Anastomotic bleeding from invaginated pancreaticogastrostomy following pancreatoduodenectomy: incidence, risk factors, treatment and prevention.

BACKGROUND: Meta-analysis of 10 randomized prospective trials demonstrated a higher risk of postoperative bleeding from pancreaticogastrostomy (PG) compared with pancreatojejunostomy following pancreatoduodenectomy (PD). This study evaluated the incidence, risk factors, and treatment of anastomotic bleeding from invaginated PG. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated all consecutive PDs performed between April 1, 2011 and December 31, 2022 using invaginated PG by the double purse-string technique. Multivariate analysis identified risk factors for anastomotic PG bleeding. RESULTS: During the study, 695 consecutive patients with a median age of 66 years underwent PD; the majority was performed for ductal pancreatic adenocarcinomas. Simultaneous vascular resections were performed in 328 patients. Postoperative mortality was 4.1%. Bleeding from PG occurred in 33(4.6%) patients at a median interval of 5 days (range, 1-14) from surgery, leading to reoperation in 21(63%). PG bleeding-related mortality was 9.0%. Multivariate analyses identified a soft pancreatic texture and Wirsung duct > 3 or ≤ 3 mm (Class C and D, respectively, of the ISGPS) (odds ratio [OR]: 2.17, 95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 1.38-3.44; P = 0.0009) and wrapping of the invaginated pancreas (OR: 0.37, 95% CI: 0.17-0.84; P = 0.01) as independent risk factors for PG bleeding. CONCLUSIONS: In a large volume setting, anastomotic bleeding from invaginated PG occurred in ~ 5% of patients and was associated with soft pancreatic parenchyma and small wirsung duct. The reduced rate of PG bleeding observed with wrapping of the invaginated pancreatic stump warrants further evaluation in a prospective randomized study.

Ante Situm Liver Resection for Tumors Invading the Inferior Vena Cava Hepatic Vein Confluence.

BACKGROUND: Liver malignancy invading the retrohepatic inferior vena cava beyond the cavo-hepatic vein venous confluence can be resected by an ante situm technique first described by Hannoun et al.1 In this approach, a major hepatectomy is performed and the hepatic veins are sectioned to allow the inferior vena cava reconstruction while the liver is cold perfused and the liver remains within the abdominal cavity. The hepatic vein is then reimplanted on the reconstructed inferior vena cava in "a liver autotransplantation fashion." PATIENT AND METHODS: The patient was a 66-year-old with a recurrent adrenocortical carcinoma cancer invading the right liver and the retrohepatic inferior vena cava with intraluminal thrombus extending beyond to the hepatic vein confluence. A right hepatectomy extended to segment 1 and the retrohepatic inferior vena cava was planned because of the intracaval tumoral thrombus and the infiltration of the right liver. The future liver remnant (FLR) (646 cc) to total liver volume (1526 cc) ratios was 42% while the FLR to patient weight ratio was 0.9%. RESULTS: The parenchymal liver transection was performed under a total vascular exclusion, venovenous bypass, and hypothermic perfusion of the left liver.2 The common trunk of the left and middle hepatic veins was sectioned, allowing the liver to be rotated toward the left. Vena cava reconstruction was achieved by a ringed Gore-Tex prosthesis, with reimplantation of the left and middle hepatic veins directly over the prosthesis. Surgery lasted 580 min, total duration of venovenous bypass and liver vascular exclusion was 143 min and 140 min, respectively. Blood loss was 2 liters and 8 red blood cell (RBC) units were transfused. The patient spent 5 days in the ICU, liver function tests normalized by postoperative day 8 and patient was discharged home on postoperative day 20; 1 year later, the patient is alive and disease free under mitotane treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The ante situm technique represents a safe surgical option for complex liver resection for malignancy involving the cavo-hepatic venous confluence. Compared with the ex situ liver resection, this technique allows liver remnant outflow reconstruction to be performed while the liver is cold perfused within the abdominal cavity with an intact hepatic pedicle.

Minimally invasive versus open distal pancreatectomy for resectable pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: A propensity score matched multicentric comparative French study.

