A study protocol to investigate if acipimox improves muscle function and sarcopenia: an open-label, uncontrolled, before-and-after experimental medicine feasibility study in community-dwelling older adults.

INTRODUCTION: Sarcopenia is the age-associated loss of muscle mass and strength. Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD) plays a central role in both mitochondrial function and cellular ageing processes implicated in sarcopenia. NAD concentrations are low in older people with sarcopenia, and increasing skeletal muscle NAD concentrations may offer a novel therapy for this condition. Acipimox is a licensed lipid-lowering agent known to act as an NAD precursor. This open-label, uncontrolled, before-and-after proof-of-concept experimental medicine study will test whether daily supplementation with acipimox improves skeletal muscle NAD concentrations. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Sixteen participants aged 65 and over with probable sarcopenia will receive acipimox 250 mg and aspirin 75 mg orally daily for 4 weeks, with the frequency of acipimox administration being dependent on renal function. Muscle biopsy of the vastus lateralis and MRI scanning of the lower leg will be performed at baseline before starting acipimox and after 3 weeks of treatment. Adverse events will be recorded for the duration of the trial. The primary outcome, analysed in a per-protocol population, is the change in skeletal muscle NAD concentration between baseline and follow-up. Secondary outcomes include changes in phosphocreatine recovery rate by 31P magnetic resonance spectroscopy, changes in physical performance and daily activity (handgrip strength, 4 m walk and 7-day accelerometry), changes in skeletal muscle mitochondrial respiratory function, changes in skeletal muscle mitochondrial DNA copy number and changes in NAD concentrations in whole blood as a putative biomarker for future participant selection. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The trial is approved by the UK Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (EuDRACT 2021-000993-28) and UK Health Research Authority and Northeast - Tyne and Wear South Research Ethics Committee (IRAS 293565). Results will be made available to participants, their families, patients with sarcopenia, the public, regional and national clinical teams, and the international scientific community. PROTOCOL: Acipimox feasibility study Clinical Trial Protocol V.2 2/11/21. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: The ISRCTN trial database (ISRCTN87404878).

Pose-based tremor type and level analysis for Parkinson's disease from video.

PURPOSE: Current methods for diagnosis of PD rely on clinical examination. The accuracy of diagnosis ranges between 73 and 84%, and is influenced by the experience of the clinical assessor. Hence, an automatic, effective and interpretable supporting system for PD symptom identification would support clinicians in making more robust PD diagnostic decisions. METHODS: We propose to analyze Parkinson's tremor (PT) to support the analysis of PD, since PT is one of the most typical symptoms of PD with broad generalizability. To realize the idea, we present SPA-PTA, a deep learning-based PT classification and severity estimation system that takes consumer-grade videos of front-facing humans as input. The core of the system is a novel attention module with a lightweight pyramidal channel-squeezing-fusion architecture that effectively extracts relevant PT information and filters noise. It enhances modeling performance while improving system interpretability. RESULTS: We validate our system via individual-based leave-one-out cross-validation on two tasks: the PT classification task and the tremor severity rating estimation task. Our system presents a 91.3% accuracy and 80.0% F1-score in classifying PT with non-PT class, while providing a 76.4% accuracy and 76.7% F1-score in more complex multiclass tremor rating classification task. CONCLUSION: Our system offers a cost-effective PT classification and tremor severity estimation results as warning signs of PD for undiagnosed patients with PT symptoms. In addition, it provides a potential solution for supporting PD diagnosis in regions with limited clinical resources.

Free-living monitoring of ambulatory activity after treatments for lower extremity musculoskeletal cancers using an accelerometer-based wearable - a new paradigm to outcome assessment in musculoskeletal oncology?

