Robot-assisted pyeloplasty: How to deal with anatomic variants? A step-by-step video presentation.

INTRODUCTION: Pyeloplasty (open or Robot-assisted) is the gold standard of a symptomatic UPJ stenosis. Sometimes anatomic variants make the procedure challenging. This video describes a step-by-step approach in three settings: a crossing blood vessel and two different presentations of incomplete duplicated system. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Under general anesthesia, patient positioned in lateral decubitus, three trocars are placed. After mobilization of the colon, the Gerota's fascia is opened, and the renal pelvis is dissected off the surrounding structures. Ureter and obstructed pyelum were subsequently identified, mobilized, and hinged on a traction stitch. The pyelum and ureter are divided and spatulated according to the Anderson-Hynes technique; anastomosis is achieved. In variants, the drainage is one of the challenging steps, needing custom-made drainage of both moieties. Correct positioning of the drainage is confirmed with reflux of methylene blue from the bladder. RESULTS: JJ stent was removed 6 weeks postoperatively in surgical day-clinic, additional drainage was removed 1 week after surgery in the outpatient clinic. All three children remain asymptomatic with over a year of follow-up. CONCLUSION: A step-by-step plan for pyeloplasty in case of anatomic variants is presented with a video demonstrating a robot-assisted approach in duplicated systems. Moiety drainage can be challenging.

Multicentre, prospective study on local treatment of metastatic prostate cancer (LoMP study).

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the role of cytoreductive radical prostatectomy in addition to standard of care for patients with newly diagnosed metastatic prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This multicentre, prospective study included asymptomatic patients from 2014 to 2018 (NCT02138721). Cytoreductive radical prostatectomy was offered to all fit patients with resectable tumours, resulting in 40 patients. Standard of care was administered to 40 patients who were ineligible or unwilling to undergo surgery. The primary endpoint was castration resistant cancer-free survival at the time point of ≥50% events. The secondary endpoint was local event-free survival. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses with propensity-score analysis were applied. RESULTS: After a median (quartiles) follow-up of 35 (24-47) months, 42 patients became castration-resistant or died. The median castration resistant cancer-free survival was 53 (95% confidence interval [CI] 14-92) vs 21 (95% CI 15-27) months for cytoreductive radical prostatectomy compared to standard of care (P = 0.017). The 3-year estimates for local event-free survival were 83% (95% CI 71-95) vs 59% (95% CI 51-67) for cytoreductive radical prostatectomy compared to standard of care (P = 0.012). However, treatment group showed no significance in the multivariable models for castration resistant cancer-free survival (P = 0.5) or local event-free survival (P = 0.3), adjusted for propensity-score analysis. Complications were similar to the non-metastatic setting. Patients undergoing surgery were younger, with lower baseline prostate-specific antigen levels, alkaline phosphatase levels and metastatic burden. CONCLUSION: The present LoMP study was unable to show a difference between the two inclusion groups regarding castration resistant cancer-free survival for asymptomatic patients with newly diagnosed metastatic prostate cancer. These results validate previous evidence that, in well-selected and informed patients, cytoreductive radical prostatectomy is feasible and safe, with corresponding continence rates compared to the non-metastatic, high-risk setting. Whether cytoreductive radical prostatectomy could be a valuable option to achieve good local palliation needs to be further researched. Overall, the role of cytoreductive radical prostatectomy needs to be further explored in randomized studies to correct for potential bias.

The Role of Cytoreductive Radical Prostatectomy in the Treatment of Newly Diagnosed Low-volume Metastatic Prostate Cancer. Results from the Local Treatment of Metastatic Prostate Cancer (LoMP) Registry.

