Pre-asthma: a useful concept? A EUFOREA paper. Part 2-late onset eosinophilic asthma.

The concept of pre-diabetes has led to provision of measures to reduce disease progression through identification of subjects at risk of diabetes. We previously considered the idea of pre-asthma in relation to allergic asthma and considered that, in addition to the need to improve population health via multiple measures, including reduction of exposure to allergens and pollutants and avoidance of obesity, there are several possible specific means to reduce asthma development in those most at risk (pre- asthma). The most obvious is allergen immunotherapy (AIT), which when given for allergic rhinitis (AR) has reasonable evidence to support asthma prevention in children (2) but also needs further study as primary prevention. In this second paper we explore the possibilities for similar actions in late onset eosinophilic asthma.

EPOS2020/EUFOREA expert opinion on defining disease states and therapeutic goals in CRSwNP.

Severe chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP), a form of diffuse bilateral (usually type 2) CRS, is a debilitating disease with a significant impact on quality of life (QoL). With novel knowledge and treatment options becoming available, there is a growing need to update or revise key definitions to enable communication across different specialties dealing with CRS, and to agree on novel goals of care in CRSwNP. The European Forum for Research and Education in Allergy and Airway diseases (EUFOREA) and EPOS expert members discussed how to measure treatment responses and set new treatment goals for CRSwNP. In this paper a consensus on a list of definitions related to CRSwNP is provided: control, remission, cure, recurrence/exacerbation, treatable traits, remodeling, progression, and disease modification. By providing these definitions, the involved experts hope to improve communication between all stakeholders involved in CRSwNP treatment for use in routine care, basic and clinical research and international guidelines aimed to harmonize and optimize standard of care of patients with CRSwNP in the future.

Metabolic pathways in immune senescence and inflammaging: Novel therapeutic strategy for chronic inflammatory lung diseases. An EAACI position paper from the Task Force for Immunopharmacology.

The accumulation of senescent cells drives inflammaging and increases morbidity of chronic inflammatory lung diseases. Immune responses are built upon dynamic changes in cell metabolism that supply energy and substrates for cell proliferation, differentiation, and activation. Metabolic changes imposed by environmental stress and inflammation on immune cells and tissue microenvironment are thus chiefly involved in the pathophysiology of allergic and other immune-driven diseases. Altered cell metabolism is also a hallmark of cell senescence, a condition characterized by loss of proliferative activity in cells that remain metabolically active. Accelerated senescence can be triggered by acute or chronic stress and inflammatory responses. In contrast, replicative senescence occurs as part of the physiological aging process and has protective roles in cancer surveillance and wound healing. Importantly, cell senescence can also change or hamper response to diverse therapeutic treatments. Understanding the metabolic pathways of senescence in immune and structural cells is therefore critical to detect, prevent, or revert detrimental aspects of senescence-related immunopathology, by developing specific diagnostics and targeted therapies. In this paper, we review the main changes and metabolic alterations occurring in senescent immune cells (macrophages, B cells, T cells). Subsequently, we present the metabolic footprints described in translational studies in patients with chronic asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and review the ongoing preclinical studies and clinical trials of therapeutic approaches aiming at targeting metabolic pathways to antagonize pathological senescence. Because this is a recently emerging field in allergy and clinical immunology, a better understanding of the metabolic profile of the complex landscape of cell senescence is needed. The progress achieved so far is already providing opportunities for new therapies, as well as for strategies aimed at disease prevention and supporting healthy aging.

EUFOREA summit in Brussels 2023: inspiring the future of allergy & respiratory care.

In March 2023, the European Forum for Research and Education in Allergy and Airways diseases (EUFOREA) organized its bi-annual Summit in Brussels with expert panel members of EUFOREA, representatives of the EUFOREA patient advisory board, and the EUFOREA board and management teams. Its aim was to define the research, educational and advocacy initiatives to be developed by EUFOREA over the next 2 years until the 10th anniversary in 2025. EUFOREA is an international non-for-profit organization forming an alliance of all stakeholders dedicated to reducing the prevalence and burden of chronic allergic and respiratory diseases via research, education, and advocacy. Based on its medical scientific core competency, EUFOREA offers an evidence-supported platform to introduce innovation and education in healthcare leading to optimal patient care, bridging the gap between latest scientific evidence and daily practice. Aligned with the mission of improving health care, the expert panels of asthma, allergic rhinitis (AR), chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) & European Position Paper on Rhinosinusitis and Nasal Polyps (EPOS), allergen immunotherapy (AIT) and paediatrics have proposed and elaborated a variety of activities that correspond to major unmet needs in the allergy and respiratory field. The current report provides a concise overview of the achievements, ambitions, and action plan of EUFOREA for the future, allowing all stakeholders in the allergy and respiratory field to be up-dated and inspired to join forces in Europe and beyond.

