Impact of Primary Disease Site of Involvement by Early-Stage Follicular Lymphoma on Patient Outcomes.

INTRODUCTION: Follicular lymphoma is a common non-Hodgkin lymphoma that can start in a diverse array of tissues throughout the body. While the majority of patients may be able to live many years with this disease, cure remains very difficult to achieve. OBJECTIVE: We sought to investigate the impact of follicular lymphoma primary disease site in early-stage disease on patient outcomes using a large national database. METHODS: Baseline demographic and disease data for patients diagnosed with follicular lymphoma from 2000-2015 was identified and extracted from the NCI Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Primary disease sites were grouped into one of two cohorts: nodal disease (lymph nodes and spleen) and extranodal disease (everything else). Analysis was performed using summary statistics, Kaplan-Meier method, and Cox-proportional hazards models for univariate and multivariate analysis. RESULTS: A total of 13,400 patients were included in the final analysis and the majority were non-Hispanic white (81%), with stage I (63%), and nodal FL (79%). Median overall survival for nodal disease was 15.1 years [95% CI (14.6-15.6)] while median overall survival for extranodal disease was 15.8 years [95% CI (14.9-16.3)]. Overall survival was slightly better for patients with extranodal disease [HR = 0.89, 95% CI (0.84-0.96); p-value = 0.00012]. This finding remained consistent after controlling for age and race [HR = 0.84, 95% CI (0.79-0.90); p-value <0.0001]. CONCLUSIONS: The primary site of involvement by early-stage follicular lymphoma may have an impact on patient outcomes and warrants further investigation.

Impact of primary organ site of involvement by peripheral T-cell lymphoma not otherwise specified on survival.

INTRODUCTION: Peripheral T-cell lymphoma, not otherwise specified (PTCL-NOS) is a rare, highly heterogeneous group of mature T-cell neoplasms that historically has been associated with poor outcomes. We sought to investigate the influence of primary disease site on PTCL-NOS outcomes using a large national cancer registry. METHODS: Baseline clinical and demographic data including primary organ of involvement and Ann Arbor disease stage were extracted from the SEER database. Patients were grouped into nine organ system groups and compared to nodal disease acting as a control. Cox regression models were utilized for adjusted survival analyses. RESULTS: A total of 3095 patients were identified in the SEER database and included in the final analysis. The median age was 61 and a majority of patients were male (60%) and identified as non-Hispanic white (68%). A plurality of patients had stage IV disease (32%). Lymph nodes and spleen were the most common primary disease sites (67%), while central nervous system was the least common (1%). Patients with early-stage PTCL-NOS of the gastrointestinal/genitourinary systems had worse overall survival [HR = 1.97 (1.50-2.59); p < 0.001] and lymphoma-specific survival [HR = 1.74 (1.26-2.40); p < 0.001] which was statistically significant even after adjusting for other variables. Early-stage PTCL-NOS of the central nervous system also had worse overall survival [HR = 1.90 (1.11-3.27); p = 0.020] and lymphoma-specific survival [HR = 2.11 (1.17-3.80); p = 0.013]. Early-stage PTCL-NOS of the skin had better overall survival [HR = 0.54 (0.42-0.68); p < 0.001] and lymphoma-specific survival [HR = 0.388 (0.28-0.53); p < 0.001] which was statistically significant even after adjustments. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest an association between primary organ involved by PTCL-NOS and both overall and lymphoma-specific survival even after adjusting for common variables. These results warrant validation in future prospective studies.

Facilitators and Barriers to Implementation of Lung Cancer Screening: A Framework-Driven Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study is to undertake a comprehensive systematic review to describe multilevel factors (barriers and facilitators) that may influence the implementation of low-dose chest computed tomography for lung cancer screening in the United States. METHODS: Systematic literature searches were performed using 6 online databases and citation indexes for peer-reviewed studies, for articles published from 2013 to 2021. Studies were classified into 3 perspectives, based on the study's unit of analysis: system, health-care provider, and patient. Barriers and facilitators identified for each study included in our final review were then coded and categorized using the Consolidate Framework for Implementation Research domains. RESULTS: At the system level, the 2 most common constructs were external policy and incentives and executing the implementation process. At the provider level, the most common constructs were evidence strength and quality of the intervention characteristics, patient needs and resources, implementation climate, and an individual's knowledge and beliefs about the intervention. At the patient level, the most common constructs were patient needs and resources, individual's knowledge and beliefs about the intervention, and engaging in the implementation process. These constructs can act as facilitators or barriers to lung cancer screening implementation. CONCLUSIONS: Applying the Consolidate Framework for Implementation Research domains and constructs to understand and specify factors facilitating uptake of lung cancer screening as well as cataloging the lessons learned from previous efforts helps inform the development and implementation processes of lung cancer screening programs in the community setting. REGISTRATION: PROSPERO, CRD42021247677.

Availability, Accessibility, and Price of Rapid HIV Self-Tests, New York City Pharmacies, Summer 2013.

We conducted an in-person survey of New York City (NYC) pharmacies to assess the availability, accessibility, and price of the over-the-counter, rapid HIV self-test kit. NYC pharmacies were stratified into high, moderate and low morbidity neighborhoods by the HIV diagnosis rate of the neighborhood in which the pharmacy was located. A random sample of 500 pharmacies was taken [250 from high morbidity neighborhoods (HighMN) and 250 from low morbidity neighborhoods (LowMN)]. Pharmacies were excluded if: closed during survey, non-retail, or >10 min walk from subway. Project staff visited pharmacies to determine kit availability (in pharmacy on day of survey), accessibility (not locked/behind counter), and price (marked on shelf/product). Of 361 pharmacies (161 LowMN; 200 HighMN), kits were available in 27 % and accessible in 10 %; there was no difference by neighborhood. Kits were most often kept behind the pharmacy counter; this was more common in HighMN than in LowMN. Kits were kept solely behind the pharmacy counter in 52 %. Median price was US $42.99 without variability across neighborhoods. The rapid HIV self-test had limited availability and access in retail pharmacies. The high median price measured suggests that cost remained a barrier.