Determinants of Dissatisfaction After Laparoscopic Cure of Vaginal and/or Rectal Prolapse using Mesh: a Comprehensive Retrospective Cohort Study.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The primary objective is to identify determinants of dissatisfaction after surgical treatment of vaginal prolapse ± rectal prolapse, using laparoscopic mesh sacrohysteropexy (LSH) or sacrocolpopexy (LSC) ± ventral mesh rectopexy (VMR). The secondary objective is the evaluation of complications and objective/subjective recurrence rates. METHODS: The study performed was a single-surgeon retrospective review of prospectively collected data. LSH/LSC ± VMR were performed between July 2005 and September 2022. Primary investigated outcome was patients' satisfaction, assessed using the Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) score and the bother visual analog scale (VAS) obtained postoperatively (at a 1-month interval and on a 6-month/yearly basis thereafter). We looked for a correlation between the level of satisfaction (as reflected by the VAS) and potential determinants. RESULTS: There were 355 patients with a mean age of 62 ±12 years. Nearly all the patients (94.3%) had a stage 3 or 4 prolapse according to the POP-Q classification. The mean postoperative bother VAS was 1.8, with only 12.7% of patients reporting a bother VAS score ≥ 3/10, indicating a dissatisfaction. PGI-I showed improvement in the vast majority of patients (96.4% scoring 1 to 3). Patients with anal incontinence preoperatively scored higher on the bother VAS postoperatively (r=0.175, p < 0.05). The use of a posterior arm mesh (for posterior vaginal prolapse) correlated with better satisfaction overall (r= -0.178, p = 0.001), whereas the performance of VMR was associated with a bothering sensation (r = 0.232, p < 0.001). A regression analysis confirmed the impact of posterior mesh and VMR on satisfaction levels, with odds of dissatisfaction being 2.18 higher when VMR was combined with LSH/LSC. CONCLUSIONS: Posterior mesh use improves patient satisfaction when the posterior compartment is affected. In patients with concomitant vaginal and rectal prolapse, combining VMR with anterior LSC/LSH appears to negatively impact patients' satisfaction. Preoperative anal incontinence was demonstrated to be a risk factor for postoperative dissatisfaction.

Wharton-Sheares-George vaginoplasty: a safe and efficient technique in patients with Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser (MRKH) syndrome is a condition with an underdeveloped or absent vagina and uterus due to embryological growth failure of the Müllerian ducts. Many techniques have been described to construct a neovagina with an acceptable depth that allows penetrative intercourse. This is a step-by-step video tutorial on the Wharton-Sheares-George surgical technique for vaginoplasty in patients with MRKH syndrome. METHOD: With Wharton-Sheares-George vaginoplasty, the rudimentary Müllerian ducts are incrementally dilated by pushing Hegar dilators in the direction of the pelvic axis, and the resulting median raphe is then intersected using diathermy. As a result, a neovagina is created and an estriol-coated vaginal mold is inserted for 3 days. The patient receives comprehensive discharge instructions, a self-dilation program three times a day, and a monthly follow-up. RESULTS: A 3-month follow-up showed a high subjective degree of satisfaction with surgery and sexual satisfaction in both patients. CONCLUSION: Wharton-Sheares-George vaginoplasty is a safe and efficient technique for creating a neovagina for patients with MRKH syndrome.

Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy in the management of recurrent pelvic organ prolapse.

