recent publications. We compared the concordance between the model-predicted seizure onset zone laterality and the side of surgery between patients with good and poor surgical outcomes. Forty-seven patients (30 female; ages 20-69; 20 left-sided, 10 right-sided and 17 bilateral seizure onsets) were analysed for model development and internal validation. Nineteen patients (10 female; ages 23-73; 5 left-sided, 10 right-sided, 4 bilateral) were analysed for external validation. The internal cohort cross-validated area under the curve for a model trained using spike rates was 0.83 for a model predicting left-sided seizure onset and 0.68 for a model predicting right-sided seizure onset. Balanced accuracies in the external cohort were 79.3% and 78.9% for the left- and right-sided predictions, respectively. The predicted concordance between the laterality of the seizure onset zone and the side of surgery was higher in patients with good surgical outcome. We replicated the finding that right temporal lobe epilepsy was harder to distinguish in a separate modality of resting-state functional MRI. In conclusion, interictal EEG signatures are distinct across seizure onset zone lateralities. Left-sided seizure onsets are easier to distinguish than right-sided onsets. A model trained on spike rates accurately identifies patients with left-sided seizure onset zones and predicts surgical outcome. A potential clinical application of these findings could be to either support or oppose a hypothesis of unilateral temporal lobe epilepsy when deciding to pursue surgical resection or ablation as opposed to device implantation.

Quantifying hubness to predict surgical outcomes in epilepsy: Assessing resection-hub alignment in interictal intracranial EEG networks.

OBJECTIVE: Intracranial EEG can identify epilepsy-related networks in patients with focal epilepsy; however, the association between network organization and post-surgical seizure outcomes remains unclear. Hubness serves as a critical metric to assess network organization by identifying brain regions that are highly influential to other regions. In this study, we tested the hypothesis that favorable post-operative seizure outcomes are associated with the surgical removal of interictal network hubs, measured by the novel metric "Resection-Hub Alignment Degree (RHAD)." METHODS: We analyzed Phase II interictal intracranial EEG from 69 patients with epilepsy who were seizure-free (n = 45) and non-seizure-free (n = 24) 1 year post-operatively. Connectivity matrices were constructed from intracranial EEG recordings using imaginary coherence in various frequency bands, and centrality metrics were applied to identify network hubs. The RHAD metric quantified the congruence between hubs and resected/ablated areas. We used a logistic regression model, incorporating other clinical factors, and evaluated the association of this alignment regarding post-surgical seizure outcomes. RESULTS: There was a significant difference in RHAD in fast gamma (80-200 Hz) interictal network between patients with favorable and unfavorable surgical outcomes (p = .025). This finding remained similar across network definitions (i.e., channel-based or region-based network) and centrality measurements (Eigenvector, Closeness, and PageRank). The alignment between surgically removed areas and other commonly used clinical quantitative measures (seizure-onset zone, irritative zone, high-frequency oscillations zone) did not reveal significant differences in post-operative outcomes. This finding suggests that the hubness measurement may offer better predictive performance and finer-grained network analysis. In addition, the RHAD metric showed explanatory validity both alone (area under the curve [AUC] = .66) and in combination with surgical therapy type (resection vs ablation, AUC = .71). SIGNIFICANCE: Our findings underscore the role of network hub surgical removal, measured through the RHAD metric of interictal intracranial EEG high gamma networks, in enhancing our understanding of seizure outcomes in epilepsy surgery.

Development of a blueprint for sibling psychosocial services: A nationwide study.

BACKGROUND: Siblings of youth with cancer have heightened risk for poor long-term psychosocial outcomes. Although sibling psychosocial care is a standard in pediatric oncology, this standard is among those least likely to be met. To address barriers to providing sibling services, a blueprint for systematic psychosocial screening and support of siblings was developed based on feedback from a national sample of psychosocial providers. PROCEDURE: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with a purposive sample of psychosocial care providers (N = 27) of various disciplines working in US pediatric cancer centers, varied in size, type, and extent of sibling support. Interviews queried providers' suggestions for the future of sibling psychosocial care and impressions of a blueprint for sibling service delivery, which was iteratively refined based on respondents' feedback. Interviews were analyzed using applied thematic analysis. RESULTS: Based on existing literature and refined according to providers' recommendations, the Sibling Services Blueprint was developed to provide a comprehensive guide for systematizing sibling psychosocial care. The blueprint content includes: (i) a timeline for repeated sibling screening and assessment; (ii) a stepped model of psychosocial support; (iii) strategies for circumventing barriers to sibling care; and (iv) recommendations for how centers with varying resources might accomplish sibling-focused care. The blueprint is available online, allowing providers to easily access and individualize the content. Providers indicated enthusiasm and high potential utility and usability of the blueprint. CONCLUSIONS: The Sibling Services Blueprint may be a useful tool for systematizing sibling psychosocial care, promoting wider availability of sibling-focused services, and addressing siblings' unmet needs.

iEEG-recon: A fast and scalable pipeline for accurate reconstruction of intracranial electrodes and implantable devices.