PURPOSE: Ambulatory activity (walking) is affected after sarcoma surgery yet is not routinely assessed. Small inexpensive accelerometers could bridge the gap. Study objectives investigated, whether in patients with lower extremity musculoskeletal tumours: (A) it was feasible to conduct ambulatory activity assessments in patient's homes using an accelerometer-based wearable (AX3, Axivity). (B) AX3 assessments produced clinically useful data, distinguished tumour sub-groups and related to existing measures. METHODS: In a prospective cross-sectional pilot, 34 patients with musculoskeletal tumours in the femur/thigh (19), pelvis/hip (3), tibia/leg (9), or ankle/foot (3) participated. Twenty-seven had limb-sparing surgery and seven amputation. Patients were assessed using a thigh-worn monitor. Summary measures of volume (total steps/day, total ambulatory bouts/day, mean bout length), pattern (alpha), and variability (S2) of ambulatory activity were derived. RESULTS: AX3 was well-tolerated and feasible to use. Outcomes compared to literature but did not distinguish tumour sub-groups. Alpha negatively correlated with disability (walking outside (r=-418, p = 0.042*), social life (r=-0.512, p = 0.010*)). Disability negatively predicted alpha (unstandardised co-efficient= -0.001, R2=0.186, p = 0.039*). CONCLUSIONS: A wearable can assess novel attributes of walking; volume, pattern, and variability after sarcoma surgery. Such outcomes provide valuable information about people's physical performance in their homes, which can guide rehabilitation. Implications for rehabilitationRoutine capture of ambulatory activity by sarcoma services in peoples' homes can provide important information about individuals "actual" physical activity levels and limitations after sarcoma surgery to inform personalised rehabilitation and care needs, including timely referral for support.Routine remote ambulatory monitoring about out of hospital activity can support personalised care for patients, including identifying high risk patients who need rapid intervention and care closer to home.Use of routine remote ambulatory monitoring could enhance delivery of evidence-based care closer to peoples' homes without disrupting their daily routine and therefore reducing patient and carer burden.Collection of data close to home using questionnaires and objective community assessment could be more cost effective and comprehensive than in-hospital assessment and could reduce the need for hospital attendance, which is of importance to vulnerable patients, particularly during the Covid-19 pandemic.

Acipimox in Mitochondrial Myopathy (AIMM): study protocol for a randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, adaptive design trial of the efficacy of acipimox in adult patients with mitochondrial myopathy.

BACKGROUND: Mitochondrial disease is a heterogenous group of rare, complex neurometabolic disorders. Despite their individual rarity, collectively mitochondrial diseases represent the most common cause of inherited metabolic disorders in the UK; they affect 1 in every 4300 individuals, up to 15,000 adults (and a similar number of children) in the UK. Mitochondrial disease manifests multisystem and isolated organ involvement, commonly affecting those tissues with high energy demands, such as skeletal muscle. Myopathy manifesting as fatigue, muscle weakness and exercise intolerance is common and debilitating in patients with mitochondrial disease. Currently, there are no effective licensed treatments and consequently, there is an urgent clinical need to find an effective drug therapy. AIM: To investigate the efficacy of 12-week treatment with acipimox on the adenosine triphosphate (ATP) content of skeletal muscle in patients with mitochondrial disease and myopathy. METHODS: AIMM is a single-centre, double blind, placebo-controlled, adaptive designed trial, evaluating the efficacy of 12 weeks' administration of acipimox on skeletal muscle ATP content in patients with mitochondrial myopathy. Eligible patients will receive the trial investigational medicinal product (IMP), either acipimox or matched placebo. Participants will also be prescribed low dose aspirin as a non-investigational medical product (nIMP) in order to protect the blinding of the treatment assignment. Eighty to 120 participants will be recruited as required, with an interim analysis for sample size re-estimation and futility assessment being undertaken once the primary outcome for 50 participants has been obtained. Randomisation will be on a 1:1 basis, stratified by Fatigue Impact Scale (FIS) (dichotomised as < 40, ≥ 40). Participants will take part in the trial for up to 20 weeks, from screening visits through to follow-up at 16 weeks post randomisation. The primary outcome of change in ATP content in skeletal muscle and secondary outcomes relating to quality of life, perceived fatigue, disease burden, limb function, balance and walking, skeletal muscle analysis and symptom-limited cardiopulmonary fitness (optional) will be assessed between baseline and 12 weeks. DISCUSSION: The AIMM trial will investigate the effect of acipimox on modulating muscle ATP content and whether it can be repurposed as a new treatment for mitochondrial disease with myopathy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: EudraCT2018-002721-29 . Registered on 24 December 2018, ISRCTN 12895613. Registered on 03 January 2019, https://www.isrctn.com/search?q=aimm.

