Sentinel node mapping in high-intermediate and high-risk endometrial cancer: Analysis of 5-year oncologic outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: To assess 5-year oncologic outcomes of apparent early-stage high-intermediate and high-risk endometrial cancer undergoing sentinel node mapping versus systematic lymphadenectomy. METHODS: This is a multi-institutional retrospective, propensity-matched study evaluating data of high-intermediate and high-risk endometrial cancer (according to ESGO/ESTRO/ESP guidelines) undergoing sentinel node mapping versus systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy (with and without para-aortic lymphadenectomy). Survival outcomes were assessed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazard methods. RESULTS: Overall, the charts of 242 patients with high-intermediate and high-risk endometrial cancer were retrieved. Data on 73 (30.1%) patients undergoing hysterectomy plus sentinel node mapping were analyzed. Forty-two (57.5%) and 31 (42.5%) patients were classified in the high-intermediate and high-risk groups, respectively. Unilateral sentinel node mapping was achieved in all patients. Bilateral mapping was achieved in 67 (91.7%) patients. Three (4.1%) patients had site-specific lymphadenectomy (two pelvic areas only and one pelvic plus para-aortic area), while adjunctive nodal dissection was omitted in the hemipelvis of the other three (4.1%) patients. Sentinel nodes were detected in the para-aortic area in eight (10.9%) patients. Twenty-four (32.8%) patients were diagnosed with nodal disease. A propensity-score matching was used to compare the aforementioned group of patients undergoing sentinel node mapping with a group of patients undergoing lymphadenectomy. Seventy patient pairs were selected (70 having sentinel node mapping vs. 70 having lymphadenectomy). Patients undergoing sentinel node mapping experienced similar 5-year disease-free survival (HR: 1.233; 95%CI: 0.6217 to 2.444; p = 0.547, log-rank test) and 5-year overall survival (HR: 1.505; 95%CI: 0.6752 to 3.355; p = 0.256, log-rank test) than patients undergoing lymphadenectomy. CONCLUSIONS: Sentinel node mapping does not negatively impact 5-year outcomes of high-intermediate and high-risk endometrial cancer. Further prospective studies are warranted.

Incidence of sentinel lymph node metastases in apparent early-stage endometrial cancer: a multicenter observational study.

OBJECTIVE: Ultrastaging is accurate in detecting nodal metastases, but increases costs and may not be necessary in certain low-risk subgroups. In this study we examined the risk of nodal involvement detected by sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy in a large population of apparent early-stage endometrial cancer and stratified by histopathologic characteristics. Furthermore, we aimed to identify a subgroup in which ultrastaging may be omitted. METHODS: We retrospectively included patients who underwent SLN (with bilateral mapping and no empty nodal packets on final pathology) ± systematic lymphadenectomy for apparent early-stage endometrial cancer at two referral cancer centers. Lymph node status was determined by SLN only, regardless of non-SLN findings. The incidence of macrometastasis, micrometastasis, and isolated tumor cells (ITC) was measured in the overall population and after stratification by histotype (endometrioid vs serous), myometrial invasion (none, <50%, ≥50%), and grade (G1, G2, G3). RESULTS: Bilateral SLN mapping was accomplished in 1570 patients: 1359 endometrioid and 211 non-endometrioid, of which 117 were serous. The incidence of macrometastasis, micrometastasis, and ITC was 3.8%, 3.4%, and 4.8%, respectively. In patients with endometrioid histology (n=1359) there were 2.9% macrometastases, 3.2% micrometastases, and 5.3% ITC. No macro/micrometastases and only one ITC were found in a subset of 274 patients with low-grade (G1-G2) endometrioid endometrial cancer without myometrial invasion (all <1%). The incidence of micro/macrometastasis was higher, 2.8%, in 708 patients with low-grade endometrioid endometrial cancer invading <50% of the myometrium. In patients with serous histology (n=117), the incidence of macrometastases, micrometastasis, and ITC was 11.1%, 6.0%, and 1.7%, respectively. For serous carcinoma without myometrial invasion (n=36), two patients had micrometastases for an incidence of 5.6%. CONCLUSIONS: Ultrastaging may be safely omitted in patients with low-grade endometrioid endometrial cancer without myometrial invasion. No other subgroups with a risk of nodal metastasis of less than 1% have been identified.

Let go of the myth: safety of indocyanine green for sentinel lymph node mapping in endometrial cancer.

