Adherence to hormonal therapy after surgery among older women with ductal carcinoma in situ: Implications for breast cancer-related adverse health events.

BACKGROUND: Evidence from randomized clinical trials (RCTs) shows that receipt of hormonal therapy after surgery for estrogen receptor-positive ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) reduces the risk of DCIS and contralateral invasive breast cancer (IBC) but not death from breast cancer. RCTs examined homogeneous samples, and therefore whether this evidence can be generalized to diverse populations is unclear. METHODS: Population-based data from four state cancer registries (California, New Jersey, New York, and Texas) were analyzed on women aged 65 years and older newly diagnosed with DCIS who underwent surgery with or without radiation during the years 2006-2013. Registry records were merged with Medicare enrollment in Parts A and/or B and D (prescription drugs) and associated claims. Whether adherence to hormonal therapy was associated with adverse breast cancer-related health events was analyzed. RESULTS: Achieving excellent adherence did not affect death from breast cancer. In contrast, the risk of developing a subsequent breast tumor was 6.24 percentage points (breast-conserving surgery [BCS] with radiation therapy [RT]) and 10.54 percentage points (BCS alone) lower for women with excellent versus low adherence (p < .00001). For excellent versus good adherence, the reduced risk among women who had BCS with and without RT was approximately 3 and 5 percentage points, respectively. A similar pattern emerged for the risk of IBC among women who achieved excellent versus good or low adherence, whereas good versus low adherence comparisons were not significant. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis of a diverse population-based cohort of women with DCIS demonstrates that achieving excellent adherence to hormonal therapy is critical to minimizing the occurrence of developing subsequent breast tumors. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: Our analysis of a diverse population-based cohort of women with ductal carcinoma in situ demonstrates that achieving excellent adherence to hormonal therapy is critical to minimizing the occurrence of developing subsequent breast tumors.

Nonclinical factors associated with the treatment of older women with newly diagnosed low-grade ductal carcinoma in situ.

BACKGROUND: Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is the most common form of noninvasive breast cancer and is associated with an excellent prognosis. As a result, there is concern about overdiagnosis and overtreatment of DCIS because most patients with DCIS are treated as though they have invasive breast cancer and undergo either breast-conserving surgery (BCS)-most commonly followed by radiation therapy (RT)-or mastectomy. Little research to date has focused on nonclinical factors influencing treatments for DCIS. METHODS: Population-based data were analyzed from five state cancer registries (California, Florida, New Jersey, New York, and Texas) on women aged 65 years and older newly diagnosed with DCIS during the years 2003 to 2014 using a retrospective cohort design and multinominal logistic modeling. The registry records with Medicare enrollment data and fee-for-service claims to obtain treatments (BCS alone, BCS with RT, or mastectomy) were merged. Surgeon practice structure was identified through physician surveys and internet searches. RESULTS: Patients of surgeons employed by cancer centers or health systems were less likely to receive BCS with RT or mastectomy than patients of surgeons in single specialty or multispecialty practices. There also was substantial geographic variation in treatments, with patients in New York, New Jersey, and California being less likely to receive BCS with RT or mastectomy than patients in Texas or Florida. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest nonclinical factors including the culture of the practice and/or financial incentives are significantly associated with the types of treatment received for DCIS. Increasing awareness and targeted efforts to educate physicians about DCIS management among older women with low-grade DCIS could reduce patient harm and yield substantial cost savings.

Vertical Integration Versus Physician Owners: Trends in Practice Structure Among Breast Cancer Surgeons.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to document changes in physician practice structure among surgeons who treat women with breast cancer. DESIGN: We merged cancer registry records from 5 large states with Medicare Part B claims to identify each surgeon who treated women with breast cancer. We added information from SK&A surveys and extensive internet searches. We analyzed changes in breast surgeons' practice structure over time. MEASURES: We assigned each surgeon-year a practice structure type: (1) small single-specialty practice; (2) single-specialty surgery or multispecialty practice with ownership in an ambulatory surgery center (ASC); (3) physician-owned hospital; (4) multispecialty; (5) employed. RESULTS: In 2003, nearly 74% of breast cancer surgeons belonged to small single-specialty practices. By 2014, this percentage fell to 51%. A shift to being employed (vertical integration) accounted for only a portion of this decline; between 2003 and 2014, the percentage of surgeons who were employed increased from 10% to 20%. The remainder of this decline is due to surgeons opting to acquire ownership in an ASC or a specialty hospital. Between 2003 and 2014, the percentage of surgeons with ownership in an ASC or specialty hospital increased from 4% to 17%. CONCLUSIONS: Dramatic changes in surgeon practice structure occurred between 2003 and 2014 across the 5 states we examined. The most notable was the sharp decline in the prevalence of the small single-specialty practice and large increases in the proportion of surgeons either employed or with ownership in ACSs or hospitals.