OBJECTIVE: Clinicians use intracranial electroencephalography (iEEG) in conjunction with noninvasive brain imaging to identify epileptic networks and target therapy for drug-resistant epilepsy cases. Our goal was to promote ongoing and future collaboration by automating the process of "electrode reconstruction," which involves the labeling, registration, and assignment of iEEG electrode coordinates on neuroimaging. We developed a standalone, modular pipeline that performs electrode reconstruction. We demonstrate our tool's compatibility with clinical and research workflows and its scalability on cloud platforms. METHODS: We created iEEG-recon, a scalable electrode reconstruction pipeline for semiautomatic iEEG annotation, rapid image registration, and electrode assignment on brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Its modular architecture includes a clinical module for electrode labeling and localization, and a research module for automated data processing and electrode contact assignment. To ensure accessibility for users with limited programming and imaging expertise, we packaged iEEG-recon in a containerized format that allows integration into clinical workflows. We propose a cloud-based implementation of iEEG-recon and test our pipeline on data from 132 patients at two epilepsy centers using retrospective and prospective cohorts. RESULTS: We used iEEG-recon to accurately reconstruct electrodes in both electrocorticography and stereoelectroencephalography cases with a 30-min running time per case (including semiautomatic electrode labeling and reconstruction). iEEG-recon generates quality assurance reports and visualizations to support epilepsy surgery discussions. Reconstruction outputs from the clinical module were radiologically validated through pre- and postimplant T1-MRI visual inspections. We also found that our use of ANTsPyNet deep learning-based brain segmentation for electrode classification was consistent with the widely used FreeSurfer segmentations. SIGNIFICANCE: iEEG-recon is a robust pipeline for automating reconstruction of iEEG electrodes and implantable devices on brain MRI, promoting fast data analysis and integration into clinical workflows. iEEG-recon's accuracy, speed, and compatibility with cloud platforms make it a useful resource for epilepsy centers worldwide.

Network coupling and surgical treatment response in temporal lobe epilepsy: A proof-of-concept study.

OBJECTIVE: This proof-of-concept study aimed to examine the overlap between structural and functional activity (coupling) related to surgical response. METHODS: We studied intracranial rest and ictal stereoelectroencephalography (sEEG) recordings from 77 seizures in thirteen participants with temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) who subsequently underwent resective/laser ablation surgery. We used the stereotactic coordinates of electrodes to construct functional (sEEG electrodes) and structural connectomes (diffusion tensor imaging). A Jaccard index was used to assess the similarity (coupling) between structural and functional connectivity at rest and at various intraictal timepoints. RESULTS: We observed that patients who did not become seizure free after surgery had higher connectome coupling recruitment than responders at rest and during early and mid seizure (and visa versa). SIGNIFICANCE: Structural networks provide a backbone for functional activity in TLE. The association between lack of seizure control after surgery and the strength of synchrony between these networks suggests that surgical intervention aimed to disrupt these networks may be ineffective in those that display strong synchrony. Our results, combined with findings of other groups, suggest a potential mechanism that explains why certain patients benefit from epilepsy surgery and why others do not. This insight has the potential to guide surgical planning (e.g., removal of high coupling nodes) following future research.