OBJECTIVES: We set out to assess long-term anatomical and functional outcomes in women after laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for recurrent pelvic organ prolapse. METHODS: All women with a history of pelvic organ prolapse surgery operated between 2005 and 2022 were enrolled in this retrospective observational study. The indication for recurrent POP surgery was a symptomatic stage II and above pelvic organ prolapse. The data from objective urogynecologic examination and subjective patient assessment using validated questionnaires were collected. The last follow-up information was evaluated. The outcomes were compared with preoperative state using Student t-test and Wilcoxon test, p<0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: 39 women were enrolled in the study. The rate of perioperative complications was very low; no significant hemorrhage, ureteral damage or conversion to laparotomy were observed. The mean follow-up was 40 ± 26.8 months. The postoperative course was not complicated by bowel incarceration, pelvic infection or mesh exposure. We observed a statistically significant elevation of all POP-Q points and decrease in all mean scores of PFDI, PFIQ, Wexner and VAS prolapse bother postoperatively. Improvement in stress urinary incontinence, anal incontinence and constipation was found. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for recurrent pelvic organ prolapse is a safe and effective surgery regardless of the type of the original repair performed. It provides good subjective and anatomical outcomes with a lasting effect on the quality of life in a long-term follow-up.

Urethral Bulkamid® injection after failed midurethral sling: a step-by-step video.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Bulking agents are a minimally invasive treatment option for women with stress urinary incontinence (SUI) or stress-predominant mixed urinary incontinence (MUI). Recurrent SUI is a major challenge for most clinicians because there is little evidence in the literature on the best option after midurethral sling (MUS) failure. METHODS: Bulkamid® (Contura International A/S), a urethral bulking agent, is a homogenous gel without particles, consisting of a polyacrylamide hydrogel that is nonbiodegradable. RESULTS: In this video case report, we demonstrate the Bulkamid® injection procedure. This procedure can be carried out as an office-based procedure under local anesthesia, with no down time and only minor possible complications. CONCLUSIONS: We consider it a valid option for patients with recurrent or persistent SUI after failed MUS surgery.

Impact of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (LSC) on sexual function in women with advanced stages of pelvic organ prolapse (POP): A five-year prospective study.

OBJECTIVE: To compare patients undergoing laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (LSC) for pelvic organ prolapse (POP), in terms of sexual function and surgical anatomical outcomes more than 5-years follow up period. STUDY DESIGN: This is a cohort study of prospectively collected data that includes all women who underwent LSC between July 2005 and December 2021 at a tertiary care center. A total of 228 women were enrolled in this study. Patients completed a validated quality of life questionnaires and were evaluated using the POP-Q, the PFDI-20, PFIQ-7 and the PISQ-12 scores. Patients were divided preoperatively if they are sexually active or not and postoperatively according to the sexual improvement after POP surgery. RESULTS: There was a statistically significant improvement in the PFDI, PFIQ and POPQ score. There was no significant improvement in the PISQ-12 score with more than 5 years follow-up. 76.1 % of patients who were not sexually active preoperatively resumed their sexual activity after the surgery. CONCLUSION: The anatomical correction of a pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor disorders by laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy allowed a significant proportion (over ¾) of the women to resume sexual activity whom had not previously been sexually active. However, PISQ 12 scores did not alter significantly in those who were sexually active prior to surgery. Sexual function is a very complex issue affected by multitude of factors among which prolapse seems to be less important.

Long-term development of surgical outcome of laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy with anterior and posterior mesh extension.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Long-term durability and functional outcome of laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy (LSH) remains to be confirmed. We set out to assess the development of surgical outcome in women with increasing minimal follow-up. METHODS: All women after LSH with anterior and posterior mesh extension operated for advanced apical uterine prolapse at Geoffroy Saint-Hilaire clinic from July 2005 to June 2020 were enrolled in this retrospective study. Last known follow-up information was used for the analysis and allocation into groups. The surgical success was defined as no prolapse beyond hymen, no symptomatic recurrence or no retreatment. Functional outcome was evaluated from validated questionnaires and presence of pelvic floor disorders. The outcomes were compared with preoperative state using chi-square and Fisher's test; p < 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: In total, 270 patients after LSH with a follow-up of up to 14.5 years were enrolled and divided into groups according to their last follow-up length: ≥ 1 year 242, ≥ 3 years 112, ≥ 5 years 76, ≥ 7 years 45 and ≥ 10 years 18 women. Increase of minimal follow-up was associated with gradual decrease in surgical success. Rates of stress urinary incontinence were unchanged by the surgery, while anal incontinence and constipation rates decreased significantly; 14.5% of women were operated on for SUI in the follow-up. The PFDI-20, PFIQ-7 and VAS bother scores decreased significantly regardless of minimal follow-up length. CONCLUSIONS: LSH with anterior and posterior mesh extension is a safe, effective and durable surgery with a positive long-term effect on quality of life. Although the surgical success gradually decreases, LSH remains a surgical success in most women.