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive surgery has gained momentum for left pancreatic resections. However, debate remains about whether it has any advantage over open surgery for distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. METHODS: This retrospective review examined pancreatectomies performed for resectable pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors at 21 centers in France between January 2014 and December 2018. Short and long-term outcomes were compared before and after propensity score matching based on tumor size, sex, age, body mass index, center, and method of pancreatic transection. RESULTS: During the period study, 274 patients underwent left pancreatic resection for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors [109 underwent distal splenopancreatectomy, and 165 underwent spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy [(splenic vessel preservation (n = 97; 58.7%)/splenic vessel resection (n = 68; 41.3%)]. Before propensity score matching, minimally invasive surgery was associated with a lower rate of major morbidity (P = .004), lower rate of postoperative delayed gastric emptying (P = .04), and higher rate of "textbook" outcomes (P = .04). After propensity score matching, there were 2 groups of 54 patients (n = 30 distal splenopancreatectomy; n = 78 spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy). Minimally invasive surgery was associated with less blood loss (P = .05), decreased rate of major morbidity (6% vs. 24%; P = .02), less delayed gastric emptying (P = .05) despite similar rates of postoperative fistula, hemorrhage, and reoperation (P > .05). The 5-year overall survival (79% vs. 75%; P = .74) and recurrence-free survival (10% vs 17%; P = .39) were similar. CONCLUSION: Minimally invasive surgery for left pancreatic resection can be safely proposed for patients with resectable left pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Minimally invasive surgery decreases the rate of major complications while providing comparable long-term oncologic outcomes.

Graft reduction in adult liver transplantation: indications, techniques, and outcomes.

PURPOSE: Graft reduction can be a patient's graft-saving option to avoid large-for-size (LFS) syndrome. This study aimed to summarize the literature on graft reduction in adult liver transplantation and to demonstrate the technique of H67 graft hepatectomy. METHODS: The technique, shown in a didactical video, entails an ex situ posterior sectionectomy under hypothermic perfusion. The right hepatic vein is identified, and the transection line follows the right hepatic fissure. The Glissonean pedicles are ligated during parenchymal transection. RESULTS: A narrative review of the literature yielded 7 studies. A total of 15 liver grafts were reduced in adult liver transplantations. Most of the reductions were ex situ (11/15 [73.3%]). Graft reduction entailed an H67 sectionectomy in 10 cases and an H23 sectionectomy in 1 case. In situ reduction included 1 right hepatectomy (H5678), 2 H67 sectionectomies, and 1 H23 left lateral sectionectomy. The duration of the ex situ reduction averaged 56 minutes (median: 40.5 minutes; IQR, 33.0-130.0), and the graft weight-to-recipient weight ratio decreased from 3.57% ± 0.40% to 2.70% ± 0.50% after graft reduction. The average cold ischemia time was 390 minutes (IQR, 230-570). There was no liver retransplantation. CONCLUSION: Graft reduction in adult liver transplantation may be necessary to avoid LFS syndrome. Ex-situ H67 posterior sectionectomy represents the easiest graft reduction hepatectomy and is able to minimize the occurrence of graft compression while leaving enough functional liver parenchyma.

Volumetric Remodeling of the Left Liver After Right Hepatectomy: Analysis of Factors Predicting Degree of Hypertrophy and Post-hepatectomy Liver Failure.

BACKGROUND: This study investigated the volumetric remodeling of the left liver after right hepatectomy looking for factors predicting the degree of hypertrophy and severe post-hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF). METHODS: In a cohort of 121 right hepatectomies, we performed CT volumetrics study of the future left liver remnant (FLR) preoperatively and postoperatively. Factors influencing FLR degree of hypertrophy and severe PHLF were identified by multivariate analysis. RESULTS: After right hepatectomy, the mean degree of hypertrophy and kinetic growth rate of the left liver remnant were 25% and 3%/day respectively. The mean liver volume recovery rate was 77%. Liver remodeling volume was distributed for 79% on segments 2 and 3 and 21% on the segment 4 (p<0.001). Women showed a greater hypertrophy of segments 2 and 3 compared with men (p=0.002). The degree of hypertrophy of segment 4 was lower in case of middle hepatic vein resection (p=0.004). Left liver remnant kinetic growth rate was associated with the standardized future liver remnant (sFLR) (p<0.001) and a two-stage hepatectomy (p=0.023). Severe PHLF were predicted by intraoperative transfusion (p=0.009), biliary tumors (p=0.013), and male gender (p=0.022). CONCLUSIONS: Volumetric remodeling of the left liver after right hepatectomy is not uniform and is mainly influenced by gender and sacrifice of middle hepatic vein. Male gender, intraoperative transfusion, and biliary tumors increase the risk of postoperative liver failure after right hepatectomy.

