Cancer Treatment Before and After Physician-Pharmacy Integration.

Importance: Integration of pharmacies with physician practices, also known as medically integrated dispensing, is increasing in oncology. However, little is known about how this integration affects drug use, expenditures, medication adherence, or time to treatment initiation. Objective: To examine the association of physician-pharmacy integration with oral oncology drug expenditures, use, and patient-centered measures. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study used claims data from a large commercial insurer in the US to analyze changes in outcome measures among patients treated by pharmacy-integrating vs nonintegrating community oncologists in 14 states between January 1, 2011, and December 31, 2019. Commercially insured patients were aged 18 to 64 years with 1 of the following advanced-stage diagnoses: breast cancer, colorectal cancer, kidney cancer, lung cancer, melanoma, or prostate cancer. Data analysis was conducted from May 2023 to March 2024. Exposure: Treatment by a pharmacy-integrating oncologist, ascertained by the presence of an on-site pharmacy or nonpharmacy dispensing site. Main Outcomes and Measures: Oral, intravenous (IV), total, and out-of-pocket drug expenditures for a 6-month episode of care; share of patients prescribed oral drugs; days' supply of oral drugs; medication adherence measured by proportion of days covered; and time to treatment initiation. The association between an oncologist's pharmacy integration and each outcome of interest was estimated using the difference-in-differences estimator. Results: Between 2012 and 2019, 3159 oncologists (745 females [27.1%], 2002 males [72.9%]) treated 23 968 patients (66.4% female; 53.4% aged 55-64 years). Of the 3159 oncologists, 578 (18.3%) worked in practices that integrated with pharmacies (with a low rate in 2011 of 0% and a high rate in 2019 of 31.5%). In the full sample (including all cancer sites), after physician-pharmacy integration, no significant changes were found in oral drug expenditures, IV drug expenditures, or total drug expenditures. There was, however, an increase in days' supply of oral drugs (5.96 days; 95% CI, 0.64-11.28 days; P = .001). There were no significant changes in out-of-pocket expenditures, medication adherence, or time to treatment initiation of oral drugs. In the breast cancer sample, there was an increase in oral drug expenditures ($244; 95% CI, $41-$446; P = .02) and a decrease in IV drug expenditures (-$4187; 95% CI, -$8293 to -$80; P = .05). Conclusions and Relevance: Results of this cohort study indicated that the integration of oncology practices with pharmacies was not associated with significant changes in expenditures or clear patient-centered benefits.

Long term cost outcomes among commercially insured patients undergoing bariatric surgical procedures.

Objective: Bariatric procedures have become safer in recent years, warranting new data on long-term costs. This study examined the impact of bariatric procedures on a person's long-term healthcare costs up to 10 years and if it differed by socio-economic status (SES). Methods: This retrospective observational study compared the downstream health care cost of patients with obesity who had undergone bariatric surgery (BS) between 2009 and 2018 to a 1:1 matched group of members with obesity but no surgery. Results: 167,764 individuals from administrative claims data with an obesity diagnosis were included; 83,882 in the BS group and 83,882 in the non-surgical group. In follow-up years 2-10, the BS group was associated with lower total medical healthcare cost compared to the non-surgical group (cost ratios ranged 0.85-0.93, p values < 0.05). When stratifying the BS group by SES quartiles, there were no significant cost differences by SES (cost ratios ranged from 0.96 to 1.05, most p values > 0.05). Conclusions: BS was associated with lower long-term follow-up medical cost and cost savings appeared similar among the SES quartiles in the BS group. The study results may help policy makers and employers in designing benefits and extending coverage for bariatric surgical procedures.

