High prevalence of incidental endoscopic findings at routine endoscopy after atrial fibrillation ablation: Do we need a screening endoscopy for the upper gastrointestinal tract in the general population?

INTRODUCTION: High-power short-duration ablation (HPSD) is an effective therapy for atrial fibrillation with thermal esophageal injury as a rare but relevant side effect. AIM AND METHODS: In this retrospective single-center analysis we evaluated the incidence and relevance of ablation-induced findings and the prevalence of ablation-independent incidental gastrointestinal findings. For 15 months all patients undergoing ablation were screened by postablation esophagogastroduodenoscopy. Pathological findings were followed up and treated if necessary. RESULTS: 286 consecutive patients (66±10 years; 54.9% male) were included. 19.6% of patients showed ablation-associated alterations (10.8% esophageal lesions, 10.8% gastroparesis, 1.7% both findings). Logistic multivariable regression analysis confirmed an influence of lower BMI on the occurrence of RFA-associated endoscopic findings (OR 0.936, 95% CI 0.878-0.997, p<0.05). 48.3% of patients demonstrated incidental gastrointestinal findings. In 1.0% neoplastic lesions were present, 9.4% showed precancerous lesions and in 4.2% neoplastic lesions of unknown dignity were found requiring further diagnostics or therapy. 18.1% of patients demonstrated findings associated with a potentially increased risk of bleeding under anticoagulation. Patients with clinically relevant incidental findings were significantly more often male, 68.8% vs. 49.5% (p<0.01). CONCLUSION: HPSD ablation is safe, no devasting complication occurred in any patient. It resulted in 19.6% ablation-induced thermal injury whereas incidental findings of the upper GI tract were found in 48.3% of patients. Due to the high prevalence of 14.7% of findings requiring further diagnostics, therapy, or surveillance in a cohort that is mimicking the general population, screening endoscopy of the upper GI tract seems to be reasonable in the general population.

Effect of MRI-Guided Fibrosis Ablation vs Conventional Catheter Ablation on Atrial Arrhythmia Recurrence in Patients With Persistent Atrial Fibrillation: The DECAAF II Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) remains a challenge. Left atrial fibrosis plays an important role in the pathophysiology of AF and has been associated with poor procedural outcomes. Objective: To investigate the efficacy and adverse events of targeting atrial fibrosis detected on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in reducing atrial arrhythmia recurrence in persistent AF. Design, Setting, and Participants: The Efficacy of Delayed Enhancement-MRI-Guided Fibrosis Ablation vs Conventional Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation trial was an investigator-initiated, multicenter, randomized clinical trial involving 44 academic and nonacademic centers in 10 countries. A total of 843 patients with symptomatic or asymptomatic persistent AF and undergoing AF ablation were enrolled from July 2016 to January 2020, with follow-up through February 19, 2021. Interventions: Patients with persistent AF were randomly assigned to pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) plus MRI-guided atrial fibrosis ablation (421 patients) or PVI alone (422 patients). Delayed-enhancement MRI was performed in both groups before the ablation procedure to assess baseline atrial fibrosis and at 3 months postablation to assess for ablation scar. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was time to first atrial arrhythmia recurrence after a 90-day blanking period postablation. The primary safety composite outcome was defined by the occurrence of 1 or more of the following events within 30 days postablation: stroke, PV stenosis, bleeding, heart failure, or death. Results: Among 843 patients who were randomized (mean age 62.7 years; 178 [21.1%] women), 815 (96.9%) completed the 90-day blanking period and contributed to the efficacy analyses. There was no significant difference in atrial arrhythmia recurrence between groups (fibrosis-guided ablation plus PVI patients, 175 [43.0%] vs PVI-only patients, 188 [46.1%]; hazard ratio [HR], 0.95 [95% CI, 0.77-1.17]; P = .63). Patients in the fibrosis-guided ablation plus PVI group experienced a higher rate of safety outcomes (9 [2.2%] vs 0 in PVI group; P = .001). Six patients (1.5%) in the fibrosis-guided ablation plus PVI group had an ischemic stroke compared with none in PVI-only group. Two deaths occurred in the fibrosis-guided ablation plus PVI group, and the first one was possibly related to the procedure. Conclusions and Relevance: Among patients with persistent AF, MRI-guided fibrosis ablation plus PVI, compared with PVI catheter ablation only, resulted in no significant difference in atrial arrhythmia recurrence. Findings do not support the use of MRI-guided fibrosis ablation for the treatment of persistent AF. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02529319.