Intracranial EEG Structure-Function Coupling and Seizure Outcomes After Epilepsy Surgery.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Surgery is an effective treatment for drug-resistant epilepsy, which modifies the brain's structure and networks to regulate seizure activity. Our objective was to examine the relationship between brain structure and function to determine the extent to which this relationship affects the success of the surgery in controlling seizures. We hypothesized that a stronger association between brain structure and function would lead to improved seizure control after surgery. METHODS: We constructed functional and structural brain networks in patients with drug-resistant focal epilepsy by using presurgery functional data from intracranial EEG (iEEG) recordings, presurgery and postsurgery structural data from T1-weighted MRI, and presurgery diffusion-weighted MRI. We quantified the relationship (coupling) between structural and functional connectivity by using the Spearman rank correlation and analyzed this structure-function coupling at 2 spatial scales: (1) global iEEG network level and (2) individual iEEG electrode contacts using virtual surgeries. We retrospectively predicted postoperative seizure freedom by incorporating the structure-function connectivity coupling metrics and routine clinical variables into a cross-validated predictive model. RESULTS: We conducted a retrospective analysis on data from 39 patients who met our inclusion criteria. Brain areas implanted with iEEG electrodes had stronger structure-function coupling in seizure-free patients compared with those with seizure recurrence (p = 0.002, d = 0.76, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC] = 0.78 [95% CI 0.62-0.93]). Virtual surgeries on brain areas that resulted in stronger structure-function coupling of the remaining network were associated with seizure-free outcomes (p = 0.007, d = 0.96, AUC = 0.73 [95% CI 0.58-0.89]). The combination of global and local structure-function coupling measures accurately predicted seizure outcomes with a cross-validated AUC of 0.81 (95% CI 0.67-0.94). These measures were complementary to other clinical variables and, when included for prediction, resulted in a cross-validated AUC of 0.91 (95% CI 0.82-1.0), accuracy of 92%, sensitivity of 93%, and specificity of 91%. DISCUSSION: Our study showed that the strength of structure-function connectivity coupling may play a crucial role in determining the success of epilepsy surgery. By quantitatively incorporating structure-function coupling measures and standard-of-care clinical variables into presurgical evaluations, we may be able to better localize epileptogenic tissue and select patients for epilepsy surgery. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This is a Class IV retrospective case series showing that structure-function mapping may help determine the outcome from surgical resection for treatment-resistant focal epilepsy.

Quantifying interictal intracranial EEG to predict focal epilepsy.

Introduction: Intracranial EEG (IEEG) is used for 2 main purposes, to determine: (1) if epileptic networks are amenable to focal treatment and (2) where to intervene. Currently these questions are answered qualitatively and sometimes differently across centers. There is a need for objective, standardized methods to guide surgical decision making and to enable large scale data analysis across centers and prospective clinical trials. Methods: We analyzed interictal data from 101 patients with drug resistant epilepsy who underwent presurgical evaluation with IEEG. We chose interictal data because of its potential to reduce the morbidity and cost associated with ictal recording. 65 patients had unifocal seizure onset on IEEG, and 36 were non-focal or multi-focal. We quantified the spatial dispersion of implanted electrodes and interictal IEEG abnormalities for each patient. We compared these measures against the "5 Sense Score (5SS)," a pre-implant estimate of the likelihood of focal seizure onset, and assessed their ability to predict the clinicians' choice of therapeutic intervention and the patient outcome. Results: The spatial dispersion of IEEG electrodes predicted network focality with precision similar to the 5SS (AUC = 0.67), indicating that electrode placement accurately reflected pre-implant information. A cross-validated model combining the 5SS and the spatial dispersion of interictal IEEG abnormalities significantly improved this prediction (AUC = 0.79; p<0.05). The combined model predicted ultimate treatment strategy (surgery vs. device) with an AUC of 0.81 and post-surgical outcome at 2 years with an AUC of 0.70. The 5SS, interictal IEEG, and electrode placement were not correlated and provided complementary information. Conclusions: Quantitative, interictal IEEG significantly improved upon pre-implant estimates of network focality and predicted treatment with precision approaching that of clinical experts. We present this study as an important step in building standardized, quantitative tools to guide epilepsy surgery.

The seizure severity score: a quantitative tool for comparing seizures and their response to therapy.

Objective.Epilepsy is a neurological disorder characterized by recurrent seizures which vary widely in severity, from clinically silent to prolonged convulsions. Measuring severity is crucial for guiding therapy, particularly when complete control is not possible. Seizure diaries, the current standard for guiding therapy, are insensitive to the duration of events or the propagation of seizure activity across the brain. We present a quantitative seizure severity score that incorporates electroencephalography (EEG) and clinical data and demonstrate how it can guide epilepsy therapies.Approach.We collected intracranial EEG and clinical semiology data from 54 epilepsy patients who had 256 seizures during invasive, in-hospital presurgical evaluation. We applied an absolute slope algorithm to EEG recordings to identify seizing channels. From this data, we developed a seizure severity score that combines seizure duration, spread, and semiology using non-negative matrix factorization. For validation, we assessed its correlation with independent measures of epilepsy burden: seizure types, epilepsy duration, a pharmacokinetic model of medication load, and response to epilepsy surgery. We investigated the association between the seizure severity score and preictal network features.Main results.The seizure severity score augmented clinical classification by objectively delineating seizure duration and spread from recordings in available electrodes. Lower preictal medication loads were associated with higher seizure severity scores (p= 0.018, 97.5% confidence interval = [-1.242, -0.116]) and lower pre-surgical severity was associated with better surgical outcome (p= 0.042). In 85% of patients with multiple seizure types, greater preictal change from baseline was associated with higher severity.Significance.We present a quantitative measure of seizure severity that includes EEG and clinical features, validated on gold standard in-patient recordings. We provide a framework for extending our tool's utility to ambulatory EEG devices, for linking it to seizure semiology measured by wearable sensors, and as a tool to advance data-driven epilepsy care.