Unintended Consequences of Health Care Reform: Impact of Changes in Payor Mix on Patient Safety Indicators.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of the Affordable Care Act's Medicaid expansion on patient safety metrics at the hospital level by expansion status, across varying levels of safety-net burden, and over time. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Medicaid expansion has raised concerns over the influx of additional medically and socially complex populations on hospital systems. Whether increases in Medicaid and uninsured payor mix impact hospital performance metrics remains largely unknown. We sought to evaluate the effects of expansion on Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services-endorsed Patient Safety Indicators (PSI-90). METHODS: Three hundred fifty-eight hospitals were identified using State Inpatient Databases (2012-2015) from 3 expansions (KY, MD, NJ) and 2 nonexpansion (FL, NC) states. PSI-90 scores were calculated using Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality modules. Hospital Medicaid and uninsured patients were categorized into safety-net burden (SNB) quartiles. Hospital-level, multivariate linear regression was performed to measure the effects of expansion and change in SNB on PSI-90. RESULTS: PSI-90 decreased (safety improved) over time across all hospitals (-5.2%), with comparable reductions in expansion versus nonexpansion states (-5.9% vs -4.7%, respectively; P = 0.441) and across high SNB hospitals within expansion versus nonexpansion states (-3.9% vs -5.2%, P = 0.639). Pre-ACA SNB quartile did not predict changes in PSI-90 post-ACA. However, when hospitals increased their SNB by 5%, they incurred significantly more safety events in expansion relative to nonexpansion states (+1.87% vs -14.0%, P = 0.013). CONCLUSIONS: Despite overall improvement in patient safety, increased SNB was associated with increased safety events in expansion states. Accordingly, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services measures may unintentionally penalize hospitals with increased SNB following Medicaid expansion.

Bariatric surgery among vulnerable populations: The effect of the Affordable Care Act's Medicaid expansion.

BACKGROUND: Obesity disproportionately affects vulnerable populations. Bariatric surgery is an effective long-term treatment for obesity-related complications; however, bariatric surgical rates are lower among racial minorities and low-income and publicly insured patients. The Affordable Care Act's Medicaid expansion improved access to health insurance, but its impact on bariatric surgical disparities has not been evaluated. We sought to determine the impact of the Affordable Care Act's Medicaid expansion on disparate utilization rates of bariatric surgery. METHODS: A total of 47,974 nonelderly adult bariatric surgical patients (ages 18-64 years) were identified in 2 Medicaid-expansion states (Kentucky and Maryland) versus 2 nonexpansion control states (Florida and North Carolina) between 2012 and 2015 using the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project's State Inpatient Database. Poisson interrupted time series were conducted to determine the adjusted incidence rates of bariatric surgery by insurance (Medicaid/uninsured versus privately insured), income (high income versus low income), and race (African American versus white). The difference in the counts of bariatric surgery were then calculated to measure the gap in bariatric surgery rates. RESULTS: The adjusted incidence rate of bariatric surgery among Medicaid or uninsured and low-income patients increased by 15.8% and 5.1% per quarter, respectively, after the Affordable Care Act in expansion states (P < .001). No marginal change was seen in privately insured and high-income patients in expansion states. The adjusted incidence rates increased among African American and white patients, but these rates did not change significantly before and after the Affordable Care Act in expansion states. CONCLUSION: The gap in bariatric surgery rates by insurance and income was reduced after the Affordable Care Act's Medicaid expansion, but racial disparities persisted. Future research should track these trends and identify factors to reduce racial disparity in bariatric surgery.

Expansion coverage and preferential utilization of cancer surgery among racial and ethnic minorities and low-income groups.

