Another Use for EUS: Removal of a Transesophageal-Migrated Mediastinal Foreign Body.

Removal of foreign bodies from the upper gastrointestinal tract, though a common occurrence, can be technically challenging and risky. We report the case of a young man that, after eating a pizza cooked in a wood-burning oven, reported a sense of foreign body. Though the first evaluation by fiberoptic laryngoscopy found no foreign body, after a few weeks, the patient was readmitted from the ER for worsening symptoms and fever. A CT scan showed a metallic mediastinal foreign body inside a large fluid collection. After multidisciplinary evaluation, an endoscopic removal was attempted by accessing the mediastinal collection through EUS-guided positioning of a Hot Axios™ stent. The cavity was drained by naso-esophageal suction. The foreign body was a fragment of the brush used to clean the oven. The patient is now doing well after 7 months.

Abdominal aortic bifurcation anatomy and endograft limb size affect the use of adjunctive iliac stenting after bifurcated endograft deployment for abdominal aortic aneurysm.

BACKGROUND: The aims of the study are: 1) to define the incidence of intraoperative endograft limb stenosis >50% (ELS) after bifurcated EVAR, 2) to find risk factors for ELS considering morphology of aortic bifurcation and structural characteristics of endograft iliac limbs, and 3) to evaluate early and follow-up outcomes of intraoperative adjunctive endograft iliac stenting. METHODS: Patients treated with bifurcated EVAR for abdominal aortic aneurysm were prospectively collected from 2005 to 2011. Patient demographics, clinical risk factors, preoperative aortic bifurcation morphology (minimum and maximum diameter [ABD], calcification [ABC]), endograft iliac limb parameters (diameters [ELDs], stent material, type of endograft), ratio between ELDs and ABD), perioperative ELS and results during follow-up were analyzed. Primary outcomes were incidence of perioperative ELS and risk factors for its occurrence. Considering adjunctive stenting procedure, secondary outcomes were technical success, 30-day and mid-term iliac endograft leg patency and clinical success. RESULTS: Two hundred and forty-seven patients (men 233; mean age 74±7 years) were included. Mean maximum ABD was 28.9±12.9 mm. ABC was ≥50% in 56 (22.7%) cases. Median sum of ELDs was 31 mm (IQR 13-46). Endograft limb with stainless steel and nitinol stents was deployed in 69 (27.9%) and 178 (72.1%) patients. Median ELDs/ABD ratio was 1.2 (IQR: 0.9-1.5). ELS in aortic bifurcation occurred in 42 (8.5%) endograft limbs in 36 (14.6%) patients. ABD≤20 mm, ABC≥50%, ELDs≥30 mm, nitinol endograft stents and ELDs/ABD>1.4 were identified as possible positive predictive factors. At univariate and multivariate analysis, ELDs/ABD>1.4 resulted a positive prognostic factor for ELS (0.008 and 0.022, respectively). Forty-two adjunctive stents were deployed in 36 (14.6%) patients as intraoperative adjunctive procedure. Technical success, 30-day iliac endograft leg patency was 100%. Mean follow-up was 33 months (range 6-55 months) and mid-term clinical success and iliac endograft limb patency were 100%. CONCLUSIONS: ELS is a common event after EVAR with bifurcated endograft and ELDs/ABD>1.4 results positive predictive factor. Adjunctive stenting is a safe and effective procedure and ensures optimal mid-term endograft limb patency.

Persistent type II endoleak after EVAR: the predictive value of the AAA thrombus volume.

