Transradial versus transfemoral access for diagnostic cerebral angiography: frequency of acute MRI findings in 500 consecutive patients at a single center.

BACKGROUND: The frequency of clinically symptomatic and asymptomatic diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) hyperintense lesions and their correlation with the transradial artery (TRA) approach is unclear. OBJECTIVE: To assess the frequency of abnormal diffusion restriction foci on DWI following cerebral angiography (digital subtraction angiography (DSA)) with the TRA or transfemoral artery (TFA) approach and identify predictors of DWI restriction foci. METHODS: We analysed data from consecutive diagnostic cerebral angiograms obtained between January 2021 and October 2023 at a single tertiary center. MRI DWI was performed 2 hours after DSA. Patients underwent neurological assessment periprocedurally, as well as prior to discharge. RESULTS: 500 patients were analysed; 277 (55%) procedures were performed via TRA and 223 (45%) via TFA. Overall, 74 (14.8%) patients had abnormal findings in the postprocedure MRI DWI. A higher incidence of positive DWI findings was noted in the TRA group, with 46 (16.6%) patients, compared with 28 (12.6%) in the TFA group (P=0.21). Symptomatic events occurred in seven (2.5%) of the TRA group and in two (0.9%) of the TFA cohort (P=0.31). At 60 days, the neurological deficit rate was one (0.4%) for the TRA group and one (0.4%) for the TFA group. Procedure time was the only significant predictor of DWI restriction (OR=1.04 per minute; P=0.0001). CONCLUSION: Although there were more symptomatic or asymptomatic embolic events with TRA than with the TFA approach following elective cerebral angiography, this was not significantly different. We recommend the choice of vascular access based on patient anatomy and characteristics, aimed at improving care through enhanced safety.

Safety and efficacy of adjunctive intra-arterial antithrombotic therapy during endovascular thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Half of patients who achieve successful recanalization following endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) for acute ischemic stroke experience poor functional outcome. We aim to investigate whether the use of adjunctive intra-arterial antithrombotic therapy (AAT) during EVT is safe and efficacious compared with standard therapy (ST) of EVT with or without prior intravenous thrombolysis. METHODS: Electronic databases were searched (PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library) from 2010 until October 2023. Data were pooled using a random-effects model and reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Risk of bias was assessed using ROBINS-I and ROB-2. The primary outcome was functional independence (modified Rankin Scale (mRS) 0-2) at 3 months. Secondary outcomes were successful recanalization (modified Thrombolysis In Cerebral Infarction (TICI) 2b-3), symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), and 90-day mortality. RESULTS: 41 randomized and non-randomized studies met the eligibility criteria. Overall, 15 316 patients were included; 3296 patients were treated with AAT during EVT and 12 020 were treated with ST alone. Compared with ST, patients treated with AAT demonstrated higher odds of functional independence (46.5% AAT vs 42.6% ST; OR 1.22, 95% CI 1.07 to 1.40, P=0.004, I2=48%) and a lower likelihood of 90-day mortality (OR 0.71, 95% CI 0.61 to 0.83, P<0.0001, I2=20%). The rates of sICH (OR 1.00, 95% CI 0.82 to 1.22,P=0.97, I2=13%) and successful recanalization (OR 1.09, 95% CI 0.84 to 1.42, P=0.52, I2=76%) were not significantly different. CONCLUSION: The use of AAT during EVT may improve functional outcomes and reduce mortality rates compared with ST alone, without an increased risk of sICH. These findings should be interpreted with caution pending the results from ongoing phase III trials to establish the efficacy and safety of AAT during EVT.

Vanguard Study: Initial experience with the new fourth generation Pipeline Vantage Flow Diverter (PVFD): 6-month results, technical and clinical considerations.

