RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Alterations in the hematological profile have been linked to disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). We aimed to evaluate the levels of hematological parameters in different phases of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and determine whether hematological parameters could be used to predict RA remission. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The medical records of 365 RA patients were reviewed. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to compare hematological parameters among RA patients who were categorized into 4 groups according to disease activity: disease remission or low, moderate or high disease activity. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to determine the predictive performances of significant parameters for RA remission. RESULTS: Complete data were obtained from 325 patients. The 4 groups of patients had different levels of hemoglobin (Hb), red blood cell, white blood cell, and platelet values. In multivariate analysis, Hb level, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and mean platelet volume (MPV) were independent factors associated with disease activity. The combination of these 3 parameters yielded a sensitivity of 95.2% (95% confidence interval [CI] 88.7-98.2), specificity of 23.6% (95% CI 18.3-29.9), positive predictive value of 37.3% (95% CI 31.6-43.4), and negative predictive value of 91.2% (95% CI 80.0-96.7) in predicting disease remission. CONCLUSION: Hb level, NLR and MPV were independently associated with RA disease activity. The high sensitivity and negative predictive value of the model consisting of Hb level, NLR and MPV may serve as a simple and inexpensive tool to identify patients who are less likely to have disease remission.
RESUMO
AIM: In June 2015, the Thai Rheumatism Association (TRA) approved an update of its recommendation for the use of biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) and targeted synthetic (tsDMARD) in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) to cover those currently available in Thailand (etanercept, infliximab, golimumab, rituximab, tocilizumab, abatacept and tofacitinib). METHOD: A search of the literature was performed between January 2000 and June 2015. Existing RA recommendations, in relation to the use of bDMARDs and tsDMARD, were identified and evaluated by the AGREE II instrument prior to their use as a 'guide' for developing this TRA recommendation. An additional literature search was performed in order to answer specific clinical questions that could not be found in existing guidelines. RESULT: Thirteen recommendations were developed. They covered the use of RA classification criteria, the aim of RA treatment, when to initiate bDMARDs/tsDMARD or taper or switch them to other medications, as well as monitoring these drugs during their use. In addition, specific issues including their use and vaccination, malignancies, pregnancy and lactation, and perioperative period also were addressed. Public hearings were performed at the annual meeting of the TRA and of the Royal College of Physicians of Thailand. The recommendations were distributed to other professional associations related to RA management, as well as government sectors associated with the reimbursement policy, prior to development of the final version. CONCLUSION: These recommendations will help Thai rheumatologists prescribe bDMARDs and tsDMARD more appropriately when treating RA patients.