[Early detection of prostate cancer: Towards a new paradigm?] / Détection précoce du cancer de la prostate : vers un nouveau paradigme ?

Prostate cancer (PCa) is a public health issue. The diagnostic strategy for PCa is well codified and assessed by digital rectal examination, PSA testing and multiparametric MRI, which may or may not lead to prostate biopsies. The formal benefit of organized PCa screening, studied more than 10 years ago at an international scale and for all incomers, is not demonstrated. However, diagnostic and therapeutic modalities have evolved since the pivotal studies. The contribution of MRI and targeted biopsies, the widespread use of active surveillance for unsignificant PCa, the improvement of surgical techniques and radiotherapy… have allowed a better selection of patients and strengthened the interest for an individualized approach, reducing the risk of overtreatment. Aiming to enhance coverage and access to screening for the population, the European Commission recently promoted the evaluation of an organized PCa screening strategy, including MRI. The lack of screening programs has become detrimental to the population and must shift towards an early detection policy adapted to the risk of each individual.

Prognostic value of comorbidities in older patients with cancer: the ELCAPA cohort study.

BACKGROUND: In older patients, comorbidities competed with cancer for mortality risk. We assessed the prognostic value of comorbidities in older patients with cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We analysed all patients >70 years of age with colorectal, breast, prostate, or lung cancer included in the prospective ELCAPA cohort. The Cumulative Illness Rating Scale-Geriatrics (CIRS-G) score was used to assess comorbidities. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) at 3, 12, and 36 months. The adjusted difference in the restricted mean survival time (RMST) was used to assess the strength of the relationship between comorbidities and survival. RESULTS: Of the 1551 patients included (median age 82 years; interquartile range 78-86 years), 502 (32%), 575 (38%), 283 (18%), and 191 (12%) had colorectal, breast, prostate, and lung cancer, respectively, and 50% had metastatic disease. Hypertension, kidney failure, and cognitive impairment were the most common comorbidities (67%, 38%, and 29% of the patients, respectively). A CIRS-G score >17, two or more severe comorbidities, more than seven comorbidities, heart failure, and cognitive impairment were independently associated with shorter OS. The greatest effect size was observed for CIRS-G >17 (versus CIRS-G <11): at 36 months, the adjusted differences in the RMST (95% confidence interval) were -6.0 months (-9.3 to -2.6 months) for colorectal cancer, -9.1 months (-13.2 to -4.9 months) for breast cancer, -8.3 months (-12.8 to -3.9 months) for prostate cancer, and -5.5 months (-9.9 to -1.1 months) for lung cancer (P < 0.05 for all). CONCLUSIONS: Comorbidities' type, number, and severity were independently associated with shorter OS. A 17-point cut-off over 56 for the total CIRS-G score could be considered in clinical practice.

[High risk localized and locally advanced prostate cancer: Long-term oncological outcomes after prostatectomy]. / Cancer de la prostate localisé de haut risque et localement avancé : résultats oncologiques à long terme de la prostatectomie.

INTRODUCTION: High risk localized and locally advanced forms are responsible for the vast majority of specific deaths from prostate cancer among non-metastatic diseases at diagnosis. No randomized study has yet been published to establish the best local treatment in terms of survival. AIM: Conduct a large-volume cohort study with long-term follow-up to analyze specific and overall survival outcomes after surgery. METHOD: A single-center retrospective study of all patients operated on for localized high-risk and locally advanced prostate cancer was performed. Actuarial survival analyses and multivariate analyses were performed to discern predictive risk factors. RESULTS: Five hundred patients were included. MRI stage was≥iT3a in 40.7% of cases and 50.2% of patients had a Gleason score≥8 on biopsy. The mean follow-up was 63.1 months. The overall, specific and biological recurrence-free survival were respectively 77.6%, 93.9% and 26.8% at 10 years. A PSA level≥20, a Gleason score on biopsy≥9 and a MRI stage≥iT3a were significantly associated with the 10-years biological recurrence risk. CONCLUSION: This study shows very good long-term oncological results. In the absence of a randomized controlled trial, these results suggest the primary role of surgery in this indication and support the evolution of current practices. We pointed out very pejorative features that might help selection of the best candidates for surgical treatment.

Robotic-assisted laparoscopy living donor nephrectomy: Technique and results of a monocentric retrospective series.

INTRODUCTION: Robot-assisted nephrectomy for living kidney donation (LKD) has been described in the literature as a safe and reproducible technique in high volume centers with extensive robotic surgery experience. Any surgical procedure in a healthy individual ought to be safe in regards to complications. The objective of this study was to evaluate the Robotic-assisted Living Donor Nephrectomy (RLDN) experience in a robotic surgery expert center. METHODS: This is a retrospective study from 11/2011 and 12/2019. In total, 118 consecutive Living Donor (LD) kidney transplants were performed at our institution. All the procedures were performed by robotic-assisted laparoscopic approach. Extraction was performed by iliac (IE), vaginal (VE) or umbilical extraction (UE). The left kidney was preferred even if the vascular anatomy was not modal. RESULTS: For donors: the median operative time was 120min with 50mL of blood loss. The median warm ischemia time was 4min, with a non-significant shorter duration with the UE (4min) in comparison with IE or VE (5min). Nine patients had postoperative complications including 1 grade II (blood transfusion) and 1 grade IIIb (vaginal bleeding after VE). None of our procedures were converted to open surgeries and no deaths were reported. For the recipients: 1.7% presented delayed graft function; their median GFR at 1 year was 61mL/min/1.73m2. CONCLUSION: RLDN in an expert center appears to be a safe technique. The advantages of the robot device in terms of ergonomy don't hamper the surgical outcomes. Donor, recipient and graft survivals seem comparable to the reported laparoscopic outcomes in the literature.

[Assessment of positive surgical margins in the management of patients after radical prostatectomy for pT2 prostate cancer]. / Impact des marges chirurgicales positives après prostatectomie radicale chez les patients atteints d'un cancer de la prostate localisé pT2.

INTRODUCTION: Few data are available regarding positive surgical margins (PSM) in patients who underwent surgery for localized prostate cancer (PC). Our objective was to evaluate the impact of PSM on biochemical recurrence-free survival (BRFS) for patients who underwent PC for pT2 tumor without adjuvant treatment. METHODS: We included each patient who underwent radical prostatectomy for pT2N0 PC between 1988 and 2018. Primary endpoint was biochemical recurrence (BR). BRFS was calculated using Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to determine factors associated with BR and PSM. RESULTS: Overall, 2429 patients were included whom 420 patients had PSM (17.3%). Median follow-up was 116 months. BRFS at 10 years was 66.6% in case of PSM, and 84% in the negative margins group (P<0.0001). Parameters associated with BR were preoperative PSA level (P<0.0001), Gleason score (P<0.0001), tumor volume in biopsies, and margins length (P<0.04). CONCLUSION: PSM in pT2N0 CP are associated with poor prognosis in terms of BR. Nevertheless, only a small number of pT2R1 cancer will present biological recurrence. The use of adjuvant radiotherapy in these patients therefore represents a risk of overtreatment, with the risk of adverse effects inherent to irradiation. Clinical and biological monitoring in case of PSM seems acceptable.

[Radical prostatectomy in patients with Gleason 6 (ISUP 1) prostate cancer: 10-year follow-up]. / Recul à 10 ans des patients opérés pour un cancer de prostate Gleason 6 (ISUP1).

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate extraprostatic extension and 10 years cancer specific survival in a population of patients with Gleason 6 (ISUP 1) prostate cancer (PCa) treated by radical prostatectomy (RP) in two French third referral centers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The data were extracted from 2 university hospital databases according to the following criteria: PCa classified ISUP 1 following both biopsy (PB) and surgery (RP) between 1998 and 2008. Pathology slides of patients having presented an extraprostatic extension and/or a recurrence were reviewed by a uropathologist. RESULTS: Among the 534 patients who met the inclusion criteria, 66 (12.2%) had a pT3 stage. One patient out of 198 who received lymph node dissection had a positive node. Median follow-up was 10.3 years. Only one patient presented with metastatic progression. No cancer specific death was observed. An independent pathologist reviewed the slides of 58 out of the 70 patients who presented pT3 disease and/or a recurrence (in 12 cases, pathological material was not available). After review, all pT3b stages and 12 pT3a (out of 14) were upgraded to ISUP2 or higher. Similarly, the patient with a positive node and the patient who progressed towards a metastatic disease were both upgraded to ISUP 3. CONCLUSION: No pT3b or pN+stage was associated with ISUP 1 PCa in our study. With a median follow-up of more than 10 years, biological progression was the only type of progression observed.

