The relationship between ultrasound and physical examination in the assessment of enthesitis in SpA patients: results from the DEUS multicentre study

OBJECTIVES: i) To explore the agreement between the OMERACT ultrasound lesions of enthesitis and physical examination in assessing enthesitis in spondyloarthritis (SpA) patients; ii) To investigate the prevalence and clinical relevance of subclinical enthesitis in this population. METHODS: Twenty rheumatology centres participated in this cross-sectional study. SpA patients, including axial SpA (axSpA) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA) patients, underwent both ultrasound scan and physical examination of large lower limb entheses. The OMERACT ultrasound lesions of enthesitis were considered, along with a recently proposed definition for 'active enthesitis' by our group. Subclinical enthesitis was defined as the presence of 'active enthesitis' in ≥1 enthesis in SpA patients without clinical enthesitis (i.e., number of positive entheses on physical examination and Leeds Enthesitis Index score =0). RESULTS: 4130 entheses in 413 SpA patients (224 axSpA/189 PsA) were evaluated through ultrasound and physical examination. Agreement between ultrasound and physical examination ranged from moderate (i.e., enthesophytes) to almost perfect (i.e., power Doppler and 'active enthesitis'). Patellar tendon entheses demonstrated the highest agreement, whereas Achilles tendon insertion showed the lowest. Among 158/413 (38.3%) SpA patients with clinical enthesitis, 108 (68.4%) exhibited no 'active enthesitis' on ultrasound. Conversely, of those 255 without clinical enthesitis, 39 (15.3%) showed subclinical enthesitis. Subclinical enthesitis was strongly associated with local structural damage. However, no differences were observed regarding the demographic and clinical profiles of SpA patients with and without subclinical enthesitis. CONCLUSIONS: Our study underscores the need for a comprehensive tool integrating ultrasound and physical examination for assessing enthesitis in SpA patients.

Influence of Safety Warnings on the Prescribing Attitude of JAK Inhibitors for Rheumatoid Arthritis in Italy.

Background/Objectives: The Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi) tofacitinib (TOFA), baricitinib (BARI), upadacitinib (UPA), and filgotinib (FILGO) are effective drugs for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. However, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) raised concerns about the safety of TOFA after its approval. This prompted the European Medicines Agency (EMA) to issue two safety warnings for limiting TOFA use, then extended a third warning to all JAKi in patients at high risk of developing serious adverse effects (SAE). These include thrombosis, major adverse cardiac events (MACE), and cancer. The purpose of this work was to analyze how the first two safety warnings from the EMA affected the prescribing of JAKi by rheumatologists in Italy. Methods: All patients with rheumatoid arthritis who had been prescribed JAKi for the first time in a 36-month period from 1 July 2019, to 30 June 2022 were considered. Data were obtained from the medical records of 29 Italian tertiary referral rheumatology centers. Patients were divided into three groups of 4 months each, depending on whether the JAKi prescription had occurred before the EMA's first safety alert (1 July-31 October 2019, Group 1), between the first and second alerts (1 November 2019-29 February 2020, Group 2), or between the second and third alerts (1 March 2021-30 June 2021, Group 3). The percentages and absolute changes in the patients prescribed the individual JAKi were analyzed. Differences among the three groups of patients regarding demographic and clinical characteristics were also assessed. Results: A total of 864 patients were prescribed a JAKi during the entire period considered. Of these, 343 were identified in Group 1, 233 in Group 2, and 288 in Group 3. An absolute reduction of 32% was observed in the number of patients prescribed a JAKi between Group 1 and Group 2 and 16% between Group 1 and Group 3. In contrast, there was a 19% increase in the prescription of a JAKi in patients between Group 2 and Group 3. In the first group, BARI was the most prescribed drug (227 prescriptions, 66.2% of the total), followed by TOFA (115, 33.5%) and UPA (1, 0.3%). In the second group, the most prescribed JAKi was BARI (147, 63.1%), followed by TOFA (65, 27.9%) and UPA (33, 11.5%). In the third group, BARI was still the most prescribed JAKi (104 prescriptions, 36.1%), followed by UPA (89, 30.9%), FILGO (89, 21.5%), and TOFA (33, 11.5%). The number of patients prescribed TOFA decreased significantly between Group 1 and Group 2 and between Group 2 and Group 3 (p ˂ 0.01). The number of patients who were prescribed BARI decreased significantly between Group 1 and Group 2 and between Group 2 and Group 3 (p ˂ 0.01). In contrast, the number of patients prescribed UPA increased between Group 2 and Group 3 (p ˂ 0.01). Conclusions: These data suggest that the warnings issued for TOFA were followed by a reduction in total JAKi prescriptions. However, the more selective JAKi (UPA and FILGO) were perceived by prescribers as favorable in terms of the risk/benefit ratio, and their use gradually increased at the expense of the other molecules.