Case report: Epicardial ligation of the left atrial appendage in a patient with an inaccessible left atrial cavity.

It has been shown that endocardial occlusion of the left atrial appendage (LAA) is equally effective in preventing embolic events compared to oral anticoagulation in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. An 82-year-old female patient was admitted for LAA occlusion for repetitive GI bleeding. She had high CHADSVASC Score and HASBLED with long persistent atrial fibrillation with many comorbities. The preprocedural transesophageal echo revealed a great mass in the left atrium (Picture 1). Cardiac surgery was denied, we performed an epicardial only ligation for closing the LAA. For this approach we performed an epicardial puncture and contrast injection within the pericardial space to delineate the LAA. An epicardial wire with a suction mechanism at its distal end was attached to the anterior lobe of the LAA. Using this epicardial wire the snare could be advanced over the appendage and closed down. Complete exclusion of the LAA was achieved. There were no procedural complications and the patient is doing well after 3 months.

[Relevant anatomy of epicardial space for the electrophysiologists]. / Relevante Anatomie des epikardialen Raums für Elektrophysiologen.

The arrhythmogenic substrate in patients with Chagas cardiomyopathy, arrhythmogenic dysplasia, postmyocarditis nonischemic dilative cardiomyopathy as well as after extensive posterior or anterior wall myocardial infarction is predominantly located epicardially. This can necessitate epicardial access for an effective, substrate-based catheter ablation of the ventricular tachycardia (VT). Anterior percutaneous epicardial puncture represents the standard approach for epicardial VT ablation. The most important anatomical particularities that must be taken into account when performing an epicardial puncture or epicardial VT ablation are epicardial coronary arteries, left phrenic nerve and epicardial fat. The typical anatomic characteristics of the epicardial structures and resulting considerations for epicardial access are discussed here in detail.

Acute oesophageal safety of high-power short duration with 50 W for atrial fibrillation ablation.

AIMS: Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) using radiofrequency (RF) ablation is an effective treatment option for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). This study aims to investigate the safety of high-power short duration (HPSD) with emphasis on oesophageal lesions after PVI. METHODS AND RESULTS: Consecutive patients undergoing AF ablation with HPSD (50 W; ablation index (AI)-guided; target AI 350 for posterior wall ablation, AI 450 for anterior wall ablation) using the ThermoCool SmartTouch SF catheter were included. Patients underwent post-ablation oesophageal endoscopy to detect and categorize thermal oesophageal injury (EDEL). Occurrence and risk factors of oesophageal lesions and perforating complications were analysed. A total of 1033 patients underwent AF ablation with HPSD. Of them, 953 patients (67.6 ± 9.6 years; 58% male; 43% paroxysmal AF; 68% first PVI) underwent post-procedural oesophageal endoscopy and were included in further analyses. Median procedure time was 82.8 ± 24.4 min with ablation times of 16.1 ± 9.2 min. Thermal oesophageal injury was detected in 58 patients (6%) (n = 29 Category 1 erosion, n = 29 Category 2 ulcerous). One patient developed oesophageal perforation (redo, 4th AF ablation). No patient died. Using multivariable regression models, increased total ablation time [odds ratio (OR) 1.029, P = 0.010] and history of stroke (OR 2.619, P = 0.033) were associated with increased incidence of EDEL after AF ablation, whereas increased body mass index was protective (OR 0.980, P = 0.022). CONCLUSION: Thermal oesophageal lesions occur in 6% of HPSD AF ablations. The risk for development of perforating complications seems to be low. Incidence of atrio-oesophageal fistula (0.1%) is comparable to other reported series about RF ablation approaches.

