Preoperative Identification and Outcomes of Vascular Variants on Surgery for Chronic Pancreatitis.

INTRODUCTION: Surgeries for chronic pancreatitis are tailored based on disease process and either include parenchymal-preserving surgeries or total pancreatectomy with or without islet cell autotransplantation. It is critical to account for vascular variants as injuries to these are associated with short- and long-term morbidity and mortality. There is a lack of contemporary data on the true incidence of aberrant arterial anatomy, and it is likely to be underreported by nonhepatobiliary radiologists. METHODS: This study is a retrospective analysis of all patients undergoing pancreatic resections for chronic pancreatitis at the single center. The presence of vascular variants was compared between standard reporting and preoperative imaging review by a hepatobiliary radiologist and surgeon. Primary outcomes were operative time and blood loss. RESULTS: Of the 72 pancreatic resections for chronic pancreatitis, 50 (69%) satisfied inclusion criteria. Three of fifty (6%) had vascular anomalies reported on standard reporting while 11 (22%) had vascular anomalies identified on preoperative imaging review and confirmed at surgery. Hence, only 27% of patients with variant vascular anatomy were reported on standard imaging. There was no significant difference in operative times or blood loss between those with and without known vascular anomalies. CONCLUSIONS: Pancreatic resection is a complex undertaking as long-standing inflammation distorts anatomic planes and increases opportunity for inadvertent vascular injury especially if there are aberrant vessels. In this study, we found that anatomic vascular variants are oftentimes not reported. Dedicated surgical planning with review of cross-sectional imaging identified all cases of anatomic variants resulting in no difference in operative time or incidence of intraoperative hemorrhage.

Hepaticoduodenostomy for Recurrent Biliary Anastomotic Stricture after Liver Transplant.

Biliary strictures afterlivertransplant are amenable to endoscopic dilatation or percutaneous dilatation and stenting in most cases. In rare cases, for recurrence or tight stricture, surgery is required, and hepaticojejunostomy is the favored procedure. We report a case of posttransplant stricture in a duct-to-duct anastomosis that could not be accessed due to prior gastric bypass. Despite multiple percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography dilatations, the stricture recurred, and the patient was taken up for bilioenteric bypass. During surgery, dense adhesions in the infracolic compartment with chronically twisted jejunal loops, due to prior mini gastric bypass, were encountered, which prevented the creation of a jejunal Roux limb. Hepaticoduodenostomy was performed with no recurrence of stricture at 12 months. Hepaticoduodenostomy is a viable option for surgical management of recurrent biliary strictures, especially in a setting of prior bariatric/diversion procedures.

Current practices in islet cell autotransplantation.

INTRODUCTION: Chronic pancreatitis and recurrent acute pancreatitis comprise a spectrum of disease that results in complications related to exocrine and endocrine insufficiency and chronic pain with narcotic dependence and poor quality of life. The mainstay of therapy has been medical and endoscopic therapy; surgery, especially total pancreatectomy, was historically reserved for few select patients as the obligate exocrine insufficiency and pancreatogenic diabetes (type 3C) are challenging to manage. The addition of islet cell autotransplantation after total pancreatectomy helps to mitigate brittle type 3c diabetes and prevents mortality related to severe hypoglycemic episodes and hypoglycemic unawareness. There have been more recent data demonstrating the safety of surgery and the beneficial long-term outcomes. AREAS COVERED: The purpose of this review is to describe the current practices in the field of islet cell autotransplantation including the selection and evaluation of patients for surgery, their preoperative work up and management, surgical approach, post-operative management and outcomes. EXPERT OPINION: Total pancreatectomy and islet cell autotransplantation has the ability to drastically improve quality of life and prevent brittle diabetes for patients suffering with chronic pancreatitis.

ExPert ConsEnsus on the management of Advanced clear-cell RenaL celL carcinoma: INDIAn Perspective (PEARL-INDIA).

In advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma (aRCC), systemic therapy is the mainstay of treatment, with no or little role for surgery in these patients. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and immune-oncological (IOs) therapies, either alone or in combination, are recommended in these patients depending on patient and tumour factors. The sequencing of therapies is critical in RCC because the choice of subsequent line therapy is heavily dependent on the response and duration of the previous treatment. There are additional barriers to RCC treatment in India. Immunotherapy is the cornerstone of treatment in ccRCC, but it is prohibitively expensive and not always reimbursed, effectively putting it out of reach for the vast majority of eligible patients in India. Furthermore, in advanced RCC (particularly the clear cell variety), Indian oncologists consider the disease burden of the patients, which is particularly dependent on the quantum of the disease load, clinical symptoms, and performance status of the patient, before deciding on treatment. There are no India-specific guidelines for clear cell RCC (ccRCC) treatment or the positioning and sequencing of molecules in the management of advanced ccRCC that take these country-specific issues into account. The current consensus article provides expert recommendations and treatment algorithms based on existing clinical evidence, which will be useful to specialists managing advanced ccRCC.

Perioperative Management of Patients Undergoing Total Pancreatectomy with/without Islet Cell Autotransplantation: A Single Center Experience.

Total pancreatectomy (TP) and islet cell autotransplantation (IAT) are complex operations that require intensive postoperative monitoring with standardized protocols. There are few studies detailing immediate perioperative management. The purpose of this study was to describe the perioperative management of post-pancreatectomy patients in the first week following surgery to guide clinicians in addressing salient points from different organ systems. This is a retrospective cohort review of prospectively collected data from September 2017 to September 2022 at a single institution, including patients 16 years and older who underwent TP or TPIAT for chronic pancreatitis. Patients were maintained on a heparin drip (TPIAT), insulin drip, and ketamine infusion. Primary outcomes were complications in the first 5 days following surgery and ICU length of stay (LOS). Secondary outcomes included overall LOS and mortality. Of 31 patients, 26 underwent TPIAT, and 5 underwent TP. Median ICU LOS was five days (IQR 4-6). The most common immediate postoperative complications were reintubation [n = 5 (16%)] and bleeding [n = 2 (6%)]. Median insulin drip use was 70 h (IQR 20-124). There was no mortality. Patients were extubated quickly and progressed well on the protocol. Immediate postoperative complications were generally minor and without long-term effects.

Avelumab first-line maintenance plus best supportive care (BSC) vs. BSC alone for advanced urothelial carcinoma: JAVELIN Bladder 100 Asian subgroup analysis.

BACKGROUND: The phase 3 JAVELIN Bladder 100 trial showed significantly prolonged overall survival (OS) with avelumab first-line maintenance + best supportive care (BSC) vs. BSC alone in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma (UC) that had not progressed with first-line platinum-containing chemotherapy. Here, efficacy and safety were assessed from the initial analysis of the JAVELIN Bladder 100 trial (data cutoff October 21, 2019) in patients enrolled in Asian countries. METHODS: Patients with locally advanced or metastatic UC that had not progressed with 4 to 6 cycles of first-line platinum-containing chemotherapy (gemcitabine + cisplatin or carboplatin) were randomized 1:1 to receive avelumab first-line maintenance + BSC or BSC alone, stratified by best response to first-line chemotherapy and visceral vs. nonvisceral disease when initiating first-line chemotherapy. The primary endpoint was OS assessed from randomization in all patients and patients with PD-L1+ tumors (Ventana SP263 assay). Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS) and safety. RESULTS: A total of 147 patients in JAVELIN Bladder 100 were enrolled in Asian countries (Hong Kong, India, Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan). In this Asian subgroup, 73 and 74 patients received avelumab + BSC or BSC alone, respectively. Median OS was 25.3 months (95% CI, 18.6 to not estimable [NE]) in the avelumab + BSC arm vs. 18.7 months (95% CI, 12.8-NE) in the BSC alone arm (hazard ratio [HR], 0.74 [95% CI, 0.43-1.26]); median PFS was 5.6 months (95% CI, 2.0-7.5) vs. 1.9 months (95% CI, 1.9-1.9), respectively (HR, 0.58 [95% CI, 0.38-0.86]). In the avelumab + BSC vs. BSC alone arms, grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events (any causality) occurred in 44.4% vs. 16.2%, respectively. The most common grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events in the avelumab + BSC arm were anemia (9.7%), amylase increased (5.6%), and urinary tract infection (4.2%). CONCLUSIONS: Efficacy and safety results for avelumab first-line maintenance in the Asian subgroup of JAVELIN Bladder 100 were generally consistent with those in the overall trial population. These data support the use of avelumab first-line maintenance as standard of care for Asian patients with advanced UC that has not progressed with first-line platinum-containing chemotherapy. NCT02603432.