Power Doppler signal at the enthesis and bone erosions are the most discriminative OMERACT ultrasound lesions for SpA: results from the DEUS (Defining Enthesitis on Ultrasound in Spondyloarthritis) multicentre study.

OBJECTIVES: To assess, in spondyloarthritis (SpA), the discriminative value of the Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) ultrasound lesions of enthesitis and their associations with clinical features in this population. METHODS: In this multicentre study involving 20 rheumatology centres, clinical and ultrasound examinations of the lower limb large entheses were performed in 413 patients with SpA (axial SpA and psoriatic arthritis) and 282 disease controls (osteoarthritis and fibromyalgia). 'Active enthesitis' was defined as (1) power Doppler (PD) at the enthesis grade ≥1 plus entheseal thickening and/or hypoechoic areas, or (2) PD grade >1 (independent of the presence of entheseal thickening and/or hypoechoic areas). RESULTS: In the univariate analysis, all OMERACT lesions except enthesophytes/calcifications showed a significant association with SpA. PD (OR=8.77, 95% CI 4.40 to 19.20, p<0.001) and bone erosions (OR=4.75, 95% CI 2.43 to 10.10, p<0.001) retained this association in the multivariate analysis. Among the lower limb entheses, only the Achilles tendon was significantly associated with SpA (OR=1.93, 95% CI 1.30 to 2.88, p<0.001) in the multivariate analyses. Active enthesitis showed a significant association with SpA (OR=9.20, 95% CI 4.21 to 23.20, p<0.001), and unlike the individual OMERACT ultrasound lesions it was consistently associated with most clinical measures of SpA disease activity and severity in the regression analyses. CONCLUSIONS: This large multicentre study assessed the value of different ultrasound findings of enthesitis in SpA, identifying the most discriminative ultrasound lesions and entheseal sites for SpA. Ultrasound could differentiate between SpA-related enthesitis and other forms of entheseal pathology (ie, mechanical enthesitis), thus improving the assessment of entheseal involvement in SpA.

Therapeutic Effects of Apremilast on Enthesitis and Dactylitis in Real Clinical Setting: An Italian Multicenter Study.

INTRODUCTION: Enthesitis and dactylitis are difficult-to-treat features of psoriatic arthritis (PsA), leading to disability and affecting quality of life. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to evaluate enthesitis (using the Leed enthesitis index (LEI)) and dactylitis at 6 and 12 months in patients treated with apremilast. METHODS: Patients affected by PsA from fifteen Italian rheumatological referral centers were screened. The inclusion criteria were: (a) enthesitis or dactylitisphenotype; (b) treatment with apremilast 30 mg bid. Clinical and treatment history, including PsA disease activity, were recorded. Mann-Whitney and chi-squared tests were used to assess the differences between independent groups, and Wilcoxon matched pairs signed-rank test assessed the differences between dependent samples. A p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: The Eph cohort consisted of 118 patients (median LEI 3); the Dph cohort included 96 patients with a median dactylitis of 1 (IQR 1-2). According to an intention to treat analysis, 25% and 34% of patients with enthesitis achieved remission (i.e., LEI = 0) in T1 and T2. The remission of dactylitis was 47% in T1 and 44% in T2. The per protocol analysis (patients observed for at least 12 months) showed that both dactylitis and LEI significantly improved in T1 (median LEI 1 (IQR 1-3)) and T2 (median LEI 0 (IQR 1-2)). CONCLUSION: Eph and Dph PsA patients treated with apremilast experienced a significant improvement in enthesitis and dactylitis activity. After 1 year, enthesitis and dactylitis remission was achieved in more than one-third of patients.

