Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Palliat Med ; 15(8): 870-9, 2012 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22747192

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Canada does not have a standardized ethical and practice framework for continuous palliative sedation therapy (CPST). Although a number of institutional and regional guidelines exist, Canadian practice varies. Given the lack of international and national consensus on CPST, the Canadian Society for Palliative Care Physicians (CSPCP) formed a special task force to develop a consensus-based framework for CPST. OBJECTIVE: Through a preliminary review of sedation practices nationally and internationally, it was determined that although considerable consensus was emerging on this topic, there remained both areas of contention and a lack of credible scientific evidence to support a definitive clinical practice guideline. This led to the creation of a framework to help guide policy, practice, and research. METHODS: This framework was developed through the following steps: 1) literature review; 2) identification of issues; 3) preparation of a draft framework; 4) expert consultation and revision; 5) presentation at conferences and further revision; and 6) further revision and national consensus building. RESULTS: A thorough literature review, including gray literature, of sedation therapy at the end of life was conducted from which an initial framework was drafted. This document was reviewed by 30 multidisciplinary experts in Canada and internationally, revised several times, and then submitted to CSPCP members for review. Consensus was high on most parts of the framework. CONCLUSION: The framework for CPST will provide a basis for the development of safe, effective, and ethical use of CPST for patients in palliative care and at the end of life.


Assuntos
Sedação Profunda/normas , Política de Saúde , Hipnóticos e Sedativos/administração & dosagem , Dor Intratável/tratamento farmacológico , Cuidados Paliativos/normas , Canadá , Consenso , Sedação Profunda/métodos , Humanos , Hipnóticos e Sedativos/normas , Cuidados Paliativos/ética , Cuidados Paliativos/métodos , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto
2.
Prim Care Respir J ; 17(1): 46-50, 2008 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18264648

RESUMO

Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) receive poor end-of-life (EoL) care, in part because their disease course is not predictable. If the family physician would not be surprised at the patient's death within a year, then EoL issues should be raised for discussion. Embarking on such a discussion has the potential to enhance the patient's quality of life and EoL care, thereby avoiding unnecessary treatments or interventions. An Advance Health Care Directive can be useful. Appropriately-used systemic (not nebulised) opioids are safe and effective for managing dyspnoea. The family physician is in an excellent position to provide comprehensive EoL care for COPD patients.


Assuntos
Planejamento Antecipado de Cuidados , Comunicação , Cuidados Paliativos/métodos , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/terapia , Dispneia/tratamento farmacológico , Dispneia/etiologia , Humanos , Dor/tratamento farmacológico , Dor/etiologia , Relações Médico-Paciente , Relações Profissional-Família , Prognóstico , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/complicações , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/psicologia , Qualidade de Vida , Assistência Terminal
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA