Bladder spasms following ambulatory urologic procedures.

INTRODUCTION: Bladder spasm are common complications following cystoscopic urologic procedures. This study aims to determine the incidence and risk factors for bladder spasm after ambulatory cystoscopic urologic procedures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Medical records of adult patients who underwent urologic procedures in our ambulatory center from May 1st, 2018 through December 30th, 2020, were reviewed. Bladder spasm was identified from the administration of antispasmodic therapy (e.g. oxybutynin) during anesthesia recovery. Multivariable analyses were performed to assess the association between bladder spasm and clinical factors. RESULTS: Included were 2,671 patients, of which 917 (34.3%) developed postoperative bladder spasm, yielding an incidence of 343 (95%CI 325-361) per 1,000 procedures. Risk factors associated with bladder spasm were younger adult age (< 60 years), longer (> 45 minutes) and more complex procedures. Compared to cystoscopy the risk of spasm following transurethral resection of the bladder tumor was OR 4.35 (95%CI 3.22, 5.87) and for transurethral resection of the prostate OR 3.25 (95% CI 2.24, 4.71). Spasm prophylaxis with belladonna and opium suppositories (B&O) was used in 1,158 patients and 384 (33.2%) developed spasms. The use of B&O was not associated with reduction of bladder spasm, OR 0.91 (95%CI 0.75, 1.1, p = 0.318). Postoperative outcomes did not differ between patients who did or did not develop spasms. CONCLUSION: Bladder spasms are common following ambulatory urologic procedures, more so with more extensive procedures. Prophylaxis with B&O was not significantly associated with a lower rate of bladder spasms.

Intravenous Versus Oral Acetaminophen in Outpatient Cystoscopy Procedures: Retrospective Comparison of Postoperative Opioid Requirements and Analgesia Scores.

PURPOSE: To assess if the choice of acetaminophen formulation (intravenous vs oral) when administered preoperatively for ambulatory cystoscopy procedures is associated with differences in anesthetic outcomes. METHODS: Medical records of adult patients undergoing ambulatory cystoscopy procedures at an outpatient procedural center from July 1, 2014, through November 30, 2017, were abstracted. The association between anesthetic outcomes (severe pain, rescue opioids, postoperative nausea, and vomiting) and acetaminophen formulation was assessed. Propensity-adjusted analyses were performed using inverse probability of treatment weighting to account for potential confounders. RESULTS: During the study time frame, there were 611 intravenous and 2955 oral acetaminophen administrations for cystoscopy procedures. Postoperative bladder spasms were a major contributor to severe pain and complicated 1036 cases, with similar rates between intravenous (N = 183, 29.9%) and oral (N = 853, 28.9%) formulations, P = .625. After adjusting for bladder spasms, intravenous acetaminophen was associated with longer anesthesia recovery (estimate 5.2 [95% CI 0.5-9.9] minutes, P = .030), use of rescue opioids (odds ratio 1.33 [1.07-1.66], P = .012), and postoperative nausea and vomiting (1.40 [1.02-1.93], P = .037), but not severe pain (1.07 [0.81-1.40], P = .640). CONCLUSION: Preoperative intravenous acetaminophen compared to oral acetaminophen for ambulatory cystoscopy procedures was not associated with better anesthetic outcomes. Bladder spasms were a major contributor to postoperative pain.

Preoperative cognitive impairment associated with oversedation during recovery from anesthesia.