Commercial Claims-Based Comparison of Survival and Toxic Effects of Definitive Radiotherapy vs Primary Surgery in Patients With Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Importance: Definitive radiotherapy (RT) and primary surgery (PS) are considered to be equally viable local therapy modalities for oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC). The comparative effectiveness of these therapies is often debated, and treatment decisions are based on a paucity of comparative data. Objective: To examine the differences in overall survival and key toxic effects in patients with OPSCC treated with RT and PS. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort analysis used the HealthCore Integrated Research Database to identify 884 patients diagnosed with OPSCC from January 1, 2007, to December 31, 2014. Patients were categorized as receiving definitive RT (with or without chemotherapy) or PS (with or without adjuvant RT or chemoradiotherapy). Administrative claims data were linked with state cancer registries from California, Connecticut, Georgia, Kentucky, New York, and Ohio. Data analysis was performed from February 29, 2016, to February 6, 2018. Exposures: Definitive RT or PS. Main Outcomes and Measures: Overall survival was analyzed using Cox proportional hazards regression. Risks of gastrostomy dependence, esophageal stricture, and osteoradionecrosis were determined through claims and analyzed using logistic regression. Results: A total of 884 patients (608 [68.8%] in the RT group and 276 [31.2%] in the PS group; mean [SD] age, 61.5 [10.7] years; 727 [82.2%] male; 842 [95.3%] white) were included in this study. The 3-year overall survival was 76% among patients treated with RT and 81% among patients treated with PS (hazard ratio, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.54-1.01). On multivariable analysis, increasing age, female sex, and low income were associated with inferior survival; treatment type was not. Patients treated with RT were more likely to have gastrostomy dependence within the first year (391 [64.3%] vs 127 [46.0%]; adjusted OR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.42-0.77). After treating chemotherapy as an effect modifier, there was no difference between modalities. Treatment type was not associated with esophageal stricture or osteoradionecrosis risk. Mean costs were approximately $100 000 for payers and $5000 for patients, with no adjusted differences between RT and PS. Conclusions and Relevance: This study suggests that RT and PS are equally viable treatment options for OPSCC; therefore, local therapy decisions may be individualized to each patient. However, the frequent addition of chemotherapy was associated with increased gastrostomy dependence among patients undergoing RT, which may be relevant in clinical decision making.

Untreated Sleep Apnea: An Analysis of Administrative Data to Identify Risk Factors for Early Nonadherence.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: Discontinuation of positive airway pressure (PAP) treatment for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is widely reported, but research has not adequately addressed nonadherence with diagnostic testing for sleep disorders and initiation of PAP. This study sought to identify drivers of nonadherence with diagnostic sleep testing and PAP treatment initiation among patients preauthorized for these services. METHODS: This observational cohort study used preauthorization records from a sleep management program and administrative medical claims from a large commercial health insurer. Participants included adults preauthorized for sleep testing and a subset in whom OSA was diagnosed and who were preauthorized for PAP treatment. Outcome measures were nonadherence with diagnostic sleep testing and PAP treatment initiation, identified as lack of a claim for a preauthorized service within 3 months of preauthorization of that service. Risk factors for nonadherence included patient demographics, prescribing factors, signs and symptoms of OSA, comorbidities, and prior health service utilization. RESULTS: Of 51,749 patients preauthorized for diagnostic testing, 23.5% did not undergo testing. Among 19,968 patients preauthorized for PAP treatment, 11.1% did not initiate treatment. Testing and treatment ordered by primary care providers, residence outside the Midwest region, and two or fewer office visits within 6 months before preauthorization were strong predictors of nonadherence. Apnea-hypopnea index score < 30 events/h was also a strong predictor of nonadherence with treatment initiation. CONCLUSIONS: This study adds to existing knowledge about risk factors for nonadherence with sleep testing and treatment initiation following preauthorization. Health plans and providers should develop strategies to better engage patients with higher risk of nonadherence.

Real-World Impact of a Decision Support Tool on Colony-Stimulating Factor Use and Chemotherapy-Induced Febrile Neutropenia Among Patients With Breast Cancer.