OBJECTIVE: Sentinel lymph node mapping by intracervical indocyanine green injection is the preferred method for surgical staging in endometrial cancer. Adverse reactions to indocyanine green are extremely rare, and information about the safety of this tracer in patients with a history of other allergies, asthma, or comorbidities is limited. We aim to evaluate the rate of adverse reactions to indocyanine green injected during sentinel lymph node mapping in patients with endometrial cancer and review the etiology of such reactions. METHODS: All patients with endometrial cancer undergoing sentinel lymph node mapping with indocyanine green cervical stroma injection at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota between June 2014 and December 2018 were retrospectively evaluated. Any adverse reaction occurring intra-operatively or within 7 days after surgery was identified. A thorough chart review was performed by an allergy specialist physician for any patient with an allergic-type reaction. RESULTS: We included 923 patients of which 565 (61.2%) had a history of allergy to antibiotics, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), other medications, and/or environmental exposures. Of 490 patients who had previously received contrast media, 25 (5.1%) had a history of an adverse reaction. No immediate anaphylaxis or other allergic reactions were observed after indocyanine green injection. 10 (1.1%) patients developed a transient skin reaction within 7 days after surgery. None of these patients had a history of contrast media reaction. Based on timing and clinical/peri-operative history of affected patients, it was determined that skin reactions were likely induced by other newly prescribed medications or contact sensitivity, not administration of indocyanine green. CONCLUSION: Indocyanine green injection for sentinel lymph node mapping in patients with endometrial cancer caused no immediate/delayed anaphylactic or other severe allergic reactions. This included patients with a history of other allergies, asthma, and comorbidities. The myth of iodine's relationship to allergic reactions must be refuted to allow indocyanine green use in patients with a history of contrast media or shellfish allergy.

Prognostic value of isolated tumor cells in sentinel lymph nodes in low risk endometrial cancer: results from an international multi-institutional study.

OBJECTIVE: The prognostic significance of isolated tumor cells (≤0.2 mm) in sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) of endometrial cancer patients is still unclear. Our aim was to assess the prognostic value of isolated tumor cells in patients with low risk endometrial cancer who underwent SLN biopsy and did not receive adjuvant therapy. Outcomes were compared with node negative patients. METHODS: Patients with SLNs-isolated tumor cells between 2013 and 2019 were identified from 15 centers worldwide, while SLN negative patients were identified from Mayo Clinic, Rochester, between 2013 and 2018. Only low risk patients (stage IA, endometrioid histology, grade 1 or 2) who did not receive any adjuvant therapy were included. Primary outcomes were recurrence free, non-vaginal recurrence free, and overall survival, evaluated with Kaplan-Meier methods. RESULTS: 494 patients (42 isolated tumor cells and 452 node negative) were included. There were 21 (4.3%) recurrences (5 SLNs-isolated tumor cells, 16 node negative); recurrence was vaginal in six patients (1 isolated tumor cells, 5 node negative), and non-vaginal in 15 (4 isolated tumor cells, 11 node negative). Median follow-up among those without recurrence was 2.3 years (interquartile range (IQR) 1.1-3.0) and 2.6 years (IQR 0.6-4.2) in the SLN-isolated tumor cell and node negative patients, respectively. The presence of SLNs-isolated tumor cells, lymphovascular space invasion, and International Federation of Obstetrics and Gynecology (FIGO) grade 2 were significant risk factors for recurrence on univariate analysis. SLN-isolated tumor cell patients had worse recurrence free survival (p<0.01) and non-vaginal recurrence free survival (p<0.01) compared with node negative patients. Similar results were observed in the subgroup of patients without lymphovascular space invasion (n=480). There was no difference in overall survival between the two cohorts in the full sample and the subset excluding patients with lymphovascular space invasion. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with SLNs-isolated tumor cells and low risk profile, without adjuvant therapy, had a significantly worse recurrence free survival compared with node negative patients with similar risk factors, after adjusting for grade and excluding patients with lymphovascular space invasion. However, the presence of SLNs-isolated tumor cells was not associated with worse overall survival.

