The role of self-perceived age in older adults considering adjuvant chemotherapy.

INTRODUCTION: Aging-related concerns can increase the risk of treatment toxicities among older adults considering adjuvant chemotherapy. We previously demonstrated that older adults with cancer who reported feeling older than their chronological age (i.e., self-perceived age) were more likely to have aging-related concerns identified during a geriatric assessment. We explored how decisions about adjuvant chemotherapy vary with or are related to older adults' self-perceived age. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a secondary analysis of a multi-phased feasibility pilot using semi-structured interviews that were conducted to explore the patient decision-making process for adjuvant chemotherapy. Interviews incorporated questions about chronological and perceived age as factors for decision-making. Patient eligibility for the study included (1) age ≥ 70 years and older, (2) a diagnosis of breast, colon, or lung cancer and considering adjuvant chemotherapy, and (3) able to read size 18 font in English. Interview data were analyzed using constant comparative method. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients were enrolled. The mean chronological age was 78 years (range 71-91). The average perceived age of patients was 57 years (range 21-80). Eleven patients chose to receive treatment while ten patients did not. Aging-related themes illustrated that self-perceived age plays an important role when patients make decisions about adjuvant chemotherapy. More specifically, patients who reported their self-perceived age as younger than their chronological age also reported better perceived health status and chose to receive adjuvant chemotherapy. DISCUSSION: Patients' experiences of aging and self-perceived age may have different implications for decision-making.

Reducing hospital readmission through team-based primary care: A 7-week pilot study integrating behavioral health and pharmacy.

INTRODUCTION: A team-based service delivery model was applied to provide patients with biopsychosocial care following hospital discharge to reduce hospital readmission. Most previous interventions focused on transitions of care occurred in the inpatient setting with attention to predischarge strategies. These interventions have not considered psychosocial stressors, and few have explored management in primary care settings. METHOD: A 7-week team-based service delivery model was implemented in a family medicine practice emphasizing a biopsychosocial approach. A physician, psychologist, pharmacist, care managers, and interdisciplinary trainees worked with 17 patients following hospital discharge. This comprehensive evaluation assessed patients' mood, cognitive abilities, and self-management of health behaviors. Modifications were made to improve ease of access to outpatient care and to improve patient understanding of the therapeutic plan. This pilot study was conducted to determine the utility of the model. RESULTS: Of 17 patients, 15 individuals avoided readmission at 30- and 90-day intervals. Other substantial benefits were noted, including reduced polypharmacy, engagement in specialty care, and reduction of environmental stressors to improve access to care. The clinic in which this was implemented is currently making efforts to maintain this model of care based on observed success. DISCUSSION: Although this work only represents a small sample, results are encouraging. This model can be replicated in other primary care settings with specialty clinicians on site. Specifically, approaches that promote a team-based delivery in a primary care setting may support improved patient outcomes and reduced overall systems' costs. Recommendations for research in a clinical setting are also offered. (PsycINFO Database Record