Background: White blood cell colony-stimulating factors (CSFs) decrease the incidence of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia (FN). Widespread use of CSFs that is not guideline-concordant has been reported. Among patients with breast cancer receiving chemotherapy, the ability of evidence-based decision support tools to promote risk-appropriate reductions in CSF use without increased incidence of FN has not been examined. Methods: A retrospective cohort design and US commercial claims data were used. The impact of CSF decision support was analyzed among women with breast cancer receiving first-cycle chemotherapy from April 1, 2013, to March 30, 2015. The tool was implemented as part of a prior authorization process in 9 states starting July 1, 2014. Patients were assigned to intervention (ie, states where the decision support tool had been implemented) or nonintervention states (ie, 39 states where the tool had not been implemented). CSF use and subsequent incidence of FN were compared using difference-in-difference (DID) regressions adjusting for baseline differences in FN risk factors such as comorbidities and various infections. Results: The study sample of 7,224 patients (intervention states: pre-implementation, 1,991 and post-implementation, 2,010; nonintervention states: pre-implementation, 1,569 and post-implementation, 1,654) showed no significant difference in risk factors. Before and after implementation, a significant decrease in the proportion of patients with CSF use was observed in the intervention states (75% to 69%) compared with no significant change in the nonintervention (72% to 71%) states (DID, -5.4%; 95% CI, -6.0% to -4.7%; P=.006). No significance increase in FN incidence occurred in intervention (5.0% to 5.5%) and nonintervention (5.4% to 4.8%) states (DID, 0.2%; 95% CI, -0.20 to 0.30; P=.78). Similar results were obtained in subgroups by comorbidities and in sensitivity analyses by claims-based FN definitions. Conclusions: CSF use decreased modestly after implementation of the decision support tool, with no observed changes in FN rates. Such tools can reduce practice variation to improve care standards.

Reducing Overuse of Colony-Stimulating Factors in Patients With Lung Cancer Receiving Chemotherapy: Evidence From a Decision Support-Enabled Program.

PURPOSE: Colony-stimulating factors (CSFs) are frequently overused for the primary prevention of febrile neutropenia (FN) in patients receiving chemotherapy. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study design was used to analyze commercial claims data in adults with lung cancer initiated on chemotherapy from April 1, 2013, to March 30, 2015. The tool was implemented at oncology practices in phases across 14 US states. Patients were assigned to intervention and nonintervention states according to whether they resided in service areas where the tool had been implemented. Patients were followed up to 6 months after initiating chemotherapy. Difference in pre- and postimplementation CSF use and FN incidence rates were compared with the use of difference-in-differences (DID) models that were adjusted for baseline FN risk factors. RESULTS: The study population of 3,467 patients (intervention states: pre, 707; post, 1,150; nonintervention states: pre, 636; post, 974) showed no significant differences in FN risk factors at baseline. In adjusted results before and after implementation, CSF use decreased from 48.4% to 35.6% in the intervention states versus 43.2% to 44.4% in the nonintervention states (DID, -8.7%; 95% CI, -14.65% to -2.67%; P ≤ .001). The rates of FN were consistent for both groups in both periods, with no statistical difference in trend for the intervention (2.8% to 4.3%) versus the nonintervention (3.1% to 5.1%) states (DID, -0.13; 95% CI, -0.35 to 0.10; P = .927). CONCLUSION: These findings demonstrate that a decision support-enabled utilization management tool can improve risk-appropriate, guideline-adherent CSF use in patients with lung cancer.

Finding the Value in 'Value' Designation: Evidence and Opportunity in the United States.

