Timing of Surgery for Thoracolumbar Spine Trauma: Patients With Neurological Injury.

STUDY DESIGN: Large multicenter retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to analyze the effect of fusion timing on inpatient outcomes in a nationally representative population with thoracolumbar fracture and concurrent neurological injury. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Among thoracolumbar trauma admissions, concurrent neurological injury is associated with greater long-term morbidity. There is little consensus on optimal surgical timing for these patients; previous investigations fail to differentiate thoracolumbar fracture with and without neurological injury. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analyzed 19,136 nonelective National Inpatient Sample cases (2004-2014) containing International Classifications of Disease, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) diagnosis codes for closed thoracic/lumbar fracture with neurological injury and procedure codes for primary thoracolumbar/lumbosacral fusion, excluding open/cervical fracture. Timing classification from admission to fusion was same-day, 1-2-, 3-6-, and ≥7-day delay. Primary outcomes included in-hospital mortality, complications, and infection; secondary outcomes included total and postoperative length of stay and charges. Logistic regressions and generalized linear models with gamma distribution and log-link evaluated the effect of surgical timing on primary and secondary outcomes, respectively, controlling for age, sex, fracture location, fusion approach, multiorgan system injury severity score, and medical comorbidities. RESULTS: Patients undergoing surgery ≤72 hours (n=12,845) had the lowest odds of in-hospital cardiac [odds ratio (OR)=0.595; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.357-0.991] and respiratory complications (OR=0.495; 95% CI, 0.313-0.784) and infection (OR=0.615; 95% CI, 0.390-0.969). No differences were observed between same-day (n=4724) and 1-2-day delay (n=8121) (P>0.05). Lowest odds of hemorrhage or hematoma was observed following 3-6-day delay (OR=0.467; 95% CI, 0.236-0.922). A ≥7-day delay to fusion (n=2,002) was associated with greatest odds of hemorrhage/hematoma (OR=2.019; 1.107-3.683), respiratory complications (OR=1.850; 95% CI, 1.076-3.180), and infection (OR=3.155; 95% CI, 1.891-5.263) and greatest increases in mean postoperative length of stay (4.26% or 35.3% additional days) and charges (163,562 or 71.7% additional US dollars) (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with thoracolumbar fracture and associated neurological injury who underwent surgery within 3 days of admission experienced fewer in-hospital complications. These benefits may be due to secondary injury mechanism avoidance and earlier mobilization. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Critical Assessment of the Contemporary Orthopaedic Surgery Residency Application Process.

BACKGROUND: Matching into orthopaedic surgery residency in the United States has become an increasingly competitive process because of the large number of well-qualified applicants. Over the past several years, applicants have sought to maximize their chances of matching by submitting an increasing number of applications. The purpose of this study was to assess trends in application numbers, applicant qualifications, and application reviews, with the goal of obtaining data to help inform future improvements in the orthopaedic surgery residency application process. METHODS: Applicant data were obtained from the Electronic Residency Application Service (ERAS, www.aamc.org/services/eras/stats) and the National Resident Matching Program (NRMP, www.nrmp.org/report-archives). These included residency application data from 2000 to 2017. In addition, we analyzed available NRMP Applicant Survey Reports between 2008 and 2017, Program Director Survey Reports between 2008 and 2016, and NRMP's Charting Outcomes in the Match between 2006 and 2016. RESULTS: The number of U.S. senior medical student applicants per orthopaedic surgery residency position was stable from 2000 to 2017 (1.13 vs. 1.16 for 2000 and 2017, respectively). A significant increase in the United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) Step-1 and Step-2 scores and self-reported research activity was present over the same time period. The number of applications submitted per applicant significantly increased, by 71.7%, from 48.4 in 2006 to 83.1 in 2017. Additionally, applications per program increased 46.4% from 457 in 2010 to 669 in 2016. In 2010, programs performed in-depth reviews for 54% of applications; however, in 2016, in-depth reviews had decreased to 45% of applications. CONCLUSIONS: Orthopaedic residency applicant USMLE scores and research productivity have increased over time. Concurrently, the average number of applications submitted per applicant has increased, with the average applicant applying to nearly half of all orthopaedic residency programs. Consequently, programs have seen more than double the number of applications over this study period. The accompanying decline in the proportion of applications undergoing in-depth review, along with the applicant and program resources associated with these changes, warrants the development of strategies to enhance the efficiency of the application process for orthopaedic residency.

