Imatinib with intensive chemotherapy in AML with t(9;22)(q34.1;q11.2)/BCR::ABL1. A DATAML registry study.

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with t(9;22) (q34.1; q11.2)/BCR::ABL1, a distinct entity within the group of AML with defining genetic abnormalities, belong to the adverse-risk group of the 2022 ELN classification. However, there is little data on outcome since the era of tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Among 5819 AML cases included in the DATAML registry, 20 patients with de novo BCR::ABL1+AML (0.3%) were identified. Eighteen patients treated with standard induction chemotherapy were analyzed in this study. Imatinib was added to chemotherapy in 16 patients. The female-to-male ratio was 1.25 and median age was 54 years. The t(9;22) translocation was the sole chromosomal abnormality in 12 patients. Main gene mutations detected by NGS were ASXL1, RUNX1 and NPM1. Compared with patients with myeloid blast phase of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML-BP), de novo BCR::ABL1+AML had higher WBC, fewer additional chromosomal abnormalities, lower CD36 or CD7 expression and no ABL1 mutations. Seventeen patients (94.4%) achieved complete remission (CR) or CR with incomplete hematologic recovery. Twelve patients were allografted in first remission. With a median follow-up of 6.3 years, the median OS was not reached and 2-year OS was 77% (95% CI: 50-91). Four out of five patients who were not transplanted did not relapse. Comparison of BCR::ABL1+AML, CML-BP, 2017 ELN intermediate (n = 643) and adverse-risk patients (n = 863) showed that patients with BCR::ABL1+AML had a significant better outcome than intermediate and adverse-risk patients. BCR::ABL1+AML patients treated with imatinib and intensive chemotherapy should not be included in the adverse-risk group of current AML classifications.

Dismal outcome of refractory or relapsing patients with myelodysplasia-related acute myeloid leukemia partially alleviated by intensive chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with myelodysplasia-related characteristics is a heterogeneous subset of AML that has been challenged throughout the history of myeloid malignancies classifications, considered to have similar outcomes as intermediate- or adverse-risk AML depending on the subgroup. However, little is known about the fate of these patients in refractory or relapsed situation (R/R) after first line therapy. METHODS: A large series of R/R AML patients, recorded in the French DATAML registry, have received either intensive chemotherapy (ICT), azacitidine (AZA) as single agent, or best supportive care (BSC). A cohort of 183 patients (median age 63-year-old) with what was called at the time AML-MRC has been explored, and data are reported here. RESULTS: Patient status was refractory for 93, while 90 had relapsed. Respectively, 88, 34, and 61 were included in the three treatment arms. The median OS of the whole cohort was 4.2 months (95%CI: 3.1-5.6) with a mean 1-year overall survival of 24% ± 3.2%. There was no significant survival difference between refractory and relapsed patients. The BSC group had overall a significantly worse outcome (p = 0.0001), and this remained true in both refractory (p = 0.01) and relapsed (p = 0.002) patients. Similar survivals were observed in both groups comparing ICT and AZA. CONCLUSIONS: These data, reporting about an ill-explored population, indicate the poor prognosis of this condition where both ICT and AZA can be proposed. The latter, which was demonstrated here to be a feasible option, should be added to new targeted therapies.

Artificial intelligence-based prediction models for acute myeloid leukemia using real-life data: A DATAML registry study.

We designed artificial intelligence-based prediction models (AIPM) using 52 diagnostic variables from 3687 patients included in the DATAML registry treated with intensive chemotherapy (IC, N = 3030) or azacitidine (AZA, N = 657) for an acute myeloid leukemia (AML). A neural network called multilayer perceptron (MLP) achieved a prediction accuracy for overall survival (OS) of 68.5% and 62.1% in the IC and AZA cohorts, respectively. The Boruta algorithm could select the most important variables for prediction without decreasing accuracy. Thirteen features were retained with this algorithm in the IC cohort: age, cytogenetic risk, white blood cells count, LDH, platelet count, albumin, MPO expression, mean corpuscular volume, CD117 expression, NPM1 mutation, AML status (de novo or secondary), multilineage dysplasia and ASXL1 mutation; and 7 variables in the AZA cohort: blood blasts, serum ferritin, CD56, LDH, hemoglobin, CD13 and disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC). We believe that AIPM could help hematologists to deal with the huge amount of data available at diagnosis, enabling them to have an OS estimation and guide their treatment choice. Our registry-based AIPM could offer a large real-life dataset with original and exhaustive features and select a low number of diagnostic features with an equivalent accuracy of prediction, more appropriate to routine practice.