BACKGROUND: Radiotherapy to the prostate (RTp) prolongs survival for patients with low-volume, newly diagnosed metastatic prostate cancer (ndmPC). OBJECTIVE: to evaluate whether cytoreductive radical prostatectomy (cRP) is equally beneficial as RTp in low-volume ndmPC. DESIGN SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: A multicenter prospective registry was established in 2014 to observe patients with ndmPC. Eligible patients were offered cRP or RTp. For this study we selected only patients with low-volume ndmPC (n = 109). Of these, 48, 26, and 35 patients underwent cRP, RTp, and no local therapy (NLT), respectively. Median follow-up was 32 mo (interquartile range 16-49). INTERVENTION: cRP was compared with RTp and NLT. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and local event-free survival (LEFS) were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Factors prognostic for OS were identified using univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: The 2-yr OS was 93%, 100%, and 69%, and 2-yr CSS was 93%, 100%, and 75% for cRP, RTp, and NLT, respectively. The cRP and RTp groups had better OS compared to NLT and there was no significant difference between cRP and RTp. The 2-yr LEFS was 92%, 77%, and 60% for cRP, RTp, and NLT, respectively. The cRP group had better LEFS compared to RTp and NLT, and there was no significant difference between RTp and NLT. Advanced tumor stage, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≥2, and NLT were negative prognostic factors for OS. The main limitation is selection of fitter patients with less advanced tumors for cRP and the small sample size. CONCLUSIONS: For selected patients with low-volume ndmPC, cRP is able to achieve similar OS and CSS to RTp. cRP is effective in preventing local events due to disease progression. PATIENT SUMMARY: Patients with a low volume of newly diagnosed prostate cancer that has spread beyond the prostate gland might benefit from removal of the prostate, which we found was as effective as radiotherapy to the prostate in prolonging survival. Removal of the prostate is effective in preventing urinary problems caused by cancer progression.

Primary versus Redo Urethroplasty: Results from a Single-Center Comparative Analysis.

OBJECTIVES: To explore the differences between primary and redo urethroplasty and to directly compare according stricture-free survival (SFS). Materials and Methods. Data of all male patients who underwent urethroplasty at Ghent University Hospital were collected between 2000 and 2018. Exclusion criteria for this analysis were age <18 years and follow-up <1 year. Two patient groups were created for further comparison: the primary urethroplasty (PU) group (no previous urethroplasty) and redo urethroplasty (RU) group (≥1 previous urethroplasty), irrespective of prior endoscopic treatments. A comparison between groups was performed using the Mann-Whitney U test and Fisher's Exact test. SFS was calculated using Kaplan-Meier statistics. A functional definition of failure, being the need for further urethral manipulation, was used. Uni- and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed on the entire patient cohort. RESULTS: 805 patients were included. Median (IQR) follow-up of the PU (n = 556) and RU (n = 556) and RU (p=0.1). The RU group involved more penile strictures (p=0.1). The RU group involved more penile strictures (p=0.1). The RU group involved more penile strictures (p=0.1). The RU group involved more penile strictures (p=0.1). The RU group involved more penile strictures (p=0.1). The RU group involved more penile strictures (p=0.1). The RU group involved more penile strictures (p=0.1). The RU group involved more penile strictures (p=0.1). The RU group involved more penile strictures (. CONCLUSIONS: Several differences between primary and redo urethroplasties exist. Redo urethroplasty entails a distinct patient population to treat and is, in general, associated with lower stricture-free survival than primary urethroplasty, although more homogeneous series are required to corroborate these results. Prior urethroplasty and diabetes are independent risk factors for urethroplasty failure.

A Trial-Based Cost-Utility Analysis of Metastasis-Directed Therapy for Oligorecurrent Prostate Cancer.

The optimal management of patients with oligorecurrent prostate cancer (PCa) is unknown. There is growing interest in metastasis-directed therapy (MDT) for this population. The objective was to assess cost-utility from a Belgian healthcare payer's perspective of MDT and delayed androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in comparison with surveillance and delayed ADT, and with immediate ADT. A Markov decision-analytic trial-based model was developed, projecting the results over a 5-year time horizon with one-month cycles. Clinical data were derived from the STOMP trial and literature. Treatment costs were derived from official government documents. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses showed that MDT is cost-effective compared to surveillance (ICER: €8393/quality adjusted life year (QALY)) and immediate ADT (dominant strategy). The ICER is most sensitive to utilities in the different health states and the first month MDT cost. At a willingness-to-pay threshold of €40,000 per QALY, the cost of the first month MDT should not exceed €8136 to be cost-effective compared to surveillance. The Markov-model suggests that MDT for oligorecurrent PCa is potentially cost-effective in comparison with surveillance and delayed ADT, and in comparison with immediate ADT.

Robot-assisted nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma: results from three high-volume robotic surgery institutions.