Proximal junctional failure prevention in adult spinal deformity surgery utilizing interlaminar fixation constructs.

Proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) is a common complication following fusion for Adult Spinal Deformity. PJK and proximal junctional failure (PJF) may lead to pain, neurological injury, reoperation, and increased healthcare costs. Efforts to prevent PJK and PJF have aimed to preserve or reconstruct the posterior spinal tension band and/or modifying instrumentation to allow for more gradual transitions in stiffness at the cranial end of long spinal constructs. We describe placement of an interlaminar fixation construct at the upper instrumented vertebra which may decrease PJK/PJF severity, and is placed with little additional operative time and minimal posterior soft tissue trauma.

Tobacco Use and Complications Following Spinal Fusion: A Comparison of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program and National Inpatient Sample Datasets.

BACKGROUND: Smoking is a known risk factor for inferior health outcomes. Retrospective analyses of large datasets may assess whether such risk is manifested or mitigated in clinical practice. Although many risk factor analyses use the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) and National (Nationwide) Inpatient Sample (NIS), such investigations have seldom been directly compared. METHODS: NIS and NSQIP datasets were used. Primary outcome measures were perioperative complications. NSQIP complications were stratified based on occurrence before versus after discharge. Multiple logistic regression was employed in adjusted analyses. RESULTS: Among NSQIP (N = 56,145) and NIS (N = 1,311,426) patients, 24.0% and 31.8% were identified as tobacco users, respectively. Before discharge, NSQIP smokers had increased odds of pneumonia (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.43), postoperative intubation (aOR = 1.40), and sepsis (aOR = 1.71) and decreased odds of pulmonary embolism (aOR = 0.57) (all P < 0.05). After discharge, NSQIP smokers exhibited increased odds of cardiac arrest (aOR = 2.53) and surgical site infection (aOR = 1.25) and decreased odds of urinary tract infection (aOR = 0.68) and deep venous thrombosis (aOR = 0.61) (all P < 0.05). In adjusted analysis of NIS data, tobacco users exhibited increased odds of inpatient pneumonia (aOR = 1.57), myocardial infarction (aOR = 1.29), and postoperative intubation (aOR = 1.15) and decreased odds of pulmonary embolism (aOR = 0.80) and deep venous thrombosis (aOR = 0.78) (all P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with a history of tobacco use undergoing spinal fusion were at increased risk of pneumonia and intubation but decreased risk of deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism during the inpatient postoperative stay. After discharge, smokers exhibited increased odds of cardiac arrest and surgical site infection. NIS and NSQIP results were similar, with 9 of 12 outcomes exhibiting identical inpatient conclusions. Qualitative comparison of NIS and NSQIP yields results that offer increased validity over single-source studies.

Early Subspecialization in Orthopedic Surgery Training.

Recent studies have shown that applicants to the American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery Part II examination are performing fewer procedures outside of their chosen subspecialty. In this study, the authors assessed whether trainees are beginning their subspecialization during residency. The authors reviewed the chosen fellowships and case logs of 231 residents graduating from 5 academic orthopedic residency training programs from 2002 to 2017. The number of cases logged by residents who chose a specialty was then compared with the number of cases logged by residents who chose other specialties. Residents who chose spine surgery (108.4±50.7 vs 74.4±60.2, P<.01), hand surgery (242.2±92.9 vs 194.3±78.2, P<.01), and sports medicine (278.5±105.8 vs 229.0±93.9, P<.01) performed significantly more procedures in their chosen fields than their colleagues. In contrast, for total joint arthroplasty (P=.18) and foot and ankle surgery (P=.46), there was no significant difference in the number of cases between residents who chose the sub-specialty and those who did not. Residents pursuing careers in spine surgery, hand surgery, and sports medicine obtained additional operative exposure to their chosen field during residency. Formalizing this early experience with specialization tracks during the chief year may be considered. [Orthopedics. 2019; 42(1):e39-e43.].