Outcomes of sacrocolpopexy/sacrohysteropexy with mesh placement targeted to affected compartment.

OBJECTIVE: No recommendation regarding the number of meshes to be implanted in laparoscopic genital prolapse surgery exists. Is it necessary to implant a mesh into a compartment that is not affected to prevent its prolapse in the follow-up? Our objective was to compare the long-term outcomes of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy according to compartments where mesh was implanted. STUDY DESIGN: This is a retrospective cohort study of 328 patients after laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy at our centre in 7/2005 - 3/2021. 294 patients with perioperative data and POP-Q and/or prolapse symptoms in mean follow-up of 42.8 months was available for the outcome analysis. Surgical failure was defined as prolapse beyond hymen, subjective recurrence or retreatment. The women were divided into four groups depending on compartments, where the mesh was implanted. Group A - anterior, group P - posterior, Group AP - compound of patients with anterior or posterior single arm mesh placement and (B), with anterior and posterior arm placement. Groups AP and B were compared for feasibility of single compartment mesh implantation. Comparison of groups A and P allowed assessment of non-inferiority of single anterior vs. posterior compartment placement. The data were compared using Wilcoxon Two Sample test, Chi-square test or Fishers Exact test, p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: A single compartment mesh implantation was associated with shorter operating time and hospital stay and comparable incidence of complications. A statistically significant difference in all POP-Q points in favour of group B was observed, however, with comparable rate of prolapse beyond hymen(6.3%AP vs. 7.8%B). Similar frequency of surgical failure (17.5%AP vs. 13.8%B) and incidence of de novo pelvic floor disorders or pain was observed. Comparison of groups A and P showed higher suspension of point C in group P(-2.6 vs. -4.0, p < 0.05) with no difference in points Ba, Bp, surgical failure rate and de novo pelvic floor disorders. CONCLUSION: Implantation of a single sheet of mesh was not associated with inferior outcome to implantation of mesh to both compartments. Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with a single mesh arm placed into the affected compartment along with apical suspension does not induce a de novo prolapse in unoperated compartment.

Laparoscopic synthetic mesh explantation after sacrohysteropexy.

INTRODUCTION: In this video, we present a case of rectal and bladder injury, which occurred during laparoscopic mesh removal following sacrohysteropexy treated 6 months later with a laparoscopic pectopexy. METHODS: We present the case of a 66-year-old woman with a prolapse recurrence after sacrohysteropexy. During the laparoscopic explantation of the mesh, we detected a fixation of the mesh to the bladder and the rectum rather than a fixation to the vaginal walls. Consequently, bladder and rectal injuries occurred during the dissection and were diagnosed and repaired immediately. Due to bowel injury, the treatment of the prolapse was postponed. Six months later, a laparoscopic pectopexy was performed to avoid complications during the repeated dissection of the promontory. The postoperative recovery after the pectopexy was uncomplicated with no short-term prolapse recurrence or postoperative complications. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopy appears to be an efficient approach to mesh explantation. Futhermore, laparoscopic pectopexy seems to be a good approach to secondary prolapse reconstruction after sacrohysteropexy mesh explantation avoiding complications during repeated dissection of the promontory.

