The correlation between prenatal ultrasound and MRI in isolated periventricular pseudocysts: Analysis of 10 years' experience at the University Hospital of Angers.

BACKGROUND: Periventricular cysts are one of the most extensively documented antenatal brain lesions found through fetal ultrasound at the University Hospital of Angers. The main purpose of our study was to determine the contribution of fetal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and postnatal transfontanellar ultrasound (TFU) in the assessment of isolated periventricular cysts found on antenatal ultrasound at the University Hospital of Angers. METHODS: This retrospective, descriptive study was carried out over a 10-year period. Overall, 82 cases were included, divided into two groups according to the type of cysts found on the ultrasound: 13 cases of subependymal pseudocysts (SEPC) and 69 cases of frontal horn cysts (FHC). In all, 43 children underwent a postnatal TFU: seven in the SEPC group and 36 in the FHC group. RESULTS: Our study found excellent agreement between antenatal ultrasound and fetal MRI in the FHC group concerning classification of the cysts (approval rate [TA]: 98.60%; kappa coefficient [κ]: 0.85), their location (TA: 98.80%; κ: 0.91), their number (TA: 78.20%; κ: 0.73), and the detection of FHC (TA: 81.10%; κ: 0.74), as well as a good agreement concerning the detection of SEPC and temporal horn cysts (THC; TA: 99.40% and 95.60%, respectively). Fetal MRI proved to be better in the SEPC group for cyst classification (TA: 66.70%; κ: 0.33), their location (TA: 60%; κ: 0.41), and their number (TA: 53, 30%; κ: 0.45) and the detection of SEPC (TA: 23.10%; κ: 0.14). In both groups, postnatal TFU did not provide additional information compared to MRI. CONCLUSION: The finding of periventricular cysts in antenatal ultrasound should lead to a reference ultrasound, a key procedure for distinguishing between SEPC and FHC. In our study, no additional benefit from MRI and TFU was established for the evaluation of FHC. These findings should be considered as normal variants, thus limiting pre- and postnatal investigations. The visualization of SEPC, THC, or a parenchymal abnormality on the reference ultrasound should lead to an additional MRI being performed and a personalized follow-up of the child.

Thoracic skeletal anomalies following surgical treatment of esophageal atresia. Lessons from a national cohort.

INTRODUCTION: Thoracotomy as surgical approach for esophageal atresia treatment entails the risk of deformation of the rib cage and consequently secondary thoracogenic scoliosis. The aim of our study was to assess these thoracic wall anomalies on a large national cohort and search for factors influencing this morbidity. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Pediatric surgery departments from our national network were asked to send recent thoracic X-ray and operative reports for patients born between 2008 and 2010 with esophageal atresia. The X-rays were read in a double-blind manner to detect costal and vertebral anomalies. RESULTS: Among 322 inclusions from 32 centers, 110 (34.2%) X-rays were normal and 25 (7.7%) displayed thoracic malformations, including 14 hemivertebrae. We found 187 (58.1%) sequelae of surgery, including 85 costal hypoplasia, 47 other types of costal anomalies, 46 intercostal space anomalies, 21 costal fusions and 12 scoliosis, with some patients suffering from several lesions. The rate of patients with these sequelae was not influenced by age at intervention, weight at birth, type of atresia, number of thoracotomy or size of the center. The rate of sequelae was higher following a classical thoracotomy (59.1%), whatever the way that thoracotomy was performed, compared to nonconverted thoracoscopy (22.2%; p=0.04). CONCLUSION: About 60 % of the patients suffered from a thoracic wall morbidity caused by the thoracotomy performed as part of surgical treatment of esophageal atresia. Minimally invasive techniques reduced thoracic wall morbidity. Further studies should be carried out to assess the potential benefit of minimally invasive approaches to patient pulmonary functions and on the occurrence of thoracogenic scoliosis in adulthood. LEVELS OF EVIDENCE: Level III retrospective comparative treatment study.

MR cholangiopancreatography versus endoscopic sonography in suspected common bile duct lithiasis: a prospective, comparative study.

OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to compare the accuracy of MR cholangiopancreatography and endoscopic sonography for the diagnosis of common bile duct stones in patients with a mild to moderate clinical suspicion of common bile duct stones. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Forty-seven patients were prospectively enrolled. Inclusion criteria included acute pancreatitis, subclinical jaundice, and clinical features of common bile duct stone migration. Radial endoscopic sonography and MR cholangiopancreatography with the single-shot fast spin-echo technique were performed a maximum of 48 hr apart. The gold-standard diagnosis was obtained with ERCP (n = 20) or intraoperative cholangiography (n = 14) if the results of endoscopic sonography or MR cholangiopancreatography were abnormal or if a cholecystectomy was performed, or by clinical and biochemical follow-up (n = 11) if the results of endoscopic sonography and MR cholangiopancreatography were normal. RESULTS: The final diagnosis was common bile duct stones in 16 patients, malignant obstructions in four, and another biliary disease in two (lithiasis migration aspect with papillary edema); 23 patients had no biliary disease. The sensitivity and specificity of MR cholangiopancreatography were, respectively, 90.5% and 87.5% for etiologic diagnosis and 87.5% and 96.6% for the detection of common bile duct stones. The corresponding values for endoscopic sonography were 86.4% and 91.3% for etiologic diagnosis and 93.8% and 96.6% for visualization of choledocholithiasis. Accuracy did not significantly differ between the techniques. CONCLUSION: In cases of mild to moderate suspicion of choledocholithiasis, the accuracies of endoscopic sonography and MR cholangiopancreatography are similar. Because MR cholangiopancreatography is noninvasive, it may be preferred for this indication.