[Urethro-vesical anastomosis reconstruction using extra-peritoneal robot-assisted laparoscopy for anastomotic stenosis after radical prostatectomy]. / Réfection d'anastomose urétro-vésicale par voie extra-péritonéale laparoscopique robot-assistée pour sténose anastomotique post-prostatectomie radicale.

INTRODUCTION: Urethro-vesical anastomosis stenosis following radical prostatectomy is a rare complication but represents a challenging situation. While the first-line treatment is endoscopic, recurrences after urethrotomies require a radical approach. We present the updated results of our patient's cohort treated by pure robotic anastomosis refection. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This is a retrospective, single-center study focusing on one surgeon's experience. Patients presented an urethro-vesical stricture following a radical prostatectomy. Each patient received at least one endoscopic treatment. The procedure consisted of a circumferential resection of the stenosis, followed by a re-anastomosis with well-vascularized tissue. We reviewed the outcomes in terms of symptomatic recurrences and continence after the reconstructive surgery. RESULTS: From April 2013 to May 2020, 8 patients underwent this procedure. Half of the patients had previously been treated with salvage radio-hormonotherapy. The median age was 70 years (64-76). The mean operative time was 109minutes (60-180) and blood loss was 120cc (50-250). One patient had an early postoperative complication, with vesico-pubic fistula. The average length of stay was 4.6 days (3-8). Mean follow-up was 24.25 months (1-66). Half of the patients experienced a recurrence at a median time of 8.25 months (6-11) after surgery. Five patients experienced incontinence of which 3 required an artificial urinary sphincter implantation. CONCLUSION: Extra-peritoneal robot-assisted urethro-vesical reconstruction is feasible and safe to manage bladder neck stricture after radical prostatectomy. The risk of postoperative incontinence is high, justifying preoperative information. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Polyethylene glycol-based hydrogel rectal spacers for prostate brachytherapy: a systematic review with a focus on technique.

INTRODUCTION: Radiation dose to the rectum in prostate brachytherapy (PBT) can be reduced by the use of polyethylene glycol (PEG) hydrogel spacers. This reduces the rate of rectal toxicity and allows dose escalation to the prostate. Our objectives were to provide an overview of technique for injection of a PEG hydrogel spacer, reduction in rectal dosimetry, gastrointestinal toxicity and potential complications. METHODS: We systematically reviewed the role of PEG hydrogel spacers in PBT using the Cochrane and PRISMA methodology for all English-language articles from January 2013 to December 2019. Data was extracted for type of radiotherapy, number of patients, type of PEG-hydrogel used, mean prostate-rectum separation, rectal dosimetry, acute and late GI toxicity, procedure-related complications and the technique used for hydrogel insertion. RESULTS: Nine studies (671 patients and 537 controls) met our inclusion criteria. Of these 4 used DuraSeal® and 5 used SpaceOAR®. The rectal spacing achieved varied between 7.7-16 mm. Failure of hydrogel insertion was seen only in 12 patients, mostly related to failure of hydrodissection in patients undergoing salvage PBT. Where reported, the rectal D2 cc was reduced by between 21.6 and 52.6% and the median rectal V75% cc was reduced by between 91.8-100%. Acute GI complications were mostly limited to grade 1 or 2 toxicity (n = 153, 33.7%) with low levels of grade 3 or 4 toxicity (n = 1, 0.22%). Procedure-related complications were limited to tenesmus (0.14%), rectal discomfort (1.19%), and bacterial prostatitis (0.44%). CONCLUSIONS: PEG hydrogel spacers are safe to insert. Gel insertion is easy, fast and has a low rate of failure. These studies convincingly demonstrate a significant reduction in rectal dosimetry. Although the results of spacers in reducing rectal toxicity is promising, these need to be confirmed in prospective randomised trial.

Quality of life with pharmacological treatment in patients with benign prostatic enlargement: results from the Evolution European Prospective Multicenter Multi-National Registry Study.

