Evaluation at 3 years of concurrent bevacizumab and radiotherapy for breast cancer: Results of a prospective study.

PURPOSE: To determine the 3 years late toxicity among patients with non-metastatic breast cancer who received concurrent bevacizumab and locoregional radiotherapy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This is a single-arm, multicentre, prospective study, of the toxicity of adjuvant concomitant association of bevacizumab and radiotherapy in patients with breast cancer. Toxicity was assessed by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 3.0 during the radiotherapy and follow-up clinics at 12 and 36 months after its completion. The study was designed to evaluate the toxicity at one year, 3 years and 5 years. RESULTS: Sixty-four patients were included from October 2007 to August 2010. All of them received concurrent adjuvant radiotherapy and bevacizumab (in 24 cases after primary systemic treatment). All patients received non-fractionated radiotherapy to breast or chest wall with or without irradiation of regional lymph nodes. Early toxicity has been previously reported. Median follow-up was 46.4 months (range: 18-77 months). Median age was 53 years old (range: 23-68 years). The 3-years overall survival was 93% (range: 87-100%). Evaluation of the toxicity at 3 years was available for 67% of the patients. There was a low rate of toxicity: 14% grade 1 pain, 9% grade 1 fibrosis, 2% grade 1 telangiectasia, 2% grade 1 paresis, 7% grade 1 lymphedema and 2% grade 3 lymphedema. No grade 4 toxicity was observed. No patient had a left ventricular ejection fraction below 50% at 3 years. CONCLUSIONS: Concurrent bevacizumab with locoregional radiotherapy is associated with acceptable 3-years toxicity in patients with breast cancer.

[Spinal stereotactic body radiotherapy: French assessment in 2016]. / État des lieux de la radiothérapie en conditions stéréotaxiques vertébrale en France en 2016.

PURPOSE: Stereotactic body radiotherapy to vertebral column remains uncommon practice and only relevant in selected group of patients. The main objective of the study was to describe the current state of medical practices of stereotactic body radiotherapy to vertebral column in France in 2016 and to assess the diversity of practices to identify areas for improvement and establish a common database set for this technique. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A questionnaire was written with contribution of a medical physicist, a radiation oncologist, an information technologist and a radiotherapy resident. The questionnaire was distributed online to a radiation oncologists and a medical physicists partner of selected French radiotherapy specialized centres that provide stereotactic body radiotherapy to vertebral metastasis from April to June 2016. The questionnaire surveyed the following topics: patients' selection, simulation, targeted volume and organs at risk delineation, prescription, dosimetric implementation and image guidance. RESULTS: A total of 31 centres were surveyed. Seventy eight per cent of centres (n=21) completed the questionnaire. The "ideal" patient for spine stereotactic radiotherapy according to these institutions has a good performance status, a long life expectancy, controlled primary tumour with oligometastatic spread. The most prescribed protocol was 30Gy in three fractions. For clinical target volume delineation, about two thirds of centres used the International Spine Radiosurgery Consortium (ISRC) recommendations (Noël G et al.,2006). CONCLUSION: This study identified some consistency of practices in some aspects despite the lack of consensus guidelines. Nevertheless, further studies are needed to establish consensus of planning and treatment.

Late toxicities and outcomes of adjuvant radiotherapy combined with concurrent bevacizumab in patients with triple-negative non-metastatic breast cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety of the concurrent combination of bevacizumab with adjuvant radiotherapy (B-RT) in breast cancer (BC). METHODS: Multicentre, prospective study, of the toxicity of adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) alone or B-RT in patients with non-metastatic BC enrolled in randomized Phase 3 BEATRICE trial. Early and late toxicities were assessed by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v. 3.0 during and 12 months after the completion of RT. RESULTS: From 2007 to 2012, 39 females received adjuvant B-RT and 45 received adjuvant RT alone. Median follow-up was 21.5 months. All patients had triple-negative non-metastatic BC and received adjuvant chemotherapy followed by RT. 90% of the 39 females treated by concurrent B-RT received whole breast irradiation (WBI) with a boost and 4 (10%) received post-mastectomy RT. Lymph node RT was delivered in 49% of the females with internal mammary chain irradiation. The mean duration of bevacizumab was 11.7 months. 38 (84%) females treated by RT alone received WBI with a boost and 16% of the females received post-mastectomy RT. Lymph node RT was delivered in 47% of the females with internal mammary chain RT in 31%. Grade 3 acute dermatitis was observed in 9% of patients receiving B-RT and 5% of patients receiving RT alone with no significant difference. 1 year after the completion of RT, the most common late grade 1-2 toxicities in the B-RT group were pain (18%), fibrosis (8%) and telangiectasia (5%). CONCLUSION: The concurrent bevacizumab with locoregional RT is associated with acceptable early and late 1-year toxicities in patients with BC. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: The largest series of this association.

[Role of locoregional radiation therapy in breast cancer patients with negative lymph nodes after preoperative chemotherapy and mastectomy. The Institut Curie-Hôpital René-Huguenin experience]. / Rôle de l'irradiation locorégionale adjuvante en l'absence d'envahissement ganglionnaire après chimiothérapie néoadjuvante, mastectomie totale et lymphadénectomie axillaire pour un cancer du sein. Expérience de l'hôpital René-Huguenin-institut Curie.