Radiologic Reporting of Simple Hepatic Cyst Versus Biliary Cystadenoma May Lead to Unnecessary Surgery.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Simple liver cyst (SHC) is a benign condition with no malignant potential. They are typically discovered incidentally due to the increased use of abdominal imaging, but some patients may present with abdominal pain. A radiologist's differential diagnosis in cases of SHC will often include "rule out biliary cystadenoma." Under these circumstances, patients and surgeons are more likely to pursue surgical options even in asymptomatic cases. The aim of this study is to conduct a retrospective analysis of presentation, radiologic reporting, management plan, and histopathology of patients referred to a tertiary hospital in order to determine the correlation between radiology and histology. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the clinical, radiological, and histopathological data of 20 patients operated for a diagnosis of a cystic lesion in the liver. RESULT: The CT/MRI of 6 (30%) patients was reported as a biliary cystadenoma, 13 (65%) were reported as a simple hepatic cyst and 1 patient (5%) had hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with the additional diagnosis of multiple hepatic cysts. The lesion reported as HCC on the scan was separate from the cystic lesions. The modality of imaging for these cysts was evenly split, 50% of patients had a CT scan, and 50% had an MRI performed. All imaging studies were interpreted by an attending radiologist and most of them were discussed in multidisciplinary meetings. Nineteen patients (95%) had an intraoperative diagnosis of a simple liver cyst based on its visual appearance and clear fluid within the cyst. These patients underwent cyst wall fenestration and de-roofing with the cyst wall sent for histopathology. One patient (5%) with HCC underwent a non-anatomical liver resection. Histopathology was conclusive for a benign hepatic cystic lesion from the cyst wall biopsy. All 20 patients in this study underwent surgery, either due to symptoms or due to radiologic diagnosis of BCA. Four of the 20 cases (20%) were asymptomatic and out of these four cases, 3 (75%) were diagnosed as cystadenoma on the preoperative imaging studies. All 19 cases were diagnosed as a simple liver cyst on pathology. CONCLUSION: In summary, there is a growing trend of "ruling-out the diagnosis of biliary cystadenoma" in patients who present with liver cysts. Patients are appropriately more anxious after this preoperative diagnosis and the treating surgeons have medico-legal concerns regarding conservative management in asymptomatic patients diagnosed as BCA. This single center experience draws attention to the radiology criteria utilized for diagnosing a biliary cystadenoma and suggests that it is time to revisit the imaging interpretation and differential diagnosis.

Management of Major Injuries to the Bile Duct at a Hepatobiliary Specialty Referral Center.

INTRODUCTION: Aim is to evaluate geographical and demographic factors influencing management of bile duct injuries occurring during cholecystectomy in a tertiary hepato-pancreato-biliary center in Southeast US. METHODS: All referrals for biliary injuries during cholecystectomy, between Jan 2017 and December 2020 were included. RESULTS: 19 patients were identified with a median age of 59 (47-65), average BMI of 30.3 (18-49), and the prevalence of diabetes mellitus, hypertension and cardiovascular disease of 11%, 47% and 16%, respectively. The average transfer distance was 76 miles (8-102) and median transfer time was 3 days (1-12). 16 (84%) had Strasberg E injury, with 4 (21%) having a concomitant vascular injury (3 - right hepatic artery, 1 - right portal vein). Two (10.5%) were managed non-operatively, immediate surgical repair was performed in 2 (10.5%) and 15 (78.9%) patients underwent a delayed repair with a median of 87 days (69-118) from injury to repair. Median operative time was 5 hours (4-7), blood loss was 150 mL (100-200) and hospital stay was 8 days (6-12). DISCUSSION: Factors including distance between hospitals, delays in patient transfer due to bed availability and transportation, play a role in the decision-making towards delayed repair. The delayed repair has the benefit of medical optimization of our high-risk patients' population.