Clinicopathological characteristics of multiple-classifier endometrial cancers: a cohort study and systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Endometrial cancers with more than one molecular feature-POLE mutations (POLEmut), mismatch repair protein deficiency (MMRd), p53 abnormality (p53abn)-are called 'multiple classifiers'. OBJECTIVE: To describe our cohort of multiple classifiers and to report the results of a review on their incidence and the techniques used to identify them. METHODS: Multiple classifiers identified at the European Institute of Oncology, Milan, between April 2019 and Decmber 2022, were included. Clinicopathological, molecular characteristics, and oncologic outcomes were summarized and compared between single and multiple classifiers sharing common features. Studies on molecular classification of endometrial cancer were searched in the PubMed Database to collect data on the incidence of multiple classifiers and the techniques used for classification. RESULTS: Among 422 patients, 48 (11.4%) were multiple classifiers: 15 (3.6%) POLEmut-p53abn, 2 (0.5%) POLEmut-MMRd, 28 (6.6%) MMRd-p53abn, and 3 (0.7%) POLEmut-MMRd-p53abn. MMRd-p53abn and MMRd differed in histotype (non-endometrioid: 14.8% vs 2.0%, p=0.006), grade (high-grade: 55.6% vs 22.2%, p=0.001), and MMR proteins expression, whereas they differed from p53abn in histotype (non-endometrioid: 14.8% vs 50.0%, p=0.006). POLEmut-p53abn and POLEmut differed only in grade (high-grade: 66.7% vs 22.7%, p=0.008), while they differed from p53abn in age (56.1 vs 66.7 years, p=0.003), stage (advanced: 6.7% vs 53.4%, p=0.001), and histotype (non-endometrioid: 6.7% vs 50.0%, p=0.002). Two (7.1%) patients with MMRd-p53abn, 4 (4.0%) with MMRd, and 25 (34.3%) with p53abn had a recurrence. No recurrences were observed in POLEmut-p53abn and POLEmut. TP53 sequencing allowed the detection of additional 7 (18.9%) multiple classifiers with normal p53 immunostaining. The incidence of multiple classifiers ranged from 1.8% to 9.8% in 10 published studies including >100 patients. When only p53 immunohistochemistry was performed, the highest incidence was 3.9%. CONCLUSIONS: The characteristics of POLEmut-p53abn resembled those of POLEmut, whereas MMRd-p53abn appeared to be intermediate between MMRd and p53abn. The high proportion of multiple classifiers may be related to the methods used for molecular classification, which included both p53 immunohistochemistry and TP53 sequencing.

Prognostic factors in patients with endometrial cancer with isolated lymphatic recurrence.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the clinicopathological features and outcomes in patients with endometrial cancer with isolated lymphatic recurrence after lymphadenectomy, stratified by different isolated lymphatic recurrence sites and treatment approaches. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all surgically treated patients with endometrial cancer, identifying those with recurrence. We defined primary isolated lymphatic recurrence as the first and unique evidence of recurrence in lymph node-bearing areas, without concomitant vaginal, hematogenous, or peritoneal recurrence. Isolated lymphatic recurrences were classified as pelvic, para-aortic, distant, or multiple sites. Our primary outcome was cause-specific survival after diagnosis of the recurrence. RESULTS: Among 4216 patients with surgically staged endometrial cancer, we identified 66 (1.6%) women with isolated lymphatic recurrence. The overall median cause-specific survival for patients with isolated lymphatic recurrence was 24 months. Although cause-specific survival was not significantly different between the four isolated lymphatic recurrence groups (p=0.21), 7 of 15 (47%) patients with isolated lymphatic recurrence in the para-aortic area were long-term survivors. At multivariate Cox regression, the absence of lymphovascular space invasion and grade 1 histology in the primary tumor were significantly associated with improved cause-specific survival. In addition, patients with isolated lymphatic recurrence who underwent surgery for recurrence (with/without other associated therapies) had improved cause-specific survival compared with patients who did not undergo surgery, also after adjusting for age. CONCLUSIONS: Low-grade histology and absence of lymphovascular space invasion in the primary tumor were predictors of improved prognosis in patients with endometrial cancer with isolated lymphatic recurrence. In addition, in this retrospective cohort, patients with isolated lymphatic recurrence who were selected for eradicative surgical treatment had improved cause-specific survival.

Endometrial stromal tumors of the uterus: Epidemiology, pathological and biological features, treatment options and clinical outcomes.