iEEG-recon: A Fast and Scalable Pipeline for Accurate Reconstruction of Intracranial Electrodes and Implantable Devices.

Background: Collaboration between epilepsy centers is essential to integrate multimodal data for epilepsy research. Scalable tools for rapid and reproducible data analysis facilitate multicenter data integration and harmonization. Clinicians use intracranial EEG (iEEG) in conjunction with non-invasive brain imaging to identify epileptic networks and target therapy for drug-resistant epilepsy cases. Our goal was to promote ongoing and future collaboration by automating the process of "electrode reconstruction," which involves the labeling, registration, and assignment of iEEG electrode coordinates on neuroimaging. These tasks are still performed manually in many epilepsy centers. We developed a standalone, modular pipeline that performs electrode reconstruction. We demonstrate our tool's compatibility with clinical and research workflows and its scalability on cloud platforms. Methods: We created iEEG-recon, a scalable electrode reconstruction pipeline for semi-automatic iEEG annotation, rapid image registration, and electrode assignment on brain MRIs. Its modular architecture includes three modules: a clinical module for electrode labeling and localization, and a research module for automated data processing and electrode contact assignment. To ensure accessibility for users with limited programming and imaging expertise, we packaged iEEG-recon in a containerized format that allows integration into clinical workflows. We propose a cloud-based implementation of iEEG-recon, and test our pipeline on data from 132 patients at two epilepsy centers using retrospective and prospective cohorts. Results: We used iEEG-recon to accurately reconstruct electrodes in both electrocorticography (ECoG) and stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) cases with a 10 minute running time per case, and ~20 min for semi-automatic electrode labeling. iEEG-recon generates quality assurance reports and visualizations to support epilepsy surgery discussions. Reconstruction outputs from the clinical module were radiologically validated through pre- and post-implant T1-MRI visual inspections. Our use of ANTsPyNet deep learning approach for brain segmentation and electrode classification was consistent with the widely used Freesurfer segmentation. Discussion: iEEG-recon is a valuable tool for automating reconstruction of iEEG electrodes and implantable devices on brain MRI, promoting efficient data analysis, and integration into clinical workflows. The tool's accuracy, speed, and compatibility with cloud platforms make it a useful resource for epilepsy centers worldwide. Comprehensive documentation is available at https://ieeg-recon.readthedocs.io/en/latest/.

Validation of the Psychosocial Assessment Tool Sibling Module Follow-Up Version.

OBJECTIVE: Psychosocial screening is recommended to connect siblings of youth with cancer to psychosocial services, but the lack of validated sibling-specific screening tools is a barrier to routine screening. The current study aimed to validate and establish a clinical cutoff for the recently developed Psychosocial Assessment Tool (PAT) Sibling Module follow-up version to address this barrier. METHODS: Parents (N = 246) completed the PAT Sibling Module follow-up version for all siblings within their families ages 0-17 years (N = 458) at three time points between 6- and 24-month post-cancer diagnosis. For one target sibling within each family aged 8-17 years, parents also completed the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire, and the target sibling completed the Child PTSD Symptom Scale. Cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses examined internal consistency and convergent and predictive validity. Receiver operator characteristic analyses were used to establish a maximally sensitive and specific clinical cutoff. RESULTS: Internal consistency was acceptable for all age versions (Kuder-Richardson 20s ≥ 0.79), except for the ages 0-2 version, which had low internal consistency at 18 months post-diagnosis (Kuder-Richardson 20 = 0.57). Convergent (r values >0.7, p values <.001) and predictive (r values >0.6, p values <.001) validity were strong at each time point. An optimal clinical cutoff of 0.32 was identified (range: 0.00-1.00). CONCLUSIONS: The PAT Sibling Module follow-up version is a reliable and valid screener for sibling psychosocial risk following cancer diagnosis. Validation of a sibling-specific screener and establishment of a clinical cutoff are necessary first steps to addressing siblings' unmet psychosocial needs and improving trajectories of sibling functioning.

