The Uncommon Trapezium Fracture: A Case Series.

Background Isolated trapezium fractures are rare and account for only 1 to 5% of all carpal fractures but are still the third most common carpal fracture. Trapezium fractures are hard to detect and easily missed on standard radiographs. Trapezium fractures can be treated conservatively, as well as operatively, the best treatment is still debatable. Damage of the joint surface between the trapezium and the base of the first metacarpal or scaphoid could cause pain and restriction of movements. Therefore, it is important to diagnose and treat the fracture at early stage, so that articular congruence is guaranteed. Case description We present four cases of the uncommon trapezium fracture. All four cases are conservatively treated with good results, there was no need for operative treatment in all the cases. Literature review The literature describes the possibility to use fixation techniques, only when it is not possible to reduce the displaced fracture or the residual articular step-off is too high a fixation technique should be used. Clinical relevance Primarily, we would recommend navicular cast immobilization for 4 to 6 weeks as initial treatment.

Model-based roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis of the surface replacement trapeziometacarpal total joint arthroplasty.

The primary aim of this clinical and radiostereometric study was to study the migration pattern of the surface replacement trapeziometacarpal joint prosthesis (SRTMTMC, Avanta®, San Diego, CA). The secondary aims were to assess patient-related outcomes and prosthesis survival 5 years after surgery. Ten patients received the prosthesis. Radiostereometric radiographs were obtained 6 weeks, 6 months, 1 year and 5 years post-operatively and were analysed using model-based software. All patients completed DASH and Nelson Hospital scores at these follow-ups. Mean translations varied between 0.0 and 0.5 mm after 5 years. Rotation values could be calculated in six patients and mean rotations varied between -0.3 and 2.3°, although the precision of rotation values seems to be poor. The 5-year survival rate was 80%. Mean pre-operative DASH and Nelson Hospital scores were 53 (SD 14) and 51 (SD 13), respectively. Six months post-operatively, the DASH and Nelson Hospital scores had both significantly improved to 25 (SD 20) and 74 (SD 18) and remained high after 5 years. Implant stability was good 5 years post-operatively, and early migration did not predict implant failure in this study. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Epidiaphyseal versus other intercalary allografts for tumors of the lower limb.

Epidiaphyseal intercalary reconstruction has become possible for bone tumors that extend into the epiphysis because advances in magnetic resonance imaging and chemotherapy allow close resection while sparing the juxtaarticular bone and joint. In a retrospective study, we questioned whether epidiaphyseal reconstructions around the knee had a clinical outcome (measured as long-term survival, complication rate, and functional score) comparable with metadiaphyseal and diaphyseal reconstructions. Between 1988 and 1999, 14 epidiaphyseal, nine metaphyseal, and 12 diaphyseal reconstructions were done, and the median followup was 7.2 years. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed a 10-year survival rate of 79% for epidiaphyseal reconstructions, which did not differ from an 89% rate for metadiaphyseal and a 75% rate for diaphyseal reconstructions. Epidiaphyseal complications included two infections, five fractures, and three nonunion treatments. Complications for all 35 grafts included three infections, 12 fractures, and nine nonunion treatments. Ultimately, six grafts failed, with infection and length of resection as predisposing factors. All epiphyseal osteotomies had tumor-free margins and no local recurrences. The mean Musculoskeletal Tumor Society score for each type of intercalary reconstruction was between 23 and 24. Because the epidiaphyseal reconstruction avoids complications associated with joint reconstruction and the results are comparable with those of other types of intercalary grafts, these reconstructions should be considered if at least 1 cm of tumor-free juxtaarticular bone can be maintained.

Hemicortical allograft reconstruction after resection of low-grade malignant bone tumours.

Low-grade surface tumours of bone may theoretically be treated by hemicortical resection, retaining part of the circumference of the cortex. An inlay allograft may be used to reconstruct the defect. Since 1988 we have performed 22 hemicortical procedures in selected patients with low-grade parosteal osteosarcoma (6), peripheral chondrosarcoma (6) and adamantinoma (10). Restricted medullary involvement was not a contraindication for this procedure. There was no evidence of local recurrence or distant metastasis at a mean follow-up of 64 months (27 to 135). Wide resection margins were obtained in 19 patients. All allografts incorporated completely and there were no fractures or infections. Fractures of the remaining hemicortex occurred in six patients and were managed successfully by casts or by osteosynthesis. The functional results were excellent or good in all except one patient. Hemicortical procedures for selected cases of low-grade surface tumours give excellent oncological and functional outcomes. There was complete remodelling and fewer complications when compared with larger intercalary procedures. The surgery is technically demanding but gives good clinical results.