Vinorelbine/docetaxel combination treatment of metastatic breast cancer: a phase I study.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to investigate the combination of vinorelbine (VRL) alternating intravenous (i.v.) and oral in combination with docetaxel (DCT) as first-line chemotherapy of patients with metastatic breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Tested doses were 60 or 70 mg m(-2) given on day 1 for DCT, 20 to 25 mg m(-2) for i.v. VRL on day 1, 60 mg m(-2) on day 8 or day 15 for oral VRL. Day 1 was administered every 3 weeks. Three to six patients were treated per dose level. RESULTS: The median age of the 30 treated patients was 60 years. Four patients were non evaluable for the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and were replaced. Reported dose-limiting toxicities were 11 omissions of oral VRL for neutropenia, two cases of febrile neutropenia and two grade 4 neutropenia >or=7 days. Dose levels using DCT doses >60 mg m(-2) and/or i.v. VRL doses >20 mg m(-2) met the criteria for MTD. Most frequent toxicities were febrile neutropenia in seven patients and neutropenic infection in four patients (one fatal). Therefore, the recommended schedule was established at i.v. VRL 20 mg m(-2) with DCT 60 mg m(-2) on day 1 and oral VRL 60 mg m(-2) given on day 15 every 3 weeks. At this recommended schedule, only one of six patients experienced febrile neutropenia. Among 22 patients evaluable for tumour response, 2 complete and 10 partial responses were reported. Pharmacokinetics of combined VRL and DCT demonstrated the absence of mutual interaction. CONCLUSIONS: This phase I study established the recommended doses and schedules of the combination alternating i.v. and oral VRL with DCT, this recommended regimen being further explored in a phase II study.

Population pharmacokinetics of short intravenous vinorelbine infusions in patients with metastatic breast cancer.

PURPOSE: To develop a population pharmacokinetic model of vinorelbine administered by short intravenous infusion in metastatic breast cancer patients. METHODS: Vinorelbine was administered as infusions of 5-10 min at 15, 20 or 25 mg/m(2) to 30 patients. Blood samples were collected over 18 h. Plasma concentrations of vinorelbine were determined by HPLC. Population pharmacokinetic analysis was performed using a nonlinear mixed effects modeling method. RESULTS: Vinorelbine concentration-time profiles were best described by a three-compartment open model. Plasma clearance (CL) was high and positively related to lean body weight (LBW) and body surface area (BSA) or to a combination of height and body weight (BW). Elevated serum alkaline phosphatases had a negative effect on CL. Typical population estimates of CL and central distribution volume (V(1)) were 74.2 l/h and 7.8 l, respectively. The interindividual population coefficients of variation for CL and V(1) were 17.0% and 32.0%, respectively. The stability and predictive performance of the final population pharmacokinetic model were assessed using 200 bootstrap samples of the original data. CONCLUSION: This study identified combined effects of BSA and serum alkaline phosphatases on clearance. These results partly support the conventional dose adjustment of vinorelbine based on BSA, but suggest dose modification in cases of extreme values of serum alkaline phosphatases.

Modelling of ftorafur and 5-fluorouracil pharmacokinetics following oral UFT administration. A population study in 30 patients with advanced breast cancer.

PURPOSE: The pharmacokinetics of ftorafur, 5-fluorouracil (5FU) and uracil were investigated in order to built a population pharmacokinetic model for the anticancer drug UFT, administered with leucovorin and vinorelbine. METHODS: A total of 31 patients with metastatic breast cancer were treated with escalating oral doses of UFT (300 to 500 mg per day) plus leucovorin (90 mg per day) in combination with intravenous vinorelbine (15 to 25 mg/m(2)). Concentration-time data were obtained on days 1, 8, 15 and 21 of cycle 1. RESULTS: Of the 31 patients treated, 30 were available for the pharmacokinetic analysis. Ftorafur, 5FU and uracil appeared rapidly in plasma and showed large interpatient variations. Ftorafur concentrations were higher than those of 5FU and uracil. AUC significantly increased between day 1, and days 8, 15 and 21. Ftorafur C(max) and AUC values were proportional to UFT dose, whereas C(max) and AUC values of 5FU and uracil were not linearly related to UFT dose. The pharmacokinetics of ftorafur were ascribed to a two-compartment open model in which 5FU was produced from the central compartment. The absorption and exponential distribution rate constants were assumed equal. The effect of uracil on 5FU elimination was straightforward, since no reasonable curve-fitting could be obtained for 5FU data when this covariate was not taken into account. The uracil concentration inducing a 50% reduction in 5FU elimination was 2.67 micro mol.l(-1). This result confirms the important role played by uracil as a competitive inhibitor of 5FU catabolism. CONCLUSION: A pharmacokinetic model for ftorafur and 5FU was developed and should be useful to further study drug interactions and establish dosing guidelines.