Azacitidine, intensive chemotherapy or best supportive care in relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia, a DATAML registry study.

We analyzed 526 consecutive acute myeloid leukemia patients refractory to or relapsing after chemotherapy. 270 patients received intensive salvage chemotherapy (IC), 97 azacitidine (AZA) and 159 best supportive care (BSC). Complete response was obtained in 37/19/0% (p = .0008). Allogeneic stem-cell transplantation (alloSCT) was performed in 39.3/10.3/0%. Median overall survival (OS) and 5-year OS were 8.2/9.6/2.2 months and 16/6/2% (p < .0001). Predictive factors of worse OS were post-myelodysplastic/chronic myelomonocytic leukemia, bone marrow blasts ≥20%, adverse cytogenetics, AZA cycle ≥2 and no alloSCT at R/R for AZA and age, performance status, white blood cell count and myelodysplasia-related changes for IC. The impact of treatment was time-dependent: adjusted hazard ratio for OS was in favor of AZA up to 1 month, was not different between 1 and 7 months, then was in favor of IC after 7 months. While AZA represents a therapeutic option for the oldest patients, it does not lead to long-term survivors.

Delivering HDAC over 3 or 5 days as consolidation in AML impacts health care resource consumption but not outcome.

Postremission treatment is crucial to prevent relapse in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). High-dose cytarabine delivered every 12 hours on days 1, 3, and 5 (HDAC-135) is the standard of care for younger adult patients with AML. Although this standard has been unsuccessfully challenged by other treatment regimens, including multiagent chemotherapy, the timing of HDAC administration has attracted little attention. Here, we retrospectively compared the safety, efficacy, and health care resource consumption associated with HDAC-135 and another standard, condensed HDAC-123 regimen, as consolidation treatment in younger AML patients in first complete response. This study included 221 patients (median age, 46.6 years; range, 18-60 years). HDAC-123 and HDAC-135 were used in 92 and 129 patients, respectively. Both regimens were associated with similar rates of relapse-free survival, cumulative incidence of relapse, nonrelapse mortality, and overall survival, including in core binding factor AML subgroup in which levels of minimal residual disease reduction were similar in both schedules. Hematological recovery times regarding neutrophils and platelets were significantly shorter in patients receiving HDAC-123, with an average difference of 3 to 4 days for each consolidation cycle. The total duration of hospitalization for the whole postremission program was shorter with HDAC-123 (32 days; interquartile ratio [IQR], 22.0,36.5) compared with HDAC-135 (41 days; IQR, 30.5, 50.0) (P < .0001). In conclusion, the condensed HDAC-123 regimen induced faster hematological recovery and therefore significantly reduced the length of hospital stay without affecting treatment response or outcome in younger AML patients.

Real-World Outcomes of Patients with Refractory or Relapsed FLT3-ITD Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Toulouse-Bordeaux DATAML Registry Study.

Two recent phase 3 trials showed that outcomes for relapsed/refractory (R/R) FLT3-mutated acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients may be improved by a single-agent tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) (i.e., quizartinib or gilteritinib). In the current study, we retrospectively investigated the characteristics and real-world outcomes of R/R FLT3-internal tandem duplication (ITD) acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients in the Toulouse-Bordeaux DATAML registry. In the study, we included 316 patients with FLT3-ITD AML that received intensive chemotherapy as a first-line treatment. The rate of complete remission (CR) or CR without hematological recovery (CRi) was 75.2%, and 160 patients were R/R after a first-line TKI-free treatment (n = 294). Within the subgroup of R/R patients that fulfilled the main criteria of the QUANTUM-R study, 48.9% received an intensive salvage regimen; none received hypomethylating agents or low-dose cytarabine. Among the R/R FLT3-ITD AML patients with CR1 durations < 6 months who received intensive TKI-free treatment, the rate of CR or CRi after salvage chemotherapy was 52.8%, and these results allowed a bridge to be transplanted in 39.6% of cases. Finally, in this QUANTUM-R standard arm-matched cohort, the median overall survival (OS) was 7.0 months and 1-, 3- and 5-year OS were 30.2%, 23.7% and 21.4%, respectively. To conclude, these real-world data show that the intensity of the second-line treatment likely affects response and transplantation rates. Furthermore, the results indicate that including patients with low-intensity regimens, such as low-dose cytarabine or hypomethylating agents, in the control arm of a phase 3 trial may be counterproductive and could compromise the results of the study.