Association of adipocytokines serum levels with left atrial thrombus formation in atrial fibrillation patients on oral anticoagulation (Alert) - A cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Oral anticoagulation is effective for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (AF). However, strokes may still occur in high-risk individuals. We conducted a prospective trial to assess the association between adipocytokine serum levels and surrogate parameters for thromboembolic events. METHODS AND RESULTS: In this cross-sectional multicenter trial, we enrolled 189 patients with AF who were on oral anticoagulation. The primary endpoint was defined as either the presence of spontaneous echo contrast (SEC), a left atrial appendage (LAA), or a left atrial (LA) thrombus on transesophageal echocardiography. We investigated the association of adipocytokine serum levels with the combined endpoint using logistic regression analysis. Forty-eight individuals (25%) were assigned to group 1 (G1) due to the occurrence of at least one of the components of the combined endpoint (41 [21.7%] SEC, 3 [1.6%] LA thrombus, 13 [6.9%] LAA thrombus), whereas the remaining patients formed group 2 (G2). The BMI, logarithmized (loge) leptin (G1: 2.0 ± 1.3 µg/ml, G2: 2.0 ± 1.1 µg/ml, p = 0.746) and visfatin serum levels (G1: 3.4 ± 0.3 ng/ml, G2: 3.4 ± 0.5 ng/ml, p = 0.900) did not significantly differ between the groups. Conversely, logarithmized adiponectin (G1: 3.3 ± 0.6 ng/ml, G2: 3.1 ± 0.7 ng/ml, p = 0.036) and resistin levels (G1: 1.8 ± 0.5 ng/ml, G2: 1.6 ± 0.5 ng/ml, p = 0.009) were higher in patients with the primary endpoint. Multivariate logistic regression analysis using a score that combined the individual adiponectin and resistin values in each patient corroborated this association. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that adiponectin and resistin may act as potential biomarkers to identify individuals with AF who are at high thromboembolic risk.

Correlation of magnetic resonance imaging and post-ablation endoscopy to detect oesophageal thermal injury in patients after atrial fibrillation ablation: MRI-EDEL-study.

AIMS: To correlate oesophageal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) abnormalities with ablation-induced oesophageal injury detected in endoscopy. METHODS AND RESULTS: Ablation-naïve patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), who underwent ablation using a contact force sensing irrigated radiofrequency ablation catheter, received a cardiac MRI on the day of ablation, and post-ablation oesophageal endoscopy (OE) 1 day after ablation. Two MRI expert readers recorded presence of abnormal oesophageal tissue signal intensities, defined as increased oesophageal signal in T2-fat-saturated (T2fs), short-tau inversion-recovery (STIR), or late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) sequences. Oesophageal endoscopy was performed by experienced operators. Finally, we correlated the presence of any affection with endoscopically detected oesophageal thermal lesions (EDEL). Among 50 consecutive patients (age 67 ± 7 years, 60% male), who received post-ablation MRI and OE, complete MRI data were available in 44 of 50 (88%) patients. In OE, 7 of 50 (14%) presented with EDEL (Category 1 lesion: erosion n = 3, Category 2 lesion: ulcer n = 4). Among those with EDEL, 6 of 7 (86%) patients presented with increased signal intensities in all three MRI sequences, while only 2 of 37 (5%) showed hyperintensities in all three MRI sequences and negative endoscopy. Correspondingly, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value (NPV) for MRI (increased signal in T2fs, STIR, and LGE) were 86%, 95%, 75%, and 97%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Increased signal intensity in T2fs, STIR, and LGE represents independent markers of EDEL. In particular, the combination of all three has the highest diagnostic value. Hence, MRI may represent an accurate, non-invasive method to exclude acute oesophageal injury after AF ablation (NPV: 97%).

Incidence of acute thermal esophageal injury after atrial fibrillation ablation guided by prespecified ablation index.

INTRODUCTION: Ablation index (AI), a novel parameter defining energy application at single ablation lesions, calculated by integration of ablation time, energy, catheter stability, and contact force, has been documented to be associated with effective lesions and higher ablation efficacy. Using a prespecified target AI in addition to acute lesion efficacy may affect local collateral damage like esophageal thermal injury when used for guiding radiofrequency (RF) ablation at the posterior left atrial (LA) wall. METHODS AND RESULTS: Consecutive patients undergoing first AF ablations using AI were included. Ablation energy was reduced to 25 W when ablating at posterior LA wall. Two different individually defined AI target values were used (300 and 350 for posterior wall ablation). Esophageal endoscopy (EE) was performed 1 to 3 days after ablation procedure to document and categorize endoscopically detected esophageal thermal lesion (EDEL). Two-hundred and eleven consecutive patients with postprocedural EE were included. Incidence of EDEL was 14% (29 of 211 patients; mild category 1 lesions in 22 of 29 patients (76%) and severe category 2 lesions (ulcers > 5 mm) in 7 of 29 patients (24% of EDEL group, 3% of total group). Ablation time at posterior LA wall (9.5 vs 9.0 minutes [P = .67]) was comparable in patients with and without EDEL. CONCLUSION: LA posterior wall RF ablation adopting AI ≤350 was associated with 14% esophageal thermal injury including 3% of severe esophageal thermal ulcers. This incidence is comparable to historic control groups with non AI-guided AF ablation.