PURPOSE: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy generally induces significant changes in the pathological extent of disease and challenges the standard indications of adjuvant postmastectomy radiation therapy. We retrospectively evaluated the impact of postmastectomy radiation therapy in breast cancer patients with negative lymph nodes (pN0) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND MATERIALS: Among 1054 breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy in our institution between 1990 and 2004, 134 patients had pN0 status after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and mastectomy. Demographic data, tumor characteristics, metastatic sites, and treatments were prospectively recorded. The impact of postmastectomy radiation therapy on locoregional recurrence-free survival and overall survival was evaluated by multivariate analysis including known prognostic factors. RESULTS: Among 134 eligible patients, 78 patients (58.2%) received postmastectomy radiation therapy, and 56 patients (41.8%) did not. With a median follow-up time of 91.4 months, the 10-year locoregional recurrence-free survival and overall survival rates were 96.2% and 77.2% with postmastectomy radiation therapy and 86.8% and 87.7% without radiation therapy, respectively (no significant difference). In multivariate analysis, there was a trend towards poorer overall survival among patients who did not have a pathologically complete primary tumour response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (hazard ratio [HR], 6.65; 95% CI, 0.82-54.12; P=0.076). Postmastectomy radiation therapy had no effect on either locoregional recurrence-free survival (HR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.09-1.61; P=0.18) or overall survival (HR, 2.06; 95% CI, 0.71-6; P=0.18). There was a trend towards poorer overall survival among patients who did not have pathologically complete in-breast tumour response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (HR, 6.65; 95% CI, 0.82-54.12; P=0.076). CONCLUSIONS: This retrospective study showed no increase in the risk of distant metastasis, locoregional recurrence or death when postmastectomy radiation therapy was omitted in breast cancer patients with pN0 status after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and mastectomy. Whether the omission of postmastectomy radiation therapy is acceptable for these patients should be addressed prospectively.

[Role of lymph node irradiation in breast cancer patients with negative pathologic node status after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: the René-Huguenin Cancer Center experience]. / Rôle de l'irradiation ganglionnaire chez les patientes indemnes d'envahissement ganglionnaire après chimiothérapie néoadjuvante pour un cancer du sein: expérience du centre René-Huguenin.

PURPOSE: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy generally induces significant changes in the pathological extent of disease. This potential down-staging challenges the standard indications of adjuvant radiation therapy. We assessed the utility of lymph node irradiation in breast cancer patients with pathological N0 status (pN0) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and breast-conserving surgery. PATIENTS AND MATERIALS: Among 1054 breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy in our institution between 1990 and 2004, 248 patients with clinical N0 or N1-N2 lymph node status at diagnosis had pN0 status after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and breast-conserving surgery. Cox regression analysis was used to identify factors influencing locoregional recurrence-free survival, disease-free survival and overall survival. RESULTS: All 248 patients received breast irradiation, and 158 patients (63.7%) also received lymph node irradiation. With a median follow-up of 88 months, the 5-year locoregional recurrence-free survival and overall survival rates were respectively 89.4% and 88.7% with lymph node irradiation and 86.2% and 92% without lymph node irradiation (no significant difference). Survival was poorer among patients who did not have a pathological complete primary tumor response (pCR) (hazards ratio [HR]=3.05; 95% CI, 1.17 to 7.99) and in patients with N1-N2 clinical status at diagnosis ([HR]=2.24; 95% CI, 1.15 to 4.36). Lymph node irradiation did not significantly affect survival. CONCLUSIONS: Relative to combined breast and local lymph node irradiation, isolated breast irradiation does not appear to be associated with a higher risk of locoregional relapse or death among breast cancer patients with pN0 status after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. These results need to be confirmed in a prospective study.

[Pain and bone metastases]. / Douleur et métastases osseuses.

Average 20% of the cancer patients will have bone metastasis most of time painful and with variable clinical expressions. Due to animal models, the bone metastasis pain is better known and it explains the different treatments mechanisms. After a suitable evaluation of the pain, several therapeutic approaches can be suggested. In addition to the classical analgesics, several medications are known to be efficient in few indications like neuropathic pain. Besides a local surgery, an external radiotherapy or an interventional radiology treatment can often be useful along with a medical treatment. When there is a bone progression, the anti-cancer treatment by chemotherapy, hormonotherapy or targeted therapies must always be reviewed, because if efficient it could have an analgesic action.

Prognostic value of CA 15.3 kinetics for metastatic breast cancer.

Up to 80% of breast cancer patients developing metastases have high levels of CA 15.3. We studied the prognostic implications of CA 15.3 kinetics in 119 patients before and at first metastasis by univariate and multivariate statistics. At first metastasis, CA 15.3 was elevated in 82.4% of patients, with a lead time (median 162 days) in 42.0% of them. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed overall survival (median 1477 days) to be significantly related to estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PgR) status (p=0.0001) and tumor size (p=0.025). The interval between diagnosis and first abnormal CA 15.3 (p=0.0001), the CA 15.3 concentration (p=0.013), and the presence or absence of a lead time (p=0.001) also had prognostic value. ER and PgR status (p=0.0005 and p=0.0103, respectively), metastasis-free interval (p=0.0003), existence of a CA 15.3 lead time (p=0.0028), and days from diagnosis to first abnormal CA 15.3 (p=0.0055) entered in the Cox model. After first metastasis (median survival 573 days), ER and PgR status (p=0.0001 and p=0.0004, respectively), existence of a lead time for CA 15.3 (p=0.0138), and the concentration of first abnormal CA 15.3 (p=0.0145) had individual prognostic value. In the Cox model ER status (p=0.0001), nodal status (p=0.0191), existence of a lead time for CA 15.3 (p=0.0033), days from diagnosis to first abnormal CA 15.3 (p=0.0132), and concentration of first abnormal CA 15.3 (p=0.0320) were found to be independent prognostic variables. Compared to a matched historical control group that was not monitored by CA 15.3 assaying (n=140), the study group had a significantly longer survival after the first metastasis (p=0.0005). In conclusion, the kinetics of CA 15.3 before the first metastasis is of prognostic value. When associated with 18-fluorodeoxyglucose imaging, serial CA 15.3 assays may help to implement early treatment of metastases.