[From evidence to care sustainability: risk management by contrast agent in cancer patient. Experience in an italian teaching hospital]. / Dalle evidenze alla sostenibilità assistenziale: la gestione del rischio da mezzo di contrasto nel paziente oncologico. Esperienza in un centro universitario italiano.

The use of organo-iodinated contrast media (CM) in diagnostics and intervention has increased in the last 10 years. It is necessary to distinguish between the different types of contrast agent, primarily with respect to osmolarity: with low osmolarity the safety profile for the patient is higher. The risk of acute renal injury caused by contrast agent (PC-AKI) is however determined also by risk factors related to the patient. Particularly in main centers, it is advisable to have a standardized program in order to stratify patients with respect to risk, to define prevention strategies and the roles of the specialists involved. The experience described in this work consists in the application of an organizational model relating to CT, with a feasibility study of applying an evidence-based check-list in the clinical routine, as a tool to support clinical decisions (Clinical Decision Support System, CDSS) in the oncology field. A pilot evaluation was carried out on 54 patients belonging to the case series treated in a Teaching Hospital, in a day service regime with a diagnosis of solid tumor. The results of this evaluation led the working group to believe that the CDSS thus structured determines the possibility of overestimating the clinical risk of PC-AKI, and consequently to redefine the evaluation form. Experience has shown that it is not generally easy to immediately identify an algorithm useful for standardizing the management of clinically complex situations, such as PC-AKI prevention. The conduction of pilot evaluations can be a valid instrument of harmonization between the solidity of the references deriving from evidence based medicine and the tangibility of real world data. It is advisable to broaden the application of the CDSS more in a larger number of cases, as well as conduct a pre-post analysis relating to the clinical impact in terms of incidence from PC-AKI.

The PRECEDE-PROCEED model as a tool in Public Health screening: a systematic review.

OBJETCTIVE: The aim of this systematic review was to summarize the scientific literature concerning the use of the Precede-Proceed model (PPM) applied to educational programs and health screenings contextsV. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review. METHODS: The search process was based on a selection of publications listed in Medline and Scopus. The keywords used were "Precede-Proceed" AND ("screening" OR "educational programs"). Studies included in the systematic review were subdivided into those applying the model in a screening context, and those applying it within educational programs. RESULTS: Twenty-seven studies were retrieved, mostly performed in the USA and, generally, the promoting center was the University. In the context of cancer screening, the PPM model was most of all applied to Mammography Screening (5 of 13 studies in cancer screening), and Cervical Cancer Screening (5 of 13). Another three studies within the cancer field investigated Menopause-Inducing Cancer Treatments, Oral cancer prevention, and cancer screening in general. In the remaining studies, the model was applied in various screening areas, particularly chronic and degenerative diseases. There were many different study designs, most of which cross-sectional (8), though several RTCs (8) and focus groups (5) were also found. For the cross-sectional studies the methodological quality varied between 3/10 and 9/10, whilst for the RCTs it ranged from 2/5 to 3/5. CONCLUSIONS: The PPM provides an excellent framework for health intervention programs especially in screening contexts, and could improve the understanding of the relationship between variables such as knowledge and screening. Given the complexity of a behavioral change process, certain important predisposing factors could be measured in future studies, and during health intervention planning.