PURPOSE: Centers of Excellence (COE) designations have been used to distinguish high-quality facilities. Originally based on quality metrics alone, published evidence failed to consistently show improvements in measurable quality markers. COE development has since shifted to a value-based framework incorporating cost of care, providing greater transparency. This study evaluated the patient outcomes of such value-designated facilities certified under one of the larger U.S. commercial provider networks. DESIGN: Retrospective, observational study using 2009-2013 commercial administrative claims data. METHODOLOGY: Analysis included 33,827 adults (≥18 years) who received spine surgery at value-designated (n=6,141, 22%) vs. other facilities (n=27,686, 78%). Multivariate regression models were used to compare 90-day episodic costs and quality outcomes, adjusted for patient characteristics and comorbidities. RESULTS: Adjusted episodic cost per surgery was lower in value-designated facilities by $3,157 (16%) for lumbar discectomy/decompression, $6,784 (19%) for cervical simple fusion, and $11,134 (18%) for lumbar simple fusion (all P<.05). Adjusted complication rate was lower (1.5% vs. 2.0%; P<.05) at value-designated facilities, while other quality measures were similar. Value-designated facilities tended to be large, in metropolitan areas, affiliated with medical schools, and performed more surgical procedures and provided more nursing hours. CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, this is the first large-scale study evaluating value-designated COE. Value-designated COE programs represent an advance over a cost- or quality-alone designation in the ability to identify facilities with lower costs and equal or better quality outcomes. Value designation offers patients transparency for selecting care providers. Future efforts should continue to refine quality criteria used in designations to distinguish patient outcomes.

Early Trends Among Seven Recommendations From the Choosing Wisely Campaign.

IMPORTANCE: The Choosing Wisely campaign consists of more than 70 lists produced by specialty societies of medical practices or procedures of minimal clinical benefit to patients in most situations, with recommendations regarding judicious use. OBJECTIVE: To quantify the frequency and trends of some of the earliest Choosing Wisely recommendations using nationwide commercial health plan population-level data. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Retrospective analysis of claims data for members of Anthem-affiliated commercial health plans. The low-value services selected were (1) imaging tests for uncomplicated headache; (2) cardiac imaging without history of cardiac conditions; (3) low back pain imaging without red-flag conditions; (4) preoperative chest x-rays with unremarkable history and physical examination results; (5) human papillomavirus testing for women younger than 30 years; (6) use of antibiotics for acute sinusitis; and (7) use of prescription nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) for members with hypertension, heart failure, or chronic kidney disease. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The number of members with medical and/or pharmacy claims for the included low-value services was assessed quarterly over a 2- to 3-year span through 2013. Trend changes in recommendations were evaluated across all quarters using Poisson regression with denominators as offsets. RESULTS: Two services had declines: Use of imaging for headache decreased from 14.9% to 13.4% (trend estimate, 0.99 [95% CI, 0.98-0.99]; P < .001), and cardiac imaging decreased from 10.8% to 9.7% (trend estimate, 0.99 [95% CI, 0.99-0.99]; P < .001). Two services had increases: Use of NSAIDs in select conditions increased from 14.4% to 16.2% (trend estimate, 1.02 [95% CI, 1.01-1.02]; P < .001), and human papillomavirus testing in younger women increased from 4.8% to 6.0% (trend estimate, 1.01 [95% CI, 1.00-1.01]; P < .001). Use of antibiotics for sinusitis remained stable (0.8% decrease from 84.5% to 83.7%; trend estimate, 1.00 [95% CI, 1.00-1.00]; P = .16). Use of preoperative chest x-rays (0.2% decrease, ending utilization 91.5%; trend estimate, 1.00 [95% CI, 1.00-1.00]; P = .70) and imaging for low back pain (53.7% utilization throughout study; P = .71) remained high with no statistically significant changes. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: For this population-level analysis of 7 low-value services analyzed, changes were modest but showed a desirable decrease for 2 recommendations (imaging for headache, cardiac imaging for low-risk patients). The effect sizes were marginal, however, and although 4 of the 7 lists had statistically significant changes-unsurprising given the large sample size-the clinical significance is uncertain. These results suggest that additional interventions are necessary for wider implementation of Choosing Wisely recommendations.

Intravenous Versus Subcutaneous Anti-TNF-Alpha Agents for Crohn's Disease: A Comparison of Effectiveness and Safety.

