RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Opportunities to improve emergency surgery outcomes exist through guided better practice and reduced variability. Few attempts have been made to define optimal care in emergency surgery, and few clinically derived key performance indicators (KPIs) have been published. A summit was therefore convened to look at resources for optimal care of emergency surgery. The aim of the Donegal Summit was to set a platform in place to develop guidelines and KPIs in emergency surgery. METHODS: The project had multidisciplinary global involvement in producing consensus statements regarding emergency surgery care in key areas, and to assess feasibility of producing KPIs that could be used to monitor process and outcome of care in the future. RESULTS: Forty-four key opinion leaders in emergency surgery, across 7 disciplines from 17 countries, composed evidence-based position papers on 14 key areas of emergency surgery and 112 KPIs in 20 acute conditions or emergency systems. CONCLUSIONS: The summit was successful in achieving position papers and KPIs in emergency surgery. While position papers were limited by non-graded evidence and non-validated KPIs, the process set a foundation for the future advancement of emergency surgery.
Assuntos
Lesões Encefálicas Traumáticas/cirurgia , Pediatria/métodos , Acidentes por Quedas/mortalidade , Acidentes por Quedas/estatística & dados numéricos , Acidentes de Trânsito/mortalidade , Acidentes de Trânsito/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Mundo Árabe , Lesões Encefálicas Traumáticas/epidemiologia , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Técnica Delphi , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Masculino , Oriente Médio/epidemiologia , Pediatria/tendências , Estudos Retrospectivos , Centros de Traumatologia/organização & administração , Centros de Traumatologia/estatística & dados numéricos , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The FLS trainer lacks objective and automated assessments of laparoscopic performance and requires a large supply of relatively expensive consumables. Virtual reality simulation has a great potential as a training and assessment tool of laparoscopic skills and can overcome some limitations of the FLS trainer. This study was carried out to assess the value of our Virtual Basic Laparoscopic Surgical Trainer (VBLaST(©)) in the peg transfer task compared to the FLS trainer and its ability to differentiate performance between novice, intermediate, and expert groups. METHODS: Thirty subjects were divided into three groups: novices (PGY1-2, n = 10), intermediates (PGY3-4, n = 10), and experts (PGY5, surgical fellows and attendings, n = 10). All subjects performed ten trials of the peg transfer task on each simulator. Assessment of laparoscopic performance was based on FLS scoring while a questionnaire was used for subjective evaluation. RESULTS: The performance scores in the two simulators were correlated, though subjects performed significantly better in the FLS trainer. Experts performed better than novices only on the FLS trainer while no significant differences were observed between the other groups. Moreover, a significant learning effect was found on both trainers, with a greater improvement of performance on the VBLaST(©). Finally, 82.6% of the subjects preferred the FLS over the VBLaST(©) for surgical training which could be attributed to the novelty of the VR technology and existing deficiencies of the user interface for the VBLaST(©). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that the VBLaST(©) reproduced faithfully some aspects of the FLS peg transfer task (such as color, size, and shape of the peg board, etc.) while other aspects require additional development. Future improvement of the user interface and haptic feedback will enhance the value of the system as an alternative to the FLS as the standard training tool for laparoscopic surgery skills.
Assuntos
Simulação por Computador , Laparoscopia/educação , Adulto , Competência Clínica , Retroalimentação , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Interface Usuário-ComputadorRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Emergent cricothyroidotomy remains an uncommon, but life-saving, core procedural training requirement for emergency medicine (EM) physician training. We hypothesized that, although most cricothyroidotomies occur in the emergency department (ED), they are rarely performed by EM physicians. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of all emergent cricothyroidotomies performed at two large level one trauma centers over 10 years. Operators and assistants for all procedures were identified, as well as mechanism of injury and patient demographics were examined. RESULTS: Fifty-four cricothyroidotomies were performed. Patients were: mean age of 50, 80% male and 90% blunt trauma. The most common primary operator was a surgeon (n = 47, 87%), followed by an Emergency Medical Services (EMS) provider (n = 6, 11%) and a EM physician (n = 1, 2%). In all cases, except those performed by EMS, the operator or assistant was an attending surgeon. All EMS procedures resulted in serious complications compared to in-hospital procedures (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: 1. Pre-hospital cricothyroidotomy results in serious complications. 2. Despite the ubiquitous presence of emergency medicine physicians in the ED, all crico-thyroidotomies were performed by a surgeon, which may represent a serious emergency medicine training deficiency.