"The other side of the coin": understanding noninvasive follicular tumor with papillary-like nuclear features in unifocal and multifocal settings.

The recent description of noninvasive follicular tumor with papillary-like nuclear features (NIFTP) creates several diagnostic and therapeutic challenges for both the pathologist and the attending clinician. Given the concern about overtreatment of these neoplasms, the best way to manage the patients by a surgical procedure and postsurgical follow-up is still under discussion. We aimed to identify predictors of synchronous disease (eg, bilateral cancers) that can influence the appropriate type of surgery and long-term surveillance. We reevaluated the original diagnosis and the presence of contralateral lesions in 94 cases retrieved from our archives that were seen between 2010 and 2017. In 74 cases, the diagnosis was NIFTP, and in 20 cases, the diagnosis was infiltrative follicular variant of papillary thyroid carcinoma (IFVPTC). Bilateral disease was found in 17% of the cases. In 13 (18%) of those cases, NIFTP was the primary lesion, and in 3 (15%), it was IFVPTC. The contralateral disease was predominantly invasive: 6 cases of micropapillary carcinoma, 5 of papillary thyroid carcinoma, 3 of IFVPTC, and 2 of NIFTP. Despite the higher frequency of contralateral disease in NIFTP, there was no statistically significant difference with IFVPTC. In the patients with multifocal NIFTP, 2 (15%) of the contralateral malignancies showed microscopic extrathyroidal extension (P < .05). We conclude that close monitoring of the contralateral lobe is appropriate in patients with FVPTC, particularly NIFTP, if they are not submitted to total thyroidectomy.

The new guidelines of Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology for respiratory specimens: Assessment of risk of malignancy and diagnostic yield in different cytological modalities.

BACKGROUND: In 2016, the Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology (PSC) issued a new classification scheme for respiratory cytology. We aim to evaluate our samples according to this classification and to assess risk of malignancy and diagnostic yield of different cytological modalities. METHODS: Respiratory specimens (sputum, bronchial wash/brush, BAL and FNA) obtained between 2007 and 2016 were reclassified according to PSC guidelines. Risk of malignancy for each diagnostic category was determined. Diagnostic yield was evaluated based on three-categorical approach. RESULTS: One thousand, two hundred and ninety respiratory specimens were retrieved, of which 280 had histologic follow-up. Samples were reclassified as nondiagnostic 16%, negative for malignancy 53%, atypical 5.4%, neoplastic (benign neoplasm/low-grade carcinoma) 0.4%, suspicious for malignancy 2.1% and malignant 23.1%. Risk of malignancy for each category was 64.01% for ND, 48.27% for NM, 59.09% for A, 100% for N-B-LG; 90% for SM and 89.74% for M. When only malignant cases were considered positive tests, cytology sensitivity was 55% and specificity 88%. CONCLUSION: Our results were in line with PSC guidelines, but the use of multiple cytological techniques may cause some discrepancies in overall diagnostic yield and in estimated risks of malignancy, which is important due to the widespread utilization of different cytological procedures.