Endometrial stromal tumors (EST) are uterine mesenchymal tumors, which histologically resemble endometrial stroma of the functioning endometrium. The majority of EST are malignant tumors classified as low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma (LG-ESS), high-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma (HG-ESS), and undifferentiated uterine sarcoma (UUS). Overall, ESTs are rare malignancies, with an annual incidence of approximately 0.30 per 100'000 women, mainly affecting peri- or postmenopausal women. The most common genetic alteration identified in LG-ESS is the JAZF1-SUZ12 rearrangement, while t(10;17)(q23,p13) translocation and BCOR gene abnormalities characterize two major subtypes of HG-ESS. The absence of specific genetic abnormalities is the actual hallmark of UUS. Unlike HG-ESSs, LG-ESSs usually express estrogen and progesterone receptors. Total hysterectomy without morcellation and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (BSO) is the first-line treatment of early-stage LG-ESS. Ovarian preservation, fertility-sparing treatment, and adjuvant hormonal therapy ± radiotherapy may be an option in selected cases. In advanced or recurrent LG-ESS, surgical cytoreduction followed by hormonal treatment, or vice versa, are acceptable treatments. The standard treatment for apparently early-stage HG-ESS and UUS is total hysterectomy without morcellation with BSO. Ovarian preservation and adjuvant chemotherapy ± radiotherapy may be an option. In advanced or recurrent HG-ESS, surgical cytoreduction and neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy can be considered. Alternative treatments, including biological agents and immunotherapy, are under investigation. LG-ESSs are indolent tumor with a 5-year overall survival (OS) of 80-100% and present as stage I-II at diagnosis in two third of patients. HG-ESSs carry a poor prognosis, with a median OS ranging from 11 to 24 months, and 70% of patients are in stage III-IV at presentation. UUS median OS ranges from 12 to 23 months and, at diagnosis, 70% of patients are in stage III-IV. The aim of this review is to assess the clinical, pathological, and biological features and the therapeutic options for malignant ESTs.

A novel algorithm to implement the molecular classification according to the new ESGO/ESTRO/ESP 2020 guidelines for endometrial cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the risk class attribution with molecular classification unknown to those with molecular classification known, according to the European Society of Gynaecological Oncology/European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology/European Society of Pathology (ESGO/ESTRO/ESP) 2020 guidelines on endometrial cancer, with a focus on risk group migration. Additionally, to evaluate the capability of a novel molecular analysis algorithm to reduce the number of required tests. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study including all consecutive patients with endometrial cancer undergoing surgery and comprehensive molecular analyses between April 2019 and December 2021. Molecular analyses including immunohistochemistry for p53 and mismatch repair (MMR) proteins, and DNA sequencing for POLE exonuclease domain were performed to classify tumors as POLE-mutated (POLE), MMR-deficient (MMR-d), p53 abnormal (p53abn), or non-specific molecular profile (NSMP). The two risk classifications of the ESGO/ESTRO/ESP 2020 guidelines were compared to estimate the proportion of patients in which the molecular analysis was able to change the risk class attribution. We developed a novel algorithm where the molecular analyses are reserved only for patients in whom incorporation of the molecular classification could change the risk class attribution. RESULTS: A total of 278 patients were included. Molecular analyses were successful for all cases, identifying the four subgroups: 27 (9.7%) POLE, 77 (27.7%) MMR-d, 49 (17.6%) p53abn, and 125 (45.0%) NSMP. Comparison of risk class attribution between the two classification systems demonstrated discordance in the risk class assignment in 19 (6.8%, 95% CI 4.2% to 10.5%) cases. The application of our novel algorithm would have led to a reduction in the number of POLE sequencing tests by 67% (95% CI 61% to 73%) and a decrease of p53 immunohistochemistry by 27% (95% CI 22% to 33%), as compared with the application of molecular classification to all patients. CONCLUSION: Molecular categorization of endometrial cancer allows the reallocation of a considerable proportion of patients in a different risk class. Furthermore, the application of our algorithm enables a reduction in the number of required tests without affecting the risk classification.

Tumor BRCA Testing in Epithelial Ovarian Cancers: Past and Future-Five-Years' Single-Institution Experience of 762 Consecutive Patients.

The establishment of PARP inhibitors in the treatment of epithelial ovarian carcinoma (EOC) has prompt BRCA assessment at the time of diagnosis. We described our five years of experience of tumor BRCA testing, as part of a multidisciplinary workflow for the management of EOC patients. We used a BRCA next-generation sequencing (NGS) test for profiling formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) EOCs of 762 consecutive patients, with a success rate of 99.7% and a median turnaround time of 12 days. We found 178 (23.4%) cases with pathogenic/likely pathogenic (P/LP) mutations, 74 (9.7%) cases with variants of uncertain significance and 508 (66.8%) wild type tumors. Among 174 patients without P/LP mutations and investigated with multiple-ligation probe-amplification analysis on peripheral blood, two (1.1%) were positive for large rearrangements. Patients with P/LP alterations and/or with positive family history were referred to genetic counselling. Comparing tumor and blood NGS test results of 256 patients, we obtained a tumor test negative predictive value of 100% and we defined 76% of P/LP alterations as germline and 24% as somatic variants. The proposed workflow may successfully identify EOC patients with BRCA1/2 alteration, guiding both therapeutic and risk assessment clinical decisions.