PURPOSE: Our objective was to examine the association between preoperative cognitive status and postoperative recovery from anesthesia. METHODS: We included patients (70-91 years old) from the Mayo Clinic Study of Aging who received general anesthesia and were admitted to the postanesthesia care unit from January 1, 2010 through April 30, 2018. Procedures were categorized according to patient's preoperative cognitive status: cognitive impaired (CI) and cognitive unimpaired (CU). Perioperative records were reviewed and analyses were performed with generalized estimating equations. RESULTS: A total of 896 procedures from 611 patients were included, with 203 (22.7%) procedures in the CI group. Compared to CU procedures, CI procedures had higher rates of moderate-deep sedation during anesthesia recovery (52 [25.6%] vs. 103 [14.9%]; odds ratio [OR], 1.91; 95% CI, 1.30-2.80; P  < 0.01), postoperative pulmonary complications (22 [10.8%] vs. 34 [4.9%]; OR, 2.36[1.22-4.54]; P  =  0.01), and postoperative delirium (32 [16.2%] vs. 24 [3.5%]; OR, 5.33 [2.88-9.86]; P  <  0.01). When moderate-deep sedation during anesthesia recovery was a covariate, both CI (OR, 3.02[1.60-5.70]; P  <  0.01) and moderate-deep sedation (OR, 3.94[2.19-7.11]; P  <  0.01) were associated with delirium. In multivariable analysis, postoperative pulmonary complications were associated with moderate-deep sedation (OR, 2.14[1.18-3.87]; P  = 0 .01) but not with CI (OR, 1.49 [0.76-2.92]; P  = 0 .25). CONCLUSIONS: Cognitive impairment was associated with higher rates of moderate-deep residual sedation during anesthesia recovery and delirium, while moderate-deep sedation was associated with higher rates of pulmonary complications and delirium. We speculate that tailoring the anesthetic to facilitate faster emergence for CI patients could improve complication rates.

Outcomes After Noncardiac Surgery for Patients with Pulmonary Hypertension: A Historical Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVE: Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is a substantial preoperative risk factor. For this study, morbidity and mortality were examined after noncardiac surgery in patients with precapillary PH. DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Quaternary medical center in Rochester, MN. PARTICIPANTS: Adults with PH undergoing noncardiac surgery. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The PH and surgical databases were reviewed from 2010 to 2017. Patients were excluded if PH was attributable to left-sided heart disease or they had undergone cardiac or transplantation surgeries. To assess whether PH-specific diagnostic or cardiopulmonary testing parameters were predictive of perioperative complications, generalized estimating equations were used. Of 196 patients with PH, 53 (27%) experienced 1 or more complications, including 5 deaths (3%) within 30 days. After adjustment for age and PH type, there were more complications in those undergoing moderate- to high-risk versus low-risk procedures (odds ratio [OR] 4.17 [95% confidence interval {CI} 2.07-8.40]; p < 0.001). After adjustment for age, surgical risk, and PH type, the complication risk was greater for patients with worse functional status (OR 2.39 [95% CI 1.19-4.78]; p = 0.01 for classes III/IV v classes I/II) and elevated serum N-terminal fragment of the prohormone brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) (OR 2.28 [95% CI 1.05-4.96]; p = 0.04 for ≥300 v <300 pg/mL). After adjusting for age, surgical risk, and functional status, elevated NT-proBNP remained associated with increased risk (OR 2.23 [95% CI 1.05-4.76]; p = 0.04). CONCLUSION: PH patients undergoing noncardiac surgery have a high frequency of complications. Worse functional status, elevated serum NT-proBNP, and higher-risk surgery are predictive of worse outcome.

Effects of Sugammadex on Time of First Postoperative Bowel Movement: A Retrospective Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether time to first postoperative bowel movement after intraperitoneal surgery differs among neuromuscular blockade reversal with either anticholinesterase/anticholinergic combination vs sugammadex. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sugammadex was introduced to our practice in October 2016. Patients were identified who underwent intraperitoneal surgery between January 1, through June 30, 2016, and January 1 through June 30, 2017, and received aminosteroid neuromuscular blockade for paralysis. Reversal was initiated with neostigmine, coadministered with glycopyrrolate (neostigmine/glycopyrrolate) for control participants and sugammadex for patients. Time to first bowel movement was determined from nursing documentation for study cohorts (2016 and 2017). We compared times to first bowel movement between cases and controls using raw and inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) analyses. RESULTS: In the 2016 cohort, 2583 received neostigmine/glycopyrrolate. Of 2750 patients in 2017, sugammadex reversal technique was administered to 1500 patients and neostigmine/glycopyrrolate to 1250 participants. Without weighting, the groups were relatively balanced for most baseline characteristics, and after IPTW, all standardized differences were <0.035. In comparison with the 2016 and 2017 controls, sugammadex treatment was associated with faster occurrence of first bowel movement. For 2016, unweighted hazard ratio (HR) (95% confidence interval [CI]) was 1.35 (1.21-1.51) (P<.001). After IPTW, HR (95% CI) was 1.27 (1.12-1.43) (P<.001). For 2017, unweighted HR (95% CI) was 1.51 (1.31-1.72) (P<.001); after IPTW, it was 1.25 (1.08-1.45) (P =.003). CONCLUSION: Patients undergoing intraperitoneal surgery who had aminosteroid neuromuscular blockade reversal with sugammadex had earlier first postoperative bowel movement than patients with reversal through neostigmine/glycopyrrolate.