Extended Right Hepatectomy to Inferior Vena Cava Under Total Vascular Exclusion, Veno-Venous Bypass and In Situ Hypothermic Perfusion of the Future Liver Remnant.

BACKGROUND: Venous obstruction at the hepatic veins-inferior vena cava confluence can be particularly challenging to manage if an associated liver resection is needed. Total vascular exclusion (TVE) with veno-venous bypass (VVB) and hypothermic in situ perfusion (HP) of the future liver remnant can be used in these conditions.1,2 METHODS: The patient was a 58-year-old with a voluminous adrenal cancer invading the kidney, the right liver and the retrohepatic inferior vena cava with intraluminal thrombus extending up to the hepatic veins confluence. A right hepatectomy, extended to segment 1, the right kidney, and the retrohepatic inferior vena cava was planned. RESULTS: The parenchymal liver transection was performed under a TVE, VVB, and HP of the left liver to decrease blood losses and risk of postoperative liver failure. Vena cava reconstruction was achieved by a ringed Gore-Tex prosthesis with reimplantation of the left renal vein. Total duration of veno-venous bypass and liver vascular exclusion were 2 h 40 min and 2 h 10 min, respectively. The patient was discharged on postoperative day 17. CONCLUSIONS: Total vascular exclusion with veno-venous bypass and in-situ liver hypothermic perfusion increases the safety of major liver resection requiring complex vascular reconstruction.1,2 TVE under VVB and HP of the future liver remnant is used at our institution when: (1) TVE will last more than 30 min; (2) vascular reconstruction is needed; (3) in the presence of venous obstruction; (4) in the presence of injured liver parenchyma; and (5) in the presence of cardiovascular comorbidities.

Incidence and outcomes of post-hepatectomy diaphragmatic hernia: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Post-hepatectomy diaphragmatic hernia is the second most common cause of acquired diaphragmatic hernia. This study aims to review the literature on this complication's incidence, treatment and prognosis. METHODS: Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, we systematically searched PubMed for all studies related to acquired diaphragmatic hernias after hepatectomy. RESULTS: We included 28 studies in our final analysis, comprising 11,368 hepatectomies. The incidence of post-hepatectomy diaphragmatic hernia was 0.75% (n = 86). The most frequent type of hepatectomy performed was right hepatectomy (79%, n = 68), and the indications for liver resection were a liver donation for living donor transplantation (n = 40), malignant liver tumors (n = 13), and benign tumors (n = 11). The mean onset between liver resection and the diagnosis of diaphragmatic hernia was 25.7 months (range, 1-72 months), and the hernia was located on the right diaphragm in 77 patients (89.5%). Pain was the most common presenting symptom (n = 52, 60.4%), while six patients were asymptomatic (6.9%). Primary repair by direct suture was the most frequently performed technique (88.3%, n = 76). Six patients experienced recurrence (6.9%), and three died before diaphragmatic hernia repair (3.5%). CONCLUSION: Diaphragmatic hernia is a rare complication occurring mainly after right liver resection. Repair should be performed once detected, given the not-negligible associated mortality in the emergency setting.

Sequential Y90 liver radioembolization and portal vein embolization: an additional strategy to downstage liver tumors and to enhance liver hypertrophy before major hepatectomies.

