Comparison of the efficacy and safety of transdermal buprenorphine patch to conventional analgesics after operative fixation of extra capsular fracture of proximal femur.

INTRODUCTION: Proximal femur fractures are common among older individuals and pose challenges in achieving effective post-operative analgesia. Age-related co-morbidities limit the selection of analgesics in this population. This study aimed to compare the safety and effectiveness of transdermal buprenorphine (TDB) patch with traditional analgesics after fixation of an extracapsular fracture of the proximal femur. METHODOLOGY: A prospective randomized controlled study was conducted over a 2-year period, involving 60 patients who underwent surgery for extra capsular intertrochanteric fracture fixation. The patients were randomly assigned to two groups by random envelope method. Group A received an intravenous formulation of paracetamol and tramadol for the initial 48 h, followed by an oral formulation. Group B received a transdermal buprenorphine (TDB) patch delivering 5 mcg/hour immediately after surgery, which continued for 2 weeks postoperatively. During the 14-day monitoring period, patients' pain scores were assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at rest and during movement. The primary objective was to maintain a VAS score of 4 or lower. Rescue analgesics were administered if the VAS score reached 6. The secondary objectives included evaluating the quantity of rescue analgesics required and monitoring for any adverse effects or complications. RESULTS: Pain scores at rest and during movement were significantly lower in Group B at all-time points (p-value 0.0006 - ≤ 0.0001), and the requirement for rescue analgesia was also significantly lower in this group. The administration of the TDB patch did not result in any significant adverse effects. CONCLUSION: TDB patch is secure and offers better compliance and analgesia than other analgesics in the postoperative period whilst treating proximal femur extra capsular fracture.

Beyond one step: unveiling optimal approach for bilateral knee arthroplasty - a comprehensive meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is an efficient and common procedure used to treat advanced osteoarthritis of the knee. Geriatric patients make up the majority of TKA patients. For the surgical management of bilateral knee arthritis, there is still debate regarding whether to do a simultaneous or staged TKA. We through this study have gathered data and aimed to assess the safety of simultaneous bilateral TKA in patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a study according to the PRISMA guidelines by searching through various databases for the following search terms: total knee arthroplasty (TKA), complications following TKA, bilateral TKA, and bilateral vs. unilateral TKA. The search included case series and clinical trials and excluded review articles, yielding 24 articles from the original search. We extracted data upon the outcomes in patients undergoing simultaneous bilateral TKA. We performed additional bias assessments to validate our search algorithm and results. RESULTS: One hundred and three published articles were identified, and twenty-four that included a total of 2, 18,385 patients were included in the meta-analysis. 93,074 patients underwent simultaneous bilateral TKA and 125,311 patients underwent staged bilateral TKA. Simultaneous bilateral TKA was associated with significantly increased mortality rate (P < 0.00001, Odd's ratio [OR] 1.86, 95% Confidence interval [CI] 1.53-2.26), increased incidence of pulmonary embolism (P < 0.00001, OR 1.58, 95% CI 1.30-1.91), deep venous thrombosis (P < 0.00001, OR 1.31, 95% CI 1.17-1.46), and neurological complications (P < 0.002, OR 1.44, 95% CI 1.14-1.82). There were no significant differences in cardiac complications between both the procedures (P = 0.60, OR 0.93, 95% CI 0.70-1.23). CONCLUSION: Staged bilateral TKA is associated with less complication rates as compared to simultaneous bilateral TKA. Hence, patients should be counselled and selected based on the risks respective to each strategy.

Comparison of Time Taken in Conventional versus Active Robotic-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Background: Computer- and robotic-assisted total knee replacement procedures have been shown to improve the accuracy of the implant size. It also allows dynamic confirmation of the implant and limb alignment during total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The major inhibition of the arthroplasty surgeon in adapting to the robotic-assisted TKA (RA-TKA) is the extra time spent during the registration process and milling of the bone with the robot. The aim of the study was to ascertain the extra time spent during these 2 steps as compared to the conventional TKA (C-TKA). Methods: It is a prospective study involving 30 patients each in the conventional TKA and RA-TKA operated by the same surgical team. The patients were given a choice between the C-TKA and RA-TKA and consecutive 30 cases in each group were studied by an independent observer. In the C-TKA group, the time for the application of appropriate zigs and execution of the bone cuts and soft-tissue release was recorded whereas in the RA-TKA group, the time taken for fixation of the tibial and femoral arrays and bone registration and bone milling with robot and required soft-tissue release was measured. Results: The preoperative patient characteristics were the same in both groups. The time taken in the C-TKA and RA-TKA groups was 24.77 ± 1.92 minutes and 25.03 ± 3.27 minutes, respectively, which is statistically insignificant (p = 0.709). Conclusions: The study findings show that RA-TKA does not take additional time than C-TKA.

Analysis of robot-specific operative time and surgical team anxiety level and its effect on alignment during robot-assisted TKA.

Adapting to robotic-assisted (RA) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is hindered by the surgeon's fear of extra time. The main purpose of this study was to determine the robot's operative time, and the secondary goals were to assess the surgical team's anxiety, implant location and size, and limb alignment. From February to April 2022, 40 participants participated in prospective research. The study included primary Cuvis joint active RA-TKA patients for end-stage arthritis, but conversion of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty to TKA, and patients with prior knee surgery were excluded. The active RA-TKA surgical time included surgeon-dependent and surgeon-independent/active robot time. The surgeon's anxiety was measured using the state-trait anxiety inventory (STAI). The implant size/position and limb alignment were checked by post-operative weight-bearing lateral, anteroposterior, and full-length scanograms. Operative time specifically related to active RA-TKA was higher in the first 10 cases as against 10-20, 20-30 and 30-40 cases which was observed to lower from cohort 2. A similar trend was observed for the surgical team's anxiety levels which seem to lower from cohort 2 (case 10-20). Cumulative experience of active RA-TKA showed no effect on the precision of implant alignment/ size, limb alignment and complications. The study showed progressive improvement in the surgical anxiety scores and reduction in operating time indicating the proficiency gained by the surgical team. Further no learning curve was involved in achieving the implant positioning and sizing, limb alignment with the absence of complications.