Predictive factors of positive online patient ratings of spine surgeons.

BACKGROUND: Online physician rating websites are increasingly used by patients to evaluate their doctors. The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate factors associated with better spine surgeon ratings. METHODS: Orthopedic spine surgeons were randomly selected from the North American Spine Society directory utilizing a random number generator. Surgeon profiles on three physician rating websites, namely, www.HealthGrades.com, www.Vitals.com, and www.RateMDs.com, were analyzed to gather qualitative and quantitative data on patients' perceptions of the surgeons. Independent variables from the websites were analyzed in relation to overall physician or patient satisfaction rating. Comments were coded by subject into following three categories: professional competence, bedside manner, and practice characteristics. RESULTS: A total of 250 surgeons were evaluated, and 92% (n=230) of these doctors had at least one rating among the three websites. The surgeons with a higher average rating had significantly better trust (p<.01), scheduling (p<.01), staff (p<.01), helpfulness (p<.01), and punctuality (p<.01) scores but significantly less experience (p<.05). A linear regression model for the average rating of each surgeon (R2 value=0.754) yielded only following three significant variables: trustworthiness (p<.01), experience match (p<.05), and the average number of negative comments on surgeon's professional competence (p<.05). Trustworthiness (ß=0.749) was the strongest predictor variable of physician rating, followed by the number of negative professional competence comments (ß=-0.132) and experience match (ß=-0.112). CONCLUSIONS: This investigation assessed spine surgeon online patient ratings and categorized factors that patients associate with quality care. Trustworthiness was the most significant predictor of positive ratings, whereas ease of scheduling, quality of staff, helpfulness, and punctuality were also associated with higher patient ratings. Understanding what patients value may help optimize care of spine surgery patients.

Machine learning modeling for predicting hospital readmission following lumbar laminectomy.

In BriefAuthors of this study analyzed hospital readmissions following laminectomy and developed predictive models to identify readmitted patients with an accuracy >95% when using all variables and >79% when using only predischarge variables. A model capable of predicting 40% of readmitted patients was created using only the variables known predischarge. This investigation is important in its provision of data that will assist the development of predictive models for readmission as well as interventions to prevent readmission in high-risk patients.

Trends in the Orthopaedic Surgery Subspecialty Fellowship Match: Assessment of 2010 to 2017 Applicant and Program Data.

BACKGROUND: Orthopaedic surgery has become increasingly specialized, and most trainees currently complete subspecialty fellowship training. The purposes of this investigation were to evaluate recent trends in U.S. orthopaedic fellowship matches and to provide relevant analyses for future orthopaedic fellowship applicants and fellowship program directors. METHODS: This study analyzed data from orthopaedic fellowship match programs from 2010 to 2017. For each fellowship, the following variables were analyzed: numbers of positions offered, participating programs, applicant registrations, rank lists submitted by applicants (i.e., completed applications), applicants matched, and filled positions. Applicant-matching success rate and percentage of total fellowship positions filled for each subspecialty were calculated, and trends were evaluated for significance and difference between subspecialties utilizing ordinary least-square regressions, with p < 0.05 indicating significance. RESULTS: From 2010 to 2017, the number of fellowship positions that were offered increased in all subspecialties (p < 0.05) except for spine (p = 0.44) and trauma (p = 0.92). Participating fellowship programs increased in all subspecialties (p < 0.05) except spine (p = 0.38) and sports medicine; the latter experienced the only significant decrease (p < 0.05). The largest significant increases (p < 0.05) in both applicant registrations (33.5%) and rank lists submitted by applicants (45.3%) were in adult reconstruction. The subspecialty with the highest applicant-matching success rate during the study period of 2010 to 2017 was sports (mean, 93.5%). Spine and trauma had the lowest applicant-matching success rates in 2016 to 2017. The percentage of positions filled across all subspecialties increased from 2011 to 2017 (p < 0.05); hand had the highest mean (96.6% filled), and adult reconstruction had the largest significant increase from 82.0% in 2010 to 95.5% in 2017 (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: This investigation provides data with regard to current trends in the orthopaedic fellowship match. Specifically, adult reconstruction fellowship training has recently gained popularity at a more rapid rate than the other subspecialty fellowship pathways, although hand surgery consistently maintains a very high rate of positions filled. Our results for orthopaedic subspecialty fellowship match trends may assist fellowship directors with program planning and career advising and may also assist current residents with fellowship application expectations and career planning.