Seizure onset patterns predict outcome after stereo-electroencephalography-guided laser amygdalohippocampotomy.

OBJECTIVE: Stereotactic laser amygdalohippocampotomy (SLAH) is an appealing option for patients with temporal lobe epilepsy, who often require intracranial monitoring to confirm mesial temporal seizure onset. However, given limited spatial sampling, it is possible that stereotactic electroencephalography (stereo-EEG) may miss seizure onset elsewhere. We hypothesized that stereo-EEG seizure onset patterns (SOPs) may differentiate between primary onset and secondary spread and predict postoperative seizure control. In this study, we characterized the 2-year outcomes of patients who underwent single-fiber SLAH after stereo-EEG and evaluated whether stereo-EEG SOPs predict postoperative seizure freedom. METHODS: This retrospective five-center study included patients with or without mesial temporal sclerosis (MTS) who underwent stereo-EEG followed by single-fiber SLAH between August 2014 and January 2022. Patients with causative hippocampal lesions apart from MTS or for whom the SLAH was considered palliative were excluded. An SOP catalogue was developed based on literature review. The dominant pattern for each patient was used for survival analysis. The primary outcome was 2-year Engel I classification or recurrent seizures before then, stratified by SOP category. RESULTS: Fifty-eight patients were included, with a mean follow-up duration of 39 ± 12 months after SLAH. Overall 1-, 2-, and 3-year Engel I seizure freedom probability was 54%, 36%, and 33%, respectively. Patients with SOPs, including low-voltage fast activity or low-frequency repetitive spiking, had a 46% 2-year seizure freedom probability, compared to 0% for patients with alpha or theta frequency repetitive spiking or theta or delta frequency rhythmic slowing (log-rank test, p = .00015). SIGNIFICANCE: Patients who underwent SLAH after stereo-EEG had a low probability of seizure freedom at 2 years, but SOPs successfully predicted seizure recurrence in a subset of patients. This study provides proof of concept that SOPs distinguish between hippocampal seizure onset and spread and supports using SOPs to improve selection of SLAH candidates.

Remote effects of temporal lobe epilepsy surgery: Long-term morphological changes after surgical resection.

OBJECTIVE: Epilepsy surgery is an effective treatment for drug-resistant patients. However, how different surgical approaches affect long-term brain structure remains poorly characterized. Here, we present a semiautomated method for quantifying structural changes after epilepsy surgery and compare the remote structural effects of two approaches, anterior temporal lobectomy (ATL), and selective amygdalohippocampectomy (SAH). METHODS: We studied 36 temporal lobe epilepsy patients who underwent resective surgery (ATL = 22, SAH = 14). All patients received same-scanner MR imaging preoperatively and postoperatively (mean 2 years). To analyze postoperative structural changes, we segmented the resection zone and modified the Advanced Normalization Tools (ANTs) longitudinal cortical pipeline to account for resections. We compared global and regional annualized cortical thinning between surgical treatments. RESULTS: Across procedures, there was significant cortical thinning in the ipsilateral insula, fusiform, pericalcarine, and several temporal lobe regions outside the resection zone as well as the contralateral hippocampus. Additionally, increased postoperative cortical thickness was seen in the supramarginal gyrus. Patients treated with ATL exhibited greater annualized cortical thinning compared with SAH cases (ATL: -0.08 ± 0.11 mm per year, SAH: -0.01 ± 0.02 mm per year, t = 2.99, P = 0.006). There were focal postoperative differences between the two treatment groups in the ipsilateral insula (P = 0.039, corrected). Annualized cortical thinning rates correlated with preoperative cortical thickness (r = 0.60, P < 0.001) and had weaker associations with age at surgery (r = -0.33, P = 0.051) and disease duration (r = -0.42, P = 0.058). SIGNIFICANCE: Our evidence suggests that selective procedures are associated with less cortical thinning and that earlier surgical intervention may reduce long-term impacts on brain structure.

Quantitative approaches to guide epilepsy surgery from intracranial EEG.