Perioperative opioid requirements of patients receiving sublingual buprenorphine-naloxone: a case series.

BACKGROUND: Buprenorphine, a partial opioid agonist, displaces full opioid agonists from receptors and may impede surgical pain management. We report the effects of a sublingual formulation of buprenorphine-naloxone, Suboxone (SL-BUP), on perioperative pain management. METHODS: We identified all adult surgical patients from December 31, 2004, to January 1, 2016, who received SL-BUP within 30 days prior to procedures performed with general, regional, or combined general/regional anesthesia. We recorded opioid use during the procedure, in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU), and during the 24 h following PACU discharge. We also examined opioid use in those who continued SL-BUP until the day of surgery vs those who preoperatively discontinued SL-BUP. RESULTS: Thirty-two patients were treated preoperatively with SL-BUP. Three patients had regional anesthesia only, and opioid requirements were case dependent. Requirements were minimal for creation of an arteriovenous fistula and high following knee replacement and cesarean section. Twelve patients received combined general/regional anesthesia, and 17 received general anesthesia only. Intraoperative and PACU opioid use in these 2 groups were not significantly different (P = .10 and P = .93, respectively). In both groups opioid use increased after discharge from the PACU, and remained comparable between the general and combined general/regional group through the first 24 h after PACU discharge (P = .78). Although median [interquartile range] 24-h opioid doses were higher among patients who discontinued SL-BUP, the difference was not statistically significant in the general anesthesia-only group (SL-BUP discontinued, 199 [110-411] mg IV-MEq [intravenous morphine equivalent] vs SL-BUP continued, 106 [58-160] mg IV-MEq; P = .15) or in the combined general/regional group (SL-BUP discontinued, 140 [100-157] mg IV-MEq vs SL-BUP continued, 100 [73-203] mg IV-MEq; P = .94). CONCLUSIONS: Regardless of the type of anesthesia used, physicians treating patients with SL-BUP must be prepared to administer large doses of opioids during the early postoperative period. No difference in opioid requirements was noted between patients who perioperatively stopped SL-BUP versus those who continued SL-BUP.

Hemodynamic instability during percutaneous ablation of extra-adrenal metastases of pheochromocytoma and paragangliomas: a case series.

BACKGROUND: Surgical manipulation of pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas (PPGLs) may induce large hemodynamic oscillations due to catecholamine release. Little is known regarding hemodynamic instability during percutaneous ablation of PPGLs. We examined intraprocedural hemodynamic variability and postoperative complications related to percutaneous ablation of extra-adrenal metastases of PPGL. METHODS: From institutional PPGL registry we identified patients undergoing ablation of extra-adrenal PPGL metastases from January 1, 2000, through December 31, 2016. We reviewed medical records for clinical characteristics and hospital outcomes. Tumors were categorized as functional or nonfunctional based on preprocedural fractionated catecholamine and metanephrine profiles. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients (14 female [67%]) underwent 38 ablations. Twenty-four ablations were performed in patients with functional metastatic lesions, and 14 were in nonfunctional lesions. Intraprocedural use of potent vasodilators for hypertension was higher for patients with functional tumors (P = 0.02); use of vasopressors for hypotension was similar for functional and nonfunctional tumors (P = 0.74). Mean (±SD) intraprocedural blood pressure range (maximum-minimum blood pressure) during 38 procedures was greater for functional than nonfunctional tumors [systolic: 106 (±48) vs 64 (±30) mm Hg, P = 0.005; diastolic: 58 (±22) vs 35 (±14) mm Hg, P = 0.002; mean arterial: 84 (±43) vs 47 (±29) mm Hg, P = 0.007]. Complications included 5 unplanned intensive care unit admissions (3 for precautionary monitoring, 1 for recalcitrant hypotension, and 1 for hypertensive crisis), 1 case of postoperative bleeding, and 1 death. CONCLUSIONS: Substantial hemodynamic instability may develop during ablation of functional and nonfunctional PPGL metastases. When anesthesia is provided for ablation of metastatic PPGLs in radiology suites, preparation for hemodynamic management should match standards used for surgical resection.

