RESUMO
Clinical trials are a necessary tool for evaluating the effectiveness of newly developed treatments and interventions for cystic fibrosis (CF). Prior work demonstrated a proportional underrepresentation of people with CF (pwCF) identifying as part of a minoritized racial or ethnic group in clinical trials. In order to establish a baseline for improvement efforts, we undertook a center-level self-study to evaluate if the racial and ethnic backgrounds of pwCF participating in clinical trials at our CF Center in New York City reflect our overall patient diversity (N = 200; 55 pwCF identifying as part of a minoritized racial or ethnic group and 145 pwCF identifying as non-Hispanic White). A smaller proportion of pwCF identifying as part of a minoritized racial or ethnic group participated in a clinical trial as compared to pwCF identifying as non-Hispanic White (21.8% vs. 35.9%, P = 0.06). A similar trend was present for pharmaceutical clinical trials (9.1% vs. 16.6%, P = 0.3). When limiting the study population to the pwCF most likely to be eligible for a CF pharmaceutical clinical trial, a larger proportion of pwCF identifying as part of a minoritized racial or ethnic group participated in a pharmaceutical clinical trial as compared to pwCF identifying as non-Hispanic White (36.4% vs. 19.6%, P = 0.2). No pwCF identifying as part of a minoritized racial or ethnic group participated in an offsite clinical trial. Efforts to improve the racial and ethnic diversity of pwCF in clinical trials, both onsite and offsite, will require a shift in how recruitment opportunities are identified and communicated to pwCF.
Assuntos
Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto , Fibrose Cística , Humanos , Fibrose Cística/tratamento farmacológico , Preparações FarmacêuticasRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: While the performance of the emPHasis-10 (e10) score has been evaluated against limited patient characteristics within the United Kingdom, there is an unmet need for exploring the performance of the e10 score among pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) patients in the United States. METHODS: Using the Pulmonary Hypertension Association Registry, we evaluated relationships between the e10 score and demographic, functional, haemodynamic and additional clinical characteristics at baseline and over time. Furthermore, we derived a minimally important difference (MID) estimate for the e10 score. RESULTS: We analysed data from 565 PAH (75% female) adults aged mean±sd 55.6±16.0â years. At baseline, the e10 score had notable correlation with factors expected to impact quality of life in the general population, including age, education level, income, smoking status and body mass index. Clinically important parameters including 6-min walk distance and B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP)/N-terminal proBNP were also significantly associated with e10 score at baseline and over time. We generated a MID estimate for the e10 score of -6.0â points (range -5.0--7.6â points). CONCLUSIONS: The e10 score was associated with demographic and clinical patient characteristics, suggesting that health-related quality of life in PAH is influenced by both social factors and indicators of disease severity. Future studies are needed to demonstrate the impact of the e10 score on clinical decision-making and its potential utility for assessing clinically important interventions.
Assuntos
Hipertensão Pulmonar , Hipertensão Arterial Pulmonar , Adulto , Idoso , Hipertensão Pulmonar Primária Familiar , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Peptídeo Natriurético Encefálico , Fragmentos de Peptídeos , Qualidade de Vida , Reino UnidoRESUMO
Disseminated acanthamoebiasis is a rare, often fatal, infection most commonly affecting immunocompromised patients. We report a case involving sinuses, skin, and bone in a 60-year-old woman 5 months after heart transplantation. She improved with a combination of flucytosine, fluconazole, miltefosine, and decreased immunosuppression. To our knowledge, this is the first case of successfully treated disseminated acanthamoebiasis in a heart transplant recipient and only the second successful use of miltefosine for this infection among solid organ transplant recipients. Acanthamoeba infection should be considered in transplant recipients with evidence of skin, central nervous system, and sinus infections that are unresponsive to antibiotics. Miltefosine may represent an effective component of a multidrug therapeutic regimen for the treatment of this amoebic infection.