Over the past 10 years, the drive to improve outcomes from epilepsy surgery has stimulated widespread interest in methods to quantitatively guide epilepsy surgery from intracranial EEG (iEEG). Many patients fail to achieve seizure freedom, in part due to the challenges in subjective iEEG interpretation. To address this clinical need, quantitative iEEG analytics have been developed using a variety of approaches, spanning studies of seizures, interictal periods, and their transitions, and encompass a range of techniques including electrographic signal analysis, dynamical systems modeling, machine learning and graph theory. Unfortunately, many methods fail to generalize to new data and are sensitive to differences in pathology and electrode placement. Here, we critically review selected literature on computational methods of identifying the epileptogenic zone from iEEG. We highlight shared methodological challenges common to many studies in this field and propose ways that they can be addressed. One fundamental common pitfall is a lack of open-source, high-quality data, which we specifically address by sharing a centralized high-quality, well-annotated, multicentre dataset consisting of >100 patients to support larger and more rigorous studies. Ultimately, we provide a road map to help these tools reach clinical trials and hope to improve the lives of future patients.

Inconsistent, uncoordinated, and reactive: The current state of sibling psychosocial care.

BACKGROUND: Although providing sibling psychosocial services is a standard of care in pediatric oncology, initial survey research suggests that this standard is rarely achieved and siblings' support needs remain unmet. Which sibling psychosocial services are available and how centers provide such services is unknown. To identify targetable services gaps, this qualitative study characterizes current sibling psychosocial care practices at select pediatric cancer centers across the United States. PROCEDURE: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with a purposive sample of psychosocial care providers (N = 27) working across the United States in pediatric oncology centers of varied sizes. Interviews queried providers regarding sibling-focused parent psychoeducation, psychosocial screening, comprehensive assessment, and psychosocial support offerings. Interview data were analyzed using Applied Thematic Analysis. RESULTS: Across cancer centers, sibling care practices did not align with consensus-based recommendations. The nature and availability of sibling-focused psychoeducation, screening, assessment, and support were variable between and within centers. Siblings themselves were largely absent from sibling psychosocial care, and care was rarely sibling-specific. The flow of information about siblings was discontinuous and uncoordinated across the care continuum, resulting in psychosocial care provided reactively, typically in response to parental concerns. CONCLUSIONS: Sibling psychosocial care provision falls short of established care recommendations, leaving sibling psychosocial needs unmet. Findings highlight the need for tools and strategies to facilitate the implementation of sibling psychosocial care across the care continuum, to support siblings' psychosocial functioning across the life course.

Interictal intracranial EEG asymmetry lateralizes temporal lobe epilepsy.

Patients with drug-resistant temporal lobe epilepsy often undergo intracranial EEG recording to capture multiple seizures in order to lateralize the seizure onset zone. This process is associated with morbidity and often ends in postoperative seizure recurrence. Abundant interictal (between-seizure) data is captured during this process, but these data currently play a small role in surgical planning. Our objective was to predict the laterality of the seizure onset zone using interictal (between-seizure) intracranial EEG data in patients with temporal lobe epilepsy. We performed a retrospective cohort study (single-center study for model development; two-center study for model validation). We studied patients with temporal lobe epilepsy undergoing intracranial EEG at the University of Pennsylvania (internal cohort) and the Medical University of South Carolina (external cohort) between 2015 and 2022. We developed a logistic regression model to predict seizure onset zone laterality using interictal EEG. We compared the concordance between the model-predicted seizure onset zone laterality and the side of surgery between patients with good and poor surgical outcomes. 47 patients (30 women; ages 20-69; 20 left-sided, 10 right-sided, and 17 bilateral seizure onsets) were analyzed for model development and internal validation. 19 patients (10 women; ages 23-73; 5 left-sided, 10 right-sided, 4 bilateral) were analyzed for external validation. The internal cohort cross-validated area under the curve for a model trained using spike rates was 0.83 for a model predicting left-sided seizure onset and 0.68 for a model predicting right-sided seizure onset. Balanced accuracies in the external cohort were 79.3% and 78.9% for the left- and right-sided predictions, respectively. The predicted concordance between the laterality of the seizure onset zone and the side of surgery was higher in patients with good surgical outcome. In conclusion, interictal EEG signatures are distinct across seizure onset zone lateralities. Left-sided seizure onsets are easier to distinguish than right-sided onsets. A model trained on spike rates accurately identifies patients with left-sided seizure onset zones and predicts surgical outcome.

Initial validation of a new psychosocial screener for siblings of youth with cancer: The Psychosocial Assessment Tool Sibling Modules.