BACKGROUND: Persistent type II endoleaks (ELIIp, ≥6 months) after an endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) can be associated with adverse outcomes. The aims of this study are the evaluation of the incidence of ELIIp, their preoperative morphological predictive features (PMF) and the post-EVAR abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) evolution in the presence of ELIIp. METHODS: Patients underwent EVAR between 2008 and 2010 were prospectively collected. Cases with ELIIp (group A: AG) were identified. A control group without ELIIp (group B: BG), homogeneous for clinical characteristics, follow-up timing and methods (CTA and/or CEUS at 6.12 months and yearly thereafter) was retrospectively selected. The PMF evaluated by computed-tomography-angiography (CTA) were: AAA-diameter, number and diameter of AAA efferent patent vessels (EPV), AAA-total volume (TV), AAA-thrombus volume (THV) and TV/THV rate (%VR). Volumes were calculated by the dedicated vessels analysis software. AG and BG were compared. The primary endpoint was to evaluate the incidence of ELIIp. Secondary endpoints were to analyze the relation between PMF and ELIIp and to assess the post-EVAR AAA-evolution in the presence of ELIIp. RESULTS: Between 2008 and 2010, 200 patients underwent EVAR to treat AAA electively. An ELIIp was detected in 35cases (17.5%) (AG). Twenty-seven patients (13.5%) were included in BG. An overall of 62 patients (GA+GB) were analyzed. The mean pre-operative AAA diameter and EPV were 58±11.6 mm and 5.5±1.8 mm, respectively. The mean TV and THV were 187±111.5 cc and 82±75 cc, respectively. The median %VR was 42.3%. ELIIp was correlated to EPV≥6 (χ2, p=.015) and %VR <40% (logistic regression, P=0.032). The mean follow-up was 22±9 months. Seven (20%) ELIIp spontaneously sealed and 6 (17%) required reinterventions (2 conversions to OR). There were not PMF associated to ELIIp evolution and AAA growth post-EVAR. CONCLUSIONS: ELIIp is a not rare complication and it could require re-interventions. Our data suggest that VEP≥6 or %VT<40% are risk factors for ELIIp. No PMF was able to predict the ELIIp evolution. The relative high rate of re-interventions, could suggest the need of adjunctive/preventing primary procedures in patients at high-risk for ELIIp.

Three-dimensional surgical simulation-guided navigation in thoracic surgery: a new approach to improve results in chest wall resection and reconstruction for malignant diseases.

OBJECTIVES: Oncological surgery of the chest wall should be performed to achieve free margins of at least 2 cm for metastasis or 4 cm for primary tumours. When the lesion is not visible or palpable, difficulty in identification may lead to a larger incision and a resection wider than is necessary. METHODS: We report three cases of non-palpable metastatic chest wall lesions in which the preoperative surgical planning and the intraoperative identification of the tumour, and thus the subsequent chest wall reconstruction, was supported using computer-based surgery. RESULTS: The application of high-resolution three-dimensional imaging technology and navigational systems is used in preoperative surgical planning to provide virtual simulations of a patient's skeletal changes and new soft tissue profile. Intraoperatively, a mobile navigation probe was used to identify the lesion, matching surgical landmarks and the preoperative computed tomography imaging, achieving the radical resection of the tumour with correct but not excessive surgical margins. Two patients underwent partial sternectomy followed by sternal allograft reconstruction. The third patient underwent chest wall resection followed by reconstruction using titanium bars and vicryl mesh. In all cases, the postoperative period was uneventful. After a follow-up period of 13.9 and 8 months, respectively, all patients are disease free, without complications. CONCLUSIONS: Application of navigation technology in thoracic surgery should be encouraged because it is easy to use and requires a limited learning curve.

Repeat biopsy in patients with initial diagnosis of PIN.

PURPOSE: Prostatic intra-epithelial neoplasia (PIN) is considered a pre-malignant lesion and the main precursor of invasive prostatic adenocarcinoma. A PIN diagnosis established by prostate needle biopsy poses a difficult clinical management problem. We retrospectively reviewed our three-year experience in order to identify criteria for referring patients to repeat biopsy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed the repeat biopsy records of 72 patients in whom PIN had been detected on initial US-guided needle biopsy of the prostate. All the patients had a minimum of 6 biopsy cores taken, and they all had PSA > 4 ng/ml. RESULTS: Adenocarcinoma was detected in 15 patients out of 50 (30%) with an initial diagnosis of low-grade PIN and in 10 patients out of 22 (45.4%) with high grade PIN, in 7 out of 18 (39%) in whom PSA levels had decreased during the observation interval, in 16 patients out of 46 (35%) in whom the PSA had increased and in 2 patients out of 8 (25%) with stable PSA. CONCLUSIONS: Our results seem to confirm that PIN can be considered a precursor of prostatic adenocarcinoma or a histological alteration often associated with it. Patients with low-grade PIN and particularly those with high-grade PIN should be regularly subjected to repeat biopsy at short intervals due to the high frequency of the final diagnosis of carcinoma. No agreement has been reached on the time interval between the first and the second biopsy. The PSA changes during the observation period are not a statistically significant parameter to suggest the repetition of prostatic biopsy.