A novel methylation signature predicts extreme long-term survival in glioblastoma.

PURPOSE: Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common malignant primary brain tumor with a dismal prognosis of less than 2 years under maximal therapy. Despite the poor prognosis, small fractions of GBM patients seem to have a markedly longer survival than the vast majority of patients. Recently discovered intertumoral heterogeneity is thought to be responsible for this peculiarity, although the exact underlying mechanisms remain largely unknown. Here, we investigated the epigenetic contribution to survival. METHODS: GBM treatment-naïve samples from 53 patients, consisting of 12 extremely long-term survivors (eLTS) patients and 41 median-term survivors (MTS) patients, were collected for DNA methylation analysis. 865 859 CpG sites were examined and processed for detection of differentially methylated CpG positions (DMP) and regions (DMR) between both survival groups. Gene Ontology (GO) and pathway functional annotations were used to identify associated biological processes. Verification of these findings was done using The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database. RESULTS: We identified 67 DMPs and 5 DMRs that were associated with genes and pathways - namely reduced interferon beta signaling, in MAPK signaling and in NTRK signaling - which play a role in survival in GBM. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, baseline DNA methylation differences already present in treatment-naïve GBM samples are part of genes and pathways that play a role in the survival of these tumor types and therefore may explain part of the intrinsic heterogeneity that determines prognosis in GBM patients.

Deep Brain Stimulation for GNAO1-Associated Dystonia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

OBJECTIVES: Guanine nucleotide-binding protein alpha-activating activity polypeptide O (GNAO1) syndrome, a rare congenital monogenetic disorder, is characterized by a neurodevelopmental syndrome and the presence of dystonia. Dystonia can be very pronounced and even lead to a life-threatening status dystonicus. In a small number of pharmaco-refractory cases, deep brain stimulation (DBS) has been attempted to reduce dystonia. In this study, we summarize the current literature on outcome, safety, and outcome predictors of DBS for GNAO1-associated dystonia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis on individual patient data. We included 18 studies describing 28 unique patients. RESULTS: The mean age of onset of symptoms was 2.4 years (SD 3.8); 16 of 28 patients were male, and dystonia was nearly always generalized (20/22 patients). Symptoms were present before DBS for a median duration of 19.5 months, although highly variable, occurring between 3 and 168 months. The exact phenotype, genotype, and radiologic abnormalities varied and seemed to be of little importance in terms of DBS outcome. All studies described an improvement in dystonia. Our meta-analysis focused on pallidal DBS and found an absolute and relative improvement in Burke-Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale (BFMDRS) of 32.5 points (37.9%; motor part; p = 0.001) and 5.8 points (21.5%; disability part; p = 0.043) at last follow-up compared with preoperative state; 80% of patients were considered responders (BFMDRS-M reduction by ≥25%). Although worsening over time does occur, an improvement was still observed in patients after >10 years. All reported cases of status dystonicus resolved after DBS surgery. Skin erosion and infection were observed in 18% of patients. CONCLUSION: Pallidal DBS can be efficacious and safe in GNAO1-associated dystonia.

Single-cell profiling and zebrafish avatars reveal LGALS1 as immunomodulating target in glioblastoma.

Glioblastoma (GBM) remains the most malignant primary brain tumor, with a median survival rarely exceeding 2 years. Tumor heterogeneity and an immunosuppressive microenvironment are key factors contributing to the poor response rates of current therapeutic approaches. GBM-associated macrophages (GAMs) often exhibit immunosuppressive features that promote tumor progression. However, their dynamic interactions with GBM tumor cells remain poorly understood. Here, we used patient-derived GBM stem cell cultures and combined single-cell RNA sequencing of GAM-GBM co-cultures and real-time in vivo monitoring of GAM-GBM interactions in orthotopic zebrafish xenograft models to provide insight into the cellular, molecular, and spatial heterogeneity. Our analyses revealed substantial heterogeneity across GBM patients in GBM-induced GAM polarization and the ability to attract and activate GAMs-features that correlated with patient survival. Differential gene expression analysis, immunohistochemistry on original tumor samples, and knock-out experiments in zebrafish subsequently identified LGALS1 as a primary regulator of immunosuppression. Overall, our work highlights that GAM-GBM interactions can be studied in a clinically relevant way using co-cultures and avatar models, while offering new opportunities to identify promising immune-modulating targets.

Immunogenic cell death and its therapeutic or prognostic potential in high-grade glioma.

Immunogenic cell death (ICD) has emerged as a key component of therapy-induced anti-tumor immunity. Over the past few years, ICD was found to play a pivotal role in a wide variety of novel and existing treatment modalities. The clinical application of these techniques in cancer treatment is still in its infancy. Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most lethal primary brain tumor with a dismal prognosis despite maximal therapy. The development of new therapies in this aggressive type of tumors remains highly challenging partially due to the cold tumor immune environment. GBM could therefore benefit from ICD-based therapies stimulating the anti-tumor immune response. In what follows, we will describe the mechanisms behind ICD and the ICD-based (pre)clinical advances in anticancer therapies focusing on GBM.