Procedural success, safety and patients satisfaction after second ablation of atrial fibrillation in the elderly: results from the German Ablation Registry.

BACKGROUND: Aged patients are underrepresented in clinical trials on catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF). In addition, results of outcomes after repeat ablation in the elderly are lacking. We report the results of first repeat AF ablation procedures of aged patients from a real-world multicenter prospective registry. METHODS: Patients undergoing second AF ablation included in the prospective, multicenter German Ablation Registry were divided in two groups (age > 70 years (group 1) and age ≤ 70 years (group 2)) and analyzed for procedural characteristics and clinical follow-up. RESULTS: 738 patients were analyzed (108 patients in group 1, 630 patients in group 2). Significantly more aged patients had structural heart disease (56 patients (51.9%) vs. 203 patients (32.2%), p < 0.001). The majority of the patients underwent repeat pulmonary vein isolation (101 patients (93.5%) vs. 593 patients (94.1%), p = 0.98). More aged patients underwent ablation of left atrial linear lesions (78.1% vs. 57.3% of all linear lesions, p = 0.027). There was no difference in the occurrence of peri-procedural complications (7 patients (6.5%) vs. 24 patients (3.8%), p = 0.30). Recurrence of atrial arrhythmias was documented in 45/105 (42.9%) and 252/603 (41.8%) patients with available follow-up in groups 1 and 2 after a median of 447 (400; 532) and 473 (411; 544) days (p = 0.84). A comparable amount of patients were asymptomatic or reported symptom improvement after repeat ablation in both groups (80% (80/100) in group 1 and 77% (446/576) in group 2; p = 0.57). CONCLUSION: Repeat ablation for AF in elderly patients can be performed with safety and efficacy comparable to younger patients.

Temporal relationships between esophageal injury type and progression in patients undergoing atrial fibrillation catheter ablation.

BACKGROUND: Currently, little is known about the onset, natural progression, and management of esophageal injuries after atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. OBJECTIVES: We sought to provide a systematic review on esophageal injury after AF ablation and identify temporal relationships between various types of esophageal lesions, their progression, and clinical outcomes. METHODS: A comprehensive search of PubMed and Web of Science was conducted until September 21, 2017. All AF ablation patients who underwent upper gastrointestinal endoscopy within 1 week of the procedure were included. Patients with esophageal lesions were classified into 3 types by using our novel Kansas City classification: type 1: erythema; type 2a: superficial ulcers; type 2b: deep ulcers; type 3a: perforation without communication with the atria; and type 3b: perforation with atrioesophageal fistula. RESULTS: Thirty studies met our inclusion criteria. Of the 4473 patients, 3921 underwent upper gastrointestinal evaluation. The overall incidence of esophageal injuries was 15% (570). There were 206 type 1 lesions (36%), 222 type 2a lesions (39%), and 142 type 2b lesions (25%). Six of 142 type 2b lesions (4.2%) progressed further to type 3, of which, 5 were type 3a and 1 was type 3b. All type 1 and type 2a and most type 2b lesions resolved with conservative management. One type 3a and 1 type 3b lesions were fatal. CONCLUSION: Based on our classification, all type 1 and most type 2 lesions resolved with conservative management. A small percentage (4.2% [6 of 142]) of type 2b lesions progressed to perforation and/or fistula formation, and these patients need to be followed closely.