BACKGROUND: The Affordable Care Act Medicaid expansion demonstrated inconsistent effects on cancer surgery utilization rates among racial and ethnic minorities and low-income Americans. This quasi-experimental study examines whether Medicaid expansion differentially increased the utilization of surgical cancer care for low-income groups and racial minorities in states that expanded their Medicaid programs. METHODS: A cohort of more than 81,000 patients 18 to 64 years of age who underwent cancer surgery were examined in Medicaid expansion versus nonexpansion states. This evaluation utilized merged data from the State Inpatient Database, American Hospital Association, and the Area Resource File for the years 2012 to 2015. Poisson interrupted time series analysis were performed to examine the impact of Medicaid expansion on the utilization of cancer surgery for the uninsured overall, low-income persons, and racial minorities, adjusting for age, sex, Elixhauser comorbidity score, population-level characteristics, and provider-level characteristics. RESULTS: For persons from low-income ZIP codes, Medicaid expansion was associated with an immediate 24% increase in utilization (P = .002) relative to no significant change in nonexpansion states. No significant trends, however, were observed after the Affordable Care Act expansion for racial and ethnic minorities in expansion versus nonexpansion states. CONCLUSION: Medicaid expansion was associated with greater utilization of cancer surgery by low-income Americans but provided no preferential effects for racial minorities in expansion states. Beyond the availability of coverage, these findings highlight the need for additional investigation to uncover other factors that contribute to race-ethnic disparities in surgical cancer care.

Affordable Care Act's Medicaid Expansion and Use of Regionalized Surgery at High-Volume Hospitals.

BACKGROUND: The Affordable Care Act (ACA)'s Medicaid expansion has increased access to surgical care overall. Whether it was associated with reduced disparities in use of regionalized surgery at high-volume hospitals (HVH) remains unknown. Quasi-experimental evaluations of this expansion were performed to examine the use of regionalized surgery at HVH among racial/ethnic minorities and low-income populations. STUDY DESIGN: Data from State Inpatient Databases (2012 to 2014), the American Hospital Association Annual Survey Database, and the Area Resource File from Health Resources and Services Administration, were used to examine 166,558 nonelderly (ages 18 to 64) adults at 468 hospitals, who underwent 1 of 4 regionalized surgical procedures in 3 expansion (KY, MD, NJ) and 2 nonexpansion states (NC, FL). Thresholds of HVH were defined using the top quintile of visits per year. Interrupted time series were performed to measure the impact of expansion on use rates of regionalized surgery at HVH overall, by race/ethnicity, and by income. RESULTS: Overall, ACA's expansion was not associated with accelerated use rates of regionalized surgical procedures at HVH (odds ratio [OR] 1.016, p = 0.297). Disparities in use of regionalized surgical procedures at HVH among ethnic/racial minorities and low-income populations were unchanged; minority vs white (OR 1.034 p = 0.100); low-income vs high-income (OR 1.034, p = 0.122). CONCLUSIONS: Early findings from ACA's Medicaid expansion revealed no impact on the use rates of regionalized surgery at HVH overall or on disparities among vulnerable populations. Although these results need ongoing evaluation, they highlight potential limitations in ACA's expansion in reducing disparities in use of regionalized surgical care.

The Affordable Care Act's Medicaid expansion and utilization of discretionary vs. non-discretionary inpatient surgery.

BACKGROUND: While pre-Affordable Care Act expansions in Medicaid eligibility led to increased utilization of elective inpatient procedures, the impact of the Affordable Care Act on such preference-sensitive procedures (also known as discretionary procedures) versus time-sensitive non-discretionary procedures remains unknown. As such, we performed a hospital-level quasi-experimental evaluation to measure the differential effects of the Affordable Care Act's Medicaid expansion on utilization of discretionary procedures versus non-discretionary procedures. METHODS: The State Inpatient Database (2012-2014) yielded 476 hospitals providing selected discretionary procedures or non-discretionary procedures performed on 288,446 non-elderly, adult patients across 3 expansion states and 2 non-expansion control states. Discretionary procedures included non-emergent total knee and hip arthroplasty, while non-discretionary procedures included nine cancer surgeries. Mixed Poisson interrupted time series analyses were performed to determine the impact of the Affordable Care Act's Medicaid expansion on the number of discretionary procedures versus non-discretionary procedures provided among non-privately insured patients (Medicaid and uninsured patients) and privately insured patients. RESULTS: Analysis of the number of non-privately insured procedures showed an increase in discretionary procedures of +15.1% (IRR 1.15, 95% CI:1.11-1.19) vs -4.0% (IRR 0.96, 95% CI:0.94-0.99) and non-discretionary procedures of +4.1% (IRR 1.04, 95% CI:1.0-1.1) vs -5.3% (IRR 0.95, 95% CI:0.93-0.97) in expansion states compared to non-expansion states, respectively. Analysis of privately insured procedures showed no statistically meaningful change in discretionary procedures or non-discretionary procedures in either expansion or non-expansion states. CONCLUSION: In this multi-state evaluation, the Affordable Care Act's Medicaid expansion preferentially increased utilization of discretionary procedures versus non-discretionary procedures in expansion states compared to non-expansion states among non-privately insured patients. These preliminary findings suggest that increased Medicaid coverage may have contributed to the increased use of inpatient surgery for discretionary procedures.