Are Accelerometer-based Functional Outcome Assessments Feasible and Valid After Treatment for Lower Extremity Sarcomas?

BACKGROUND: Aspects of physical functioning, including balance and gait, are affected after surgery for lower limb musculoskeletal tumors. These are not routinely measured but likely are related to how well patients function after resection or amputation for a bone or soft tissue sarcoma. Small, inexpensive portable accelerometers are available that might be clinically useful to assess balance and gait in these patients, but they have not been well studied. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: In patients treated for lower extremity musculoskeletal tumors, we asked: (1) Are accelerometer-based body-worn monitor assessments of balance, gait, and timed up-and-go tests (TUG) feasible and acceptable? (2) Do these accelerometer-based body-worn monitor assessments produce clinically useful data (face validity), distinguish between patients and controls (discriminant validity), reflect findings obtained using existing clinical measures (convergent validity) and standard manual techniques in clinic (concurrent validity)? METHODS: This was a prospective cross-sectional study. Out of 97 patients approached, 34 adult patients treated for tumors in the femur/thigh (19), pelvis/hip (3), tibia/leg (9), or ankle/foot (3) were included in this study. Twenty-seven had limb-sparing surgery and seven underwent amputation. Patients performed standard activities while wearing a body-worn monitor on the lower back, including standing, walking, and TUG tests. Summary measures of balance (area [ellipsis], magnitude [root mean square {RMS}], jerkiness [jerk], frequency of postural sway below which 95% of power of acceleration power spectrum is observed [f95 of postural sway]), gait [temporal outcomes, step length and velocity], and TUG time were derived. Body-worn monitor assessments were evaluated for feasibility by investigating data loss and patient-reported acceptability and comfort. In addition, outcomes in patients were compared with datasets of healthy participants collected in parallel studies using identical methods as in this study to assess discriminant validity. Body-worn monitor assessments were also investigated for their relationships with routine clinical scales (the Musculoskeletal Tumour Society Scoring system [MSTS], the Toronto Extremity Salvage Score [TESS], and the Quality of life-Cancer survivors [QoL-CS)] to assess convergent validity and their agreement with standard manual techniques (video and stopwatch) to assess concurrent validity. RESULTS: Although this was a small patient group, there were initial indications that body-worn monitor assessments were well-tolerated, feasible to perform, acceptable to patients who responded (95% [19 of 20] of patients found the body-worn monitor acceptable and comfortable and 85% [17 of 20] found it user-friendly), and produced clinically useful data comparable with the evidence. Balance and gait measures distinguished patients and controls (discriminant validity), for instance balance outcome (ellipsis) in patients (0.0475 m/s [95% confidence interval 0.0251 to 0.0810]) was affected compared with controls (0.0007 m/s [95% CI 0.0003 to 0.0502]; p = 0.001). Similarly gait outcome (step time) was affected in patients (0.483 seconds [95% CI 0.451 to 0.512]) compared with controls (0.541 seconds [95% CI 0.496 to 0.573]; p < 0.001). Moreover, body-worn monitor assessments showed relationships with existing clinical scales (convergent validity), for instance ellipsis with MSTS (r = -0.393; p = 0.024). Similarly, manual techniques showed excellent agreement with body-worn monitor assessments (concurrent validity), for instance stopwatch time 22.28 +/- 6.93 seconds with iTUG time 21.18 +/- 6.23 seconds (intraclass correlation coefficient agreement = 0.933; p < 0.001). P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Although we had a small, heterogeneous patient population, this pilot study suggests that body-worn monitors might be useful clinically to quantify physical functioning in patients treated for lower extremity tumors. Balance and gait relate to disability and quality of life. These measurements could provide clinicians with useful novel information on balance and gait, which in turn could guide rehabilitation strategies. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, diagnostic study.