OBJECTIVE: Psychosocial screening can facilitate the identification of families who have difficulty adjusting to and managing serious pediatric illness. Despite siblings' roles within the family and increased psychosocial risk, a systematic approach to screening siblings of youth with cancer remains rare. One barrier to systematic sibling screening is the lack of a validated screener. We aimed to establish initial validity of the new parent-reported Psychosocial Assessment Tool (PAT) Sibling Modules for siblings ages 0-2, 3-4, 5-9, and 10+. METHODS: Families (N = 64) completed the PAT Sibling Modules and the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) regarding siblings' functioning at cancer diagnosis (13-23 items, depending on age version) and 6 months later (17-42 items). Cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses examined internal consistency and convergent and predictive validity of the PAT Sibling Modules. RESULTS: Baseline and follow-up versions of the modules have strong internal consistency (Kuder-Richardson 20 range: 0.82-0.93) and convergent validity at diagnosis (r-values ≥0.4, p-values <0.01) and follow-up (r-values >0.4, p-values <0.05). Predictive validity was supported by significant correlations between baseline PAT Sibling Module scores and 6 month SDQ scores (r = 0.86, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Findings provide initial evidence that the PAT Sibling Modules are valid measures of sibling psychosocial risk. Availability of a validated screener is a first step toward addressing siblings' unmet psychosocial needs.

Deep learning-based automated segmentation of resection cavities on postsurgical epilepsy MRI.

Accurate segmentation of surgical resection sites is critical for clinical assessments and neuroimaging research applications, including resection extent determination, predictive modeling of surgery outcome, and masking image processing near resection sites. In this study, an automated resection cavity segmentation algorithm is developed for analyzing postoperative MRI of epilepsy patients and deployed in an easy-to-use graphical user interface (GUI) that estimates remnant brain volumes, including postsurgical hippocampal remnant tissue. This retrospective study included postoperative T1-weighted MRI from 62 temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) patients who underwent resective surgery. The resection site was manually segmented and reviewed by a neuroradiologist (JMS). A majority vote ensemble algorithm was used to segment surgical resections, using 3 U-Net convolutional neural networks trained on axial, coronal, and sagittal slices, respectively. The algorithm was trained using 5-fold cross validation, with data partitioned into training (N = 27) testing (N = 9), and validation (N = 9) sets, and evaluated on a separate held-out test set (N = 17). Algorithm performance was assessed using Dice-Sørensen coefficient (DSC), Hausdorff distance, and volume estimates. Additionally, we deploy a fully-automated, GUI-based pipeline that compares resection segmentations with preoperative imaging and reports estimates of resected brain structures. The cross-validation and held-out test median DSCs were 0.84 ± 0.08 and 0.74 ± 0.22 (median ± interquartile range) respectively, which approach inter-rater reliability between radiologists (0.84-0.86) as reported in the literature. Median 95 % Hausdorff distances were 3.6 mm and 4.0 mm respectively, indicating high segmentation boundary confidence. Automated and manual resection volume estimates were highly correlated for both cross-validation (r = 0.94, p < 0.0001) and held-out test subjects (r = 0.87, p < 0.0001). Automated and manual segmentations overlapped in all 62 subjects, indicating a low false negative rate. In control subjects (N = 40), the classifier segmented no voxels (N = 33), <50 voxels (N = 5), or a small volumes<0.5 cm3 (N = 2), indicating a low false positive rate that can be controlled via thresholding. There was strong agreement between postoperative hippocampal remnant volumes determined using automated and manual resection segmentations (r = 0.90, p < 0.0001, mean absolute error = 6.3 %), indicating that automated resection segmentations can permit quantification of postoperative brain volumes after epilepsy surgery. Applications include quantification of postoperative remnant brain volumes, correction of deformable registration, and localization of removed brain regions for network modeling.

Normative intracranial EEG maps epileptogenic tissues in focal epilepsy.

Planning surgery for patients with medically refractory epilepsy often requires recording seizures using intracranial EEG. Quantitative measures derived from interictal intracranial EEG yield potentially appealing biomarkers to guide these surgical procedures; however, their utility is limited by the sparsity of electrode implantation as well as the normal confounds of spatiotemporally varying neural activity and connectivity. We propose that comparing intracranial EEG recordings to a normative atlas of intracranial EEG activity and connectivity can reliably map abnormal regions, identify targets for invasive treatment and increase our understanding of human epilepsy. Merging data from the Penn Epilepsy Center and a public database from the Montreal Neurological Institute, we aggregated interictal intracranial EEG retrospectively across 166 subjects comprising >5000 channels. For each channel, we calculated the normalized spectral power and coherence in each canonical frequency band. We constructed an intracranial EEG atlas by mapping the distribution of each feature across the brain and tested the atlas against data from novel patients by generating a z-score for each channel. We demonstrate that for seizure onset zones within the mesial temporal lobe, measures of connectivity abnormality provide greater distinguishing value than univariate measures of abnormal neural activity. We also find that patients with a longer diagnosis of epilepsy have greater abnormalities in connectivity. By integrating measures of both single-channel activity and inter-regional functional connectivity, we find a better accuracy in predicting the seizure onset zones versus normal brain (area under the curve = 0.77) compared with either group of features alone. We propose that aggregating normative intracranial EEG data across epilepsy centres into a normative atlas provides a rigorous, quantitative method to map epileptic networks and guide invasive therapy. We publicly share our data, infrastructure and methods, and propose an international framework for leveraging big data in surgical planning for refractory epilepsy.