Risk Factors for Unplanned Reoperation Within 30 Days Following Elective Posterior Lumbar Spinal Fusion.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVES: Unplanned reoperation following lumbar spinal fusion is detrimental to patients, providers, and health systems. The aim of this study was to identify risk factors associated with unplanned reoperation following elective posterior lumbar spinal fusion and assess the reasons for reoperation. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 22 151 patients from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program data set between 2012 and 2015 was completed. The primary outcome measure was unplanned reoperation within 30 days. Secondary outcome measures were specific diagnoses and procedures associated with unplanned reoperation, as well as time to reoperation from initial procedure. Multiple stepwise logistic regression was employed to determine preoperative variables predictive of unplanned 30-day reoperation. RESULTS: Patients with disseminated cancer (OR = 3.44, P = .0049), weight loss >10% in 6 months prior to surgery (OR = 3.26, P = .0276), bleeding disorders (OR = 1.92, P = .0049), American Society of Anesthesiologists score of 3 (OR = 1.46, P < .0001), body mass index of 35.0 to 39.9 (OR = 1.50, P = .0037), body mass index of ≥40 (OR = 1.83, P < .0001), and multilevel fusion (OR = 1.24, P = .0069) exhibited increased odds of 30-day reoperation. The most common diagnosis associated with reoperation was postoperative infection (n = 121, 21.1% of reoperations). CONCLUSIONS: Predictors and causes of unplanned reoperation within 30 days following elective posterior lumbar spinal fusion are identifiable. In this study cohort, obesity, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, disseminated cancer, weight loss, bleeding disorders, and multilevel fusion were identified as significant risk factors for reoperation. Further research investigating risk factor modification on reoperation in elective posterior lumbar spinal fusion is warranted.

Predictors of Nonneurologic Complications and Increased Length of Stay After Cervical Spine Osteotomy.

BACKGROUND: Although previous studies have used National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) data to study complications of thoracolumbar spinal deformity surgery, investigation of cervical spine deformity surgery has been limited. We performed a retrospective analysis of the NSQIP database to identify predictors of complications after cervical spine osteotomy. METHODS: Patients undergoing cervical spine osteotomy were identified in the NSQIP dataset using Current Procedural Terminology codes from years 2007-2016. For each patient, patient and case clinical characteristics, length of stay (LOS), and diagnosis of a nonneurologic complication (including reoperation and readmission) were abstracted. Patient and case clinical predictors of any of the reported complications and increased LOS were identified in multivariate logistic and Poisson regression analyses, respectively. RESULTS: There were 950 patients identified with mean age 56.1 ± 12.4 years and mean body mass index 29.9 ± 6.8. Mean LOS was 3.5 ± 4.9 days. Overall medical complication rate was 15.8%. The most common complications were transfusion (78; 8.2%), readmission (45; 4.7%), reoperation (32; 3.4%), and reintubation (28; 3.0%). Risk factors for any complication included increased age (P = 0.0467), American Society of Anesthesiologists classification III (P = 0.0023) and IV (P = 0.0013), and increased operative duration (P < 0.0001). Risk factors for increased LOS were decreased functional status (P = 0.0037), disseminated cancer (P = 0.0061), American Society of Anesthesiologists classification III and IV (P < 0.0001), increased operative duration (P < 0.0001), and orthopaedic surgeon (vs. neurosurgeon) (P = 0.0156). CONCLUSIONS: This study is the largest to date of patients undergoing cervical osteotomy and provides useful clinical data for patient selection and counseling and 30-day reoperation and readmission rates.

Rod Fracture After Apparently Solid Radiographic Fusion in Adult Spinal Deformity Patients.