BACKGROUND: The Pipeline Embolization Device has proven to be a safe and effective device for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms. The Pipeline Vantage Flow Diverter (PVFD) with Shield Technology is the new fourth generation of this implant, with modifications made compared to previous iterations. We aimed to evaluate the mechanical properties and clinical safety and efficacy of this device. METHODS: Vanguard is a single arm, single center, prospective study. Between April 2021 and April 2023, all consecutive patients with an unruptured aneurysm treated with Pipeline Vantage flow-diverting stents were included. There were no aneurysm size or location exclusion criteria. Safety (neurological serious adverse events) and efficacy (device deployment and aneurysm occlusion) were independently reviewed. Imaging follow-up data, and immediate, early (<30 days), and delayed (>30 days) neurological serious adverse events were independently assessed. RESULTS: 101 consecutive patients with a total of 115 aneurysms were included. The aneurysms were situated in the anterior (90.4%) or posterior (9.6%) circulations. A total of 124 devices were implanted. The deployment success rate was 100%. In four (4.0%) cases post-deployment angioplasty was required to optimize device wall apposition. Occlusion rates at 1 month were 54.7%, at 3 months 72.1%, and at 6 months 81.7%. Morbidity and mortality were 4.9% and 0%, respectively, at 6 months. Eight cases (6.9%) demonstrated in-stent stenosis, four of which had 'fish mouth' deformity. CONCLUSION: Initial results of the new generation PVFD for unruptured intracranial aneurysm treatment demonstrate overall satisfactory device performance, safety profile, and effectiveness.

Mechanical thrombectomy in medium vessel occlusions using the novel aspiration Q catheters: an international multicenter experience.

BACKGROUND: Medium vessel occlusions (MeVOs) comprise a large proportion of all stroke events. We performed a multicenter study of MIVI Q catheters, a novel design that optimizes suction forces without an increase in lumen diameter, for the treatment of MeVOs, aiming to evaluate its efficacy and safety. METHODS: Databases of two US and two UK centers were retrospectively reviewed for MeVO patients (M2-M3, anterior cerebral artery (ACA), or posterior cerebral artery (PCA)) treated with Q catheters. Outcomes were assessed as successful recanalization (modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction (mTICI) score ≥2b), first pass effect (FPE), and modified FPE (mFPE) as single pass achieving mTICI ≥2c and mTICI≥2b, respectively, and 90 day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score. RESULTS: 69 patients were included (median age 71 years, IQR 56-82.5; 52.2% men). Median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score at admission was 14, and Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS) was 9. Primary (without large vessel occlusion (LVO)) and secondary (with LVO) MeVOs represented 47.8% and 52.2% of cases, respectively. Q catheters used were Q3 (47.8%), Q4 (33.3%), Q5 (10.1%), and Q6 (8.7%). mTICI≥2b was achieved in 92.8% of patients, with FPE in 47.8%, and mFPE in 68.1%. Two (2.9%) intraprocedural complications (symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage) occurred. 50% (27/54) achieved an mRS score of ≤2 at the 90 day follow-up. The median NIHSS at admission was significantly higher in secondary than in primary MeVOs (19.5 vs 12, P=0.009). The rate of mRS ≤2 at 90 days was significantly higher in primary than in secondary MeVOs (77.3% vs 31.3%, P=0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of MeVO patients with Q catheters resulted in optimal angiographic and clinical outcomes. Although angiographic results were similar between primary and secondary MeVOs, the former had less severe presenting NIHSS and better outcomes at 90 days than the latter.

Endovascular thrombectomy beyond 24 hours from ischemic stroke onset: a propensity score matched cohort study.

