Comparing Early-Stage Breast Cancer Patients with Sentinel Lymph Node Metastasis with and without Completion Axillary Lymph Node Dissection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Currently, the standard method for staging and treatment of axillary lymph nodes for early-stage breast cancer is sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB), while axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) is used in cases with palpable axillary lymph nodes or positive SLNB cases. The aim of this review was to compare overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and axillary recurrence in early-stage breast cancer patients underwent SLNB or SLNB and completion ALND. METHODS: The databases of PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Library were searched using the key words of "breast cancer", "axillary lymph node dissection", and "sentinel lymph node dissection". In addition, other sources were searched for ongoing studies (i.e., clinicaltrials.gov). The clinical trials were evaluated based on the Jadad quality criteria, and cohort studies were evaluated according to the STROBE criteria. At the end of the search, the articles were screened independently by two reviewers to check their eligibility to be included in the study. Afterwards, the data were extracted independently by two researchers. RESULTS: After searching the databases, 169 papers were retrieved. However, after removing the duplicates and studying the titles and abstracts of these papers, only ten ones underwent further investigation. After reading full-text of each article, four studies were finalized. Following a manual search, 27 papers were entered into the study for the final evaluation, 11 of which were included in the meta-analysis based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The findings showed no significant differences in OS, DFS, and axillary recurrence in early-stage breast cancer patients underwent SLNB or SLNB and completion ALND. CONCLUSION: The findings did not confirm that ALND improved OS, DFS, and axillary recurrence in patients who were clinically node-negative and positive SLNB.

Adverse Impacts of Imposing International Economic Sanctions on Health.

BACKGROUND: International economic sanctions (IES) influence a country's economic development and the overall welfare of a nation's population. METHODS: An electronic search of PubMed, Embase and Web of Science was conducted until July 31, 2019. Additionally, a list of references to related articles was reviewed. Key search terms were "Economics", "Health", "Sanction", and their equivalents with no language or time restriction. RESULTS: Totally, 8624 records were identified of which 2869 duplicates were deleted. Finally, 24 papers met the inclusion criteria and were selected for drafting. The number of papers included for evaluating each factor included healthcare (n=16) and pharmaceutical industry (n=10). Nine and eight studies examined the effect of sanctions imposed on Iran and Iraq, respectively. France, Haiti, Serbia, Cuba, Syria, and other areas such as Africa were also evaluated. Sanctions lead to a decrease in immunization rates and government health care expenditures. Sanctions increase infant and under-five mortality rate, road traffic injuries and fatalities, severe malnutrition, infective diseases, neurologic and visual disorders, as well as shortage of medical or dental instruments and a variety of medicines. Sanctions have adverse impacts on female labor and are associated with disabling hospitals, dispersing medical workers, and facilities for radiation therapy. CONCLUSION: The health status of sanctioned nations in terms of healthcare, and pharmaceutical industry was adversely affected in targeted countries.

Transplantation of bone marrow stem cells during cardiac surgery.

BACKGROUND: This systematic review with meta-analysis sought to determine the efficacy and safety of intramyocardial transplantation of bone marrow stem cells during coronary artery bypass graft surgery on postoperative cardiac functional parameters such as left ventricular ejection fraction and left ventricular end-diastolic volume. METHODS: Medline/PubMed, Embase, Elsevier, Sciences online database, and Google Scholar literature search were searched. The effect sizes measured were risk ratio for categorical variables and weighted mean difference with 95% confidence interval for calculating differences between mean values of baseline and follow-up cardiac functional parameters. A value of p < 0.1 for Q test, or I(2 )> 50%, indicated significant heterogeneity among studies. The literature search retrieved 2900 studies from screened databases, of which 2866 (98.6%) were excluded and 34 (619 patients) were included for scoping review. The final analysis included 9 studies (335 patients). RESULTS: Pooled effects estimates of left ventricular ejection fraction and left ventricular end-diastolic volume showed that bone marrow stem cell transplantation had a weighted mean difference of 4.06 (95% confidence interval: 0.41-7.72; p = 0.02) and 7.06 (95% confidence interval: -8.58-22.7; p = 0.3), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Intramyocardial transplantation of bone marrow stem cells improves cardiac functional parameters, significantly increasing left ventricular ejection fraction with a nonsignificant reduction in left ventricular end-diastolic volume. Also, this therapeutic method has no life-threatening complications and was therefore found to be an effective and safe method.

