Demographic overview of pilonidal sinus carcinoma: updated insights into the incidence.

PURPOSE: There are only rough estimates of the worldwide incidence of pilonidal sinus carcinoma. The purpose of the study is to explore the demographic characteristics of this disease and to provide more precise information about its incidence. METHODS: The study included questioning the surgeons and pathologists in Germany in addition to a literature research. The literature investigation included all published articles about pilonidal carcinoma in all languages. The questionnaire included 1050 pathologists and all 834 hospitals with a surgical division in Germany. The outcome measures included the total number of cases, the language of publication, gender, age, country of origin, interval until the diagnosis of carcinoma, and reported incidence based on local studies. RESULTS: From 1900 to 2022, we found 140 cases of pilonidal sinus carcinoma in 103 articles. The investigation revealed two additional unpublished cases from Germany. The male-to-female ratio was 7.75:1. The countries with the most cases were the USA (35 cases, 25.0%), Spain (13 cases, 9.3%), and Turkey (11 cases, 7.6%). The average age was 54.0 ± 11.8 years and the interval between the diagnosis of the disease and the development of carcinoma was 20.1 ± 14.1 years. There was a parallel increase in reported cases of pilonidal sinus disease and pilonidal carcinoma over the last century. The reported incidence varied from 0.03% to 5.56%. The worldwide calculated incidence equaled 0.17%. CONCLUSION: Due to underreporting and other causes, the incidence of carcinoma emerging on the background of pilonidal sinus disease is higher than reported.

Eight Patients With Pilonidal Carcinoma in One Decade-Is the Incidence Rising?

INTRODUCTION: Carcinoma secondary to pilonidal disease is very rare with fewer than 130 reported cases so far. It is presumed that underreporting and underpublishing contribute to the low reported incidence. METHODS: A post was published on a closed Facebook group with about 30,000 Syrian doctors asking if anyone had ever seen a patient with pilonidal carcinoma before. The patients' data were collected retrospectively from the treating physicians. RESULTS: Between 2010 and 2019, we identified eight patients with pilonidal carcinoma. All patients were males with a mean age of 55.5 years. The mean interval between diagnosis of pilonidal disease and diagnosis of carcinoma was 6.9 years. A growing ulcer on the background of a pilonidal sinus disease was the presenting complaint in 50% of cases. Three patients were lost from follow-up after the diagnosis due to referral. All other five patients underwent surgical resection and three of them received postoperative chemoradiation. Four patients were followed for six months or longer: two died of metastases, one survived after recurrence and re-excision, and one survived with no recurrence. CONCLUSION: This paper presents the largest cohort of pilonidal carcinoma so far and the first that describes the disease in the Syrian population. Due to underreporting, the real incidence of pilonidal carcinoma exceeds what is reported so far in the literature.

Computed Tomography Analysis of Postsurgery Femoral Component Rotation Based on a Force Sensing Device Method versus Hypothetical Rotational Alignment Based on Anatomical Landmark Methods: A Pilot Study.

Rotation of the femoral component is an important aspect of knee arthroplasty, due to its effects on postsurgery knee kinematics and associated functional outcomes. It is still debated which method for establishing rotational alignment is preferable in orthopedic surgery. We compared force sensing based femoral component rotation with traditional anatomic landmark methods to investigate which method is more accurate in terms of alignment to the true transepicondylar axis. Thirty-one patients underwent computer-navigated total knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis with femoral rotation established via a force sensor. During surgery, three alternative hypothetical femoral rotational alignments were assessed, based on transepicondylar axis, anterior-posterior axis, or the utilization of a posterior condyles referencing jig. Postoperative computed tomography scans were obtained to investigate rotation characteristics. Significant differences in rotation characteristics were found between rotation according to DKB and other methods (P < 0.05). Soft tissue balancing resulted in smaller deviation from anatomical epicondylar axis than any other method. 77% of operated knees were within a range of ±3° of rotation. Only between 48% and 52% of knees would have been rotated appropriately using the other methods. The current results indicate that force sensors may be valuable for establishing correct femoral rotation.

Comparison of Patient-Reported Outcome from Neck-Preserving, Short-Stem Arthroplasty and Resurfacing Arthroplasty in Younger Osteoarthritis Patients.

Hip resurfacing has been considered a good treatment option for younger, active osteoarthritis patients. However, there are several identified issues concerning risk for neck fractures and issues related to current metal-on-metal implant designs. Neck-preserving short-stem implants have been discussed as a potential alternative, but it is yet unclear which method is better suited for younger adults. We compared hip disability and osteoarthritis outcome scores (HOOS) from a young group of patients (n = 52, age 48.9 ± 6.1 years) who had received hip resurfacing (HR) with a cohort of patients (n = 73, age 48.2 ± 6.6 years) who had received neck-preserving, short-stem implant total hip arthroplasty (THA). Additionally, durations for both types of surgery were compared. HOOS improved significantly preoperatively to last followup (>1 year) in both groups (p < 0.0001, η (2) = 0.69); there were no group effects or interactions. Surgery duration was significantly longer for resurfacing (104.4 min ± 17.8) than MiniHip surgery (62.5 min ± 14.8), U = 85.0, p < 0.0001, η (2) = 0.56. The neck-preserving short-stem approach may be preferable to resurfacing due to the less challenging surgery, similar outcome, and controversy regarding resurfacing implant designs.