Does Timing of Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting after ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Impact Early- and Long-Term Outcomes?

BACKGROUND: The optimal timing of surgical revascularization after ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is controversial, with some suggesting higher mortality rates in patients undergoing early surgery. The aim of the study is to determine the effect of the timing of surgical revascularization on 30-day mortality and long-term outcomes in these patients. METHODS: Retrospective single-center analysis of patients with STEMI undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) between January 2008 and December 2019 at our institution. The cohort was split into three groups based on time from symptom onset until surgical revascularization (Group 1: <12 hours, Group 2: 12-72 hours, Group 3: >72 hours). Statistical analyses were performed with and without patients in cardiogenic shock. Primary outcomes were 30-day mortality and 10-year survival. RESULTS: During the study period, 437 consecutive patients underwent surgical revascularization in the setting of STEMI. The mean age was 67.0 years, 96 (22.0%) patients were female, and 281 (64.3%) patients underwent off-pump CABG. The overall 30-day mortality including patients with cardiogenic shock was 12.8%. The 30-day mortality was 16.1, 13.9, and 9.3% in Groups 1, 2, and 3 (p = 0.31), whereas 10-year survival was 48.5, 57.3, and 54.9% (log-rank: p = 0.40). After exclusion of patients in cardiogenic shock, there was no difference between the three groups in 30-day and 10-year mortality. Timing of surgery had no influence on early- and long-term survival. CONCLUSION: In patients with STEMI, early surgical revascularization achieved similar early- and long-term survival rates compared with a delayed surgical revascularization strategy. Hence, when indicated, an early CABG strategy has no disadvantages in comparison to a delayed strategy.

Validating the SMART2 Score in a Racially Diverse High-Risk Nationwide Cohort of Patients Receiving Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.

Background We tested the potential of the Secondary Manifestations of Arterial Disease (SMART2) risk score for use in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. Methods and Results We conducted an external validation of the SMART2 score in a racially diverse high-risk national cohort (2010-2019) that underwent isolated coronary artery bypass grafting. We calculated the preoperative SMART2 score and modeled the 5-year major adverse cardiovascular event (cardiovascular mortality+myocardial infarction+stroke) incidence. We evaluated SMART2 score discrimination at 5 years using c-statistic and calibration with observed/expected ratio and calibration plots. We analyzed the potential clinical benefit using decision curves. We repeated these analyses in clinical subgroups, diabetes, chronic kidney disease, and polyvascular disease, and separately in White and Black patients. In 27 443 (mean age, 65 years; 10% Black individuals) US veterans undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (2010-2019) nationwide, the 5-year major adverse cardiovascular event rate was 25%; 27% patients were in high predicted risk (>30% 5-year major adverse cardiovascular events). SMART2 score discrimination (c-statistic: 64) was comparable to the original study (c-statistic: 67) and was best in patients with chronic kidney disease (c-statistic: 66). However, it underpredicted major adverse cardiovascular event rates in the whole cohort (observed/expected ratio, 1.45) as well as in all studied subgroups. The SMART2 score performed better in White than Black patients. On decision curve analysis, the SMART2 score provides a net benefit over a wide range of risk thresholds. Conclusions The SMART2 model performs well in a racially diverse coronary artery bypass grafting cohort, with better predictive capabilities at the upper range of baseline risk, and can therefore be used to guide secondary preventive pharmacotherapy.

Association Between the AHA Life's Essential 8 Score and Incident All-Cause Dementia: A Prospective Cohort Study from UK Biobank.