Posterior pericardiotomy in cardiac surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis.

This systematic review with meta-analysis sought to determine the impact of posterior pericardiotomy on incidences of atrial fibrillation and supraventricular arrhythmias, pericardial effusion, pleural effusion, tamponade, and the length of hospital stay after cardiac surgery. We searched for randomized controlled trials, using Medline, Embase, Elsevier and Sciences online databases as well as Google Scholar literature. The effect sizes measured were odds ratio for categorical variables and standard mean difference with 95% confidence interval for calculating differences between mean values of hospital stay in intervention and control groups. A value of p < 0.1 for Q test or I(2 )> 50% indicated significant heterogeneity between the studies. The literature search of all major databases retrieved 20 studies. After screening, 12 suitable trials were identified, which reported outcomes of 2052 patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Posterior pericardiotomy had an odds ratio of 0.33 [95% confidence interval: 0.18-0.61] p < 0.001 for atrial fibrillation; odds ratio 0.32 [0.15-0.67] p = 0.003 for supraventricular arrhythmias; odds ratio 0.09 [0.04-0.19] p = 0.000 for early pericardial effusion and odds ratio 0.04 [0.02-0.08] p < 0.001 for late pericardial effusion; odds ratio 1.64 [1.23-2.20] p = 0.001 for pleural effusion, odds ratio 0.07 [0.02-0.27] p < 0.001 for tamponade, and standard mean difference = 0.01 [-0.12 to 0.14] p = 0.8 for hospital stay. Posterior pericardiotomy is a simple intraoperative technique that can improve postoperative clinical outcomes. However, the incidence of pleural effusion associated with posterior pericardiotomy might be higher.

Antioxidant supplementations for prevention of atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery: an updated comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis of 23 randomized controlled trials.

This systematic review with meta-analysis sought to determine the impact of antioxidants (N-acetylcysteine [NAC], polyunsaturated fatty acids [PUFAs] and vitamins) on incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) and duration of length of hospital stay. Medline, Embase, Elsevier, Sciences online database and Google Scholar literature search was made for studies in randomized controlled trials. The effect sizes measured were odds ratio (OR) for categorical variable and standard mean difference (SMD) with 95% confidence interval (CI) for calculating differences between mean values of duration of hospitalization in intervention and control groups. A value of P < 0.1 for Q-test or I(2) > 50% indicated significant heterogeneity between the studies. Literature search of all major databases retrieved 355 studies. After screening, a total of 23 trials were identified that reported outcomes of 4278 patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Pooled effects estimates on POAF showed a significant reduction after NAC (OR: 0.56, 95% CI: 0.40-0.77, P < 0.001), PUFA (OR: 0.84, 95% CI: 0.71-0.99, P = 0.03) and vitamin C treatment (OR: 0.50, 95% CI: 0.27-0.91, P = 0.02). Hospital length of stay was not reduced after NAC therapy (SMD: 0.082, 95% CI -0.09 to 0.25, P = 0.3), but could be decreased with PUFA (SMD: -0.185, 95% CI: -0.35 to -0.018, P = 0.03) and vitamin C (SMD: -0.325, 95% CI -0.50 to -0.14, P < 0.01). In conclusion, perioperative antioxidant supplementations with NAC, PUFA and vitamin C prevent atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery. Moreover, PUFA and vitamin C are capable to reduce hospital stay, whereas NAC lacks this capacity.