BACKGROUND: Rod fracture occurs with delayed fusion or pseudarthrosis after adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery. Rod fracture after apparent radiographic fusion has not been previously investigated. METHODS: Patients with ASD in a multicenter database were assessed for radiographic fusion by a committee of 3 spinal deformity surgeons. Fusions were rated as bilaterally fused (A), unilaterally fused (B), partially fused (C), or not fused (D). Patients with grade A or B fusion and 2-year follow-up were included. Patients with radiographic fusion were evaluated for subsequent rod fracture. Adjusted analyses were conducted with multiple logistic regression, using backwards-variable selection to a threshold of P < 0.2, to assess for associated factors. RESULTS: Of 402 patients with radiographically apparent solid fusion, 9.5% (38) subsequently suffered a broken rod. On multivariate analysis, greater rates of rod fracture were seen among patients of age group 60-69 years (vs. 18-49), body mass index 30-34 and 35+ (vs. <25), stainless-steel rods (vs. titanium), patients with rods ≤5.5 mm (vs. 6.35 mm), and patients with Charlson score 0 (vs. 3+). Of the 38 patients with rod fractures, 18 (47.4%) presented with worsened pain, and 8 (21.1%) required revision at minimum 2-year follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Rod fracture occurred in 9.5% of patients with apparently solid radiographic fusion after ASD surgery. Advanced age, obesity, small diameter rods (5.5 mm), osteotomy, and lower comorbidity burden were significantly associated with rod fracture. Nearly one-half of these patients noted worsening pain, and 21.1% required revision surgery. Instrumentation failure may occur and may be symptomatic even in the setting of apparent fusion on plain radiographs.

Ileus Following Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative ileus (POI) is a common complication after spine surgery, with particularly high rates after adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery. Few studies have been conducted on predictors of POI following ASD surgery. The objective of this study was to determine risk factors for POI in patients undergoing ASD surgery and to determine association between POI and in-hospital mortality, length of stay, and total charges. METHODS: Data were obtained from the National (Nationwide) Inpatient Sample, years 2010-2014. Patients with ASD ≥26 years-old were selected using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification codes. Multiple logistic and linear regressions were used. RESULTS: The analysis included 59,410 patients; 7.4% of patients had POI. On adjusted analysis, the following variables were associated with increased risk of POI: male sex (OR = 1.43; CI, 1.10-1.85), anterior surgical approach (OR = 1.78; CI, 1.22-2.60), ≥9 levels fused (OR = 1.84; CI, 1.24-2.73), electrolyte disorders (OR = 2.70; CI, 2.15-3.39), and pathologic weight loss (OR = 1.94; CI, 1.08-3.46). POI was associated with significantly longer length of stay (+39% [CI, 29%-51%]) and higher total charges (+23% [CI, 14%-31%]). CONCLUSIONS: Risk factors for POI were identified. Length of stay was 2.9 days longer in patients with POI, and total charges were approximately $80,000 higher. These results may be applied clinically to identify patients at risk of POI and to address modifiable risk factors preoperatively. Future studies should be conducted with additional data to develop models capable of accurately predicting and preventing POI.