High-Resolution Infrared Thermal Imaging of the Esophagus During Atrial Fibrillation Ablation as a Predictor of Endoscopically Detected Thermal Lesions: Results From the HEAT-AF Study.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopically detected thermal esophageal lesions (EDEL) after ablation of atrial fibrillation may be precursors of atrioesophageal fistula and esophageal luminal temperature monitoring has previously failed to decrease thermal damage. METHODS: Sixty-three patients undergoing their first pulmonary vein isolation using radiofrequency point-by-point catheter ablation were prospectively included in the HEAT-AF study (High-Resolution Esophageal Assessment of Esophageal Temperature During Atrial Fibrillation Ablation) and esophageal temperatures were continuously monitored using a novel infrared thermography system (IRTS). Peak esophageal temperature (Tpeak) was correlated to postablation endoscopy results characterizing patients as EDEL positive or negative. RESULTS: Twelve patients had EDEL (19%). Comparing EDEL positive to negative patients, Tpeak was significantly higher (56.3±4.6°C versus 45.7±5.5°C, P<0.0001). Logistic regression analysis demonstrated Tpeak was a statistically significant predictor ( P=0.0008) of EDEL and yielded an odds ratio of 1.52; 95% CI, (1.24-2.05). Receiver operator curve analysis demonstrated Tpeak as a highly accurate binary classifier with an area under the curve of 93%. CONCLUSIONS: For the first time esophageal temperature monitoring using a high resolution, high-fidelity IRTS allowed accurate prediction of postablation EDEL suggesting that Tpeak alone is an excellent binary classifier of patients at risk of EDEL. The logistic regression model and associated receiver operator curve will aid in the selection of optimal temperature thresholds in future prospective studies.

Laser Balloon or Wide-Area Circumferential Irrigated Radiofrequency Ablation for Persistent Atrial Fibrillation: A Multicenter Prospective Randomized Study.

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary vein isolation is the cornerstone of ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation (AF). The role of balloon catheters in this patient population remains ill defined. We sought to compare efficacy and safety of the laser balloon (LB) with wide-area circumferential pulmonary vein isolation using irrigated radiofrequency current (RF) ablation and 3-dimensional mapping. METHODS AND RESULTS: In 6 European centers, patients with persistent AF were prospectively randomized. Follow-up included 3-day Holter ECG recordings and office visits at 3, 6, and 12 months. The primary efficacy end point was freedom from AF between 90 and 365 days after a single ablation. The primary safety end point was the incidence of any periprocedural complications. Of 152 enrolled patients, 134 (n=68 LB and 66 RF; 63% men; mean age, 66+10 years) with persistent AF (median AF history, 14 months; Q1-Q3, 7-36 months) underwent pulmonary vein isolation and completed the entire follow-up. Baseline parameters were similar in both groups. Procedure and fluoroscopy times were similar in both groups (135±38 and 14±9 minutes (LB) versus 128±51 and 11±9 minutes). The primary efficacy end point was met by 71.2% versus 69.3%, in the LB and RF groups, respectively (P=0.40). In the LB group, stroke (n=1), a false aneurysm (n=1), and phrenic nerve palsy (n=1) were observed. In the RF group, 2 patients developed a false aneurysm, and 1 patient needed surgical repair. CONCLUSIONS: An LB-guided strategy was associated with similar efficacy as wide-area circumferential pulmonary vein isolation using irrigated RF in patients with persistent AF. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: https://www.clinicaltrials.org. Unique identifier: NCT01863472.

Progression From Esophageal Thermal Asymptomatic Lesion to Perforation Complicating Atrial Fibrillation Ablation: A Single-Center Registry.