BACKGROUND: In recent years, there have been a number of pharmacological innovations for Crohn's disease (CD), a difficult-to-treat condition, including new treatment philosophies (e.g., top-down therapy) and new therapeutic options in terms of the agent and the route of administration. Three anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF-alpha) agents are available for use among CD patients in the United States: infliximab, an intravenous agent, and adalimumab and certolizumab pegol, 2 newer subcutaneous products. Infliximab is considered the "gold standard" because it has the longest clinical experience, and adalimumab and certolizumab pegol have each gained significant market share. OBJECTIVE: To examine differences in effectiveness and safety between currently available intravenous and subcutaneous anti-TNF-alpha agents used to treat patients with CD. METHODS: Data for this retrospective, administrative claims analysis were obtained from pharmacy and medical claims from major U.S. health plans geographically dispersed across 14 states during 2007-2011. Patients had at least 1 ICD-9-CM diagnosis for CD, 6 months pre-index eligibility, and initiated anti-TNF-alpha therapy on the index date. Patients in each cohort were propensity score matched on pre-index demographics, clinical characteristics, and baseline health care use. During the post-index period, age-sex adjusted incidence rate ratios (IRRs) of CD-related symptoms, infections, cancers, and hepatic-related conditions were compared using Cox (PH) models. RESULTS: The matched cohorts included 515 patients in each group, with an average age of 39 years. Median follow-up was 17.5 months in the intravenous cohort and 17.7 months in the subcutaneous cohort. In terms of effectiveness outcomes, age-sex adjusted IRRs for the subcutaneous group, with the intravenous cohort as a reference, were as follows: 0.61 (95% CI = 0.32-1.18, P = 0.14) for anal fissures; 0.97 (95% CI = 0.72-1.30, P = 0.85) for abscess; 1.08 (95% CI = 0.79-1.04, P = 0.64) for fistulas; 1.12 (95% CI = 0.83-1.54, P = 0.45) for gastrointestinal hemorrhage; and 1.22 (95% CI = 0.93-1.59, P = 0.14) for a combined measure of obstruction, occlusion, stenosis, and stricture of intestine. In terms of safety outcomes, age-sex adjusted IRRs for the subcutaneous group were as follows: 0.85 (95% CI = 0.62-1.16, P = 0.30) for infections; 1.16 (95% CI = 0.71-1.89, P = 0.55) for cancers; and 1.23 (95% CI = 0.79-1.92, P = 0.35) for hepatic-related conditions. CONCLUSIONS: After adjusting for baseline characteristics, effectiveness and safety outcomes appear to be comparable between intravenous and subcutaneous anti-TNF-alpha agents in patients with CD. With similar outcomes, other considerations such as convenience of administration and patient preference may play a more prominent role in choice of agent. Health care providers and health payers should inform CD patients about the range of options available when selecting an anti-TNF-alpha agent.

Patient Use of Cost and Quality Data When Choosing a Joint Replacement Provider in the Context of Reference Pricing.

Health plans are encouraging consumerism among joint replacement patients by reporting information on hospital costs and quality. Little is known about how the proliferation of such initiatives impacts patients' selection of a surgeon and hospital. We performed a qualitative analysis of semistructured interviews with 13 patients who recently received a hip or knee replacement surgery. Patients focused on the choice of a surgeon as opposed to a hospital, and the surgeon choice was primarily made based on reputation. Most patients had long-standing relationships with an orthopedic surgeon and tended to stay with that surgeon for their replacement. Despite growing availability of cost and quality information, patients almost never used such information to make a decision.

Considering patient preferences when selecting anti-tumor necrosis factor therapeutic options.