High-performance liquid chromatographic assay with ultraviolet detection for quantification of dihydrofluorouracil in human lymphocytes: application to measurement of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase activity.

The anticancer drug 5-fluorouracil (5FU) undergoes extensive biotransformation to 5-dihydrofluorouracil (5FUH2) by the enzyme dihydropyrimidine deshydrogenase (DPD). A new HPLC method with direct UV detection for the determination of 5FUH2 in peripheral lymphocytes has been developed to detect DPD deficiency in patients treated with 5FU-based therapy. The method has been shown to be valid over the 5FUH2 concentration range of 1.14-37.88 nmol/ml. Optimal enzymatic conditions for DPD activity measurement were studied: incubation time, protein and 5FU concentrations. The assay was successfully cross-validated with the existing method using HPLC with radiochemical detection.

Phase I dose-finding and pharmacokinetic study of docetaxel and vinorelbine as first-line chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Anthracycline-containing regimens are widely used in advanced breast cancer. However, there is a need for new, non-anthracycline regimens that are active in patients for whom anthracyclines are contraindicated. The aim of this study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), the dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) and recommended doses of docetaxel and vinorelbine as first-line chemotherapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer. The pharmacokinetics of both drugs was also evaluated. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-four women with first-line metastatic breast cancer were treated with docetaxel, 60-100 mg/m2 (day 1), and vinorelbine, 20-22.5 mg/m2 (days 1 and 5), repeated every three weeks and administered on an outpatient basis. RESULTS: Two MTDs were determined: MTD1 was defined at the dose level using docetaxel 75 mg/m2, and vinorelbine 22.5 mg/m2 DLT being a grade 3 stomatitis that was more related to the dose of vinorelbine than that of docetaxel. Therefore, the study continued with a fixed dose of vinorelbine, 20 mg/m2, and docetaxel 85-100 mg/m2. MTD2 was defined at the dose level combining docetaxel, 100 mg/m2, and vinorelbine, 20 mg/m2; DLTs were grade 3 stomatitis and severe asthenia. Fluid retention was observed in 41% of patients but was never severe or a reason for patient discontinuation. In comparison with historical experience, Daflon 500 did not seem to increase the efficacy of the three-day corticosteroid premedication by further reducing the incidence or severity of fluid retention. No significant neurotoxicity was observed and no patient discontinued the study due to this site effect. Activity was observed at all dose levels and at all metastatic sites, with an overall response rate of 71% (95% CI: 52.0%-85.8%). The median time to progression was 31.4 weeks (95% CI: 12-48 weeks) and median survival was 15.6 months (95% CI: 2.6-26.6 months). The pharmacokinetics of docetaxel and vinorelbine were not modified between day 1 and day 3 when the two drugs were combined with the day 1 administration schedule used in this study. CONCLUSION: The recommended doses for phase II studies are docetaxel, 75 mg/m2 (day 1), plus vinorelbine, 20 mg/m2 (days 1 and 5), repeated every three weeks. At these doses, the combination was found to be active and well tolerated.

Population pharmacokinetics of topotecan: intraindividual variability in total drug.

The inter- and intraindividual variabilities in topotecan clearance (CL) were explored using a population pharmacokinetic approach. Total (lactone + hydroxy acid) topotecan plasma concentrations were obtained in 31 women with metastatic epithelial ovarian cancer treated by the 30-min intravenous infusion on 5 subsequent days. The data corresponding to three occasions (days 1 and 5 of cycle 1, and day 1 of cycle 2), were analyzed using the nonlinear mixed effect model program. A large interindividual variability was observed, with CL varying from 9.1 to 42.51 per hour (mean 21.0). Topotecan CL was related to serum creatinine level, and age. A close relationship was also observed between topotecan CL and creatinine clearance. Intraindividual variability both within cycle 1 and between the two first cycles was limited, with a mean variation of -2+/-17%, and + 5+/-20%, respectively. A limited sampling strategy using Bayesian estimation based on two samples (5 min before the end of the 30-min infusion, and 4 h after the end of infusion) was developed. The results of this study combine relationships between topotecan pharmacokinetic parameters and patient covariates that may be useful for a priori dose adjustment, and convenient sampling procedure that can be used for further studies and drug monitoring.