The well-being of long-term cancer survivors.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the well-being of long-term cancer survivors with that of US residents of similar age and demographic characteristics, patients recently diagnosed with cancer, and individuals with chronic illness. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective observational study. METHODS: Using the Health and Retirement Study, a survey of US residents older than 50 years, we defined 4 cohorts: long-term cancer survivors (>4 years post diagnosis), individuals recently diagnosed with cancer (≤4 years post diagnosis), individuals with chronic illness, and US residents older than 50 years ("nationally representative cohort"). Well-being measures included self-reported health, utility, happiness, medical utilization and spending, employment, and earnings, and these measures were compared across cohorts, adjusting for survey year, demographic characteristics, smoking, and number of comorbidities. We imputed medical spending using the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey and the Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey. RESULTS: Long-term cancer survivors fared significantly better than those recently diagnosed with cancer, those with chronic illness, and individuals in the nationally representative cohort in the majority of well-being measures (P <.05), including fewer doctor visits, hospitalizations, and hospital nights; better utility and self-reported health; and greater likelihood of employment. Long-term cancer survivors had lower healthcare spending than those recently diagnosed with cancer (P <.01) and significantly greater happiness than the nationally representative cohort and those with chronic illness (P <.05). CONCLUSIONS: Although patients with cancer experience diminished well-being in the short term across a variety of measures, in the long term, cancer survivors do as well as or better than US residents of similar age and demographic characteristics. This finding is striking given that one might expect long-term cancer survivors to do worse than similar individuals without a history of cancer.

Medicaid Expansion and Disparity Reduction in Surgical Cancer Care at High-Quality Hospitals.

BACKGROUND: The Affordable Care Act's Medicaid expansion has been heavily debated due to skepticism about Medicaid's ability to provide high-quality care. Particularly, little is known about whether Medicaid expansion improves access to surgical cancer care at high-quality hospitals. To address this question, we examined the effects of the 2001 New York Medicaid expansion, the largest in the pre-Affordable Care Act era, on this disparity measure. STUDY DESIGN: We identified 67,685 nonelderly adults from the New York State Inpatient Database who underwent select cancer resections. High-quality hospitals were defined as high-volume or low-mortality hospitals. Disparity was defined as model-adjusted difference in percentage of patients receiving operations at high-quality hospitals by insurance type (Medicaid/uninsured vs privately insured) or by race (African American vs white). Levels of disparity were calculated quarterly for each comparison pair and then analyzed using interrupted time series to evaluate the impact of Medicaid expansion. RESULTS: Disparity in access to high-volume hospitals by insurance type was reduced by 0.97 percentage points per quarter after Medicaid expansion (p < 0.0001). Medicaid/uninsured beneficiaries had similar access to low-mortality hospitals as the privately insured; no significant change was detected around expansion. Conversely, racial disparity increased by 0.87 percentage points per quarter (p < 0.0001) in access to high-volume hospitals and by 0.48 percentage points per quarter (p = 0.005) in access to low-mortality hospitals after Medicaid expansion. CONCLUSIONS: Pre-Affordable Care Act Medicaid expansion reduced the disparity in access to surgical cancer care at high-volume hospitals by payer. However, it was associated with increased racial disparity in access to high-quality hospitals. Addressing racial barriers in access to high-quality hospitals should be prioritized.

Did Pre-Affordable Care Act Medicaid Expansion Increase Access to Surgical Cancer Care?

