Detecting direct oral anticoagulants in trauma patients using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry: A novel approach to medication reconciliation.

BACKGROUND: Accurate medication reconciliation in trauma patients is essential but difficult. Currently, there is no established clinical method of detecting direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in trauma patients. We hypothesized that a liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LCMS)-based assay can be used to accurately detect DOACs in trauma patients upon hospital arrival. METHODS: Plasma samples were collected from 356 patients who provided informed consent including 10 healthy controls, 19 known positive or negative controls, and 327 trauma patients older than 65 years who were evaluated at our large, urban level 1 trauma center. The assay methodology was developed in healthy and known controls to detect apixaban, rivaroxaban, and dabigatran using LCMS and then applied to 327 samples from trauma patients. Standard medication reconciliation processes in the electronic medical record documenting DOAC usage were compared with LCMS results to determine overall accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values (PPV, NPV) of the assay. RESULTS: Of 356 patients, 39 (10.96%) were on DOACs: 21 were on apixaban, 14 on rivaroxaban, and 4 on dabigatran. The overall accuracy of the assay for detecting any DOAC was 98.60%, with a sensitivity of 94.87% and specificity of 99.05% (PPV, 92.50%; NPV, 99.37%). The assay detected apixaban with a sensitivity of 90.48% and specificity of 99.10% (PPV, 86.36%; NPV 99.40%). There were three false-positive results and two false-negative LCMS results for apixaban. Dabigatran and rivaroxaban were detected with 100% sensitivity and specificity. CONCLUSION: This LCMS-based assay was highly accurate in detecting DOACs in trauma patients. Further studies need to confirm the clinical efficacy of this LCMS assay and its value for medication reconciliation in trauma patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic Test, level III.

Medications and patient safety in the trauma setting: a systematic review.

Background: Medication errors account for the most common adverse events and a significant cause of mortality in the USA. The Joint Commission has required medication reconciliation since 2006. We aimed to survey the literature and determine the challenges and effectiveness of medication reconciliation in the trauma patient population. Materials and methods: We conducted a systematic review of the literature to determine the effectiveness of medication reconciliation in trauma patients. English language articles were retrieved from PubMed/Medline, CINAHL, and Cochrane Review databases with search terms "trauma OR injury, AND medication reconciliation OR med rec OR med rek, AND effectiveness OR errors OR intervention OR improvements." Results: The search resulted in 82 articles. After screening for relevance and duplicates, the 43 remaining were further reviewed, and only four articles, which presented results on medication reconciliation in 3041 trauma patients, were included. Two were retrospective and two were prospective. Two showed only 4% accuracy at time of admission with 48% of medication reconciliations having at least one medication discrepancy. There were major differences across the studies prohibiting comparative statistical analysis. Conclusions: Trauma medication reconciliation is important because of the potential for adverse outcomes given the emergent nature of the illness. The few articles published at this time on medication reconciliation in trauma suggest poor accuracy. Numerous strategies have been implemented in general medicine to improve its accuracy, but these have not yet been studied in trauma. This topic is an important but unrecognized area of research in this field.

Utilization of a handheld telemedicine device in postoperative pediatric surgical care.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to assess the utilization of a handheld telemedicine (TM) device in the postoperative care of pediatric surgical patients. METHODS: We performed postoperative TM evaluations using an advanced medical tablet immediately prior to seeing the patients in clinic as well as at two different time points from their home. The caregivers and physicians were surveyed about their overall satisfaction. RESULTS: Twenty-four postoperative patients who underwent a variety of general surgical operations were included. There were no changes to the TM plan of care following "in person" evaluations (n = 12) and no complications, missed diagnoses, emergency department visits, or additional clinic visits in those who only had TM postoperative evaluations (n = 12). Caregiver satisfaction ratings were 3.92 ±â€¯0.28 out of 4 (4 = very satisfied). Ninety-two percent of caregivers responded that they would be comfortable with a TM-only postoperative evaluation in the future. The physician was able to formulate an accurate assessment and plan using the device. The average travel distance saved was 44.7 ±â€¯45.5 miles (range = 10-150 miles). CONCLUSIONS: These preliminary data suggest safe and effective care with high caregiver and physician satisfaction can be provided by utilizing TM in the postoperative care of pediatric surgical patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Laparoscopic gastroesophageal dissociation in neurologically impaired children with gastroesophageal reflux disease.

PURPOSE: Neurologically impaired children with severe gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) are a challenging group of patients. We theorized that a laparoscopic gastroesophageal dissociation (LGED) may decrease reflux-related readmissions and healthcare visits, and improve quality of life (QOL) for them and their caregivers. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed on our pediatric patients that underwent an LGED along with a caregiver survey from 2013 to 2017. RESULTS: Twenty-two neurologically impaired patients (14months-17years) with severe GERD underwent an LGED. Patients weighed 7.9-57kg (avg=23.8kg), length of stay ranged from 5 to 20days (avg=12days), estimated blood loss ranged from <5cm3 to 450cm3 (avg=66cm3, median=25cm3), and duration of operation ranged from 299 to 641min (avg=462min). One death occurred on postoperative day 19 from gram negative sepsis (30-day perioperative mortality of 4.5%). There were a modest number of minor and major complications (follow-up avg.=13.7months, range=2-40months). There was a decrease in healthcare visits for respiratory illnesses (rated 5/5 from all 13/19 survey respondents) as well as improvements in perceived QOL of the patient (avg=4.3/5) and caregiver (avg=4.6/5). CONCLUSIONS: Our cohort of patients had a reduction in readmissions and healthcare visits, and improved QOL after undergoing an LGED based on the perceptions of their caregivers. In neurologically impaired patients with severe GERD, an LGED may be a viable alternative to traditional treatments. TYPE OF STUDY: Retrospective case series review. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV evidence: case series without comparison.

Cardioprotection via preserved mitochondrial structure and function in the mPer2-mutant mouse myocardium.

We have previously shown that myocardial infarct size in nonreperfused hearts of mice with a functional deletion of the circadian rhythm gene mPer2 (mPer2-M) was reduced by 43%. We hypothesized that acute ischemia-reperfusion injury (I/R = 30 min I/2 h R) would also be reduced in these mice and that ischemic preconditioning (IPC) (3 × 5 min cycles) before I/R, which enhances protection in wild-type (WT) hearts, would provide further protection in mPer2-M hearts. We observed a 69 and 75% decrease in infarct size in mPer2-M mouse hearts compared with WT following I/R and IPC, respectively. This was coincident with 67% less neutrophil infiltration and 57% less apoptotic cardiomyocytes. IPC in mPer2-M mice before I/R had 48% less neutrophil density and 46% less apoptosis than their WT counterparts. Macrophage density was not different between WT and mPer2-M I/R, but it was 45% higher in mPer2-M IPC mouse hearts compared with WT IPC. There were no baseline differences in cardiac mitochondrial function between WT and mPer2-M mice, but, following I/R, WT exhibited a marked decrease in maximal O2 consumption supported by complex I-mediated substrates, whereas mPer2-M did not, despite no difference in complex I content. Moreover, cardiac mitochondria from WT mice exhibited a very robust increase in ADP-stimulated O2 consumption in response to exogenously added cytochrome c, along with a high rate of reactive oxygen species production, none of which was exhibited by cardiac mitochondria from mPer2-M following I/R. Taken together, these findings suggest that mPer2 deletion preserves mitochondrial membrane structure and functional integrity in heart following I/R injury, the consequence of which is preservation of myocardial viability. Understanding the mechanisms connecting cardiac events, mitochondrial function, and mPer2 could lead to preventative and therapeutic strategies for at risk populations.