Indocyanine Green as a Navigational Adjunct for Laparoscopic Ablation of Liver Tumors.

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive operative approaches for resection and thermal ablation (eg, microwave, radiofrequency) of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) have been successfully implemented over the last two decades, although identifying tumors can be challenging. Successfully performing laparoscopic ablation requires real-time visualization and ultrasonography skills for direct placement of the ablation probe. METHODS: In this study, we introduce a novel adjunct to ultrasound imaging for tumors located near or on the surface of the liver via intravenous delivery of indocyanine green (ICG) dye. Non-resectable lesion(s) not amenable to percutaneous ablation were considered for laparoscopic microwave ablation. Each patient initially received a dose of .3125 mg ICG via peripheral IV. RESULTS: A total of 17 patients were included. There was brisk uptake of ICG throughout the liver parenchyma in under 2 minutes in 15 of 17 patients; the remaining 2 required a second dose of ICG. In 14 cases, a hypo-fluorescent perfusion pattern in the tumor was clearly identified. DISCUSSION: Integrating ICG and fluorescent imaging provides a complementary adjunct to ultrasound in identifying HCC nodules. While previous applications of ICG typically require injections several days prior to surgery or segmental injections, this study demonstrates a novel real-time application of ICG to aid surgeons with various experiences in laparoscopic-assisted ablation procedures for HCC.

"Lichenoid Granulomatous Pattern" in a Case of Lupus Vulgaris.

Lupus vulgaris is a one of the most common skin infections in the Indian subcontinent. Even today, it often creates a diagnostic dilemma for both clinicians and histopathologists. We describe a case of lupus vulgaris that showed lichenoid granulomatous inflammation in the dermis. This pattern is not uncommon, but is rarely described in the literature as newer modalities currently take precedence in diagnosis. Our aim is to make clinicians and dermatopathologists aware of this pattern of inflammation seen in this common infection.

Differential Performance of Machine Learning Models in Prediction of Procedure-Specific Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Procedure-specific complications can have devastating consequences. Machine learning-based tools have the potential to outperform traditional statistical modeling in predicting their risk and guiding decision-making. We sought to develop and compare deep neural network (NN) models, a type of machine learning, to logistic regression (LR) for predicting anastomotic leak after colectomy, bile leak after hepatectomy, and pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). METHODS: The colectomy, hepatectomy, and PD National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) databases were analyzed. Each dataset was split into training, validation, and testing sets in a 60/20/20 ratio, with fivefold cross-validation. Models were created using NN and LR for each outcome. Models were evaluated primarily with area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC). RESULTS: A total of 197,488 patients were included for colectomy, 25,403 for hepatectomy, and 23,333 for PD. For anastomotic leak, AUROC for NN was 0.676 (95% 0.666-0.687), compared with 0.633 (95% CI 0.620-0.647) for LR. For bile leak, AUROC for NN was 0.750 (95% CI 0.739-0.761), compared with 0.722 (95% CI 0.698-0.746) for LR. For pancreatic fistula, AUROC for NN was 0.746 (95% CI 0.733-0.760), compared with 0.713 (95% CI 0.703-0.723) for LR. Variables related to intra-operative information, such as surgical approach, biliary reconstruction, and pancreatic gland texture were highly important for model predictions. DISCUSSION: Machine learning showed a marginal advantage over traditional statistical techniques in predicting procedure-specific outcomes. However, models that included intra-operative information performed better than those that did not, suggesting that NSQIP procedure-targeted datasets may be strengthened by including relevant intra-operative information.