This study aimed to investigate the association between the Life's Essential 8 (LE8) score and incident all-cause dementia (including Alzheimer's disease [AD] and vascular dementia) in UK Biobank. A total of 259,718 participants were included in this prospective study. Smoking, non-HDL cholesterol, blood pressure, body mass index, HbA1c, physical activity, diet, and sleep were used to create the Life's Essential 8 (LE8) score. Associations between the score (both continuous and as quartiles) and outcomes were investigated using adjusted Cox proportional hazard models. The potential impact fractions of 2 scenarios and the rate advancement periods were also calculated. Over a median follow-up of 10.6 years, 4958 participants were diagnosed with any dementia. Higher LE8 scores were associated with lower risk of all-cause and vascular dementia in an exponential decay pattern. Compared with individuals in the healthiest quartile, those in the least healthy quartile had a higher risk of all-cause dementia (HR: 1.50 [95% CI: 1.37-1.65] and vascular dementia (HR: 1.86 [1.44-2.42]). A targeted intervention that increased the score by 10-points among individuals in the lowest quartile could have prevented 6.8% of all-cause dementia cases. Individuals in the least healthy LE8 quartile might develop all-cause dementia 2.45 years earlier than their counterparts. In conclusion, individuals with higher LE8 scores had lower risk of all-cause and vascular dementia. Because of nonlinear associations, interventions targeted at the least healthy individuals might produce greater population-level benefits.

Incidence and outcomes of emergency intraprocedural surgical conversion during transcatheter aortic valve implantation: Insights from a large tertiary care centre.

OBJECTIVE: During a transcatheter aortic valve implant (TAVI) procedure, intraprocedural complications that are manageable only by conversion to emergency open-heart surgery (E-OHS) occasionally occur. Contemporary data on the incidence and outcome of TAVI patients undergoing E-OHS are scarce. This study aimed to evaluate early and midterm outcomes following E-OHS of patients undergoing TAVI in a large tertiary care centre with immediate surgical backup availability for all TAVI procedures over a 15-year period. METHODS: Data from all patients undergoing transfemoral TAVI between 2006 and 2020 at the Heart Centre Leipzig were analysed. The study time was divided into 3 periods: 2006-2010 (P1), 2011-2015 (P2) and 2016-2020 (P3). Patients were grouped according to their surgical risk (high risk: EuroSCORE II ≥ 6%; low/intermediate risk: EuroSCORE II <6%). Primary outcomes were intraprocedural and in-hospital death and 1-year survival. RESULTS: During the study period, a total of 6903 patients underwent transfemoral TAVI. Among them, 74 (1.1%) required E-OHS [high risk, n = 66 (89.2%); low/intermediate risk, n = 8 (10.8%)]. The rate of patients requiring E-OHS was 3.5% (20/577 patients), 1.8% (35/1967 patients) and 0.4% (19/4359 patients) in study periods P1 to P3, respectively (P < 0.001). The proportion of patients who had E-OHS who were low/intermediate risk increased considerably over time (P1:0%; P28.6%; P3:26.3%; P = 0.077). Intraprocedural deaths occurred in 10 patients (13.5%), all of whom were high-risk. In-hospital mortality was 62.1% in high-risk patients and 12.5% in low/intermediate risk patients (P = 0.007). One-year survival was 37.8% in all patients undergoing E-OHS, 31.8% in high-risk patients and 87.5% in low/intermediate risk patients (log-rank P = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: In-hospital and 1-year survival rates following E-OHS are higher in low/intermediate risk than in high-risk patients undergoing TAVI. An on-site cardiac surgical department with immediately available E-OHS capabilities is an important component of the TAVI team.

Preoperative frailty and adverse outcomes following coronary artery bypass grafting surgery in US veterans.