Robot-Assisted NephroUreterectomy (RANU) represents a minimally invasive alternative to open NephroUreterectomy (NU) for management of Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma (UTUC) but its oncologic safety is still controversial. The objective of this study was to investigate the peri-operative, pathologic and oncologic outcomes of RANU for UTUC. From 2008 to 2017, 78 patients diagnosed with UTUC and elected for RANU at 3 high-volume robotic surgery centres were retrospectively assessed. Surgery was performed using da Vinci Si® and Xi® systems. RANU was done adhering to oncological principles as in open surgery. The outcomes of the study were: (1) peri-operative morbidity, namely intra- and post-operative complications, blood loss, length of hospital stay and operative time; (2) oncologic outcomes, namely overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS). Peri-operative overall complication rate was 24.4% and high-grade complication rate was 2.6%. Median blood loss, length of hospital stay and operative time were 124 ml, 4 days and 167 min. Lymphadenectomy was performed in 31 (41%) patients. Lymph-node involvement was present in 9 (29%) patients. At median follow-up of 15 months, 2- and 4-year OS were 79% and 66%, respectively, and RFS was 63% and 53%. Peritoneal dissemination was recorded in 1 (1.3%) patient with pT4N2R1 UTUC. Our study is limited by the relatively small cohort of patients and its retrospective character. RANU as minimally invasive treatment for patients with UTUC is safe and feasible. Post-operative morbidity is low and major complications are rare. Oncologic outcomes are acceptable and no evidence of increased risk of peritoneal dissemination is recorded. Long-term data are needed. RANU should be regarded as an alternative to open surgery for UTUC that can offer good peri-operative and oncologic results.

Single-setting robot-assisted kidney transplantation consecutive to single-port laparoscopic nephrectomy in a child and robot-assisted living-related donor nephrectomy: initial Ghent experience.

INTRODUCTION: Kidney transplantation (KT) is the gold-standard treatment for end-stage renal disease (ESRD) in children. Robot-assisted kidney transplantation (RAKT) in adults is becoming increasingly common with potentially improved morbidity compared with open KT. The study objective was to evaluate feasibility and outcomes of RAKT in children. PATIENTS & METHODS: An 8-years-old boy with ESRD received a kidney transplant from his mother. Simultaneously in two operation theatres, the boy underwent single-port (GelPOINT®) right laparoscopic nephro-ureterectomy (LNU), and his mother underwent robot-assisted left donor nephrectomy (RADN).Two full surgical teams were operating at the same time. Subsequently, the boy underwent RAKT, introducing the graft through the GelPOINT®. RESULTS: Total operative time for LNU, RADN, and RAKT was 180, 140, and 195 min, respectively, with warm, cold, and rewarming ischemia times 1.5, 200, and 47 min, respectively. Blood loss was 300, 20, and 50 cc, respectively. No intraoperative complications were noted. Convalescence of both donor and recipient was uneventful, with good kidney function at 1-year follow-up. CONCLUSION: RAKT in children is technically feasible and safe, resulting in excellent graft function. Concomitant nephrectomy can be done laparoscopically through the single-site GelPOINT®. An experienced RAKT team with the full support of pediatric nephrologists is mandatory.

Metastasis-directed Therapy in Treating Nodal Oligorecurrent Prostate Cancer: A Multi-institutional Analysis Comparing the Outcome and Toxicity of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy and Elective Nodal Radiotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) and elective nodal radiotherapy (ENRT) are being investigated as metastasis-directed treatments in oligorecurrent prostate cancer (PC); however, comparative data are still lacking. OBJECTIVE: To compare outcome and toxicity between both treatments. Primary endpoint was metastasis-free survival, adjusted for selected variables (aMFS). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This was a multi-institutional, retrospective analysis of 506 (SBRT: 309, ENRT: 197) patients with hormone-sensitive nodal oligorecurrent PC (five or fewer lymph nodes (LNs; N1/M1a), treated between 2004 and 2017. Median follow-up was 36 mo (interquartile range 23-56). INTERVENTION: SBRT was defined as a minimum of 5 Gy per fraction to each lesion with a maximum of 10 fractions. ENRT was defined as a minimum dose of 45 Gy in up to 25 fractions to the elective nodes, with or without a simultaneous boost to the suspicious node(s). The choice of radiotherapy (RT) was at the discretion of the treating physician, with treatments being unbalanced over the centers. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: In total, 506 patients from 15 different treatment centers were included. Primary treatment was radical prostatectomy, RT, or their combination. Nodal recurrences were detected by positron emission tomography/computer tomography (97%) or conventional imaging (3%). Descriptive statistics was used to summarize patient characteristics. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: ENRT was associated with fewer nodal recurrences compared with SBRT (p < 0.001). In a multivariable analysis, patients with one LN at recurrence had longer aMFS after ENRT (hazard ratio: 0.50, 95% confidence interval 0.30-0.85, p = 0.009). Late toxicity was higher after ENRT compared with that after SBRT (16% vs. 5%, p < 0.01). Limitations include higher use of hormone therapy in the ENRT cohort and nonstandardized follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: ENRT reduces the number of nodal recurrences as compared with SBRT, however at higher toxicity. Our findings hypothesize that ENRT should be preferred to SBRT in the treatment of nodal oligorecurrences. This hypothesis needs to be evaluated in a randomized trial. PATIENT SUMMARY: This study investigated the difference between stereotactic and elective nodal radiotherapy in treating limited nodal metastatic prostate cancer. Nodal relapse was less frequent following elective nodal radiotherapy than following stereotactic body radiotherapy, and thus elective nodal radiotherapy might be the preferred treatment.