BACKGROUND: Up to 40% of patients demonstrate endoscopically detected asymptomatic esophageal lesions (EDEL) after atrial fibrillation ablation. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients undergoing first atrial fibrillation ablation and postinterventional esophageal endoscopy were included in the study. Occurrence of esophageal perforating complications during follow-up was related to documented EDEL (category 1: erythema/erosion; category 2: ulcer). In total, 1802 patients underwent first atrial fibrillation ablation procedure between January 2013 and August 2016 at our institution. Out of this group, 832 patients (506 male patients, 61%; 64.0±10.0 years) with symptomatic paroxysmal (n=345; 42%) or persistent atrial fibrillation underwent postprocedural esophageal endoscopy. Patients were ablated using single-tip ablation with conventional or surround flow irrigation and circular ablation catheters with open irrigation (nMARQ). In 295 of 832 patients (35%), a temperature probe was used. EDEL occurred in 150 patients (18%; n=98 category 1 EDEL, n=52 category 2 EDEL). In 5 of 832 patients (0.6%), an esophageal perforation (n=3) or an esophagopericardial or atrioesophageal fistula (n=2) occurred 15 to 28 days (19±6 days) after ablation. Two patients (1 atrioesophageal fistula and 1 esophagopericardial fistula) died. Esophageal perforation occurred only in patients with category 2 lesions (absolute risk, 9.6%). In a logistic regression analysis, ulcers were identified to be a significant predictor for esophageal perforating complications. CONCLUSIONS: Postablation endoscopy seems to identify patients at high risk of esophageal perforating complications only occurring in patients with category 2 EDEL. One out of 10 postablation esophageal ulcers progressed to perforation, and no patient without esophageal thermal ulcers showed the occurrence of perforating esophageal complications.

Repetitive atrial activation during ongoing atrial fibrillation-comparison using different mapping algorithms: preliminary findings.

PURPOSE: Targeting repetitive sources identified during atrial fibrillation (focal impulse and rotor modulation, FIRM) has been used as an ablation strategy using specific mapping tools. Aim of this study was to evaluate FIRM mapped rotors with a new multipolar mapping algorithm. METHODS: Patients with persistent atrial fibrillation undergoing FIRM ablation were included. Mapping of left atrial rotors was performed with a 64-pole basket catheter in conjunction with a specialized phase mapping algorithm. Subsequently, raw signals were analyzed by a novel mapping system (CARTOFINDER™). Comparison of FIRM identified sources with areas of repetitive activation analyzed by CARTOFINDER™ was performed. RESULTS: Nine patients were included (5 redo procedures; male n = 6; 66.5 ± 8.6 years) and 28 left atrial rotors were compared with the findings of the novel mapping system. CARTOFINDER™ identified repetitive activation patterns in 6 mapping sequences at remote sites (2 rotational patterns, 4 linear activation patterns). CONCLUSIONS: In this comparative preliminary study, two different mapping technologies to detect repetitive atrial activation during ongoing AF were used. Whereas rotational activation was documented using FIRM mapping no corresponding repetitive activation patterns near sites of FIRM-mapped rotor cores were identified using the novel mapping technology even though using the same electrogram characteristics and mapping basket position.

Impact of surround flow catheter tip irrigation in contact force ablation on the incidence of asymptomatic oesophageal lesions after atrial fibrillation ablation: a prospective comparative study.

AIMS: Aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of a recently introduced contact force ablation catheter with modified irrigation technology compared with a conventionally irrigated ablation catheter on the incidence of endoscopically detected oesophageal lesions (EDEL). METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients with symptomatic, drug-refractory paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) who underwent left atrial radiofrequency (RF) catheter ablation were prospectively enrolled. Patients were ablated using a single-tip RF contact force ablation catheter with conventional irrigation (Group 1; n = 50) or with a recently introduced intensified 'surround flow' irrigation technology (Group 2; n = 50). Assessment of EDEL was performed by oesophagogastroduodenoscopy in all patients after ablation. A total of 100 patients (mean age 63.6 ± 12.1 years; men 58%) with paroxysmal (n = 41; 41%) or persistent AF were included. Groups 1 and 2 patients were comparable in regard to baseline characteristics and procedural parameters, especially ablation time at posterior left atrial wall. Overall, 13 patients (13%) developed EDEL after AF ablation (8 oesophageal ulcerations, 5 erythema). The incidence of EDEL including oesophageal ulcerations was higher in Group 2 compared with Group 1 patients without statistical significance (18 vs. 8%, P = 0.23). One pericardial tamponade and one access site bleeding occurred in Group 2. No further adverse events were reported in both groups. CONCLUSION: According to these preliminary results, the use of an improved ablation catheter irrigation technology (surround flow) in conjunction with contact force measurement was associated with a higher but not statistically significant probability of oesophageal thermal lesions. Further studies including larger patient cohorts are needed.

Incidence of asymptomatic oesophageal lesions after atrial fibrillation ablation using an oesophageal temperature probe with insulated thermocouples: a comparative controlled study.