BACKGROUND: Contemporary guidelines emphasize the value of incorporating frailty into clinical decision-making regarding revascularization strategies for coronary artery disease. Yet, there are limited data describing the association between frailty and longer-term mortality among coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) patients. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study (2016-2020, 40 VA medical centers) of US veterans nationwide that underwent coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Frailty was quantified by the Veterans Administration Frailty Index (VA-FI), which applies the cumulative deficit method to render a proportion of 30 pertinent diagnosis codes. Patients were classified as non-frail (VA-FI ≤ 0.1), pre-frail (0.1 < VA-FI ≤ 0.2), or frail (VA-FI > 0.2). We used Cox proportional hazards models to ascertain the association of frailty with all-cause mortality. Our primary study outcome was 5-year all-cause mortality; the co-primary outcome was days alive and out of the hospital within the first postoperative year. RESULTS: There were 13,554 CABG patients (median 69 years, 79% White, 1.5% women). The mean pre-operative VA-FI was 0.21 (SD: 0.11); 31% were pre-frail (VA-FI: 0.17) and 47% were frail (VA-FI: 0.31). Frail patients were older and had higher co-morbidity burdens than pre-frail and non-frail patients. Compared with non-frail patients (13.0% [11.4, 14.7]), there was a significant association between frail and pre-frail patients and increased cumulative 5-year all-cause mortality (frail: 24.8% [23.3, 26.1]; HR: 1.75 [95% CI 1.54, 2.00]; pre-frail 16.8% [95% CI 15.3, 18.4]; HR 1.2 [1.08,1.34]). Compared with non-frail patients (mean 362[SD 12]), pre-frail (mean 361 [SD 14]; p < 0.01) and frail patients (mean 358[SD 18]; p < 0.01) spent fewer days alive and out of the hospital in the first postoperative year. CONCLUSIONS: Pre-frailty and frailty were prevalent among US veterans undergoing CABG and associated with worse mid-term outcomes. Given the high prevalence of frailty with attendant adverse outcomes, there may be an opportunity to improve outcomes by identifying and mitigating frailty before surgery.

Early Intraluminal Frozen Elephant Trunk Stent Graft Thrombosis After Aortic Arch Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Partial intraluminal thrombosis of the frozen elephant trunk (FET) stent graft is a poorly described but not infrequent complication after aortic arch surgery. This study aims to describe and analyze the occurrence of early FET stent graft thrombosis. METHODS: Retrospective single-center analysis including patients who underwent aortic arch replacement with FET technique between 2006 and 2020. Stent graft thrombosis was diagnosed through computed tomography scan. Several computed tomography scan parameters and clinical variables were analyzed as predictors of this event. RESULTS: A total of 125 patients were included for analysis. Among these, 21 (16.8%) patients developed early postoperative FET stent graft thrombosis. Mean volumetric size of the aorta was 12.2 ± 2.0 mL in patients with FET stent graft thrombosis and 10.1 ± 2.8 mL in patients without thrombosis (P < .01). Thrombosis occurred more frequently among patients requiring thoracic endovascular aortic repair completion (15 of 21 [71.4%] patients) than in patients with completely excluded aneurysms (6 of 21 [28.6%] patients) (P = .01). Mean stent-to-aneurysm diameter ratio was 0.8 ± 0.2 among patients with thrombosis and 1.0 ± 0.2 among patients without thrombosis (P < .01). Thrombosis was more frequently observed among patients with conservative management of postoperative bleeding (P = .04). Patients with early FET thrombosis had a nonsignificantly higher in-hospital all-cause mortality than patients without thrombosis (19.0% vs 8.7%; P = .3). CONCLUSIONS: Early postoperative intraluminal thrombosis is a frequent complication post FET surgery. Smaller stent graft sizes, larger or partially covered aneurysms, and major bleeding are associated with early thrombosis. Slight FET oversizing, prompt thoracic endovascular aortic repair completion, and early reintervention for major bleeding may prevent early thrombosis.

Outcomes of coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with heart failure with a midrange ejection fraction.

BACKGROUND: Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) improves survival in patients with heart failure and severely reduced left ventricular systolic function (LVEF). Limited data exist regarding adverse cardiovascular event rates after CABG in patients with heart failure with midrange ejection fraction (HFmrEF; LVEF > 40% and < 55%). METHODS: We analyzed data on isolated CABG patients from the Veterans Affairs national database (2010-2019). We stratified patients into control (normal LVEF and no heart failure), HFmrEF, and heart failure with reduced LVEF (HFrEF) groups. We compared all-cause mortality and heart failure hospitalization rates between groups with a Cox model and recurrent events analysis, respectively. RESULTS: In 6533 veterans, HFmrEF and HFrEF was present in 1715 (26.3%) and 566 (8.6%) respectively; the control group had 4252 (65.1%) patients. HFrEF patients were more likely to have diabetes mellitus (59%), insulin therapy (36%), and previous myocardial infarction (31%). Anemia was more prevalent in patients with HFrEF (49%) as was a lower serum albumin (mean, 3.6 mg/dL). Compared with the control group, a higher risk of death was observed in the HFmrEF (hazard ratio [HR], 1.3 [1.2-1.5)] and HFrEF (HR, 1.5 [1.2-1.7]) groups. HFmrEF patients had the higher risk of myocardial infarction (subdistribution HR, 1.2 [1-1.6]; P = .04). Risk of heart failure hospitalization was higher in patients with HFmrEF (HR, 4.1 [3.5-4.7]) and patients with HFrEF (HR, 7.2 [6.2-8.5]). CONCLUSIONS: Heart failure with midrange ejection fraction negatively affects survival after CABG. These patients also experience higher rates myocardial infarction and heart failure hospitalization.