Pharmacological management of patients undergoing total pancreatectomy with auto-islet transplantation.

Chronic pancreatitis results in permanent parenchymal destruction of the pancreas gland leading to anatomical and physiological consequences for patients. Surgical management varies, and some patients require total pancreatectomy with autologous islet cell transplantation (TPIAT). Patients undergoing TPIAT require complex and diligent management after surgery. This encompasses the management of glucose control (endocrine function of the pancreas) and supplementing loss of exocrine function of the pancreas with digestive enzymes. Other areas of management include optimizing pain relief while reducing narcotic usage, providing antimicrobial prophylaxis, and reducing loss of islet cells by improving its integrity through anticoagulation and use of anti-inflammatory agents. Each aspect of care is unique to this population. However, comprehensive reviews on its pharmacological management are scarce. This review will discuss the available literature to date surrounding all aspects of pharmacological management of patients undergoing TPIAT.

Selection of parenchymal preserving or total pancreatectomy with/without islet cell autotransplantation surgery for patients with chronic pancreatitis.

BACKGROUND: The selection of surgery between parenchymal preserving (PPS) and total pancreatectomy (TP) with/without islet cell autotransplantation (IAT) for chronic pancreatitis (CP) patients varies based on multiple factors with a scarcity in literature addressing both at the same time. The aim of this manuscript is to present an algorithm for the surgery selection based on dominant area of disease, ductal dilatation, and glycemic control and compare outcomes. METHODS: From 2017 to 2021, CP patients offered surgery at a single institution were retrospectively evaluated. RESULTS: 51 patients underwent surgery (20 [39.2%] TPIAT, 4 [7.8%] TP, and 27 [52.9%] PPS - 9 Whipple procedures, 15 distal pancreatectomies, and 3 duct drainage procedures). No significant difference was observed in baseline characteristics or perioperative outcomes except median length of stay (8 days [IQR 6-10] vs. 13 days [IQR 9-15.5], p < 0.001), attributed to insulin requirement and education for TPIAT group. No differences in postoperative complications, such as clinically significant leak and intrabdominal fluid collection (3 [11.1%] vs 2 [10%], p = 1.0), hemorrhage (0 vs. 2 [10.0%], p = 0.2), delayed feeding (1 [3.7%] vs. 5 [25.0%], p = 0.07), or wound infection (4 [14.8%] vs. 0, p = 0.1) between PPS and TPIAT groups, respectively, were observed nor requirement of long-acting insulin at discharge (2 [15.4%] vs. 7 [43.8%], p = 0.1) for pre-operatively non-diabetic patients. No significant difference in weaning off narcotics and no mortality observed. CONCLUSION: The most appropriate selection of surgery based on the algorithm yields good and comparable outcomes.

A review on mechanisms of resistance to PARP inhibitors.

Standard therapy for advanced ovarian cancer (OC) consists of radical debulking cytoreductive surgery followed by adjuvant chemotherapy. An important risk factor for OC is genetic predisposition, with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations accounting for the majority of hereditary OC. Mutation in BRCA ultimately causes accumulation of genetic alterations because of the failure of cells to arrest and repair DNA damage or to undergo apoptosis, resulting in tumorigenesis. Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors have emerged as a promising approach for managing BRCA-associated cancers, especially high-grade OC and breast cancers. They lead to synthetic lethality in BRCA-mutated cells by stalling the replication forks in homologous recombination-deficient (HR) cells. Four PARP inhibitors (olaparib, niraparib, rucaparib, and talazoparib) are currently approved by the Food and Drug Administration for OC, breast, and pancreatic cancer indications and are being evaluated for other BRCA-associated cancers. Despite their clinical efficacy, cancer cells generally develop resistance to them through several mechanisms. Understanding these mechanisms is crucial for developing strategies to counter resistance and identify the basic mechanisms of DNA damage response. This review focuses on the mechanism of action of PARP inhibitors, understanding various causes of resistance, and building strategies to overcome PARP inhibitor resistance.