Determining the PASS cut-off points for the FIQR, FASmod and PSD in patients with fibromyalgia: a registry-based study.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the cut-off values of Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) for the revised Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQR), the modified Fibromyalgia Assessment Scale (FASmod), and the Polysymptomatic Distress scale (PSD) and to determine the predictors of PASS in patients with fibromyalgia (FM). METHODS: FM patients belonging to the Italian Fibromyalgia Registry (IFR) completed the FIQR, the FASmod and the PSD. The PASS was assessed using a dichotomous answer. The cut-off values were obtained through the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analyses. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to determine predictors of achieving the PASS. RESULTS: 5545 women (93.7%) and 369 males (6.3%) were included in the study. The 27.8% of patients reported an acceptable symptom state. Patients in PASS differed in all patient-reported outcome measures (p <0.001). The FIQR PASS threshold was ≤58 (area under the ROC curve [AUC] = 0.819). The FASmod PASS threshold was ≤23 (AUC = 0.805) and the PSD PASS threshold was ≤16 (AUC = 0.773). In the pairwise AUC comparison, the discriminatory power of the FIQR PASS outperforms both FASmod PASS (p = 0.0124) and PSD PASS (p <0.0001). Multivariate logistic analysis showed that FIQR items related to memory and pain were the only predictors of PASS. CONCLUSIONS: The FIQR, FASmod, and PSD PASS cut-off points for FM patients have never been determined before. This study provides additional information to facilitate interpretation of the severity assessment scales in daily practice and clinical research related to FM patients.

Apremilast retention rate in clinical practice: observations from an Italian multi-center study.

OBJECTIVE: There are few real-world setting studies focused on apremilast effectiveness (i.e., retention rate) in psoriatic arthritis (PsA). The main aim of this retrospective observational study is the assessment of apremilast 3-year retention rate in real-world PsA patients. Moreover, the secondary objective is to report the reasons of apremilast discontinuation and the factors related to treatment persistence. METHODS: In fifteen Italian rheumatological referral centers, all PsA consecutive patients who received apremilast were enrolled. Anamnestic data, treatment history, and PsA disease activity (DAPSA) at baseline were recorded. The Kaplan-Meier curve and the Cox analysis computed the apremilast retention rate and treatment persistence-related risk factors. A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: The 356 enrolled patients (median age 60 [interquartile range IQR 52-67] yrs; male prevalence 42.7%) median observation period was 17 [IQR 7-34] months (7218 patients-months). The apremilast retention rate at 12, 24, and 36 months was, respectively, 85.6%, 73.6%, and 61.8%. The main discontinuation reasons were secondary inefficacy (34% of interruptions), gastro-intestinal intolerance (24%), and primary inefficacy (19%). Age and oligo-articular phenotype were related to treatment persistence (respectively hazard ratio 0.98 IQR 0.96-0.99; p = 0.048 and 0.54 IQR 0.31-0.95; p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: Almost three-fifths of PsA patients receiving apremilast were still in treatment after 3 years. This study confirmed its effectiveness and safety profile. Apremilast appears as a good treatment choice in all oligo-articular PsA patients and in those ones burdened by relevant comorbidities. Key Points • Apremilast retention rates in this real-life cohort and trials are comparable. • The oligo-articular phenotype is associated with long-lasting treatment (i.e., 3 years). • No different or more prevalent adverse events were observed.