BACKGROUND: Lower urinary tract symptoms due to benign prostate enlargement (LUTS/BPE) can lead to significant disturbances to health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and psychological well-being. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of pharmacological treatment of LUTS/BPE on disease specific and generic QOL measures. METHODS: Evolution was a European prospective, multicenter multi-national, observational registry collecting real-life clinical data over 2 years on the management of LUTS/BPE in primary and secondary care. This study investigated disease-specific QOL using questionnaires such as IPSS Q8, BPH Impact Index (BII) and generic QOL using questionnaires like EuroQOL Five Dimension (EQ5D) which encompassed EQ5D VAS and EQ5D health index. RESULTS: The registry enrolled 1838 BPE patients and 1246 patients were evaluable at the end of 24 months. Nearly 70% of patients in the study were previously treated with medical therapy and 17% of these had already discontinued medical treatment previously for various reasons with lack of efficacy being the most common. The mean time since diagnosis of LUTS in the previously treated group was 4.7 years (0-26 years). Medical management produced statistically significant improvement in QOL (disease specific and generic) in previously untreated patients and an insignificant change in generic QOL in previously treated patients. CONCLUSIONS: After 5-years from the onset of symptoms, LUTS/BPE patients previously treated with medication had significantly impaired QOL in patients in a manner comparable to other chronic diseases. Earlier intervention with minimally invasive surgical techniques (MIT) should be considered in LUTS/BPE patients that do not show a significant improvement in QOL with medical therapy.

Contemporary use of phytotherapy in patients with lower urinary tract symptoms due to benign prostatic hyperplasia: results from the EVOLUTION European registry.

BACKGROUND: To use the European Association of Urology Research Foundation (EAURF) registry data to determine the proportion of contemporary Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms associated with Benign Prostatic Enlargement (LUTS/BPE) patients prescribed phytotherapy, and to determine their subjective quality of life and clinical progression responses. METHODS: This was a prospective multicenter multinational observational registry study, conducted over 2 years. Men ≥ 50 years seeking LUTS/BPE were divided at baseline into two cohorts, presently/recently untreated patients (PUP) commencing pharmacotherapy at baseline and presently/recently treated patients (c-PTP) continuing previously received pharmacotherapy, with 24-month follow-up (FU). RESULTS: Overall, 2175 patients were enrolled with 1838 analyzed. Of the PUP cohort (n = 575), 92 (16%) received phytotherapy and 65 (71%, n = 65/92) completed 24-month FU, with France prescribing 34% (n = 30/89) the highest proportion of phytotherapy among all LUTS/BPE medications. In the c-PTP group (n = 1263), only 69 (5%) patients were using phytotherapy, falling to n = 35/69 (51%) at 24-month FU (highest in France 20% (n = 43/210)). Though defined disease progression occurred in ≤ 20%, with only 1% proceeding to surgical intervention, in both groups, clinically meaningful improvement was lower and symptom persistence was higher in PUP but similar in the treated (c-PTP) patients on phytotherapy compared to the other LUTS/BPE medication. CONCLUSION: Low heterogeneous prescribing rates for phytotherapy were reported in both PUP and c-PTP cohorts over the 24-month FU. Although phytotherapy led to subjective improvements, healthcare practitioners should prescribe them with caution until higher quality evidence and guideline recommendations supporting its use are available.

[Alpha-blockers or phytotherapy as first-line treatment of LUTS/BPH in general medicine: The PERSAT non-interventional study]. / Alpha-bloquants ou phytothérapie en traitement de première intention des SBAU/HBP en médecine générale : l'étude non interventionnelle PERSAT.

PURPOSE: The objective of the PERSAT study was to evaluate first-line treatment of BPH-associated LUTS in real-life conditions. METHODS: This prospective observational study was conducted in France by general practitioners (GP) on patients with moderate to severe LUTS (IPSS ≥12). GPs freely decided to prescribe either an alpha-blocker (AB) or phytotherapeutic treatment (PT). The main criterion was the percentage of responding patients (decrease in total IPSS score ≥3) at 6 months. RESULTS: Of the 849 patients included, 759 were analysed (381 treated with AB and 378 with PT); 718 were followed up at 6 months, 90% of which had no treatment modification. Their inclusion characteristics were similar between the AB and PT groups (mean IPSS: 18.6±4.5 and 17.8±4.1, respectively). Treatment response rates at 6 months were 94.2% [91.2%; 96.4%] in AB and 92.5% [89.2%; 95.1%] in PT. The IPSS decreased by 10.0±5.6 points, with no difference between groups. The proportion of patients bothered by their LUTS (IPSS-QoL ≥4) evolved from 88.5% to 6.5% at 6 months. The improvement of LUTS was perceived by more than 94% of patients (PGI-I) and doctors (CGI-I), 93% of patients were satisfied with the treatment at 6 months, regardless of the treatment initiated. The most reported adverse reactions were ejaculation disorder (3.9% for AB and 0.9% for PT). CONCLUSION: PERSAT confirms in current practice the effectiveness of AB and PT treatments, recommended as first-line treatment in LUTS/BPH. LEVEL OF PROOF: 3.

[Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on surgical activity within academic urological departments in Paris]. / Impact de la pandémie de COVID-19 sur l'activité chirurgicale au sein des services d'urologie de l'Assistance Publique ­ Hôpitaux de Paris.

INTRODUCTION: As a result of the COVID-19 pandemic in France, all non-emergency surgical activity has been cancelled since March 12, 2020. In order to anticipate the reinstatement of delayed interventions, surgical activity reduction analysis is essential. The objective of this study was to evaluate the reduction of urological surgery in adult during the COVID-19 pandemic compared to 2019. MATERIAL: The data regarding urological procedures realized in the 8 academic urological departments of Parisians centres (AP-HP) were compared over two similar periods (14-29 March 2019 and 12-27 March 2020) using the centralized surgical planning software shared by these centres. Procedure title, type of surgery and outpatient ratio were collected. The interventions were sorted into 16 major families of urological interventions. RESULTS: Overall, a 55% decrease was observed concerning urological procedures over the same period between 2019 and 2020 (995 and 444 procedures respectively). Oncology activity and emergencies decreased by 31% and 44%. The number of kidney transplantations decreased from 39 to 3 (-92%). Functional, andrological and genital surgical procedures were the most impacted among the non-oncological procedures (-85%, -81% and -71%, respectively). Approximatively, 1033 hours of surgery have been delayed during this 16-day period. CONCLUSION: Lockdown and postponement of non-urgent scheduled urological procedures decisions has led to a drastic decrease in surgical activity in AP-HP. Isolated kidney transplantation has been stopped (national statement). Urologists must anticipate for lockdown exit in order to catch-up delayed surgeries. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

[When to introduce hormone therapy after total prostatectomy with positive lymph nodes? Study of the factors influencing the time of introduction of hormone therapy]. / Quand introduire une hormonothérapie après prostatectomie totale avec curage ganglionnaire positif ? Étude des facteurs influençant le délai d'introduction de l'hormonothérapie.

INTRODUCTION: Adjuvant hormone therapy is the standard treatment after total prostatectomy with positive lymph node. However, this treatment has side effects and at the time of the PSA era and extensive lymph node dissection, this principle is questioned. The aim of this study is to describe the oncological characteristics of patients that may explain the delay in introducing hormone therapy in patients with positive lymph node. METHODS: Monocentric, retrospective study of 161 patients from November 1988 to February 2018 in a single French University Hospital, having undergone radical prostatectomy with positive lymph nodes on pathology. For each patient, preoperative data (age, clinical stage, biopsy results, d'Amico classification) and postoperative data (pathological results, number of lymph nodes removed, number of positive lympnodes, recurrence free survival, specific survival and overall survival) were collected. The date of introduction of hormone therapy was noted and survival without hormonal therapy was established according to the Kaplan Meier curve. The pre- and post-operative oncological factors that could influence hormone therapy introduction were investigated with Chi2 and Student tests (statistically significant when P<0.05). RESULTS: The mean number of lymph nodes removed was 12 [1-40]. The mean number of positive lymph nodes was 2.5 [1-24], the mean percentage of positive lymph nodes was 25% (2.5-100). After a mean follow-up of 95 months (3-354), 88 patients (54.6%) had no hormonal treatment. The average time to hormonal treatment was 40 months [0-310]. At 3 years, survival without hormone therapy was 52% and 51% at 5 years. Only the percentage of positive lymphnodes appeared to be a significant predictor of the introduction of hormone therapy. (29.32% vs. 21.99%, P=0.047). Hormone-free survival was significantly higher in patients with lymph node involvement less than 25% (P<0.0001) or with less than 2 positive lymph nodes (P=0.0294). CONCLUSION: Lymph node invasion is a factor of poor prognosis after total prostatectomy and leads to introduce hormone therapy. Our study identified the percentage and number of positive lymph nodes as factors that identify patients who may be delayed in introducing this hormone therapy. LEVEL OF PROOF: 3.