Effect of Age on Complications Rate and Surgical Outcomes in Women Undergoing Laparoscopic Sacrohysteropexy and Sacrocolpopexy.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To compare perioperative and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy/sacrocolpopexy in different groups of age. DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort study. Patients were evaluated preoperatively and postoperatively (starting from 1 month after surgery and then annually). SETTING: The department of functional pelvic surgery and oncology, a tertiary care center. PATIENTS: All patients who underwent laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy/sacrocolpopexy, between July 2005 and December 2019. INTERVENTIONS: Laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy/sacrocolpopexy. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The study population was divided into 3 groups, according to age at the time of surgery: group 1, <65 years; group 2, between 65 and 75 years, and group 3, >75 years. The primary outcome was the rate of perioperative complications. The secondary outcome was the comparison of long-term results among the groups. A total of 330 patients were included: in group 1, 183 patients (mean age 53.4 ± 8.2), in group 2, 92 patients (mean age 69.2 ± 2.9), and in group 3, 55 patients (mean age 79.3 ± 3.5). The overall perioperative complications rate (up to 30 days after surgery) was 5.7%. No differences among the groups in operative details and rates of perioperative complications were observed. During the follow-up period, 37 patients (11.2%) presented with prolapse recurrence (objective and/or subjective); the rates of prolapse recurrence and long-term complications were similar among the groups. Similarly, the groups did not differ in postoperative functional results except for postoperative stress urinary incontinence. A surgery for stress urinary incontinence was more common among patients in group 3 (group 1, 13.4%; group 2, 11.9%; group 3, 31.3%; p = .008). CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy/sacrocolpopexy is associated with low rates of perioperative and long-term complications. We did not find a difference in rates of complications and/or long-term outcomes, between different age groups.

Long term outcomes of laparoscopic sacro/colpo-hysteropexy with and without rectopexy for the treatment of prolapse.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy (LSH), sacrocolpopexy (LSC) and ventral rectopexy (LVR) with mesh are advocated for surgical treatment of pelvic and rectal prolapse. Our study aims at showing the feasibility of concomitant laparoscopic prolapse repair by comparing perioperative and long-term outcomes of LSH or LSC with and without LVR. METHODS: This is a retrospective study carried out on 348 women operated on between July 2009 and July 2019. Patients were divided into four groups: (1) LSH only, (2) LSC only, (3) LSH + LVR and (4) LSC + LVR. POP-Q scores and satisfaction questionnaires were recorded at baseline and then annually. Outcomes were defined as subjective failure (vaginal/rectal prolapse symptoms), objective failure (prolapse to/beyond the hymen, full thickness rectal prolapse) or retreatment for prolapse. Complications were collected and graded according to the Clavien-Dindo classification. RESULTS: Three hundred forty-eight women underwent laparoscopic repair for pelvic and rectal prolapse (219, 44, 66 and 19 in group 1, 2, 3 and 4, respectively). Median follow-up was 24 (4-174) months. Success rate for both rectal and pelvic prolapse was 90.2%. Recurrence rates were not significantly different between the groups (12.3%, 6.8%, 9.1% and 10.5% for groups 1, 2, 3 and 4, respectively). Significant improvement was noticed in satisfaction questionnaires in all groups. There was no difference in perioperative and late complications. CONCLUSION: The combined laparoscopic procedure appears to be safe and efficient in treating pelvic and rectal prolapse. Appropriate patient selection and available surgical expertise should determine whether to perform these procedures combined or separately.

Laparoscopic management of pelvic organ prolapse recurrence after open sacrocervicopexy.

