A value proposition for trough level-based anti-TNFα drug dosing.

Treatment of inflammatory bowel diseases and rheumatic disorders with anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα) drugs is expensive, while a significant proportion of patients does not show adequate clinical response. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) enables patient-specific anti-TNFα therapy. The role of laboratory tests in clinical care has recently been described in a value proposition framework. It describes care processes, stakeholders, costs, risks, benefits and patient outcomes based on the use of a laboratory test in a clinical care pathway. We have applied this concept to the use of TDM for anti-TNFα drugs, describing evidence that supports the intervention and its cost effectiveness, steps that need to be adjusted in the care pathway, possible treatment algorithms and measures to assess adoption of this framework into clinical practice. For effective TDM, an assay for measurement of drug levels together with appropriate target ranges and an anti-drug-antibody assay have to be implemented. Also, instead of only reporting the drug concentration, laboratorians, pharmacists and clinicians should deliver added value by introducing a TDM-based treatment algorithm into clinical practice. Thus, to maximize effectiveness of TDM of anti-TNFα therapy in routine care, adjustment of current care pathways and cooperation of many stakeholders are needed.

Risk factors for thiopurine-induced myelosuppression and infections in inflammatory bowel disease patients with a normal TPMT genotype.

BACKGROUND: Leucopenia is a common side effect in patients treated with thiopurines. Variants in the thiopurine S-methyltransferase (TPMT) gene are the best-known risk factor, but only explain up to 25% of leucopenia cases. AIM: To identify the clinical risk factors for thiopurine-induced leucopenia in patients without a common TPMT variant, and explore if these patients are at increased risk for infections. METHODS: Post hoc analysis of the Thiopurine response Optimisation by Pharmacogenetic testing in Inflammatory bowel disease Clinics (TOPIC) trial. For this analysis, patients without a variant in TPMT (*2, *3A or*3C) were included. Uni- and multivariate Cox-proportional hazard models were used to identify risk factors for leucopenia and infections. Leucopenia was defined as a white blood cell (WBC) count <3.0 × 109 /L and infections were classified according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events. RESULTS: Sixty hundred and ninety-five patients (90.6%) included in the TOPIC-trial had no variant in TPMT, of which 45 (6.5%) developed leucopenia. Median time to leucopenia was 56 (29-112) days. Multivariate analysis showed that use of mercaptopurine compared to azathioprine was associated with leucopenia (hazard ratio [HR] 2.61 [95% CIs, 1.39-4.88; P < .01]) and a higher baseline WBC count was protective (HR 0.80 [95% CIs, 0.71-0.89; P < .01]). Risk factors for infections were older age (per 10 year; HR 2.07 [95% CIs, 1.18-3.63; P = .01]) and concomitant use of biologic drugs (HR 2.15 [95% CIs, 1.14-4.07; P = .02]). CONCLUSIONS: Low baseline WBC count and mercaptopurine, due to a relatively higher dose, were risk factors for thiopurine-induced leucopenia in patients without a TPMT variant.

Short-term variation in plasma mitotane levels confirms the importance of trough level monitoring.

OBJECTIVE: Mitotane is the drug of choice in patients with adrenocortical carcinoma. The anti-neoplastic effect is correlated with mitotane plasma levels, which render it crucial to reach and maintain the concentration above 14 mg/l. However, mitotane pharmacokinetics is poorly understood. The aim of this study was to investigate the variation in plasma mitotane levels during the day and the influence of a single morning dose. DESIGN: A prospective case-control study was conducted to investigate the variation in plasma mitotane levels. METHODS: Patients who had been treated for at least 24 weeks and had reached the therapeutic plasma level (14 mg/l) at least once were eligible. In the first group, mitotane levels were determined hourly for the duration of 8 h after administration of a single morning dose. In the second group, mitotane levels were assessed similarly without administration of a morning dose. RESULTS: Ten patients were included in this study, and three patients participated in both groups. Median plasma level at baseline was 16.2 mg/l (range 11.3-23.3 mg/l) in the first group (n=7) and 17.0 mg/l (13.7-23.8) in the second group (n=6). Plasma levels displayed a median increase compared with baseline of 24% (range 6-42%) at t=4 after morning dose and a change of 13% (range -14 to 33%) at t=4 without morning dose (P=0.02). CONCLUSION: A substantial increase in mitotane plasma levels was observed in steady-state patients within a period of 8 h after morning dosing. Without morning dose, mitotane curves showed a variable profile throughout the day. This implies that random sampling could yield incidentally high levels. For this reason, we recommend early-morning trough sampling as standard management in monitoring mitotane treatment.