BACKGROUND: The safety and functional outcome of endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) in the very late (VL; >24 hours) time window from ischemic stroke onset remains undetermined. METHODS: Using data from a national stroke registry, we used propensity score matched (PSM) individual level data of patients who underwent EVT, selected with CT perfusion or non-contrast CT/CT angiography, between October 2015 and March 2020. Functional and safety outcomes were assessed in both late (6-24 hours) and VL time windows. Subgroup analysis was performed of imaging selection modality in the VL time window. RESULTS: We included 1150 patients (late window: 1046 (208 after PSM); VL window: 104 (104 after PSM)). Compared with EVT treatment initiation between 6 and 24 hours, patients treated in the VL window had similar modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores at discharge (ordinal shift; common OR=1.08, 95% CI 0.69 to 1.47, p=0.70). No significant differences in achieving good functional outcome (mRS ≤2 at discharge; 28.8% (VL) vs 29.3% (late), OR=0.97, 95% CI 0.58 to 1.64, p=0.93), successful reperfusion (modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction score of 2b-3) (p=0.77), or safety outcomes of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (p=0.43) and inhospital mortality (p=0.23) were demonstrated. In the VL window, there was no significant difference in functional outcome among patients selected with perfusion versus those selected without perfusion imaging (common OR=1.38, 95% CI 0.81 to 1.76, p=0.18). CONCLUSION: In this real world study, EVT beyond 24 hours from stroke onset or last known well appeared to be feasible, with comparable safety and functional outcomes to EVT initiation between 6 and 24 hours. Randomized trials assessing the efficacy of EVT in the VL window are warranted, but may only be feasible with a large international collaborative approach.

Association between time to treatment and clinical outcomes in endovascular thrombectomy beyond 6 hours without advanced imaging selection.

BACKGROUND: The effectiveness and safety of endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) in the late window (6-24 hours) for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients selected without advanced imaging is undetermined. We aimed to assess clinical outcomes and the relationship with time-to-EVT treatment beyond 6 hours of stroke onset without advanced neuroimaging. METHODS: Patients who underwent EVT selected with non-contrast CT/CT angiography (without CT perfusion or MR imaging), between October 2015 and March 2020, were included from a national stroke registry. Functional and safety outcomes were assessed in both early (<6 hours) and late windows with time analyzed as a continuous variable. RESULTS: Among 3278 patients, 2610 (79.6%) and 668 (20.4%) patients were included in the early and late windows, respectively. In the late window, for every hour delay, there was no significant association with shift towards poorer functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale (mRS)) at discharge (adjusted common OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.94 to 1.01, p=0.27) or change in predicted functional independence (mRS ≤2) (24.5% to 23.3% from 6 to 24 hours; aOR 0.99, 95% CI0.94 to 1.04, p=0.85). In contrast, predicted functional independence was time sensitive in the early window: 5.2% reduction per-hour delay (49.4% to 23.5% from 1 to 6 hours, p=0.0001). There were similar rates of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) (3.4% vs 4.6%, p=0.54) and in-hospital mortality (12.9% vs 14.6%, p=0.33) in the early and late windows, respectively, without a significant association with time. CONCLUSION: In this real-world study, there was minimal change in functional disability, sICH and in-hospital mortality within and across the late window. While confirmatory randomized trials are needed, these findings suggest that EVT remains feasible and safe when performed in AIS patients selected without advanced neuroimaging between 6-24 hours from stroke onset.

Association between anesthesia modality and clinical outcomes following endovascular stroke treatment in the extended time window.