Changing opportunities for liver transplant for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

INTRODUCTION: Aim was to study the early impact of acuity circle-based allocation implementation system on liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients. METHODS: We assessed characteristics of HCC and non-HCC deceased donor orthotopic liver transplants (OLT) in the year before (2/2019-2/2020) and after (3/2020-2/2021) introduction of the acuity circle policy using the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN)/United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) database. RESULTS: Total OLTs reduced from 6699 in the preacuity circle era to 6660 in the postacuity circle era (-.6%); this decrease is mostly driven by a decrease in HCC transplants (1529 to 1351; -11.6%). Six out of 11 regions had a reduction in the absolute number and percentage of HCC transplants with significant reductions in regions 2 (-37.8%, p < .001) and 4 (-28.3%, p = .001). DISCUSSION: The introduction of median model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) at transplant minus 3 (MMaT-3) exception points, has created differential opportunities for HCC patients, in low-MELD as opposed to high-MELD areas, despite having the same disease. This effect has become more prominent following the implementation of acuity circle-based allocation system. Ongoing investigation of these trends is needed to ensure that HCC patients are not disparately disadvantaged due to their location.

Sequencing of Systemic Therapies in the Management of Advanced Prostate Cancer in India: a Delphi-Based Consensus.

INTRODUCTION: With the availability of an increasing number of therapeutic options for advanced prostate cancer (APC), optimal sequencing and combination of therapies have emerged to be the areas of challenges. In the Indian context, there is a dearth of consensus recommendations to guide clinicians regarding optimal sequencing of therapy in APC management. A Delphi-based consensus regarding optimal therapy sequencing in APC management was developed by an expert panel of medical oncologists from across India. METHODS: An expert scientific committee of 11 medical oncologists and an expert panel of 53 medical oncologists from India constituted the panel for the Delphi consensus. In the first phase, a questionnaire with 41 clinical statements was developed in several critical controversial areas in APC treatment. In the second phase, 29 clinical statements were reworked and sent to eight experts to obtain their opinions on best practices. The consensus ratings were based on a 9-point Likert scale. Based on the overall response, statements with a mean score of ≥ 7 with 1 outlier were considered as "consensus." RESULTS: Degarelix was the preferred androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). While ADT plus docetaxel was the preferred option for metastatic castrate-sensitive/naïve prostate cancer patients with high-volume disease, ADT with abiraterone was the preferred choice for low-volume disease. Docetaxel was the preferred first-line treatment option in men who received ADT alone in the castrate-sensitive/naïve setting. For patients progressing on or after docetaxel for metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (without prior abiraterone or enzalutamide), the experts reached a consensus on the use of enzalutamide as the preferred second-line treatment option. No consensus was reached for the third-line treatment options. CONCLUSION: This article is intended to serve as a guide to help clinicians discuss with their patients as part of the shared and multidisciplinary decision-making for improved APC management in India.

Methylprednisolone-Induced Hypersensitivity Reaction in a Liver Transplant Recipient.

Corticosteroids have an essential role as an immunosuppressive agent in transplant; because of their anti-inflammatory properties, they rarely cause an allergic reaction. Here, we report a liver transplant recipient who developed an allergic reaction to intravenous methylprednisolone sodium succinate. The deceased-donor orthotopic liver transplant recipient received intravenous methylprednisolone sodium succinate for induction during transplant, which was followed by another intravenous dose and oral prednisone taper. She was later treated with intravenous methylprednisolone sodium succinate taper for acute cellular rejection, which had been confirmed with a second biopsy. After admission for further treatment, she received another 1 g of intravenous methylprednisolone sodium succinate dose. About 15 to 20 minutes after receiving this dose, she presented with a new-onset urticarial rash that started on the trunk and progressed with facial edema. She continued a course of intravenous and oral dexamethasone for treatment of rejection and later was restarted on and tolerated oral prednisone. This case highlights the importance and the possibility of using dexamethasone as an alternative treatment approach for those with similar reactions to intravenous methylprednisolone sodium succinate.