Late-presenting dural tear: incidence, risk factors, and associated complications.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Unrecognized and inadequately repaired intraoperative durotomies may lead to cerebrospinal fluid leak, pseudomeningocele, and other complications. Few studies have investigated durotomy that is unrecognized intraoperatively and requires additional postoperative management (hereafter, late-presenting dural tear [LPDT]), although estimates of LPDT range from 0.6 to 8.3 per 1,000 spinal surgeries. These single-center studies are based on relatively small sample sizes for an event of this rarity, all with <10 patients experiencing LPDT. PURPOSE: This investigation is the largest yet conducted on LPDT, and sought to identify incidence, risk factors for, and complications associated with LPDT. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: This observational cohort study employed the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program dataset (years 2012-2015). PATIENT SAMPLE: Patients who underwent spine surgery were identified based on presence of primary listed Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes corresponding to spinal fusion or isolated posterior decompression without fusion. OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary variable in this study was occurrence of LPDT, identified as reoperation or readmission with durotomy-specific CPT or International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification codes but without durotomy codes present for the index procedure. METHODS: Descriptive statistics were generated. Bivariate and multivariate analyses were conducted using chi-square tests and multiple logistic regression, respectively, generating both risk factors for LPDT and independent association of LPDT with postoperative complications. Statistical significance was defined as p<.05. RESULTS: In total, 86,212 patients were analyzed. The overall rate of reoperation or readmission without reoperation for LPDT was 2.0 per 1,000 patients (n=174). Of LPDT patients, 97.7% required one or more unplanned reoperations (n=170), and 5.7% of patients (n=10) required two reoperations. On multivariate analysis, lumbar procedures (odds ratio [OR] 2.79, p<.0001, vs. cervical), procedures involving both cervical and lumbar levels (OR 3.78, p=.0338, vs. cervical only), procedures with decompression only (OR 1.72, p=.0017, vs. fusion and decompression), and operative duration ≥250 minutes (OR 1.70, p=.0058, vs. <250 minutes) were associated with increased likelihood of LPDT. Late-presenting dural tear was significantly associated with surgical site infection (SSI) (OR 2.54, p<.0001), wound disruption (OR 2.24, p<.0001), sepsis (OR 2.19, p<.0001), thromboembolism (OR 1.71, p<.0001), acute kidney injury (OR 1.59, p=.0281), pneumonia (OR 1.14, p=.0269), and urinary tract infection (UTI) (OR 1.08, p=.0057). CONCLUSIONS: Late-presenting dural tears occurred in 2.0 per 1,000 patients who underwent spine surgery. Patients who underwent lumbar procedures, decompression procedures, and procedures with operative duration ≥250 minutes were at increased risk for LPDT. Further, LPDT was independently associated with increased likelihood of SSI, sepsis, pneumonia, UTI, wound dehiscence, thromboembolism, and acute kidney injury. As LPDT is associated with markedly increased morbidity and potential liability risk, spine surgeons should be aware of best-practice management for LPDT and consider it a rare, but possible etiology for developing postoperative complications.

Radiation Exposure and Health Risks for Orthopaedic Surgeons.

Orthopaedic surgeons are routinely exposed to intraoperative radiation and, therefore, follow the principle of "as low as reasonably achievable" with regard to occupational safety. However, standardized education on the long-term health effects of radiation and the basis for current radiation exposure limits is limited in the field of orthopaedics. Much of orthopaedic surgeons' understanding of radiation exposure limits is extrapolated from studies of survivors of the atomic bombings in Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Japan. Epidemiologic studies on cancer risk in surgeons and interventional proceduralists and dosimetry studies on true radiation exposure during trauma and spine surgery recently have been conducted. Orthopaedic surgeons should understand the basics and basis of radiation exposure limits, be familiar with the current literature on the incidence of solid tumors and cataracts in orthopaedic surgeons, and understand the evidence behind current intraoperative fluoroscopy safety recommendations.

S-1 alar/iliac screw technique for spinopelvic fixation.

Spinopelvic fixation provides an important anchor for long fusions in spinal deformity surgery, and it is also used in the treatment of other spine pathologies. Iliac screws are known to sometimes require reoperation due to pain resulting from hardware prominence and skin injury. S-2 alar/iliac (S2AI) screws do not often require removal, but they may provide inadequate fixation in select cases. In this paper the authors describe a technique for S-1 alar/iliac screws that may be used independently or as a supplement to S2AI screws. A preliminary biomechanical analysis and 2 clinical case examples are also provided.

Local Modalities for Preventing Surgical Site Infections: An Evidence-based Review.

Surgical site infections remain a dreaded complication of orthopaedic surgery, affecting both patient economics and quality of life. It is important to note that infections are multifactorial, involving both surgical and patient factors. To decrease the occurrence of infections, surgeons frequently use local modalities, such as methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus screening; preoperative bathing; intraoperative povidone-iodine lavage; and application of vancomycin powder, silver-impregnated dressings, and incisional negative-pressure wound therapy. These modalities can be applied individually or in concert to reduce the incidence of surgical site infections. Despite their frequent use, however, these interventions have limited support in the literature.