Importance of metastatic volume in prognostic models to predict survival in newly diagnosed metastatic prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: To explore the prognostic importance of metastatic volume in a contemporary daily practice cohort of patients with newly diagnosed metastatic hormone-naive prostate cancer (mHNPC) and to develop a pragmatic prognostic model to predict survival for these patients. METHODS: Since 2014, 113 patients with newly diagnosed mHNPC were prospectively registered. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 25.0™ with two-sided p value < 0.05 indicating statistical significance. Univariate and multivariate cox regression analyses were performed to identify prognostic risk factors. Kaplan-Meier method with log-rank statistics was constructed to analyze difference in survival in the prognostic groups. Model performance was assessed using the Concordance-index (C-index) and cross-validated in R v3.4.1. High-volume mHNPC (HVD) was defined as the presence of visceral metastasis or ≥ 4 bone metastases with ≥ 1 appendicular lesion. RESULTS: Multivariate analysis identified HVD (p = 0.047) and elevated alkaline phosphatase (ALP) (p = 0.018) as independent prognostic risk factors for overall survival (OS). Consequently, three prognostic groups were created: a good (no risk factors), intermediate (1 risk factor) and poor prognosis group (2 risk factors). Median OS for the good, intermediate and poor prognosis group was not reached, 73 and 20 months (95% CI 9-31 months with p < 0.001 and Correspondence-index of 0.78), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: We developed a pragmatic and qualitative prognostic model consisting of three prognostic risk groups for OS in a daily practice cohort of patients with newly diagnosed mHNPC. Independent prognostic risk factors included in the model were HVD and abnormal ALP.

Nodal Oligorecurrent Prostate Cancer: Anatomic Pattern of Possible Treatment Failure in Relation to Elective Surgical and Radiotherapy Treatment Templates.

BACKGROUND: Patients with biochemical recurrence following primary prostate cancer (PCa) treatment often experience relapse in the lymph nodes (LNs). Both salvage LN dissection (sLND) and elective nodal radiotherapy (ENRT) are potential treatment options. OBJECTIVE: To describe anatomic patterns of nodal oligorecurrent PCa in relation to different surgical and radiotherapy templates. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Patients with biochemical recurrence following primary PCa treatment were eligible for 18F-choline positron emission tomography/computed tomography (CT). Patients with five or fewer LN recurrences (N1/M1a) were eligible for the current retrospective analysis. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: All LN recurrences were mapped on a reference patient CT, as well as different surgical templates (limited to superextended) and an adapted version of the PIVOTAL ENRT template, blinded for the recurrences. Descriptive statistics were used to report recurrences in relation to the different templates and to compare LN coverage between templates. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: In total, 158 LN recurrences (N1: 88; M1a: 70) in 82 patients (median age: 67yr; prostate-specific antigen [PSA]: 3.1ng/ml; PSA doubling time of 7.8mo at the time of clinical recurrence) were mapped. In 49% of patients, recurrences were exclusively located in the true pelvis, followed by the common iliac LN (10%), retroperitoneal/inguinal LN (10%), or a combination (31%). There was up to 40% volume overlap between ENRT and the surgical templates. Theoretically, with ENRT more patients are fully covered (p<0.02) and the total number of covered lesions is higher (p<0.001) when compared to all types of sLND, except for superextended sLND, which is comparable to ENRT (patient-level: p=0.6; lesion-level: p=0.09). With 22% of all 158 lesions located outside all templates (N1: 7%; M1a: 15%), at least 31% of all 82 patients would not be salvaged using any of the templates. CONCLUSIONS: More than half of nodal recurrences are located outside the true pelvis. Limited or standard extended sLND is considered insufficient as a salvage treatment approach and is thus not recommended for use. To maximize treatment outcomes for nodal recurrences, ENRT or superextended sLND should be preferred. PATIENT SUMMARY: We compared two possible treatment options, elective nodal radiotherapy and salvage lymph node dissection, for patients with prostate cancer recurrence limited to five or fewer lymph nodes and reported the nodal distrubution. Radiotherapy and surgery cover different areas with possible different outcomes.