Absence of nodular regenerative hyperplasia after low-dose 6-thioguanine maintenance therapy in inflammatory bowel disease patients.

BACKGROUND: The use of 6-thioguanine has been proposed as a rescue drug for inflammatory bowel disease patients. Initial data on short-term efficacy and toxicity of 6-thioguanine were promising; however, these have been challenged by reports concerning its potential hepatotoxic effect (nodular regenerative hyperplasia). We proposed that these histological liver abnormalities may well be dose- or level-dependent. AIMS: We performed a prospective multi-centre study on the hepatotoxic potential of long-term and (as compared with prior studies) low-dose 6-thioguanine use. PATIENTS: Inflammatory bowel disease patients using 6-thioguanine for at least 30 consecutive months and consenting to undergo a liver biopsy were enrolled. METHODS: Liver biopsy specimens were scored by two pathologists, unaware of clinical data. Laboratory parameters, determined prior to initiation of 6-thioguanine therapy and prior to biopsy, were reviewed. RESULTS: Twenty-eight biopsies were analysed. The majority of patients (89%) were azathioprine and/or 6-mercaptopurine intolerant inflammatory bowel disease patients. In 26 patients (93%) no signs of nodular regenerative hyperplasia were detected; in two additional patients nodular regenerative hyperplasia could not be excluded due to inconclusive pathological findings. The mean 6-thioguanine dosage, 6-thioguaninenucleotides level, duration of use and cumulative dosage were 19.5mg, 564 pmol/8 x 10(8) RBC, 38 months and 22491 mg, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: We have demonstrated that low-dose 6-thioguanine maintenance therapy in inflammatory bowel disease patients is not likely to be associated with induction of nodular regenerative hyperplasia. The induction of nodular regenerative hyperplasia appears to be 6-thioguanine dose or 6-thioguaninenucleotides level dependent.

Extended thiopurine metabolite assessment during 6-thioguanine therapy for immunomodulation in Crohn's disease.

The proposed metabolic advantage of 6-thioguanine (6-TG) is the direct conversion into the pharmacologically active 6-thioguaninenucleotides (6-TGN). The authors assessed metabolic characteristics of 6-TG treatment in patients with Crohn's disease (N = 7) on therapy with 20 mg 6-TG. 6-thioguanine-monophosphate (6-TGMP), 6-thioguanine-diphosphate (6-TGDP), and 6-thioguanine-triphosphate (6-TGTP) were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography analysis in erythrocytes. Thiopurine S-methyltransferase activity and total 6-TGN levels were determined by standard methods. High interindividual variance in metabolite measurements was observed. Main metabolites were 6-TGTP (median = 531 pmol/8 x 10(8) red blood cells) and 6-TGDP (median = 199 pmol/8 x 10(8) red blood cells). Traces of 6-TGMP (median = 39 pmol/8 x 10(8) red blood cells) and 6-TG (2 patients) could be detected. 6-TGN levels correlated with 6-TGTP levels (r = 0.929, P = .003) and with the sum of separate nucleotides (r = 0.929, P = .003). No correlations were established between TPMT activity (median = 13 pmol/h/10(7)) and 6-TG metabolites. The 1-step metabolism of 6-TG still leads to high interindividual variance in metabolite concentrations. Total 6-TGN level monitoring may suffice for clinical practice.

Toxicity of 6-thioguanine: no hepatotoxicity in a series of IBD patients treated with long-term, low dose 6-thioguanine. Some evidence for dose or metabolite level dependent effects?

BACKGROUND: 6-Thioguanine is used in inflammatory bowel disease since 2001, with promising short-term results. In 2003, liver histology of some 6-thioguanine treated patients showed nodular regenerative hyperplasia. Recently, magnetic resonance imaging revealed nodular regenerative hyperplasia in patients with normal histology. AIMS: Investigating the presence of nodular regenerative hyperplasia in long-term 6-thioguanine treated patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Inflammatory bowel disease patients, using 6-thioguanine minimally 24 months, were asked to undergo liver biopsy and magnetic resonance imaging. RESULTS: Fourteen patients used 6-thioguanine minimally 24 months, 13 participated. Mean 6-thioguanine therapy duration, daily dose and 6-thioguanine nucleotide levels were: 36 months, 18.8 mg (0.28 mg/kg) and 705 pmol/8x10(8) erythrocytes, respectively. Liver histology and magnetic resonance imaging showed no nodular regenerative hyperplasia. DISCUSSION: Liver biopsy and magnetic resonance imaging showed no nodular regenerative hyperplasia in these long-term 6-thioguanine treated inflammatory bowel disease patients. 6-thioguanine dose and metabolite levels were lower compared with previous nodular regenerative hyperplasia reports, suggesting dose or metabolite level-dependent effects. Otherwise, nodular regenerative hyperplasia is related with inflammatory bowel disease itself and immunosuppressives, including azathioprine and 6-mercaptopurine. CONCLUSION: 6-Thioguanine is debated due to nodular regenerative hyperplasia. We found no nodular regenerative hyperplasia in inflammatory bowel disease patients with long-term, low dosed 6-thioguanine, suggesting metabolite level-dependent effects. Therefore, 6-thioguanine still seems useful, but in selected patients, intolerant for other immunosuppressives, low dosed and under close surveillance of metabolite levels and hepatotoxity.