Evaluating treatment response to mepolizumab in patients with severe CRSwNP.

BACKGROUND: The SYNAPSE study (NCT03085797) demonstrated that mepolizumab decreased nasal polyp (NP) size and nasal obstruction in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with NP (CRSwNP). METHODS: SYNAPSE, a randomized, double-blind study, included patients with recurrent, refractory, severe CRSwNP, eligible for repeated surgery despite receiving standard of care (SoC). Patients received 4-weekly mepolizumab 100 mg or placebo subcutaneously plus SoC for 52 weeks. This post hoc analysis further characterized treatment responses and association with patient characteristics. The proportion of patients meeting any and each of five response criteria indicating improvement in disease-specific quality of life, NP size, nasal obstruction, loss of smell, and overall symptoms at Weeks 24 and 52, were assessed in subgroups: 1) no surgery; 2) neither surgery nor systemic corticosteroids (SCS). RESULTS: Of 407 patients in the intention-to-treat population, 381 and 343 patients had no sinus surgery by Weeks 24 and 52, respectively. More mepolizumab- versus placebo-treated patients without surgery by Weeks 24 and 52 met each response criteria. Of the mepolizumab-treated patients without surgery by Week 24, 109 (55%) responded across >=3 criteria, increasing to 126 (67%) by Week 52. Similar response trends were seen for patients with neither surgery nor SCS by Weeks 24 and 52. At either timepoint, there were no major differences in baseline characteristics between mepolizumab-treated full- (5/5 categories) and non-responders (0/5 categories). CONCLUSIONS: Most patients who completed SYNAPSE required neither surgery nor SCS use and in addition achieved a progressive and sustained clinical response to mepolizumab underscoring the therapeutic benefits of mepolizumab in severe CRSwNP.

The EUFOREA pocket guide for chronic rhinosinusitis.

Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is known to affect around 5 % of the total population, with major impact on the quality of life of those severely affected (1). Despite a substantial burden on individuals, society and health economies, CRS often remains underdiagnosed, under-estimated and under-treated (2). International guidelines like the European Position Paper on Rhinosinusitis and Nasal Polyps (EPOS) (3) and the International Consensus statement on Allergy and Rhinology: Rhinosinusitis 2021 (ICAR) (4) offer physicians insight into the recommended treatment options for CRS, with an overview of effective strategies and guidance of diagnosis and care throughout the disease journey of CRS.

European Position Paper on Rhinosinusitis and Nasal Polyps 2020.

The European Position Paper on Rhinosinusitis and Nasal Polyps 2020 is the update of similar evidence based position papers published in 2005 and 2007 and 2012. The core objective of the EPOS2020 guideline is to provide revised, up-to-date and clear evidence-based recommendations and integrated care pathways in ARS and CRS. EPOS2020 provides an update on the literature published and studies undertaken in the eight years since the EPOS2012 position paper was published and addresses areas not extensively covered in EPOS2012 such as paediatric CRS and sinus surgery. EPOS2020 also involves new stakeholders, including pharmacists and patients, and addresses new target users who have become more involved in the management and treatment of rhinosinusitis since the publication of the last EPOS document, including pharmacists, nurses, specialised care givers and indeed patients themselves, who employ increasing self-management of their condition using over the counter treatments. The document provides suggestions for future research in this area and offers updated guidance for definitions and outcome measurements in research in different settings. EPOS2020 contains chapters on definitions and classification where we have defined a large number of terms and indicated preferred terms. A new classification of CRS into primary and secondary CRS and further division into localized and diffuse disease, based on anatomic distribution is proposed. There are extensive chapters on epidemiology and predisposing factors, inflammatory mechanisms, (differential) diagnosis of facial pain, allergic rhinitis, genetics, cystic fibrosis, aspirin exacerbated respiratory disease, immunodeficiencies, allergic fungal rhinosinusitis and the relationship between upper and lower airways. The chapters on paediatric acute and chronic rhinosinusitis are totally rewritten. All available evidence for the management of acute rhinosinusitis and chronic rhinosinusitis with or without nasal polyps in adults and children is systematically reviewed and integrated care pathways based on the evidence are proposed. Despite considerable increases in the amount of quality publications in recent years, a large number of practical clinical questions remain. It was agreed that the best way to address these was to conduct a Delphi exercise . The results have been integrated into the respective sections. Last but not least, advice for patients and pharmacists and a new list of research needs are included. The full document can be downloaded for free on the website of this journal: http://www.rhinologyjournal.com.