BACKGROUND: There is a paucity of data on anesthesia-related outcomes for endovascular treatment (EVT) in the extended window (>6 hours from ischemic stroke onset). We compared functional and safety outcomes between local anesthesia (LA) without sedation, conscious sedation (CS) and general anesthesia (GA). METHODS: Patients who underwent EVT in the early (<6 hours) and extended time windows using LA, CS, or GA between October 2015 and March 2020 were included from a UK national stroke registry. Multivariable analyses were performed, adjusted for age, sex, baseline stroke severity, pre-stroke disability, EVT technique, center, procedural time and IV thrombolysis. RESULTS: A total of 4337 patients were included, 3193 in the early window (1135 LA, 446 CS, 1612 GA) and 1144 in the extended window (357 LA, 134 CS, 653 GA). Compared with GA, patients treated under LA alone had increased odds of an improved modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score at discharge (early: adjusted common (ac) OR=1.50, 95% CI 1.29 to 1.74, p=0.001; extended: acOR=1.29, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.66, p=0.043). Similar mRS scores at discharge were found in the LA and CS cohorts in the early and extended windows (p=0.21). Compared with CS, use of GA was associated with a worse mRS score at discharge in the early window (acOR=0.73, 95% CI 0.45 to 0.96, p=0.017) but not in the extended window (p=0.55). There were no significant differences in the rates of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage or in-hospital mortality across the anesthesia modalities in the extended window. CONCLUSION: LA without sedation during EVT was associated with improved functional outcomes compared with GA, but not CS, within and beyond 6 hours from stroke onset. Prospective studies assessing anesthesia-related outcomes in the extended time window are warranted.

Local anesthesia as a distinct comparator versus conscious sedation and general anesthesia in endovascular stroke treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The optimal anesthetic modality for endovascular treatment (EVT) in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) is undetermined. Comparisons of general anesthesia (GA) with composite non-GA cohorts of conscious sedation (CS) and local anesthesia (LA) without sedation have provided conflicting results. There has been emerging interest in assessing whether LA alone may be associated with improved outcomes. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate clinical and procedural outcomes comparing LA with CS and GA. METHODS: We reviewed the literature for studies reporting outcome variables in LA versus CS and LA versus GA comparisons. The primary outcome was 90 day good functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of ≤2). Secondary outcomes included mortality, symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage, excellent functional outcome (mRS score ≤1), successful reperfusion (Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction (TICI) >2b), procedural time metrics, and procedural complications. Random effects meta-analysis was performed on unadjusted and adjusted data. RESULTS: Eight non-randomized studies of 7797 patients (2797 LA, 2218 CS, and 2782 GA) were identified. In the LA versus GA comparison, no statistically significant differences were found in unadjusted analyses for 90 day good functional outcome or mortality (OR=1.22, 95% CI 0.84 to 1.76, p=0.3 and OR=0.83, 95% CI 0.64 to 1.07, p=0.15, respectively) or in the LA versus CS comparison (OR=1.14, 95% CI 0.76 to 1.71, p=0.53 and OR=0.88, 95% CI 0.62 to 1.24, p=0.47, respectively). There was a tendency towards achieving excellent functional outcome (mRS ≤1) in the LA group versus the GA group (OR=1.44, 95% CI 1.00 to 2.08, p=0.05, I2=70%). Analysis of adjusted data demonstrated a tendency towards higher odds of death at 90 days in the GA versus the LA group (OR=1.24, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.54, p=0.05, I2=0%). CONCLUSION: LA without sedation was not significantly superior to CS or GA in improving outcomes when performing EVT for AIS. However, the quality of the included studies impaired interpretation, and inclusion of an LA arm in future well designed multicenter, randomized controlled trials is warranted.

Use of 8Fr angio-seal for closure of femoral arteriotomy following use of 8Fr and 9Fr sheaths in patients undergoing mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischaemic stroke.

BACKGROUND: Little is known about the safety of off-label use of an 8Fr Angio-Seal VIP for large-bore arteriotomies in patients treated with mechanical thrombectomy (MT) and intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) for acute ischaemic stroke (AIS). We aimed to identify differences in the groin complication rate using an 8Fr Angio-Seal VIP for common femoral arteriotomy closures following the use of 8Fr and 9Fr sheaths. METHODS: All AIS patients who underwent MT at our tertiary neuroscience unit between January 2018 and March 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS: 161 patients were included in the study, of whom 56 and 105 patients underwent an arteriotomy using an 8Fr sheath (36 of them receiving IVT) and a 9Fr sheath (57 of them receiving IVT). Overall, 17 groin complications were identified (10.5%) in 5 patients (8.9%) who had had 8Fr sheaths inserted and 12 patients (11.4%) who had had 9Fr sheaths inserted. Major complications were identified in only 2 patients (1.2%), one patient in each of the 8Fr and 9Fr cohorts suffering a pseudoaneurysm requiring intervention. No retroperitoneal haematoma, infection, acute limb ischaemia or ipsilateral DVT was identified. No significant difference in groin complications was observed between the 8Fr and 9Fr femoral arteriotomy cohorts or between the MT patients that did or did not receive adjunctive IVT. CONCLUSION: In the setting of MT with IVT, off-label use of an 8Fr Angio-Seal VIP for closure of a femoral arteriotomy following use of a 9Fr sheath has a similar safety profile to the licensed use of an 8Fr Angio-Seal VIP for closure of a femoral arteriotomy following use of an 8Fr sheath or smaller.