AIMS: Oesophageal probes to monitor luminal oesophageal temperature (LET) during atrial fibrillation (AF) catheter ablation have been proposed, but their effects remain unclear. Aim of this study is to evaluate the effects of an oesophageal temperature probe with insulated thermocouples. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients with symptomatic, drug-refractory paroxysmal or persistent AF who underwent left atrial radiofrequency (RF) catheter ablation were prospectively enrolled. Patients were ablated using a single-tip RF contact force ablation catheter. An intraluminal oesophageal temperature probe was used in Group 1. In Group 2, patients were ablated without LET monitoring. Assessment of asymptomatic endoscopically detected oesophageal lesions (EDEL) was performed by oesophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) in all patients. Eighty patients (mean age 63.7 ± 10.7 years; men 56%) with symptomatic, drug-refractory paroxysmal (n = 28; 35%) or persistent AF were included. Group 1 and Group 2 patients (n = 40 in each group) were comparable in regard to baseline characteristics, but RF duration on the posterior wall was significantly shorter in Group 1 patients. Overall, seven patients (8.8%) developed EDEL (four ulcerations, three erythema). The incidence of EDEL in Group 1 and Group 2 patients was comparable (7.5 vs. 10%, P = 1.0). No major adverse events were reported in both groups. CONCLUSION: According to these preliminary results, the use of oesophageal temperature probes with insulated thermocouples seems to be feasible in patients undergoing AF RF catheter ablation. The incidence of post-procedural EDEL when using a cut-off of 39°C is comparable to the incidence of EDEL without using a temperature probe.

Hemodynamic Improvement at Three Months after MitraClip® Treatment in End-Stage Heart Failure Patients with Functional Mitral Regurgitation.

BACKGROUND: Functional mitral regurgitation (FMR) is common in patients with advanced heart failure and impaired left ventricular function. The study aim was to examine functional and hemodynamic effects at three months after MitraClip® implantation in high-risk surgical patients with FMR. METHODS: A group of 93 patients was rejected for surgical treatment by heart-team decisions due to an inacceptable risk for conventional mitral valve surgery. Between October 2011 and May 2015, 89 of these patients (96%) were treated successfully with MitraClip implantation. A subsequent complete follow up was performed over three months in 32 patients with FMR, including pro-brain natriuretic peptide (pro-BNP) measurements, six-minute walk test, echocardiography, and right heart catheterization. RESULTS: The patients (mean age 73 ± 7 years) presented with a mean left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of 32 ± 13%, and mitral regurgitation (MR) grade ≥3 in 30 of 32 cases (93%). All patients suffered from severe FMR and were highly symptomatic (NYHA functional class III or IV). The mean logistic EuroSCORE was 33%. MitraClip implantation resulted in a significant clinical improvement and reverse cardiac remodelling with a decrease in LV end-diastolic and LV endsystolic diameters, while LVEF was unchanged. In addition, a statistically relevant reduction of systolic, diastolic and mean pulmonary artery pressures (PAPsystolic -7.2 mmHg, p = 0.011; PAPdiastolic -4.5 mmHg, p = 0.003; and PAPmean -5.3 mmHg, p = 0.007) were measured, while the cardiac index (+0.3 l/min/m2, p <0.001) and cardiac output (+0.5 l/min, p <0.001) were increased significantly. The 30-day mortality was 8.6% (n = 8). CONCLUSIONS: Among the study population, MitraClip implantation led to clinical improvement, reverse cardiac remodeling, and a sustained hemodynamic benefit during the three-month follow up period.

German ablation registry: Cryoballoon vs. radiofrequency ablation in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation--One-year outcome data.