Lipid Lowering in "Very High Risk" Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery and Its Projected Reduction in Risk for Recurrent Vascular Events: A Monte Carlo Stepwise Simulation Approach.

ABSTRACT: 2018 AHA guidelines provide criteria to identify patients at very high risk (VHR) for adverse vascular events and recommend an low density lipoprotein-C (LDL-C) level <1.8 mmol/L. Data regarding the 10-year risk for adverse vascular events in coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) patients at VHR and the need for nonstatin therapies in the VHR cohort are limited. We queried a national cohort of CABG patients to answer these questions. The projected reduction of LDL-C from stepwise escalation of lipid-lowering therapy (LLT) was simulated; Monte Carlo methods were used to account for patient-level heterogeneity in treatment effects. Data on preoperative statin therapy and LDL-C levels were obtained. In the first scenario, all eligible patients not at target LDL-C received high-intensity statins, followed by ezetimibe and then alirocumab; alternatively, bempedoic acid was also used. The 10-year risk for an adverse vascular event was estimated using a validated risk score. Potential risk reduction was estimated after simulating maximal LLT. Before CABG, 8948 of 27,443 patients (median LDL-C 85 mg/dL) were at VHR. In the whole cohort, 31% were receiving high-intensity statins. With stepwise LLT escalation, the proportion of patients at target were 60%, 78%, 86%, and 97% after high-intensity statins, ezetimibe, bempedoic acid, and alirocumab, respectively. The projected 10-year risk to suffer a vascular event reduced by 4.6%. A large proportion of CABG patients who are at VHR for vascular events fail to meet 2018 AHA LDL-C targets. A stepwise approach, particularly with the use of bempedoic acid, can significantly reduce the need for more expensive proprotein convertase subtilisin kexin 9 inhibitors.

Twenty-year outcomes of minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass surgery: The Leipzig experience.

OBJECTIVE: Minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass (MIDCAB) surgery involving left anterior descending coronary artery grafting with the left internal thoracic artery through a left anterior small thoracotomy is being routinely performed in some specified centers for patients with isolated complex left anterior descending coronary artery disease, but very few reports regarding long-term outcomes exist in literature. Our study was aimed at assessing and analyzing the early and long-term outcomes of a large cohort of patients who underwent MIDCAB procedures and identifying the effects of changing trends in patient characteristics on early mortality. METHODS: A total of 2667 patients, who underwent MIDCAB procedures between 1996 and 2018, were divided into 3 groups on the basis of the year of surgery: group A, 1996-2003 (n = 1333); group B, 2004-2010 (n = 627) and group C, 2011-2018 (n = 707). Groupwise characteristics and early postoperative outcomes were compared. Long-term survival for all patients was analyzed and predictors for late mortality were identified using Cox proportional hazards methods. RESULTS: The mean age was 64.5 ± 10.9 years and 691 (25.9%) patients were female. Group C patients (log EuroSCORE I = 4.9 ± 6.9) were older with more cardiac risk factors and comorbidities than groups A (log EuroSCORE I = 3.1 ± 4.5) and B (log EuroSCORE I = 3.5 ± 4.7). Overall and groupwise in-hospital mortality was 0.9%, 1.0%, 0.6%, and 1.0% (P = .7), respectively. Overall 10-, 15-, and 20-year survival estimates for all patients were 77.7 ± 0.9%, 66.1 ± 1.2%, and 55.6 ± 1.6%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: MIDCAB can be safely performed with very good early and long-term outcomes. In-hospital mortality remained constant over the 22-year period of the study despite worsening demographic profile of patients.