Adult Spinal Deformity Knowledge in Orthopedic Spine Surgeons: Impact of Fellowship Training, Experience, and Practice Characteristics.

STUDY DESIGN: Survey study. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this paper was to assess the level of adult spine deformity (ASD) knowledge among orthopedic spine surgeons and identify areas for improvement in spine surgery training. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: ASD is increasingly encountered in spine surgery practice. While ASD knowledge among neurosurgeons has been evaluated, ASD knowledge among orthopedic spine surgeons has not previously been reported. METHODS: A survey of orthopedic spine surgeon members of North American Spine Society (NASS) was conducted to assess level of spine surgery training, practice experience, and spinal deformity knowledge base. The survey used was previously completed by a group of neurologic surgeons with published results. The survey used 11 questions developed and agreed upon by experienced spinal deformity surgeons. RESULTS: Complete responses were received from 413 orthopedic spine surgeons. The overall correct-answer rate was 69.0%. Surgeons in practice for less than 10 years had a higher correct-answer rate compared to those who have practiced for 10 years or more (74% vs. 67%; p = .000003). Surgeons with 75% or more of their practice dedicated to spine had a higher overall correct rate compared to surgeons whose practice is less than 75% spine (71% vs. 63%; p = .000029). Completion of spine fellowship was associated with a higher overall correct-answer rate compared to respondents who did not complete a spine fellowship (71% vs. 59%; p < .00001). CONCLUSIONS: Completion of spine fellowship and having a dedicated spine surgery practice were significantly associated with improved performance on this ASD knowledge survey. Unlike neurosurgeons, orthopedic spine surgeons who have practiced for less than 10 years performed better than those who have practiced for more than 10 years. Ongoing emphasis on spine deformity education should be emphasized to improve adult spinal deformity knowledge base.

Completion of Multiple Fellowships by Orthopedic Surgeons: Analysis of the American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery Certification Database.

Orthopedic surgeons have become increasingly subspecialized, and recent studies have shown that American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery (ABOS) Step II applicants are performing a higher percentage of their cases within their chosen subspecialties. However, these studies focused exclusively on surgeons who have completed a single fellowship; little data exist on those who pursue a second fellowship. All applicants to the ABOS Part II examination from 2004 to 2016 were classified by their self-reported fellowship training history using the ABOS Part II examination database. Trends in the number of applicants completing multiple fellowships and the types of fellowships combined were analyzed. In addition, cases performed by applicants who had performed multiple fellowships were analyzed to determine what percentage were within their chosen subspecialties. A total of 9776 applicants to ABOS Part II were included in the database from 2004 to 2016, including 444 (4.5%) applicants who completed more than one fellowship. There were 43 different combinations of fellowships; the most common additional fellowships were trauma (40.1%), sports medicine (38.7%), and joints (30.4%). The most common combinations were joints and sports medicine (10.6%) and foot and ankle and sports medicine (10.1%). A significant increase occurred in physicians training in both pediatric orthopedics and sports medicine (P=.02). The percentage of cases within the applicants' chosen specialties ranged from 91.4% in sports to 73.6% in tumor. Multiple fellowship applicants represent a small percentage of all applicants, and although subspecialization in orthopedics is increasing, no increasing trend toward multiple fellowships within this dataset was observed. However, the significant increase in applicants who combined pediatric orthopedic and sports medicine fellowships suggests an increasing interest in treating this increasing patient population in addition to social and economic factors. [Orthopedics. 2018; 41(1):e33-e37.].