Reliability assessment of the definition of ultrasound enthesitis in SpA: results of a large, multicentre, international, web-based study.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the reliability of the OMERACT US Task Force definition of US enthesitis in SpA. METHODS: In this web exercise, based on the evaluation of 101 images and 39 clips of the main entheses of the lower limbs, the elementary components included in the OMERACT definition of US enthesitis in SpA (hypoechoic areas, entheseal thickening, power Doppler signal at the enthesis, enthesophytes/calcifications, bone erosions) were assessed by 47 rheumatologists from 37 rheumatology centres in 15 countries. Inter- and intra-observer reliability of the US components of enthesitis was calculated using Light's kappa, Cohen's kappa, Prevalence And Bias Adjusted Kappa (PABAK) and their 95% CIs. RESULTS: Bone erosions and power Doppler signal at the enthesis showed the highest overall inter-reliability [Light's kappa: 0.77 (0.76-0.78), 0.72 (0.71-0.73), respectively; PABAK: 0.86 (0.86-0.87), 0.73 (0.73-0.74), respectively], followed by enthesophytes/calcifications [Light's kappa: 0.65 (0.64-0.65), PABAK: 0.67 (0.67-0.68)]. This was moderate for entheseal thickening [Light's kappa: 0.41 (0.41-0.42), PABAK: 0.41 (0.40-0.42)], and fair for hypoechoic areas [Light's kappa: 0.37 (0.36-0.38); PABAK: 0.37 (0.37-0.38)]. A similar trend was observed in the intra-reliability exercise, although this was characterized by an overall higher degree of reliability for all US elementary components compared with the inter-observer evaluation. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this multicentre, international, web-based study show a good reliability of the OMERACT US definition of bone erosions, power Doppler signal at the enthesis and enthesophytes/calcifications. The low reliability of entheseal thickening and hypoechoic areas raises questions about the opportunity to revise the definition of these two major components for the US diagnosis of enthesitis.

Efficacy and Drug Survival after Switching from Etanercept to the Biosimilar SB4: A Real-Life Long-Term Study.

We evaluated the 3-year drug survival and efficacy of the biosimilar SB4/Benepali in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and ankylosing spondylitis (AS) patients, previously treated with etanercept (ETA). Drug survival rate was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazard models were developed to examine predictors of SB4 discontinuation. 236 patients (120 RA, 80 PsA and 36 AS), aged 60.7 ± 13.8 years and with an ETA duration of 4.1 ± 3.4 years were included. The 3-year retention rate for SB4 was 94.4%, 88% and 86% in AS, RA and PsA patients, respectively, with no difference between groups. Patients without comorbid disease had higher retention rates vs. patients with comorbid disease (90% vs. 60%, p < 0.0001). Disease activity, as measured by DAS28, DAPSA and BASDAI remained stable over the 3 years. Comorbid disease (hazard ratio; HR: 4.06, p < 0.0001) and HAQ at baseline (HR: 2.42, p = 0.0024) significantly increased the risk of SB4 discontinuation, while previous ETA duration was negatively associated with SB4 discontinuation (HR: 0.97, p = 0.0064). Forty-one (17.4%) patients left the study due to the interruption of the SB4 treatment, 31 (75.6%) discontinued due to inefficacy and 10 (24.4%) due to adverse events. This real-life study confirms the similar efficacy profile of ETA with long-term retention and a good safety profile in inflammatory arthritis patients.

A Parsonage-Turner Syndrome secondary to Parvovirus B19 infection.

Parvovirus B19 (PVB19) is a small DNA virus that causes the fifth disease in children; however it can also affect adults. The infection can be asymptomatic in about a quarter of healthy subjects. Typical clinical manifestations are: short lived fever accompanied by asthenia, myalgias and pharyngodynia; symmetrical acute polyarthritis; megalo-erytema in child; maculopulotic rash and/or fleeting purpuric at the extremities in adult; adenopathies in the cervical area. Atypical manifestions can affect neurological system (both central and peripheral), hearth and kidney. We describe a 37-year-old man with neuralgic amyotrophy (Parsonage-Turner syndrome) caused by Parvovirus B19 infection.