[Interest of a systematic assessment of the treatment of the lower urinary tract symptoms in the management of benign prostatic hypertrophy in general practice (1380 patients) - Study EVALURO]. / Intérêt d'une évaluation systématique du traitement des symptômes du bas appareil urinaire dans la prise en charge d'une hypertrophie bénigne de la prostate en médecine générale (1380 patients) ­ Étude EVALURO.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of a modification or initiation of treatment by a α-blocker in patients already medically treated for BPH-related LUTS, with persistent urinary symptoms. METHODS: This is a prospective observational study among general practitioners in France. Included patients were over 60 years of age with BPH-related LUTS who had been medically treated for at least 6 months. A treatment by an α-blocker was initiated or modified if the PGI-I (Patient Global Impression of Improvement) did not objective any improvement under treatment and the IPSS (International Prostate Symptom Score) was≥8. Patients were followed up between 1 and 3 months after inclusion. The primary endpoint was the frequency of unsatisfactory progression of patients, assessed by persistence of urinary symptoms under treatment (IPSS≥8 and PGI-I unchanged or worsened). Progress of LUTS (IPSS and PGI-I) following modification of treatment with α-blocker was also assessed at the follow-up visit. RESULTS: Three hundred and fifty-three physicians included 1449 patients between February 2, 2016 and March 9, 2017 (1380 patients were analyzed): the average age was 70.0±6.9 years ; the duration of the LUTS was 4.1±4.2 years; at inclusion, they received mainly plants (n=744; 53.9%) and α-blockers (n=463; 33.6%); the mean IPSS score was 16.4±6.7, it was not correlated with duration of SBAU; the mean PGi-I was 2.6±1.2. In total, 48.8% (612/1255) of patients had a non-satisfactory evaluation of the LUTS; 42.8% (591/1380) of patients had a modification of treatment according to the protocol: 385 (65.6%) had an initiation of a α-blocker, 202 (34.4%) had a modification of treatment by α-blocker (4 missing data). The α-blocker was monotherapy for 484 (81.9%) patients. At the follow-up visit (1 to 3 months), the average IPSS score was 7.7±4.8, significantly lower (18.7±6.1 at inclusion); the average PGI-I of 1.2±0.7 was significantly lower (3.5±0.8 at inclusion); the quality of life (Q8-IPSS) was significantly improved. For the 345 patients under plant extracts having changed for one α-blocker, as well as for the 67 patients under α-blocker having changed for another α-blocker, the 3 scores had decreased significantly. CONCLUSION: A systematic evaluation of medical treatment for BPH showed that 48.8% of patients medically treated for at least 6 months were not improved. A modification of treatment by an α-blocker (initiation or modification) can then significantly improve the LUTS.

Medical therapy versus transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) for the treatment of symptomatic benign prostatic enlargement (BPE): a cost minimisation analysis.

PURPOSE: A cost minimisation analysis compares the costs of different interventions' to ascertain the least expensive over time. We compared different prostate targeted drug treatments with TURP to identify the optimal cost saving duration of a medical therapy for symptomatic benign prostatic enlargement (BPE). METHODS: The Evolution registry is a prospective, multicentre registry, conducted by the European Association of Urology Research Foundation (EAUrf) for 24 months in 5 European countries. Evolution was designed to register the management of symptomatic BPE in clinical practice settings in 5 European countries. Direct cost evaluation associated with prostate targeted medical therapies and TURP was also recorded and analysed. RESULTS: In total, 1838 men were enrolled with 1246 evaluable at 24 months. Medical therapies were more cost saving than TURP for treatment durations ranging from 2.9 to 70.4 years. Cost saving depended on both medication class and individual country assessed. Daily tamsulosin monotherapy was more cost saving than TURP for ≤ 13.9 years in Germany compared to ≤ 32.7 years in Italy. Daily finasteride monotherapy was more cost saving for ≤ 5.9 years in France compared to ≤ 36.9 years in Spain. Combination therapy was more cost saving for ≤ 5.9 years for Italian patients versus ≤ 13.8 years in Germany. CONCLUSIONS: BPE medical management was more cost saving than TURP for different specific treatment durations. Information from this study will allow clinicians to convey medical and surgical costs over time, to both patients and payors alike, when considering BPE treatment.