Abiraterone and spironolactone in prostate cancer: a combination to avoid.

Objectives: Disease progression in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) is dependent on androgen signaling. This case describes the complex adaptive androgen signaling mechanisms in mCRPC and illustrates that caution should be exercised when treating these patients with drugs influencing the androgen axis.Methods: Single case report and review of the literature.Results: We report the case of an 86-year-old man with mCRPC, treated with the secondary antihormonal agent abiraterone acetate. Following association of spironolactone to deal with symptoms related to mineralocorticoid excess, biochemical and radiographic disease progression occurred. Spironolactone was discontinued and 8 months after withdrawal, the patient continues to show a biochemical response to abiraterone.Conclusions: Although spironolactone generally exerts anti-androgenic effects, experimental evidence exists that it acts as an androgen receptor agonist in an androgen-depleted environment, capable of inducing prostate cancer proliferation. This is supported by the observations described in this case report. Therefore, spironolactone should be avoided in prostate cancer patients suffering from treatment-associated side effects of abiraterone.

Discovery and validation of a serum microRNA signature to characterize oligo- and polymetastatic prostate cancer: not ready for prime time.

PURPOSE: Patients with oligometastatic prostate cancer (PC) may benefit from metastasis-directed therapy (MDT), delaying disease progression and the start of palliative systemic treatment. However, a significant proportion of oligometastatic PC patients progress to polymetastatic PC within a year following MDT, suggesting an underestimation of the metastatic load by current staging modalities. Molecular markers could help to identify true oligometastatic patients eligible for MDT. METHODS: Patients with asymptomatic biochemical recurrence following primary PC treatment were classified as oligo- or polymetastatic based on 18F-choline PET/CT imaging. Oligometastatic patients had up to three metastases at baseline and did not progress to more than three lesions following MDT or surveillance within 1 year of diagnosis of metastases. Polymetastatic patients had > 3 metastases at baseline or developed > 3 metastases within 1 year following imaging. A model aiming to prospectively distinguish oligo- and polymetastatic PC patients was trained using clinicopathological parameters and serum-derived microRNA expression profiles from a discovery cohort of 20 oligometastatic and 20 polymetastatic PC patients. To confirm the models predictive performance, it was applied on biomarker data obtained from an independent validation cohort of 44 patients with oligometastatic and 39 patients with polymetastatic disease. RESULTS: Oligometastatic PC patients had a more favorable prognosis compared to polymetastatic ones, as defined by a significantly longer median CRPC-free survival (not reached versus 38 months; 95% confidence interval 31-45 months with P < 0.001). Despite the good performance of a predictive model trained on the discovery cohort, with an AUC of 0.833 (0.693-0.973; 95% CI) and a sensitivity of 0.894 (0.714-1.000; 95% CI) for oligometastatic disease, none of the miRNA targets were found to be differentially expressed between oligo- and polymetastatic PC patients in the signature validation cohort. The multivariate model had an AUC of 0.393 (0.534 after cross-validation) and therefore, no predictive ability. CONCLUSIONS: Although PC patients with oligometastatic disease had a more favorable prognosis, no serum-derived biomarkers allowing for prospective discrimination of oligo- and polymetastatic prostate cancer patients could be identified.

Radiotherapy as metastasis-directed therapy for oligometastatic prostate cancer.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To summarize the available literature regarding radiotherapy as a metastasis-directed therapy (MDT) in the treatment of oligometastatic prostate cancer (PCa). RECENT FINDINGS: Three different clinical scenarios of oligometastatic PCa exist in which MDT can be applied: de novo oligometastatic PCa, oligorecurrent PCa, and oligoprogressive PCa. A cut off of three to five metastatic lesions is most often used in these settings. Data from retrospective studies, treating over 1000 patients in total, have been reported. The median progression-free survival ranges between 1 and 3 years, but is influenced by a heterogeneous use of androgen deprivation therapy. For lymph node metastases, a propensity scored matched analysis suggests that cancer specific and overall survival is improved with MDT over standard of care. MDT treatment regimens vary with different radiotherapy techniques, doses, and volumes. Adverse events are limited to grade 1-2 and only rarely grade 3 events are reported. SUMMARY: Based on data from retrospective studies, progression-free survival following MDT for oligometastatic PCa is promising with few adverse events. Comparative prospective studies are under way and will shed light on the future of MDT.