In this narrated video we present a case of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) recurrence 12 years after sacrocervicopexy, outline our management and suggest an optimal laparoscopic surgical technique that may reduce the risk of future recurrence. A 71-year-old patient, who had undergone an open sub-total hysterectomy with sacrocervicopexy 12 years previously, complained of a bulging sensation in her vagina, of 12 months' duration. On physical examination, a Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) stage III prolapse was diagnosed, with marked apical, anterior and posterior compartment prolapse. On laparoscopy we identified the old mesh attached to the promontory and to the vaginal apex, without any fixation of the vaginal walls. Complete mesh excision was performed, followed by vaginal dissection to facilitate implantation of two new meshes and performing a new sacrocolpopexy. No postoperative complications occurred. Over 6 weeks of post-operative follow-up, there was no pelvic pain, dysuria or dyschezia. A good anatomical result was noted without any prolapse. Laparoscopy appears to be an effective approach to complete mesh excision. For the treatment of prolapse recurrence, complete excision of the old mesh with new pelvic mesh-augmented reconstruction is recommended. Thorough dissection of the vesico-vaginal and recto-vaginal spaces followed by mesh fixation to the relevant vaginal walls may reduce recurrence.

Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: A comprehensive literature review on current practice.

Sacrocolpopexy is considered the preferred treatment for vaginal vault. However, numerous technical variants are being practiced. We aimed to summarize the recent literature in relation to technical aspects of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (LSC). We focused on surgical technique, mesh type, concomitant surgeries, and training aspects. We performed 2 independent literature searches in Medline, Scopus, the Cochrane library, and Embase electronic databases including the keywords: 'sacrocolpopexy', 'sacral colpopexy' and 'promontofixation'. Full text English-language studies of human patients, who underwent LSC, published from January 1, 2008 to February 26, 2019, were included. Levels of evidence using the modified Oxford grading system were assessed in order to establish a report of the available literature of highest level of evidence. Initially, 953 articles were identified. After excluding duplicates and abstracts screening, 35 articles were included. Vaginal fixation of the mesh can be performed with barbed or non-barbed (level 1), absorbable or non-absorbable sutures (level 2). Fixation of the mesh to the promontory can be performed with non-absorbable sutures or non-absorbable tackers (level 2). The current literature supports using type 1 mesh (level 2). Ventral mesh rectopexy can safely be performed with LSC while concurrent posterior repair has no additional benefit (level 2). There is no consensus regarding the preferred type of hysterectomy or the benefit of an additional anti urinary incontinence procedure. A structured learning program, as well as the number of procedures needed in order to be qualified for performing LSC is yet to be established. There are numerous variants for performing LSC. For many of its technical aspects there is little consensus.

Rectal injury during laparoscopic mesh removal after sacrocervicopexy.

In this video we present a case of rectal injury, which occurred during laparoscopic mesh removal following sacrocervicopexy. Four years after sub-total hysterectomy with laparoscopic sacrocervicopexy, a 64-year-old patient still suffered from intense proctalgia and pain while sitting. On physical examination, intense pain could be triggered by palpating the left aspect of the levator ani muscle, raising the suspicion of an association with the mesh and leading to the decision for its removal. The left posterior arm of the mesh was removed completely laparoscopically. During this procedure, a rectal lesion was diagnosed and immediately repaired by a double layer of interrupted sutures. There was an immediate and complete resolution of the symptoms after surgery, with no short-term prolapse recurrence or postoperative complications. Laparoscopy appears to be an efficient approach to mesh excision. A high level of alertness to recognize intraoperative injuries is warranted.

Auto-amputated adnexa in a young woman: Multimodal imaging to rule in a pelvic rolling stone.

We report the case of a 26-year-old woman with a right auto-amputated adnexa and a free-floating mass in the pouch of Douglas using multimodal imaging studies including ultrasonography, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging. The absence of an ovary and the evidence of an amorphous and potentially calcified mass, with no connection to the genital tract - in particular when it is found to be mobile - are the key imaging findings. Prospective diagnosis of adnexal auto-amputation could assist surgeons in patient management with a curative laparoscopy in symptomatic women, or potentially expectant management in young women who are asymptomatic or have unrelated symptoms.

Safety and effectiveness of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy as the treatment of choice for pelvic organ prolapse.