BACKGROUND: Yttrium (Y)90 liver radioembolization (TARE) induces both tumor downsizing and contralateral liver hypertrophy. In this study, we report the preliminary results of a sequential strategy combining Y90 radioembolization and portal vein embolization (PVE) before major right liver resections. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed clinical, radiological, and biological data of 5 consecutive patients undergoing Y90 TARE-PVE before major right liver resections. Comparison was made with patients undergoing PVE alone or liver venous deprivation (LVD) during the same period. RESULTS: Between January 2019 and September 2022, five patients underwent sequential TARE-PVE. Type of resection included the following: right hepatectomy (n = 1), right hepatectomy + 1 (n = 2), and right hepatectomy + 1 + 4 (n = 2) with no postoperative mortality. Volumetric data showed a mean hypertrophy ratio of 30.4% after TARE and an additional 37.4% after sequential PVE. Patients undergoing sequential TARE-PVE had higher hypertrophy ratio (p = 0.02; p = 0.004), hypertrophy degree (p = 0.02; p < 0.0001), shorter time to normalize bilirubin (p = 0.04), and prothrombin time (p = 0.003; p < 0.0001) compared with patients receiving LVD or PVE. Time from diagnosis to surgery was statistically significant longer in patients undergoing sequential TARE-PVE compared with LVD or PVE (293.4 ± 169.1 vs 54.18 ±18.26 vs 58.62±13.15; p = 0.0008; p = <0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: This preliminary report suggests that sequential PVE and TARE can represent a safe and an alternative strategy to downstage liver tumors and to enhance liver hypertrophy before major hepatectomies. When compared with PVE and LVD, sequential TARE/PVE takes longer times but achieves some advantages which warrant further evaluation in a larger setting.

Predicting Limited Survival After Resection of Synchronous Colorectal Liver Metastases: a Propensity Score Matched Comparison Between The Primary First And The Simultaneous Strategy.

BACKGROUND: The best surgical approach to treat synchronous colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) remains unclear. Here, we aimed to identify prognostic factors associated with limited survival comparing patients undergoing primary-first resection (PF) and simultaneous resection (SR) approaches. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed clinical data of 217 patients who underwent resection for synchronous CRLMs between January 1, 2011, and December 31, 2021. There were 133 (61.2%) PF resection and 84 (38.8%) SRS. The two groups of patients were compared using propensity score matching (PSM) analysis and cox analysis was performed to identify prognostic factors for overall survival (OS). RESULTS: After PSM, two groups of 71 patients were compared. Patients undergoing SR had longer operative time (324 ± 104 min vs 250 ± 101 min; p < 0.0001), similar transfusion (33.3% vs 28.1%; p = 0.57), and similar complication rates (35.9% vs 27.2%; p = 0.34) than patients undergoing PF. The median overall survival and 5-year survival rates were comparable (p = 0.94) between patients undergoing PF (48.2 months and 44%) and patients undergoing SR (45.9 months and 30%). Multivariate Cox analysis identified pre-resection elevated CEA levels (HR: 2.38; 95% CI: 1.20-4.70; P = .01), left colonic tumors (HR: 0.34; 95% CI: 0.17-0.68; P = .002), and adjuvant treatment (HR: 0.43; 95% CI: 0.22-0.83; P = .01) as independent prognostic factors for OS. CONCLUSIONS: In the presence of synchronous CRLM, right colonic tumors, persistent high CEA levels before surgery, and the absence of adjuvant treatment identified patients characterized by a limited survival rate after resection. The approach used (PF vs SR) does not influence short and long-term outcomes.

Ascending aorta cannulation for isolated liver procurement in extended criteria donors: a safe option in case of massive infrarenal aortic atherosclerosis.

The chronic organ shortage and the increased number of patients on the waiting list for liver transplantation have led to a progressive increase in the use of extended criteria donors. Nowadays more and more overweight donors with several comorbidities are selected for donation providing acceptable patient and liver graft survival. These donors have often aortic atherosclerosis which can spare the hepatic artery making suitable the liver for procurement. Massive aortic atherosclerosis localized to infrarenal aorta can challenge aortic cannulation for organ cooling. We herein describe in a stepwise approach the aortic cannulation realized at the ascending aorta level in case of massive infrarenal aortic atherosclerosis in ECD donors. This technique represents a safe option when abdominal aorta is not suitable for cannulation and it should be included into the surgical armamentarium of liver transplant surgeon.

Pancreatectomy After Neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX Chemotherapy: Identifying Factors Predicting Long-Term Survival.