Phase I trial of interleukin-2 and high-dose arginine butyrate in metastatic colorectal cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Interleukin-2 (IL-2) and sodium butyrate allow rats to be cured of peritoneal carcinomatosis from colon cancer. We performed a phase I trial of IL-2 and high-dose arginine butyrate (ArgB) in patients with advanced metastatic colorectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From April to July 1997, six patients were included in the trail; they had a median age of 52 years, four had a performance status of 0, two had a performance status of 1 with normal biological functions. All patients had received at least two prior lines of chemotherapy. A fixed dose of 18 MIU/m2 IL-2,was administered by subcutaneous injection and ArgB was delivered via continuous intravenous infusion on days 1-6 with escalating doses starting at 2 g kg(-1) day(-1). RESULTS: The planned dose escalation was not possible because of toxicities. A daily ArgB dose of 2 g/kg was delivered for nine cycles. Level 2 (4 g/kg) could not be delivered in three of the six patients because of liver toxicity. The dose-limiting toxicities were fatigue and liver function disturbances. The maximum tolerated dose for ArgB was 3 g kg(-1) day(-1), in combination with IL-2 at 12 MIU m2 day(-1). No clinical response was seen. Pharmacokinetic analysis showed large intra- and interindividual variations. CONCLUSION: This schedule with a high dose of ArgB proved to be highly toxic with liver insufficiency. We will be running another trial with lower doses of ArgB calculated from the schedule used in the experimental model, starting at a dose of 20 mg kg(-1) day(-1) for ArgB and 200000 UI kg(-1) day(-1) IL-2, every 8 h.

UFT plus oral calcium folinate/vinorelbine for advanced breast cancer.

This phase I study was undertaken to define the maximum tolerated dose, dose-limiting toxicity, and recommended dosage of UFT (uracil and tegafur) plus oral calcium folinate (Orzel) and vinorelbine (Navelbine) in combination treatment of metastatic breast cancer in patients who have received one prior chemotherapy regimen. The pharmacokinetics of UFT and vinorelbine were also evaluated. Starting doses were UFT 300 mg/day, plus a fixed calcium folinate dose of 90 mg/day, both administered in three divided daily doses on days 1 through 21 and vinorelbine 15 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, and 15. The regimen was repeated every 4 weeks. At least three patients were treated at each dose level before escalating to the next level. Prophylactic granulocyte colony-stimulating factor was not routinely given. The preliminary results are reported as we await further follow-up of this ongoing study.

Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase deficiency and fluorouracil-related toxicity.

Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) is the initial and rate-limiting enzyme of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) catabolism. We report lymphocytic DPD data concerning a group of 53 patients (23 men, 30 women, mean age 58, range 36-73), treated by 5-FU-based chemotherapy in different French institutions and who developed unanticipated 5-FU-related toxicity. Lymphocyte samples (standard collection procedure) were sent to us for DPD determination (biochemical method). Among the whole group of 53 patients, 19 had a significant DPD deficiency (DD; below 150 fmol min(-1) mg(-1) protein, i.e. less than 70% of the mean value observed from previous population study). There was a greater majority of women in the DD group (15 out of 19, 79%) compared with the remaining 34 patients (15 out of 34, 44%, P<0.014). Toxicity was often severe, leading to patient death in two cases (both women). The toxicity score (sum of WHO grading, theoretical range 0-20) was twice as high in patients with marked DD (below 100 pmol min(-1) mg(-1) protein, n = 11, mean score = 13.2) compared with patients with moderate DD (between 150 and 100 pmol min(-1) mg(-1) protein, n = 8, mean score = 6.8), P = 0.008. In the DD group, there was a high frequency of neurotoxic syndromes (7 out of 19, 37%). The two deceased patients both had severe neurotoxicity. The occurrence of cardiac toxicity was relatively rare (1 out of 19, 5%). These data suggest that women are particularly prone to DPD deficiency and allow a more precise definition of the DD toxicity profile.