Cycling or swap biologics and small molecules in psoriatic arthritis: Observations from a real-life single center cohort.

ABSTRACT: During the last years there has been an increasing availability of drugs (biologics and small molecules) with different mechanisms of action (MoA) in psoriatic arthritis (PsA). New issues about treatment strategies have arisen. The main aim of this study is to verify if there is a difference in terms of clinical efficacy (i.e. retention rate) between cycling (i.e. treating patients with the same MoA after the failure of the previous one) or swap (i.e choosing drugs with a MoA different from the failed previous one) strategies in PsA.In this mono-centric medical records review study, PsA patients treated with biologics, apremilast or tofacitinib were enrolled. Every prescription was clustered in three groups: cycling (CG), swap (SG) or first line group (1LG). Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox test estimated and compared drugs' retention rate in CG, SG and 1LG. P < .05 was considered statistically significant.One hundred eighty-three PsA patients were enrolled (9967 patient-months). In CG and 1LG the more prescribed drugs were tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (respectively 99% and 89%), in SG interleukin 17 inhibitor (60%). There were no differences in terms of sex, age, disease duration, and retention rate between CG and SG. The 18-months retention rate of 1LG, SG and CG was 77%, 60%, and 51% respectively. The CG retention rate was lower than in 1LG (P = .03).The findings of this study suggest that in PsA the swap strategy gives no remarkable advantage compared to cycling. However, patients undergoing swap strategy may experience the same failure rate observed in naives.

Prevalence and distribution of cartilage damage at the metacarpal head level in rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis: an ultrasound study.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the prevalence and distribution of US-detected qualitative cartilage damage at metacarpal heads of patients with RA and hand OA. METHODS: Fifty-two RA patients and 34 patients with hand OA were enrolled. US examination of the metacarpal head cartilage from the II to V finger of both hands was performed. A total of 414 MCP joints in RA and 266 MCP joints in OA patients were scanned with a linear probe up to 22 MHz. Qualitative assessments using a previously described scoring system for cartilage damage were performed. The prevalence and distribution of cartilage damage were analysed. Multivariate regression analysis was used to determine the predictive value of age, gender, BMI, disease duration and the presence of RF and anti-CCP antibodies for US-detected cartilage damage. RESULTS: The metacarpal head cartilage was positive for cartilage damage in 35.7% (148/414) of MCP joints in RA and in 43.6% (116/266) of MCP joints in OA patients. In RA, the hyaline cartilage of the II and III metacarpal heads (bilaterally) was the most frequently affected. In OA, cartilage damage was more homogeneously distributed in all MCP joints. Multivariate regression analysis showed that age and disease duration, but not gender, BMI or autoantibody status, were independent predictors of US-detected cartilage damage in RA. CONCLUSION: Cartilage damage was found in more than one-third of the MCP joints in both RA and OA patients, and in RA patients, the II and III MCP joints were the most damaged.

Preliminary validation of the Simplified Psoriatic Arthritis Radiographic Score (SPARS).

OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate in a preliminary way a novel radiographic scoring system for psoriatic arthritis (PsA), called Simplified Psoriatic Arthritis Radiographic Score (SPARS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Radiographs of hands and feet were obtained from consecutive PsA patients and assessed by two readers. For each joint (30 joints in the hands, ten joints in the feet), the combination of the erosions, joint narrowing space (JNS) and bony proliferation (BP) has been assessed, giving a value of 1 for erosions presence, 1 for JNS presence, and 1 for BP presence (SPARS score range, 0-120). Reliability was assessed by calculating the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and smallest detectable difference (SDD) of the readings. To determine the convergent validity, SPARS was compared to the modified Sharp/van der Heijde Score (mSvdHS) and to the Ratingen scoring system (PARS). RESULTS: One-hundred and five hands and feet radiographs have been assessed. The inter- and intra-rater reliability were excellent (inter-rater reliability 0.934, and intra-rater reliability for both readers 0.845 and 0.876). The SDD for the average SPARS scores of the two readers was 8.0. SPARS correlated strongly with mSvdHS (r = 0.926; p < 0.0001), and PARS (r = 0.904; p < 0.0001). The mean time to score each of the mSvdHS, PARS, and SPARS was 14.4, 10.1, and 4.5 min, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The SPARS properties are close to those of the mSvdHS and PARS and is quicker to calculate.

The DETection of Arthritis in Inflammatory boweL diseases (DETAIL) questionnaire: development and preliminary testing of a new tool to screen patients with inflammatory bowel disease for the presence of spondyloarthritis.

To develop and to test in a preliminary way a new self-administered screening tool, called DETection of Arthritis in Inflammatory boweL diseases (DETAIL) questionnaire, in patients suffering from inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) not previously diagnosed as having a spondyloarthritis (SpA). DETAIL questionnaire was realized through the interrogation of 95 experts. They were asked to rate the importance of a list of items, derived from a review of the referral models of SpA, to detect the SpA manifestations in IBD patients. The six top-rated items composed the questionnaire, tested in IBD patients not already diagnosed having a SpA. One-hundred and twenty-eight patients were tested with the DETAIL questionnaire in the gastroenterology setting. After the rheumatologic assessment, in 21 (16.4%) subjects was diagnosed a SpA according to the Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society (ASAS) classification criteria. Of the six items of the DETAIL questionnaire, the best positive likelihood ratio (LR+) was found in item 2 (LR+ 3.82), exploring dactylitis, and in item 6 (LR+ 3.82) and item 5 (LR+ 3.40), two questions exploring inflammatory low back pain. Enthesitis (item 3-LR+ 2.87) and peripheral synovitis (item 1 - LR+ 2.81) gave similar results, while item 4, exploring the duration of low back pain, resulted in the worst performance (LR+ 1.99). Three of the six items answered in affirmative way gave a post-test probability ≥ 75%. The presence of a fibromyalgia represents a major confounder. The DETAIL questionnaire showed good screening properties that need to be confirmed in broader cohorts.

A validation study of the Simple Psoriatic Arthritis Screening (SiPAS) questionnaire to screen psoriasis patients for psoriatic arthritis.

OBJECTIVES: To validate in a multicentric cohort of patients a self-administered PsA screening tool, called Simple Psoriatic Arthritis Screening (SiPAS) questionnaire, to screen psoriasis patients for signs and symptoms of PsA. METHODS: The SiPAS questionnaire was validated in a multicentric Italian cohort of psoriasis patients referred to two rheumatological centres. RESULTS: A total of 202 psoriasis patients were screened with SiPAS in the validation study. Sixty-two psoriasis patients (30.7%) were diagnosed with PsA. The five screening questions (1. Have you ever had a finger or a toe and/or another joint swollen and painful without any apparent reason?; 2. Occasionally, has an entire finger or toe become swollen, making it look like a 'sausage'?; 3. Do you wake up at night because of low back pain?; 4. Have you had pain in your heels?; 5. Has a doctor ever diagnosed you with psoriatic arthritis?) with a dichotomous response, demonstrated high sensitivity and specificity for predicting PsA. Likelihood ratios for individual parameters varied between 2.06 and 4.75. Using the Bayesian Analysis, the presence of three of five items answered as "yes" showed respectively a sensibility and a specificity of 79% and 87%, with a positive likelihood ratio of 6.14. CONCLUSIONS: The SiPAS questionnaire is able to quickly screen psoriasis patients for PsA. A SiPAS score ≥3 is an indication for referral to a rheumatologist. The SiPAS needs further validation.