Objective: To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (LSC)/laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy (LSH) at 1-year follow-up for female pelvic-organ prolapse (POP). Patients and methods: In all, 52 patients were included and underwent LSC/LSH in the Eldemerdash Hospital, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt. All patients with POP, with Grade ≥II of any anatomical site (anterior, posterior or combined) who were medically fit for general anaesthesia, were included in the study. Patients with previous major abdominal surgery, a body mass index (BMI) of >40 kg/m2 or un-correctable bleeding diatheses, were excluded. Preoperative data, peri- and postoperative functional and anatomical outcomes were assessed. The patients were followed-up at 3, 6 and 12 months postoperatively. Results: Pre- and postoperative data were available for the 52 patients operated on for POP. The subjective cure rate was 92.3% and the objective cure rate was 98.1%. Failure was defined as recurrence of Grade ≥II POP. Conclusion: LSC/LSH is a safe and effective procedure for the treatment of female POP due to its durable results and low rates of complications with high objective and subjective cure rates. Abbreviations: BMI: body mass index; (RA)LSC: (robot-assisted) laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy; LSH: laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy; PFDI-20: Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory; PFIQ-7: Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire; POP: pelvic-organ prolapse; QoL: quality of life; SUI: stress urinary incontinence; TVM: total transvaginal mesh; VVP: vaginal vault prolapse.

Mini-laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for apical and posterior female pelvic organ prolapse.

AIM OF THE VIDEO: Mini-laparoscopic surgery is the future for most laparoscopic procedures. Although already applied in some gynaecological surgical interventions, this video is to our knowledge the first publication on the use of the mini-laparoscopic approach to sacrocolpopexy for apical and posterior pelvic organ prolapse following total hysterectomy. METHODS: The concept of mini-laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy presented in this video article was performed on 12 women with post-hysterectomy apical and posterior pelvic organ prolapse using mini-laparoscopic instruments and ports of 3 mm in diameter combined with a 12-mm umbilical port. Surgery was performed with the same principles as for the conventional laparoscopic procedure. RESULTS: The mean operating time was 70 min (SD ± 12). The tensile strength of the mini-laparoscopic instruments allowed appropriate manipulation of tissue consistent with that of conventional instruments. No difficulties or complications were experienced in comparison to a conventional technique. All patients were discharged from hospital on day 1 postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: The effectiveness, safety and feasibility of the mini-laparoscopic surgical technique was applied to sacrocolpopexy. Because of the initial favourable experience, the mini-laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy could become more widely used in the future.

Treatment of ovarian anaplastic ependymoma by an aromatase inhibitor.

BACKGROUND: Histopathologic diagnosis and treatment of ovarian anaplastic ependymoma are challenging. CASE: A 61-year-old-woman presented with a 10-cm right adnexal tumor associated with peritoneal carcinomatosis extending to the right diaphragm and liver surface. After initial diagnosis of a papillary serous carcinoma, we performed extensive but nonoptimal cytoreductive surgery including hysterectomy with bilateral oophorectomy. Histology revealed some axially arranged cells with a prominent fibrillary cytoplasm, suggesting an ependymoma. Diagnosis was confirmed by immunophenotype showing strong positivity to glial fibrillary acidic protein. Given the strong tumoral expression of estrogen and progesterone receptors, an aromatase inhibitor was initiated. One year later, computed tomography scan showed stability of the residual peritoneal nodules. CONCLUSION: Aromatase inhibitor treatment could be effective in cases of extraaxial ependymoma with prominent estrogen receptor expression.

Vaginal myomectomy for a thirteen-centimeter anterior myoma.

Vaginal myomectomy is an uncommon but advantageous approach for large interstitial uterine fibroids. Myomectomy is performed via laparotomy and laparoscopy; however, in selected cases, vaginal myomectomy has been proven to be a safe and an effective surgical procedure. We report the case of a 38-year-old para one woman with complaints of chronic lower abdominal pain. Preoperative workup revealed a thirteen-centimeter interstitial uterine myoma in the anterior wall. Successful myomectomy was performed via the vaginal route. We will share the preoperative images, operative technique, and postoperative images.