BACKGROUND: Anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) medications for the treatment of chronic inflammatory conditions represent a large and growing expenditure for health plans. Over the past few years, there has been an increase in options for patients receiving anti-TNFs, including choice of agent, route of administration, and location for receiving the medication. OBJECTIVE: To examine patient preferences regarding available anti-TNF agents and mode of administration options. METHODS: This cross-sectional survey and claims study was based on administrative claims in the HealthCore Integrated Research Database. Patients were identified for this study if they were receiving infliximab (the intravenous [IV] group) or adalimumab, golimumab, etanercept, or certolizumab pegol (the subcutaneous [SC] group) between March 2012 and August 2012 and were diagnosed with conditions for which these agents are indicated by the US Food and Drug Administration. The survey questionnaire was developed specifically for this study. Participants were asked about their use of anti-TNF agents, locations of administration, preferences for IV or SC therapy, interest in anti-TNF home therapy options, and their physician's role in their decision-making process. A validated instrument, the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) version II, was used to assess treatment satisfaction by the patients. RESULTS: A total of 6000 patients were included in the final list of patients, and the study was stopped when the targeted number of 500 surveys were completed. The IV group consisted of 202 (40%) patients, and the SC group consisted of 298 (60%) patients. Patients in the SC group had a higher preference for the administration route they were using compared with patients in the IV group: 89.9% of the SC group preferred the SC route of administration, whereas 71.8% of the IV group preferred the IV route (P <.001). The global treatment satisfaction scores were similar in both groups (81.9 in the IV group, 80.1 in the SC group; P = .247). The reported likelihood of patients discussing alternative anti-TNF options with their physician was low (45.5% in the IV group vs 49.7% in the SC group; P = .366). CONCLUSIONS: When asked to make a hypothetical choice between IV and SC administration, patients had stronger preferences for SC routes than for IV routes. There was a strong correlation between the route of administration in use and the preference, indicating high level of satisfaction with the current treatment used, which was confirmed with the TSQM version II results. An opportunity for patient education exists, because conversations with physicians about alternative anti-TNF therapies and administration appear to be lacking.

CT scan utilization patterns in pediatric patients with recurrent headache.

UNLABELLED: Although unnecessary for children with headache and normal history, computed tomography (CT) scans are widely used. This study sought to determine current practice patterns of neuroimaging to diagnose pediatric headache in a variety of treatment settings and to identify factors associated with increased use of neuroimaging. METHODS: This retrospective claims analysis included children (aged 3­17 years) with ≥2 medical claims for headache. The primary outcome was CT scan utilization on or after first presentation with headache in a physician's office or emergency department (ED). RESULTS: Of 15 836 patients, 26% (4034 patients; mean age: 11.8 years) had ≥1 CT scan, 74% within 1 month of index diagnosis. Patients with ED visits were 4 times more likely to undergo a CT scan versus those without ED visits (P < .001 [95% confidence interval: 3.9­4.8]). However, even outside the ED, use of CT scans remained widespread. Two-thirds of patients with CT scans had no ED use.Among patients with no ED utilization, >20% received a CT scan during the study period. Evaluation by a neurologist was strongly associated with a lower likelihood of CT scan compared with other provider specialties (odds ratio: 0.37; P < .01 [95% confidence interval: 0.30­0.46]). CONCLUSIONS: Use of CT scans to diagnose pediatric headache remains high despite existing guidelines, low diagnostic yield, and high potential risk. Implementing quality improvement initiatives to ensure that CT scans in children are performed only when truly indicated will reduce unnecessary exposure to ionizing radiation and associated cancer risks.

Trends in the prescription of opioids for adolescents with non-cancer pain.

OBJECTIVES: Opioids are among the most commonly abused drugs among adolescents, and the prescription of these drugs has increased over the last decade. The goal of the current study is to examine trends and factors associated with prescription opioid use among adolescents with common non-cancer pain (NCP) conditions, sampled from two contrasting populations. METHODS: We conducted a secondary data analysis examining time trends from 2001 to 2005 in opioid use in two dissimilar populations: a national, commercially insured population and a state Medicaid plan. We examined trends in mean dose prescribed, mean number of prescriptions and types of medications given, as well as clinical and demographic features of adolescents receiving opioids. RESULTS: In 2005, 21% of adolescents with common NCP conditions in HealthCore and 40.2% of adolescents with NCP in Arkansas Medicaid had received prescription opioids. The majority of opioid prescriptions in both 2001 and 2005 were for DEA Schedule II and III short-acting opioids. In both samples, rates of prescription were higher for adolescents with comorbid mental health diagnoses compared to those without and for adolescents with multiple pain conditions compared to a single pain condition. DISCUSSION: Prescription of opioids among adolescents with NCP is common, and the prescription rate is higher among adolescents with multiple pain conditions and comorbid mental health disorders. Further research is necessary to determine risk factors for abuse and misuse of opioids in adolescents to help develop guidelines for use in this age group.