BACKGROUND: Although the Affordable Care Act (ACA) expanded Medicaid access, it is unknown whether this has led to greater access to complex surgical care. Evidence on the effect of Medicaid expansion on access to surgical cancer care, a proxy for complex care, is sparse. Using New York's 2001 statewide Medicaid expansion as a natural experiment, we investigated how expansion affected use of surgical cancer care among beneficiaries overall and among racial minorities. STUDY DESIGN: From the New York State Inpatient Database (1997 to 2006), we identified 67,685 nonelderly adults (18 to 64 years of age) who underwent cancer surgery. Estimated effects of 2001 Medicaid expansion on access were measured on payer mix, overall use of surgical cancer care, and percent use by racial/ethnic minorities. Measures were calculated quarterly, adjusted for covariates when appropriate, and then analyzed using interrupted time series. RESULTS: The proportion of cancer operations paid by Medicaid increased from 8.9% to 15.1% in the 5 years after the expansion. The percentage of uninsured patients dropped by 21.3% immediately after the expansion (p = 0.01). Although the expansion was associated with a 24-case/year increase in the net Medicaid case volume (p < 0.0001), the overall all-payer net case volume remained unchanged. In addition, the adjusted percentage of ethnic minorities among Medicaid recipients of cancer surgery was unaffected by the expansion. CONCLUSIONS: Pre-ACA Medicaid expansion did not increase the overall use or change the racial composition of beneficiaries of surgical cancer care. However, it successfully shifted the financial burden away from patient/hospital to Medicaid. These results might suggest similar effects in the post-ACA Medicaid expansion.

The burden of endometriosis: costs and quality of life of women with endometriosis and treated in referral centres.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to calculate costs and health-related quality of life of women with endometriosis-associated symptoms treated in referral centres. METHODS: A prospective, multi-centre, questionnaire-based survey measured costs and quality of life in ambulatory care and in 12 tertiary care centres in 10 countries. The study enrolled women with a diagnosis of endometriosis and with at least one centre-specific contact related to endometriosis-associated symptoms in 2008. The main outcome measures were health care costs, costs of productivity loss, total costs and quality-adjusted life years. Predictors of costs were identified using regression analysis. RESULTS: Data analysis of 909 women demonstrated that the average annual total cost per woman was €9579 (95% confidence interval €8559-€10 599). Costs of productivity loss of €6298 per woman were double the health care costs of €3113 per woman. Health care costs were mainly due to surgery (29%), monitoring tests (19%) and hospitalization (18%) and physician visits (16%). Endometriosis-associated symptoms generated 0.809 quality-adjusted life years per woman. Decreased quality of life was the most important predictor of direct health care and total costs. Costs were greater with increasing severity of endometriosis, presence of pelvic pain, presence of infertility and a higher number of years since diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: Our study invited women to report resource use based on endometriosis-associated symptoms only, rather than drawing on a control population of women without endometriosis. Our study showed that the economic burden associated with endometriosis treated in referral centres is high and is similar to other chronic diseases (diabetes, Crohn's disease, rheumatoid arthritis). It arises predominantly from productivity loss, and is predicted by decreased quality of life.

Changes in U.S. hospitalization and mortality rates following smoking bans.

U.S. state and local governments have increasingly adopted restrictions on smoking in public places. This paper analyzes nationally representative databases, including the Nationwide Inpatient Sample, to compare short-term changes in mortality and hospitalization rates in smoking-restricted regions with control regions. In contrast with smaller regional studies, we find that smoking bans are not associated with statistically significant short-term declines in mortality or hospital admissions for myocardial infarction or other diseases. An analysis simulating smaller studies using subsamples reveals that large short-term increases in myocardial infarction incidence following a smoking ban are as common as the large decreases reported in the published literature.

What do people buy when they don't buy health insurance and what does that say about why they are uninsured?

Using data from the Consumer Expenditure Survey, this study compares household spending on different goods by insured versus uninsured households, controlling for total spending and demographic characteristics. The analysis shows that uninsured households, on average, spend more on housing, food, alcohol, and tobacco compared to insured households. These results suggest that both prices and preferences, in addition to income, help explain why some households do not buy coverage; the findings also raise the possibility that the uninsured may lack coverage in part because they face higher prices for basic needs like housing and food.