INTRODUCTION: We aimed to evaluate the long-term outcomes of the association of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with pancreatectomy with vascular resection in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer. METHODS: Clinical data from patients who underwent pancreatic resection after neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX were retrospectively reviewed. Cox analyses were used to identify factors prognostic of overall survival (OS). RESULTS: FOLFIRINOX protocol was administered pre-operatively with a median number of nine cycles (range 2-18) in 98 patients. Types of resections included pancreaticoduodenectomy (n = 53), total pancreatectomy (n = 17), and distal spleno-pancreatectomy (n = 28). Venous resection and arterial resections were performed in 85 (86.7%) and 64 patients (65.3%), respectively. The overall 90-day mortality and morbidity rates were 6.1% (n = 6) and 47% (n = 47), respectively. The median OS was 31.08 months after surgery. OS rates at one, three, five, and 10 years were 82%, 47%, 28%, and 21%, respectively. According to the type of vascular resection, median OS and 5-year survival rates were exclusive venous resection (31.08 months; 23%) and arterial resections (24.7 months; 27%). Multivariate Cox analysis found lymph node involvement, venous invasion, and total pancreatectomy as independent prognostic factors for OS. According to the presence of 0 or 1-3 risk factors, 5-year survival (85% vs 16%) and median overall survival rates (not reached versus 24.7 months, respectively) were statistically significantly different (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: A multimodal treatment, including neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX combined with pancreatectomy with venous and arterial resection, achieves long term survival rates in patients with locally advanced disease. Surgery, in experienced centers, should be integrated into the treatment of patients with locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinomas.

Upper Transversal Hepatectomy with Two Hepatic Veins Reconstruction: Combining Parenchymal-Sparing Liver Surgery with Transplantation Techniques for Colorectal Liver Metastases.

BACKGROUND: Colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) involving two or three main hepatic veins pose a surgical challenge. For these lesions, compelled surgical strategies have usually included major and/or extended liver resections according to the two-stage hepatectomy (TSH) strategy. More recently, a one-stage transversal hepatectomy resecting the posterosuperior liver segment (7,8,4 superior) along with one or more hepatic veins has been described, such as showed herein in a didactical video. METHODS: The patient is a 78-year-old woman with two large CRLMs located into segment 2 and into segment 8. Magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography showed tumour stability after chemotherapy. The lesion of segment 2 is close to the left hepatic vein while the lesion of segment 8 infiltrates the middle (MHV) and the right hepatic veins (RHV). RESULTS: Under intermittent pedicular clamping, resection of the segment 7, 8, 4 superior along with the right and middle hepatic veins is performed. Reconstruction of the veins was performed with 2 cryopreserved autologous saphenous grafts. Postoperative course was uneventful and postoperative CT scan showed patency of the two venous graft reconstructions. CONCLUSIONS: Surgery for CRLM has evolved over the last two decades shifting from large anatomical resections to parenchymal-sparing resections. Sparing liver parenchyma allows surgical radicality while reducing the risk of liver failure and allowing repeated liver resection. Associating vascular reconstruction to parenchymal-sparing surgery reduces the risk of venous congestion of the spared liver parenchyma.

Sarcopenia remaining after intensive nutritional feeding support could be a criterion for the selection of patients for surgery for oesogastric junction adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Sarcopenia is recognized as a negative prognostic factor in several cancers. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of nutritional support with feeding jejunostomy (FJ) on the occurrence of sarcopenia and how it may affect postoperative short-term outcomes and long-term survival outcomes in patients undergoing esophagectomy for oesogastric junction adenocarcinoma (OJA). METHODS: Patients with OJA were included. The presence of sarcopenia was determined using cutoff values of the total cross-sectional muscle tissue measured on CT scan. We analyzed risk factors for sarcopenia occurrence and the impact of preoperative sarcopenia on postoperative results, overall survival and disease-free survival. RESULTS: A total of 124 patients were eligible for analysis. Ninety-one patients underwent surgery after chemotherapy, and 72 of them received preoperative FJ. Among the 91 patients, 21 patients (23.0%) were sarcopenic after preoperative chemotherapy. Multivariate analysis showed that FJ is a protective factor against sarcopenia occurrence. Overall survival was significantly different between sarcopenic and nonsarcopenic patients (median survival = 33.7 vs. 58.6 months, respectively, p = 0.04), and sarcopenia occurrence was an independent risk factor for overall survival in patients who underwent surgery (HR = 3.02; CI 95% 1.55-5.9; p < 0.005). Subgroup analyses showed no differences in overall survival between patients who presented sarcopenia despite nutritional prehabilitation with a FJ and patients excluded from surgery in palliative situations (median survival = 21.9 vs. 17.2 months, respectively, p = 0.46). CONCLUSION: The persistence of sarcopenia after preoperative chemotherapy despite renutrition with FJ could be a selection factor to propose curative surgery for OJA.