Ophthalmic manifestations postlightning strike.

Various ophthalmic complications affecting the anterior and posterior segments have been identified due to lightning strike. We report the first case of an indirect lightning-induced full thickness macular hole formation in the UK as evidenced by slit lamp examination and optical coherence tomography (OCT) scan in a 77-year-old woman presenting with sudden visual loss in her right eye and thermal skin injury affecting her scalp. Her best corrected visual acuities were LogMAR 0.46 and 0.12 in the right and left eyes, respectively. There were no other ocular manifestations observed in either eye. She was initially managed conservatively with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug eye drops but surgery was later advised due to minimal changes in the visual acuity and macular hole on follow-up. OCT scanning is important in diagnosing macular holes, which usually warrant surgical intervention.

Characterization of corneal stromal stem cells with the potential for epithelial transdifferentiation.

INTRODUCTION: The corneal stroma is being increasingly recognized as a repository for stem cells. Like the limbal and endothelial niches, stromal stem cells often reside in the peripheral cornea and limbus. These peripheral and limbal corneal stromal cells (PLCSCs) are known to produce mesenchymal stem cells in vitro. Recently, a common corneal stromal and epithelial progenitor was hinted at. This study aims to examine the stem cell potential of corneal stromal cells and to investigate their epithelial transdifferentiation ability. METHODS: PLCSCs were grown in traditional Dulbecco modified Eagle medium (DMEM)-based keratocyte culture medium and an M199-based medium and analyzed for a profile of cell-surface markers by using flow cytometry and differentiated into mesenchymal phenotypes analyzed with quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) and histologic staining. PLCSCs in M199 were subsequently divided into subpopulations based on CD34 and CD105 expression by using fluorescence- activated cell sorting (FACS). Subpopulations were characterized by marker profile and mesenchymal differentiation ability. Both whole PLCSCs and subpopulations were also cultured for epithelial transdifferentiation. RESULTS: Cells cultured in M199 demonstrated a more stem-like cell-surface marker profile, and the keratocyte marker CD34 was retained for several passages but absent in cells cultured in DMEM. Cells cultured in M199 also exhibited a greater mesenchymal differentiation potential, compared with DMEM. PLCSCs could be divided into CD34(+)CD105(+), CD34-CD105(+), and CD34-CD105- subpopulations, of which CD34(+)CD105(+) cells were the most stemlike with regard to marker expression and mesenchymal differentiation potential. Subpopulations of PLCSCs exhibited differing abilities to transdifferentiate into epithelial phenotypes. Cells that were initially CD34(+)CD105(+) showed the greatest differentiation potential, producing CK3(+) and CK19(+) cells, and expressed a range of both epithelial progenitor (HES1, FRZB1, DCT, SOD2, ABCG2, CDH1, KRT19) and terminally differentiated (DSG3, KRT3, KRT12, KRT24) genes. CONCLUSIONS: Culture medium has a significant effect on the phenotype and differentiation capacity of PLCSCs. The stroma contains a heterogeneous cell population in which we have identified CD34(+) cells as a stem cell population with a capacity for mesenchymal and epithelial differentiation.