Effect of Cognitive Status on the Receipt of Procedures Requiring Anesthesia and Critical Care Admissions in Older Adults.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether older adults with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or dementia have higher rates of procedures requiring general anesthesia or intensive care unit (ICU) admissions compared with cognitively normal (CN) patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A population-based cohort, 70 to 89 years old at enrollment, underwent clinical and longitudinal neurocognitive testing to identify those with MCI and dementia. We analyzed the effects of cognitive status (CN, MCI, or dementia) at entry into the study from October 1, 2004, through December 31, 2014, on the risk of receiving procedures requiring surgical anesthesia and ICU admission. RESULTS: Of 2436 participants, 1977 (81%) were CN, 387 (16%) had MCI, and 72 (3%) had dementia. Cognitively impaired individuals were sicker. Compared with CN individuals, the likelihood of receiving a procedure requiring anesthesia was similar in participants with MCI (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]=0.98; P=.78). Participants with dementia were less likely to receive these procedures (aHR=0.50; P=.02). Compared with CN participants, the likelihood of ICU admission for any indication was increased for those with MCI (aHR=1.24; P=.03) and dementia (aHR=1.59; P=.04). Admissions to the ICU after procedures were not different in patients with either MCI or dementia (aHR=0.96; P=.83 and aHR=1.01; P=.98, respectively). CONCLUSION: Patients with MCI or dementia are not more likely to undergo surgery, and neither are they more likely to require ICU admission after procedures. An increased rate of nonsurgical ICU admissions requires vigilance to prevent deterioration of nonsurgical diseases that may lead to ICU admissions.

Primary central sleep apnea and anesthesia: a retrospective case series.

PURPOSE: Primary (idiopathic) central sleep apnea (PCSA) is a rare central sleep-related breathing disorder characterized by increased chemoreceptor sensitivity to partial pressure of carbon dioxide, which manifests as hyperventilation followed by apnea during non-rapid eye movement sleep. The purpose of this retrospective study was to describe the postoperative course of patients who had PCSA and underwent procedures requiring anesthetic management. METHODS: Patients who received a diagnosis of PCSA at our institution and required procedural anesthesia between 1 January 2010 and 1 June 2016 underwent a comprehensive review of their health records with a focus on identifying respiratory complications. RESULTS: Ten patients (nine males, one female) underwent 47 procedures requiring anesthetic management: 20 (43%) under general anesthesia, 25 (53%) with monitored anesthetic care, and two (4%) with regional anesthesia. Procedures were complicated by second-degree heart block in one patient and pneumonia in another two (one had Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy and the other bronchoscopy to evaluate worsening lung infiltration). Hypoxemia (oxyhemoglobin saturation < 90% for three minutes) developed in three patients during anesthesia recovery. One was possibly due to PCSA-a 73-yr-old male with alcoholic cirrhosis who was moderately sedated and hypoxemic after orthopedic surgery; his oxygenation improved with an adaptive servoventilator positive airway pressure device and supplemental oxygen. His underlying medical condition or level of sedation may have contributed to hypoxemia. The other patients became hypoxemic after bronchoscopy. No other cases were complicated by postoperative respiratory compromise. CONCLUSIONS: No major adverse outcomes were related to PCSA postoperatively. Nevertheless, continuation of home positive airway pressure therapy during anesthesia recovery was useful in one patient who had cirrhosis and postoperative hypoxemia.