Emergency department visits among recipients of chronic opioid therapy.

BACKGROUND: There has been an increase in overdose deaths and emergency department visits (EDVs) involving use of prescription opioids, but the association between opioid prescribing and adverse outcomes is unclear. METHODS: Data were obtained from administrative claim records from Arkansas Medicaid and HealthCore commercially insured enrollees, 18 years and older, who used prescription opioids for at least 90 continuous days within a 6-month period between 2000 and 2005 and had no cancer diagnoses. Regression analysis was used to examine risk factors for EDVs and alcohol- or drug-related encounters (ADEs) in the 12 months following 90 days or more of prescribed opioids. RESULTS: Headache, back pain, and preexisting substance use disorders were significantly associated with EDVs and ADEs. Mental health disorders were associated with EDVs in HealthCore enrollees and with ADEs in both samples. Opioid dose per day was not consistently associated with EDVs but doubled the risk of ADEs at morphine-equivalent doses over 120 mg/d. Use of short-acting Drug Enforcement Agency Schedule II opioids was associated with EDVs compared with use of non-Schedule II opioids alone (relative risk range, 1.09-1.74). Use of Schedule II long-acting opioids was strongly associated with ADEs (relative risk range, 1.64-4.00). CONCLUSIONS: Use of Schedule II opioids, headache, back pain, and substance use disorders are associated with EDVs and ADEs among adults prescribed opioids for 90 days or more. It may be possible to increase the safety of chronic opioid therapy by minimizing the prescription of Schedule II opioids in these higher-risk recipients.

Risks for possible and probable opioid misuse among recipients of chronic opioid therapy in commercial and medicaid insurance plans: The TROUP Study.

The use of chronic opioid therapy (COT) for chronic non-cancer pain (CNCP) has increased dramatically in the past two decades. There has also been a marked increase in the abuse of prescribed opioids and in accidental opioid overdose. Misuse of prescribed opioids may link these trends, but has thus far only been studied in small clinical samples. We therefore sought to validate an administrative indicator of opioid misuse among large samples of recipients of COT and determine the demographic, clinical, and pharmacological risks associated with possible and probable opioid misuse. A total of 21,685 enrollees in commercial insurance plans and 10,159 in Arkansas Medicaid who had at least 90 days of continuous opioid use 2000-2005 were studied for one year. Criteria were developed for possible and probable opioid misuse using administrative claims data concerning excess days supplied of short-acting and long-acting opioids, opioid prescribers and opioid pharmacies. We estimated possible misuse at 24% of COT recipients in the commercially insured sample and 20% in the Medicaid sample and probable misuse at 6% in commercially insured and at 3% in Medicaid. Among non-modifiable factors, younger age, back pain, multiple pain complaints and substance abuse disorders identify patients at high risk for misuse. Among modifiable factors, treatment with high daily dose opioids (especially >120 mg MED per day) and short-acting Schedule II opioids appears to increase the risk of misuse. The consistency of the findings across diverse patient populations and the varying levels of misuse suggest that these results will generalize broadly, but await confirmation in other studies.

A comparison of dental service use among commercially insured women in Minnesota before, during and after pregnancy.

