Respiratory dysfunction and management in spinal cord injury.

Respiratory dysfunction is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in spinal cord injury (SCI), which causes impairment of respiratory muscles, reduced vital capacity, ineffective cough, reduction in lung and chest wall compliance, and excess oxygen cost of breathing due to distortion of the respiratory system. Severely affected individuals may require assisted ventilation, which can cause problems with speech production. Appropriate candidates can sometimes be liberated from mechanical ventilation by phrenic-nerve pacing and pacing of the external intercostal muscles. Partial recovery of respiratory-muscle performance occurs spontaneously. The eventual vital capacity depends on the extent of spontaneous recovery, years since injury, smoking, a history of chest injury or surgery, and maximum inspiratory pressure. Also, respiratory-muscle training and abdominal binders improve performance of the respiratory muscles. For patients on long-term ventilation, speech production is difficult. Often, practitioners are reluctant to deflate the tracheostomy tube cuff to allow speech production. Yet cuff-deflation can be done safely. Standard ventilator settings produce poor speech quality. Recent studies demonstrated vast improvement with long inspiratory time and positive end-expiratory pressure. Abdominal binders improve speech quality in patients with phrenic-nerve pacers. Recent data show that the level and completeness of injury and older age at the time of injury may not be related directly to mortality in SCI, which suggests that the care of SCI has improved. The data indicate that independent predictors of all-cause mortality include diabetes mellitus, heart disease, cigarette smoking, and percent-of-predicted forced expiratory volume in the first second. An important clinical problem in SCI is weak cough, which causes retention of secretions during infections. Methods for secretion clearance include chest physical therapy, spontaneous cough, suctioning, cough assistance by forced compression of the abdomen ("quad cough"), and mechanical insufflation-exsufflation. Recently described but not yet available for general use is activation of the abdominal muscles via an epidural electrode placed at spinal cord level T9-L1.

Inspiratory muscle pacing in spinal cord injury: case report and clinical commentary.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: A significant fraction of patients with cervical spinal cord injury suffer from respiratory muscle paralysis and dependence on chronic mechanical ventilation. In selected patients, diaphragm pacing (DP) through electrical stimulation of the phrenic nerves provides an alternative to mechanical ventilation with significant advantages in life quality. METHODS: A case report of an individual who successfully underwent DP using intramuscular diaphragm electrodes. A brief review of the state of the art of DP including the clinical benefits of DP, patient selection and evaluation, description of equipment, methods of transition from mechanical ventilation to DP, potential complications and side effects, long-term outcome, and potential future developments in this field is included. RESULTS: Several available DP systems are available, including conventional ones in which electrodes are positioned directly on the phrenic nerves through thoracotomy and less invasive systems in which electrodes are placed within the diaphragm through laparoscopy. For patients with only unilateral phrenic nerve function, a combined intercostal and unilateral diaphragm pacing system is under development. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with ventilator-dependent tetraplegia, there are alternative methods of ventilatory support, which offer substantial benefits compared to mechanical ventilation.

Phrenic nerve pacing via intramuscular diaphragm electrodes in tetraplegic subjects.