An Opportunity for Prevention: Associations Between the Life's Essential 8 Score and Cardiovascular Incidence Using Prospective Data from UK Biobank.

To investigate the association between the Life's Essential 8 (LE8) score and the incidence of four cardiovascular outcomes (ischemic heart disease, myocardial infarction, stroke, and heart failure [HF]) - separately and as a composite outcome of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) - in UK Biobank. 250,825 participants were included in this prospective study. Smoking, non-HDL cholesterol, blood pressure, body mass index, HbA1c, physical activity, diet, and sleep were used to create a modified version of the LE8 score. Associations between the score (both as a continuous score and as quartiles) and outcomes were investigated using adjusted Cox proportional hazard models. The potential impact fractions of two scenarios were also calculated. Over a median follow-up of 10.4 years, there were 25,068 MACE. Compared to individuals in the highest quartile of the score (healthiest), those in the lowest quartile (least healthy) had 2.07 (95% CI: 1.99; 2.16) higher risk for MACE. The highest relative risk gradient of the individual outcomes was observed for HF (HRlowest quartile: 2.67 [95% CI: 2.42; 2.94]). The magnitude of association was stronger in participants below 50 years, women, and ethnic minorities. A targeted intervention that increased, by 10-points, the score among individuals in the lowest quartile could have prevented 9.2% of MACE. Individuals with a lower LE8 score experienced more MACE, driven especially by incident HF. Our scenarios suggested that relevant interventions targeted towards those in the lowest quartile may have a greater impact than interventions producing small equal changes across all quartiles.

Trends in Prescriptions of Cardioprotective Diabetic Agents After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Among U.S. Veterans.

OBJECTIVE: Patients with type 2 diabetes undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) are at risk for cardiovascular events. Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 receptor inhibitors (SGLT2i) and glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA) are effective cardioprotective agents; however, their prescription among CABG patients is uncertain. The aims of this study were 1) to evaluate the overall use of SGLT2i/GLP-1RA after CABG and explore longitudinal trends and 2) to examine patient-related factors associated with the use of SGLT2i or GLP-1RA. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We analyzed the nationwide Veterans Affairs (VA) database (2016-2019) to report trends and factors associated with SGLT2i or GLP-1RA prescription after CABG. RESULTS: Among 5,109 patients operated on at 40 different VA medical centers, 525 of 5,109 (10.4%), 352 of 5,109 (6.8%), and 91 of 5,109 (1.8%) were prescribed SGLT2i, GLP-1RA, and both, respectively. A substantial increase in the quarterly SGLT2i prescription rates (1.6% [first quarter of 2016 (2016Q1)], 33% [2019Q4]) was present but was lower for GLP-1RA (0.8% [2016Q1], 11.2% [2019Q4]). SGLT2i use was less likely with preexisting vascular disease (odd ratio [OR] 0.75, 95% CI 0.75, 0.94) or kidney disease (OR 0.72, 95% CI 0.58, 0.88), while GLP-1RA use was associated with obesity (OR 1.91, 95% CI 1.50, 2.46). CONCLUSIONS: The overall utilization of SGLT2i or GLP-1RA drugs in U.S. veterans with type 2 diabetes undergoing CABG is low, with SGLT2i preferred over GLP-1RA.

The importance of randomization in clinical research.

Studies evaluating average treatment effects (ATE) of an intervention could broadly be classified into those with observational and randomized designs. Observational studies are limited by confounding, in addition to selection and information bias, making the evaluation of ATE hypothesis generating and not hypothesis testing. Randomization attempts to reduce the systemic error introduced by observational studies by ensuring equal distribution of prognostic factors between the treatment and control groups, thereby confirming that any difference in outcomes observed between the two groups is attributable to the treatment. While randomized controlled trials (RCT) remain the gold standard in estimating ATE of therapeutic interventions, they do have inherent limitations due to uncertain external validity. Observational studies can have a complementary role in enhancing RCTs' ability to inform routine clinical practice. In this review, we focus on the limitations of observational studies, the need for randomization, interpretation, and the limitations of RCTs.