BACKGROUND: The authors examined and compared dental services used by women before, during and after pregnancy. METHODS: In their study, the authors combined medical and dental claims data for 3,462 pregnant women in Minnesota with commercial dental insurance who had been pregnant between Jan. 1, 2004, and Dec. 31, 2005. The authors used McNemar pairwise comparisons, with each subject serving as her own control and her use of various dental services before pregnancy as her own baseline, to evaluate and compare the dental services used during and after pregnancy. RESULTS: During pregnancy, subjects' use of several dental services-radiographs, restorative services, third-molar extractions and anesthesia-decreased significantly (P < .001) in comparison with their prepregnancy use. After pregnancy, subjects' use of checkups, radiographs and restorative services showed significant increases (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: The significant decreases in use of these services during pregnancy and significant increases after pregnancy may suggest that these women and their dentists were using these services only conservatively during pregnancy or postponing their use altogether until after delivery. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: This study's findings may provide useful background information to medical and dental providers, health care plan administrators and policymakers as they consider recommendations regarding oral health care for women during pregnancy.

Trends in use of opioids by noncancer pain type 2000-2005 among Arkansas Medicaid and HealthCore enrollees: results from the TROUP study.

UNLABELLED: Use of prescription opioids for noncancer pain has increased significantly in recent years, but it is not known if trends differ among the most common noncancer pain conditions. We examined trends in opioid prescribing for the years 2000 through 2005 for individuals with arthritis/joint pain, back pain, neck pain, and headaches by type and number of pain diagnoses, using data from claims records from 2 health insurers: HealthCore commercially insured members (N = 3,768,223) and Arkansas Medicaid (N = 127,866). Rates of headache, back pain, and neck pain diagnoses increased significantly in Arkansas Medicaid enrollees but more modestly among HealthCore enrollees. Rates of opioid use increased in both groups, with long-term use (>90 days' supply per year) increasing at twice the rate of any use. Rates of opioid use did not differ widely between noncancer pain conditions, but long-term opioid use rates doubled with each additional pain diagnosis. Mean days supply and cumulative yearly dose increased between 2000 and 2005 for all pain types and with increasing number of pain diagnoses, but dose per day supply remained relatively stable. The greatest increases in dose among all the pain conditions were seen in short-acting DEA Schedule II opioids. PERSPECTIVE: This study demonstrates increased use of opioids, particularly long-term use, in noncancer pain over a 6-year period among those with multiple pain types. These results appear to reflect a general increase in use of prescription opioids for noncancer pain rather than a condition-specific change in prescribing practices.

Trends in use of opioids for non-cancer pain conditions 2000-2005 in commercial and Medicaid insurance plans: the TROUP study.

Opioids are widely prescribed for non-cancer pain conditions (NCPC), but there have been no large observational studies in actual clinical practice assessing patterns of opioid use over extended periods of time. The TROUP (Trends and Risks of Opioid Use for Pain) study reports on trends in opioid therapy for NCPC in two disparate populations, one national and commercially insured population (HealthCore plan data) and one state-based and publicly-insured (Arkansas Medicaid) population over a six year period (2000-2005). We track enrollees with the four most common NCPC conditions: arthritis/joint pain, back pain, neck pain, headaches, as well as HIV/AIDS. Rates of NCPC diagnosis and opioid use increased linearly during this period in both groups, with the Medicaid group starting at higher rates and the HealthCore group increasing more rapidly. The proportion of enrollees receiving NCPC diagnoses increased (HealthCore 33%, Medicaid 9%), as did the proportion of enrollees with NCPC diagnoses who received opioids (HealthCore 58%, Medicaid 29%). Cumulative yearly opioid dose (in mg. morphine equivalents) received by NCPC patients treated with opioids increased (HealthCore 38%, Medicaid 37%) due to increases in number of days supplied rather than dose per day supplied. Use of short-acting Drug Enforcement Administration Schedule II opioids increased most rapidly, both in proportion of NCPC patients treated (HealthCore 54%, Medicaid 38%) and in cumulative yearly dose (HealthCore 95%, Medicaid 191%). These trends have occurred without any significant change in the underlying population prevalence of NCPC or new evidence of the efficacy of long-term opioid therapy and thus likely represent a broad-based shift in opioid treatment philosophy.