CONTEXT: Diaphragm pacing in ventilator-dependent tetraplegic subjects is usually achieved by the placement of phrenic nerve electrodes via thoracotomy. However, this technique may be accomplished less invasively via laparoscopic placement of IM electrodes, at a lower cost and with less risk of injury to the phrenic nerve. OBJECTIVE: To assess the feasibility of laparascopic placement of IM diaphragm electrodes to achieve long-term ventilatory support in ventilator-dependent tetraplegic subjects. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Two IM diaphragm electrodes were placed laparoscopically in each hemidiaphragm in five subjects with ventilator-dependent tetraplegia. Studies were performed either on an outpatient basis or with a single overnight hospitalization. Ventilator-dependent tetraplegic subjects were identified in whom bilateral phrenic nerve function was present, as determined by phrenic nerve conduction studies. Following electrode placement, subjects participated in a conditioning program to improve the strength and endurance of the diaphragm over a period of 15 to 25 weeks. The duration of the study was variable depending on the time necessary to determine the maximum duration that individuals could be maintained without mechanical ventilation support. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Magnitude of inspired volume generation and duration of ventilatory support with bilateral diaphragm pacing alone. RESULTS: In four of the five subjects studied, initial bilateral diaphragm stimulation resulted in inspired volumes between 430 and 1,060 mL. Reconditioning of the diaphragm over several weeks resulted in substantial increases in inspired volumes to 1,100 to 1,240 mL. These subjects were comfortably maintained without mechanical ventilatory support for prolonged time periods by diaphragm pacing, by full-time ventilatory support in three subjects, and 20 h per day, in the fourth subject. No response to stimulation was observed in one subject, most likely secondary to denervation atrophy. CONCLUSIONS: Diaphragm pacing in ventilator-dependent tetraplegic subjects can be successfully achieved via laparascopic placement of IM electrodes.

Mapping the phrenic nerve motor point: the key to a successful laparoscopic diaphragm pacing system in the first human series.

BACKGROUND: For patients with high spinal cord injury and chronic respiratory insufficiency, electrically induced diaphragm pacing is an alternative to long-term positive pressure ventilation. The goal of this study was to laparoscopically assess the phrenic nerve motor point of the diaphragm and then implant electrodes to produce chronic negative pressure ventilation. METHODS: Patients undergoing elective laparoscopic procedures (volunteer patient group) underwent a series of electrical stimuli (2 to 24 mA at 100-microsecond pulse widths) with a mapping probe to identify the motor point through qualitative visualization of diaphragm motion and quantitative measurement of the abdominal pressure to assess the strength of the contraction. After Food and Drug Administration and Institutional Review Board approval, tetraplegic patients (spinal cord injured patient group) who were ventilator dependent underwent mapping and implantation of electrodes for pacing in both diaphragms. RESULTS: In the volunteer group, 28 patients underwent 3 to 50 stimulations per diaphragm to identify the motor points. Throughout this series the surgical tools and software were improved to allow rapid motor point location with a grid-mapping algorithm. In the spinal cord injured group, 5 of 6 patients had electrodes successfully implanted at the motor point to produce adequate tidal volumes. The one failure caused a change in our inclusion criteria to include fluoroscopic confirmation of diaphragm movement during surface nerve stimulation. Three patients are completely free of the ventilator, and the other 2 are progressively increasing their time off the ventilator with conditioning. CONCLUSIONS: Mapping and implantation of the electrodes can be done laparoscopically, providing for a low-risk, cost-effective, outpatient, diaphragm pacing system that will support the respiratory needs of patients.

Phrenic nerve pacing in a tetraplegic patient via intramuscular diaphragm electrodes.

In patients with ventilator-dependent tetraplegia, phrenic nerve pacing (PNP) provides significant clinical advantages compared with mechanical ventilation. This technique however generally requires a thoracotomy with its associated risks and in-patient hospital stay and carries some risk of phrenic nerve injury. We have developed a method by which the phrenic nerves can be activated via intramuscular diaphragm electrodes. In one patient with ventilator-dependent tetraplegia, two intramuscular diaphragm electrodes were implanted into each hemidiaphragm near the phrenic nerve motor points via laparoscopic surgery. The motor points were identified employing a previously devised mapping technique. Because inspired volumes were suboptimal on the right, a second laparoscopic procedure was necessary to position electrodes near the anterior and posterior branches of the right phrenic nerve. During bilateral stimulation, inspired volume was 580 ml. After a reconditioning program of progressively increasing diaphragm pacing, maximum inspired volumes on the left and right hemidiaphragms increased significantly. Maximum combined bilateral stimulation was 1120 ml. Importantly, the patient has been able to comfortably tolerate full-time pacing. If confirmed in additional patients, PNP with intramuscular diaphragm electrodes via laparoscopic surgery may provide a less invasive and less costly alternative to conventional PNP.