Migration in last decade to high-risk prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy.

OBJECTIVE: There is controversy around prostate cancer (PCa) screening through the use of PSA, due to the risk of overtreatment. The current trend observed in various European and American studies is a decrease in the number of radical prostatectomy (RP) in low-risk PCa and an increase for intermediate or locally advanced diseases. The objective of this study was to observe the migration of the pathological stages from radical prostatectomy (RP) over 10 years in France through 2 French centers. METHODS: It was a multicentric retrospective study, where all the RP realized in 2 French tertiary centers, in a laparoscopic or retropubic approach for each of the years 2005, 2010 and 2015 were included. Preoperative data (age, PSA, clinical stage, number of positive biopsies, Gleason biopsy score) and postoperative data (pTNM, pathological Gleason score (pGS)) were analyzed and compared. RESULTS: In all, 1282 RP were realized (503 in 2005, 403 in 2010, 376 in 2015). Respectively between 2005, 2010, 2015 the average number of positive biopsy increased significantly from 2.30 vs. 2.88 vs. 5.3 (P=0.0001). The distribution of D'Amico's risk evolves with time: low-risk: 49.9 vs. 44.4 vs. 15.7% (P=0.0001); intermediate risk: 40.95 vs. 43.92 vs. 64.1% (P=0.0001) and high-risk: 9.15 vs. 11.66 vs. 20.2% (P=0.0001) between 2005, 2010 and 2015 respectively. pGS evolved to higher score with SG<7: 22.8 vs. 29.9 vs. 7.1% et SG≥7: 77.2 vs. 70.1 vs. 92.9% (P=0.001). Also, pTNM increased to non-organ-confined disease: pT2: 66.9 vs. 51.9 vs. 48.7%; pT3: 33.1 vs. 48.1 vs. 51.3% (P=0.0001). CONCLUSION: This study showed a change in the management of PCa since new recommendations from medical authorities about PSA screening and evolving of conservative treatment. Number of RP increase for higher risk PCa. This change corresponds to better patient selection for RP: decrease for low-risk and increase for high-risk organ-confined disease. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

[Surgical treatment of BPO: Standard and innovations]. / Traitements chirurgicaux de l'obstruction prostatique bénigne : standards et innovations.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: Surgical management of benign prostatic hyperplasia has dramatically changed in the recent years towards higher proportion of endoscopic treatment and fewer perioperative complications. Nevertheless the question of urinary and sexual quality of life after surgical treatment remains partially unresolved with a high proportion of retrograde ejaculation after conventional surgical treatments. Therefore mini-invasive alternatives to conventional surgery have been proposed. The objective of this literature review was to provide an overview of the alternatives to monopolar TURP currently available in France. MATERIAL AND METHOD: A non-systematic review of the scientific literature was conducted from the PubMed database to retrieve the most relevant scientific publications. A first research was cross-referenced with the results of literature reviews already published and enriched by the authors of this review. A synthesis is proposed for each alternative technique mentioning its level of clinical development, but also its potential advantages and disadvantages compared to conventional surgical techniques. RESULTS: The quality of life of patients after surgical or interventional management has become the main priority of urologists since the risks of perioperative complication have been reduced by the use of laser or bipolar endoscopic techniques. Thanks to the development of minimally invasive alternatives that are better and better evaluated by randomized trials versus interventional simulation and conventional surgical treatment, more personalized care is possible. Patients' expectations and their individual risk factors can thus be placed at the center of the therapeutic decision and the preoperative information. CONCLUSION: The surgical and interventional management of LUTS due to BPH has evolved to lower perioperative morbidity with the help of numerous technological developments. Mini-invasive alternatives to standard treatment have also been proposed in order to improve the quality of postoperative sexual life. These alternatives provide significant improvement in LUTS that remains lower than after conventional treatments. Somme of these alternative are also not fully supported by clinical trials, which should urge urologists to act with caution when proposing these alternatives in daily clinical practice.