BACKGROUND: Although radiofrequency (RF) ablation has long been the standard of care for atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation, cryoballoon technology has emerged as a feasible approach with promising results. Prospective multicenter registry data referring to both ablation technologies in AF ablation are lacking so far. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to report data from the German ablation registry with respect to efficacy and safety in pulmonary vein ablation with different energy sources for paroxysmal AF after 1-year follow-up. METHODS: A total of 2306 patients with symptomatic paroxysmal AF from the German ablation registry were included in this analysis. The cohort was divided into two groups according to the ablation energy source used: cryoballoon and RF ablation. MACCE was defined as a combination of death, myocardial infarction, or stroke. RESULTS: AF recurrence rate after a single ablation procedure at 1 year follow-up was not significantly different between the two groups (45.8% after cryoablation and 45.4% after RF ablation, P = .87). Also, the rate of patients without AF recurrence and free of antiarrhythmic drug at 12-month follow-up was similar (cryoablation 44.2% and RF 41.4%, P = .25). MACCE occurred with an incidence of 0.7% within 500 days after cryoablation and 1.4% after RF ablation (P = .30). Persistent phrenic nerve palsy was more common after cryoablation compared to RF ablation (1.1% vs. 0.3%, P <.05). CONCLUSION: AF recurrence rate at 1-year follow-up was similar in RF ablation compared to cryoablation, whereas the spectrum and relevance of complications were significantly different between the two ablation methods. This finding might influence the choice of ablation method offered to the individual paroxysmal AF patient.

Surgical Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation.

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common chronic arrhythmia in the adult population. Ablation lines have largely replaced the historical and challenging cut and sew techniques. Surgical ablation of AF is commonly performed in cases with other indications for cardiac surgery and less commonly as a stand-alone therapy. Pulmonary vein isolation is the cornerstone of this procedure. Extended left atrial ablation lines may increase efficacy in cases with longstanding persistent or permanent AF. Additional efficacy by adding right atrial ablation is controversial but is often performed in cases undergoing right atrial or atrial septal surgery. Left atrial volume reduction is recommended in cases with large left atria and AF undergoing another cardiac surgery. Arrhythmia recurrence is not uncommon after surgical ablation of AF and varies among studies due to heterogeneity in patient population, lesion set and endpoints. Freedom from AF recurrence was 65-87% at 12 months and 58-70% at 2 years follow-up. Long-term monitoring is recommended due to an increased prevalence of asymptomatic recurrences. The strongest predictors of AF recurrence are longstanding or persistent AF and a large left atrium. The most common mechanisms of recurrence are pulmonary vein reconnection, nonpulmonary vein triggers, and gaps in the ablation lines. About 20% of atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrences are atrial flutter or atrial tachycardia. There are not enough data in the surgical literature to support withdrawal of anticoagulation after surgical AF ablation. Patients selected for stand-alone surgical ablation usually have low risk profiles and low postoperative mortality rates (0.2%).

Association between left atrial low-voltage area, serum apoptosis, and fibrosis biomarkers and incidence of silent cerebral events after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: Silent cerebral events (SCE) have been identified on cerebral diffusion-weighted cerebral magnetic resonance imaging (DE-MRI) after catheter ablation (CA) of atrial fibrillation (AF). The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of atrial remodeling on the incidence of SCE after AF CA. METHODS: Forty patients (67.8 ± 10 years, 47.5 % women) with symptomatic paroxysmal (n = 11, 27.5 %) or persistent AF undergoing AF CA were prospectively enrolled. LA fibrosis was estimated by intraprocedural bipolar voltage mapping in sinus rhythm. Apoptosis-stimulating fragment (Fas-Ligand) and amino terminal peptide from collagen III (PIIINP) concentrations were analyzed of LA and femoral vein blood. Cerebral DE-MRI was performed 1 to 2 days after CA of AF for detection of SCE. In nine patients (22.5 %), new SCE were detected on DE-MRI after AF CA. RESULTS: Patients with SCE had higher CHA2DS2-VASc score, larger left atrial diameter (LADmax), and higher surface area of left atrial low-voltage (24 ± 11.2 vs 3.5 ± 4.2 %, p < 0.0001). Concentrations of peripheral PIIINP (103.7 ± 25.9 vs 81.8 ± 16.7 pg/ml, p < 0.01) and Fas-Ligand (124.1 ± 22.4 vs 87.6 ± 19.4 pg/ml, p < 0.01) were significantly higher in patients with SCE and correlated to low-voltage surface area (p < 0.01). Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed peripheral Fas-Ligand, LADmax, CHA2DS2-Vasc score, and LA low-voltage area proportion to be independent predictors for the development of SCE. CONCLUSIONS: LA remodeling, estimated by LADmax and LA low-voltage area, has significant relationship with the risk of SCE after AF ablation. Moreover, Fas-Ligand may act as an independent predictor for SCE in the context of AF CA.