Pancytopenia due to high 6-methylmercaptopurine levels in a 6-mercaptopurine treated patient with Crohn's disease.

In a 23-year-old female with colonic Crohn's disease 6-mercaptopurine 100 mg daily (1.7 mg/kg) was added to mesalamine and prednisolone therapy because of ongoing disease activity. One month later she had fever and a pancytopenia. 6-methylmercaptopurine ribonucleotides levels were extremely elevated (57,000 pmol/8x10(8) red blood cells) and 6-thioguanine nucleotides levels were subtherapeutically (126 pmol/8x10(8) red blood cells). Genotyping showed a wildtype thiopurine S-methyltransferase TPMT(H/H) (*1/*1) genotype and a wildtype inosine triphosphate pyrophosphatase gene. TPMT and inosine triphosphate pyrophosphatase activity were normal. The pancytopenia recovered spontaneously within a few weeks, parallel with decreasing 6-methylmercaptopurine ribonucleotides levels after interrupting 6-mercaptopurine treatment. Epstein-Barrvirus, Cytomegalovirus and Herpesvirus infections were excluded by serology. This is the first report of pancytopenia due to extremely high 6-methylmercaptopurine ribonucleotides levels. No relation was found with the genotype of TPMT and inosine triphosphate pyrophosphatase enzymes, which play key roles in the thiopurine metabolic pathway. Apparently, 6-methylmercaptopurine ribonucleotides metabolites can cause pancytopenia, as was already known for 6-thioguanine nucleotides.

The pharmacokinetic effect of discontinuation of mesalazine on mercaptopurine metabolite levels in inflammatory bowel disease patients.

BACKGROUND: In vitro studies suggest interactions between mesalazine (mesalamine) and thiopurines by thiopurine S-methyltransferase (TPMT) inhibition, influencing the balance of hepatotoxic 6-methylmercaptopurine ribonucleotide and immunosuppressive tioguanine (thioguanine) metabolites. AIM: To examine the in vivo pharmacokinetic interaction between mesalazine and mercaptopurine. METHODS: A prospective study was performed in quiescent inflammatory bowel disease patients using the combination of mercaptopurine and mesalazine. Laboratory parameters, 6-methylmercaptopurine ribonucleotide and tioguanine levels and thiopurine S-methyltransferase activity in erythrocytes were measured at stable medication, after mesalazine discontinuation and mesalazine reintroduction, further mercaptopurine was continued. RESULTS: Seventeen patients were participated. Mean mercaptopurine dose was 0.78 mg/kg/day and median of mesalazine dose was 3000 mg/day. After mesalazine discontinuation, mean tioguanine levels changed significantly from 262 to 209 pmol/8 x 10(8) red blood cell, increasing to 270 after reintroduction. Mean 6-methylmercaptopurine ribonucleotide levels were 1422, 2149 and 1503 pmol/8 x 10(8) red blood cell respectively. Mean 6-methylmercaptopurine ribonucleotide/tioguanine ratio increased significantly from 6.3 at baseline to 11.2. Mean baseline thiopurine S-methyltransferase activity was 0.58 pmol/10(6) red blood cell/h and stable. All patients had wild-type thiopurine S-methyltransferase genotypes however, leucocyte counts were stable. DISCUSSION: A significantly higher tioguanine levels and improving 6-methylmercaptopurine ribonucleotide/tioguanine ratio were found during mesalazine/mercaptopurine combination. Theoretically, mesalazine inhibits thiopurine S-methyltransferase activity. In vivo thiopurine S-methyltransferase activity did not change, however. CONCLUSION: Mesalazine has synergistic effects on mercaptopurine therapy, but the mechanism is unclear. Combining these drugs may be further indication for mesalazine in inflammatory bowel disease treatment.