Population-Based Study of Nonelective Postpartum Readmissions in Women With Stroke, Migraine, Multiple Sclerosis, and Myasthenia Gravis.

OBJECTIVE: To compare maternal obstetric complications and nonelective readmissions in women with common neurologic comorbidities (WWN) vs women without neurologic disorders. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of index characteristics and acute postpartum, nonelective rehospitalizations from the 2015-2017 National Readmissions Database using ICD-10 codes. Wald χ2 testing compared baseline demographic, hospital, and clinical characteristics and postpartum complications between WWN (including previous stroke, migraine, multiple sclerosis [MS], and myasthenia gravis [MG]) and controls. Multivariable logistic regression models examined odds of postpartum complications and nonelective readmissions within 30 and 90 days for each neurologic comorbidity compared to controls (α = 0.05). RESULTS: A total of 7,612 women with previous stroke, 83,430 women with migraine, 6,760 women with MS, 843 women with MG, and 8,136,335 controls met the criteria for index admission after viable infant delivery. WWN were more likely than controls to have inpatient diagnoses of edema, proteinuria, or hypertensive disorders and to have received maternal care for poor fetal growth. The adjusted odds of a Centers for Disease Control and Prevention severe maternal morbidity indicator were greater for women with previous stroke (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 8.53, 95% CI 7.24-10.06), migraine (AOR 2.04, 95% CI 1.85-2.26), and MG (AOR 4.45, 95% CI 2.45-8.08) (all p < 0.0001). Readmission rates at 30 and 90 days for WWN were higher than for controls (30 days: previous stroke 2.9%, migraine 1.7%, MS 1.8%, MG 4.3%, controls 1.1%; 90 days: previous stroke 3.7%, migraine 2.5%, MS 5.1%, MG 6.0%, controls 1.6%). Women with MG had the highest adjusted odds of readmission (30 days: AOR 3.96, 95% CI 2.37-6.65, p < 0.0001; 90 days: AOR 3.30, 95% CI 1.88-5.78, p < 0.0001). DISCUSSION: WWN may be at higher risk of severe maternal morbidity at the time of index delivery and postpartum readmission. More real-world evidence is needed to develop research infrastructure and create efficacious interventions to optimize maternal-fetal outcomes in WWN, especially for women with previous stroke or MG.

Association Between Anatomical Location of Surgically Induced Lesions and Postoperative Seizure Outcome in Temporal Lobe Epilepsy.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: To determine the association between surgical lesions of distinct gray and white structures and connections with favorable postoperative seizure outcomes. METHODS: Patients with drug-resistant temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) from 3 epilepsy centers were included. We employed a voxel-based and connectome-based mapping approach to determine the association between favorable outcomes and surgery-induced temporal lesions. Analyses were conducted controlling for multiple confounders, including total surgical resection/ablation volume, hippocampal volumes, side of surgery, and site where the patient was treated. RESULTS: The cohort included 113 patients with TLE (54 women; 86 right-handed; mean age at seizure onset 16.5 years [SD 11.9]; 54.9% left) who were 61.1% free of disabling seizures (Engel Class 1) at follow-up. Postoperative seizure freedom in TLE was associated with (1) surgical lesions that targeted the hippocampus as well as the amygdala-piriform cortex complex and entorhinal cortices; (2) disconnection of temporal, frontal, and limbic regions through loss of white matter tracts within the uncinate fasciculus, anterior commissure, and fornix; and (3) functional disconnection of the frontal (superior and middle frontal gyri, orbitofrontal region) and temporal (superior and middle pole) lobes. DISCUSSION: Better postoperative seizure freedom is associated with surgical lesions of specific structures and connections throughout the temporal lobes. These findings shed light on the key components of epileptogenic networks in TLE and constitute a promising source of new evidence for future improvements in surgical interventions. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class II evidence that for patients with TLE, postoperative seizure freedom is associated with surgical lesions of specific temporal lobe structures and connections.