Hospital competitive intensity and perioperative outcomes following lumbar spinal fusion.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Interhospital competition has been shown to influence the adoption of surgical techniques and approaches, clinical patient outcomes, and health care resource use for select surgical procedures. However, little is known regarding these dynamics as they relate to spine surgery. PURPOSE: This investigation sought to examine the relationship between interhospital competitive intensity and perioperative outcomes following lumbar spinal fusion. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: This study used the Nationwide Inpatient Sample dataset, years 2003, 2006, and 2009. PATIENT SAMPLE: Patients were included based on the presence of the International Classification of Disease, Ninth Edition, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) codes corresponding to lumbar spinal fusion, as well as on the presence of data on the Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI). OUTCOME MEASURES: The outcome measures are perioperative complications, defined using an ICD-9-CM coding algorithm. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The HHI, a validated measure of competition within a market, was used to assess hospital market competitiveness. The HHI was calculated based on the hospital cachement area. Multiple regression was performed to adjust for confounding variables including patient age, gender, primary payer, severity of illness score, primary versus revision fusion, anterior versus posterior approach, national region, hospital bed size, location or teaching status, ownership, and year. Perioperative clinical outcomes were assessed based on ICD-9-CM codes with modifications. RESULTS: In total, 417,520 weighted patients (87,999 unweighted records) were analyzed. The mean cachement area HHI was 0.31 (range 0.099-0.724). The average patient age was 55.4 years (standard error=0.194), and the majority of patients were female (55.8%, n=232,727). The majority of procedures were primary spinal fusions (92.7%, n=386,998) and fusions with a posterior-only technique (81.5%, n=340,271). Most procedures occurred in the South (42.5%, n=177,509) or the Midwest (27.0%, n=112,758) regions. In the multiple regression analysis, increased hospital competitive intensity was associated with an increased total complication rate (odds ratio [OR] 1.52, p<.0001), device-related complications (OR 1.46, p=.0294), genitourinary complications (OR 2.15, p=.0091), infection (OR 3.48, p<.0001), neurologic complications (OR 1.69, p=.0422), total charges (+29%, p=.0034), and inpatient hospital length of stay (LOS) (+16%, p=.0012). The likelihood of complications at state-owned hospitals (OR 2.81, p=.0001) was more highly associated with HHI than at private, non-profit hospitals (OR 1.39, p=.0050). The occurrence of complications at urban teaching hospitals (OR 2.14, p<.0001) was generally more associated with HHI than at urban non-teaching hospitals (OR 1.19, p=.2457). CONCLUSIONS: Increased interhospital competitive intensity is associated with increased odds of complications, increased total charges, and prolonged LOS following lumbar spine fusion. These differences are generally highest among state-owned and urban teaching hospitals. Differences in outcome related to hospital competition may be due to suboptimal resource allocation. Identifying differences in perioperative outcomes associated with hospital market competition is important in the contemporary environment of health care reimbursement reform and hospital consolidation. Perioperative outcome disparities between highly competitive and minimally competitive areas should be monitored and further studied.

Inpatient costs and blood transfusion rates of sarcopenic patients following thoracolumbar spine surgery.

OBJECTIVE Sarcopenia, the muscle atrophy associated with aging and disease progression, accounts for nearly $18.5 billion in health care expenditures annually. Given the high prevalence of sarcopenia in patients undergoing orthopedic surgery, the goal of this study was to assess the impact of sarcopenia on inpatient costs following thoracolumbar spine surgery. METHODS Patients older than 55 years undergoing thoracolumbar spine surgery from 2003 to 2015 were retrospectively analyzed. Sarcopenia was measured using total psoas area at the L-4 vertebra on perioperative CT scans. Hospital billing data were used to compare inpatient costs, transfusion rate, and rate of advanced imaging utilization. RESULTS Of the 50 patients assessed, 16 were sarcopenic. Mean total hospital costs were 1.75-fold greater for sarcopenic patients compared with nonsarcopenic patients ($53,128 vs $30,292, p = 0.04). Sarcopenic patients were 2.1 times as likely to require a blood transfusion (43.8% vs 20.6%, p = 0.04). Sarcopenic patients had a 2.6-fold greater usage of advanced imaging (68.8% vs 26.5%, p = 0.002) with associated higher diagnostic imaging costs ($2452 vs $801, p = 0.01). Sarcopenic patients also had greater pharmacy, laboratory, respiratory care, and emergency department costs. CONCLUSIONS This study is the first to show that sarcopenia is associated with higher postoperative costs and rates of blood transfusion following thoracolumbar spine surgery. Measuring the psoas area may represent a strategy for predicting perioperative costs in spine surgery patients.