Early- and mid-term outcomes following redo surgical aortic valve replacement in patients with previous transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to analyse the early- and mid-term outcomes after redo surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) in patients with previous transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). METHODS: Retrospective single-centre analysis of early- and mid-term outcomes following redo SAVR in patients with previous TAVI between 2013 and 2020. Primary outcomes were in-hospital mortality and mid-term survival. RESULTS: During the study period, a total of 5756 patients underwent TAVI. Among them, 28 (0.5%) patients required redo SAVR after TAVI. During periods 2013-2016 and 2017-2020, 4/2184 (0.2%) patients and 24/3572 (0.7%) patients required SAVR after TAVI, respectively. The median logistic EuroSCORE was significantly higher at the time of SAVR than at the time of the index TAVI (5.9% vs 11.6%; P < 0.001). The median elapsed time between TAVI and redo SAVR was 7 months (3.5-14 months). Infective endocarditis (IE) was the most frequent indication for surgery [19 (67.8%) patients]. A total of 11 (39.3%) patients underwent isolated SAVR and 17 (60.7%) SAVR + additional cardiac surgical procedures. The overall in-hospital mortality was 14.3% (4/28). In-hospital mortality was 15.8% (3/19) among IE patients and 11.1% (1/9) among non-IE patients (P = 0.7). Overall estimated survival was 66.5%, 59.9% and 48.0% at 12, 18 and 24 months, respectively. Patients with IE showed a trend towards a lower estimated mid-term survival compared to non-IE patients [41.6% (95% confidence interval: 22.0-78.0%) vs 58.3% (95% confidence interval: 30.0-100%) survival at 24 months (P = 0.3)]. CONCLUSIONS: SAVR can be successfully performed in patients with prior TAVI despite the increased surgical risk and technical difficulty. IE is associated with decreased mid-term survival.

Systematic review and meta-analysis: a brief introduction.

LEARNING OBJECTIVES: 1. Understand the basic structure and parts of a systematic review 2. Be able to read and critically appraise a published systematic review.

Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: Department of Veteran Affairs' Use and Outcomes.

Background Coronary artery bypass can be performed off pump (OPCAB) without cardiopulmonary bypass. However, trends over time for OPCAB versus on-pump (ONCAB) use and long-term outcome has not been reported, nor has their long-term outcome been compared. Methods and Results We queried the national Veterans Affairs database (2005-2019) to identify isolated coronary artery bypass procedures. Procedures were classified as OPCAB on ONCAB using the as-treated basis. Trend analyses were performed to evaluate longitudinal changes in the preference for OPCAB. The median follow-up period was 6.6 (3.5-10) years. An inverse probability weighted Cox model was used to compare all-cause mortality between OPCAB and ONCAB. From 47 685 patients, 6759 (age 64±8 years) received OPCAB (14%). OPCAB usage declined from 16% (2005-2009) to 8% (2015-2019). Patients with triple vessel disease who received OPCAB received a lower mean number of grafts (2.8±0.8 versus 3.2±0.8; P<0.01). The ONCAB 5-, 10-, and 15-year survival rates were 82.9% (82.5-83.3), 60.4% (59.8-61.1), and 37.2% (36.1-38.4); correspondingly, OPCAB rates were 80.7% (79.7-81.7), 57.4% (56-58.7), and 34.1% (31.7-36.6) (P<0.01). OPCAB was associated with increased risk-adjusted all-cause mortality (hazard ratio, 1.15 [1.13-1.18]; P<0.01) and myocardial infarction (incident rate ratio, 1.16 [1.05-1.28]; P<0.01). Conclusions Over 15 years, OPCAB use declined considerably in Veterans Affairs medical centers. In Veterans Affairs hospitals, late all-cause mortality and myocardial infarction rates were higher in the OPCAB cohort.