RESUMO
Cardiovascular diseases (CVD) remain the leading cause of mortality globally and require innovative strategies for effective prevention and treatment. The polypill concept, which integrates multiple cardioprotective agents into a single dosage form, has emerged as a promising approach to improve adherence and simplify the management of cardiovascular risk factors. We review clinical trials and observational studies evaluating the impact of the polypill on reducing the incidence of major cardiovascular events (MACEs), its influence on medication adherence, and its potential to fill treatment gaps in diverse populations. Also of note are the pharmacoeconomic implications of the widespread use of the polypill, particularly in low- and middle-income countries where the burden of cardiovascular disease is increasing. Although the polypill demonstrates a favorable profile in improving therapeutic compliance and reducing cardiovascular risk factors, debates persist regarding its efficacy compared to individualized treatment regimens. This review summarizes the current evidence on the efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness of the polypill in CVD primary and secondary prevention. Furthermore, potential challenges in implementing the polypill strategy include tailoring the components to patient-specific risk profiles and the need for robust evidence from large-scale randomized controlled trials to substantiate its long-term benefits.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: A polypill that includes key medications associated with improved outcomes (aspirin, angiotensin-converting-enzyme [ACE] inhibitor, and statin) has been proposed as a simple approach to the secondary prevention of cardiovascular death and complications after myocardial infarction. METHODS: In this phase 3, randomized, controlled clinical trial, we assigned patients with myocardial infarction within the previous 6 months to a polypill-based strategy or usual care. The polypill treatment consisted of aspirin (100 mg), ramipril (2.5, 5, or 10 mg), and atorvastatin (20 or 40 mg). The primary composite outcome was cardiovascular death, nonfatal type 1 myocardial infarction, nonfatal ischemic stroke, or urgent revascularization. The key secondary end point was a composite of cardiovascular death, nonfatal type 1 myocardial infarction, or nonfatal ischemic stroke. RESULTS: A total of 2499 patients underwent randomization and were followed for a median of 36 months. A primary-outcome event occurred in 118 of 1237 patients (9.5%) in the polypill group and in 156 of 1229 (12.7%) in the usual-care group (hazard ratio, 0.76; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.60 to 0.96; P = 0.02). A key secondary-outcome event occurred in 101 patients (8.2%) in the polypill group and in 144 (11.7%) in the usual-care group (hazard ratio, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.54 to 0.90; P = 0.005). The results were consistent across prespecified subgroups. Medication adherence as reported by the patients was higher in the polypill group than in the usual-care group. Adverse events were similar between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with a polypill containing aspirin, ramipril, and atorvastatin within 6 months after myocardial infarction resulted in a significantly lower risk of major adverse cardiovascular events than usual care. (Funded by the European Union Horizon 2020; SECURE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02596126; EudraCT number, 2015-002868-17.).