Allergy in severe asthma.

It is well recognized that atopic sensitization is an important risk factor for asthma, both in adults and in children. However, the role of allergy in severe asthma is still under debate. The term 'Severe Asthma' encompasses a highly heterogeneous group of patients who require treatment on steps 4-5 of GINA guidelines to prevent their asthma from becoming 'uncontrolled', or whose disease remains 'uncontrolled' despite this therapy. Epidemiological studies on emergency room visits and hospital admissions for asthma suggest the important role of allergy in asthma exacerbations. In addition, allergic asthma in childhood is often associated with severe asthma in adulthood. A strong association exists between asthma exacerbations and respiratory viral infections, and interaction between viruses and allergy further increases the risk of asthma exacerbations. Furthermore, fungal allergy has been shown to play an important role in severe asthma. Other contributing factors include smoking, pollution and work-related exposures. The 'Allergy and Asthma Severity' EAACI Task Force examined the current evidence and produced this position document on the role of allergy in severe asthma.

Comparison of exhaled nitric oxide measurements between NIOX MINO electrochemical and Ecomedics chemiluminescence analyzer.

BACKGROUND: Exhaled nitric oxide (eNO) is an established, noninvasive biomarker of active airway inflammation in (atopic) asthma. Treatment with anti-inflammatory therapy, such as inhaled corticosteroids, effectively decreases eNO levels. The NIOX MINO (MINO) is a hand-held, relatively inexpensive, electrochemical device that has been shown to yield comparable eNO measurements to the NIOX stationary unit. AIM: To compare measurements of MINO with another widely used and validated stationary chemiluminescence analyzer, the Ecomedics (ECO). METHODS: We performed subsequent eNO measurements on ECO and MINO in 50 subjects (19 healthy volunteers, 18 healthy smokers and 13 non-smoking, atopic asthmatics, not on controller therapy) on two visits 4-10 days apart. The mean of three acceptable measurements by ECO and the first acceptable measurement with the MINO were used for analysis. RESULTS: Both devices yielded reproducible eNO values for all subjects on both visits, with an overall CV of 22.7% (ECO) and 18.3% (MINO). A significant correlation was found between both devices (r=0.97, p<0.0001). Bland-Altman plots showed a high degree of agreement for the entire study population (mean difference MINO vs ECO=-10%; 95% limit of agreement were -36% and +28%) and in the three individual subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: Exhaled NO values measured with the MINO are reproducible and in agreement with the ECO. Our results add further evidence to the reliability of the MINO and warrant its applicability in research and clinical practice.

MK-0873, a PDE4 inhibitor, does not influence the pharmacokinetics of theophylline in healthy male volunteers.

BACKGROUND: MK-0873 is a novel selective phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitor, which has been in development for the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). In this indication, theophylline is still an important treatment, despite its relatively small therapeutic window. In view of this, it is important to investigate whether MK-0873 could affect the pharmacokinetics, safety and tolerability of theophylline, when both drugs are given concomitantly. AIM: The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of multiple doses of oral MK-0873, a selective phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitor, on the pharmacokinetics, safety and tolerability profile of orally administered theophylline in healthy volunteers. METHODS: Eight healthy, non-smoking male subjects participated in this randomized, open-label, 2-period, cross-over study. In one period subjects received an oral dose of 2.5mg MK-0873 for 6 days co-administered with a single oral dose of 250 mg theophylline on day 5. The other period consisted of a single dose of 250 mg theophylline on day 1. In each period, blood samples were collected at predefined time points to evaluate theophylline pharmacokinetics. RESULTS: All subjects completed the study. The study medications were generally well tolerated and no clinically relevant changes were observed in either treatment periods. No significant difference was found in the AUC 0-infinity (77.7 vs. 83.8h ng/ml; p=0.280) and Cmax (6.70 vs. 7.77 ng/ml; p=0.125) of theophylline between the MK-0873+theophylline and theophylline only treatment, and bioequivalence was demonstrated for AUC0-infinity (geometric mean ratio with 90% confidence interval: 0.930 (0.826, 1.047)). CONCLUSION: In this study, in a limited number of subjects, co-administration of oral MK-0873 did not affect the pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of oral theophylline in non-smoking healthy male subjects.

The use of leukotriene receptor antagonists (LTRAs) as complementary therapy in asthma.

The cysteinyl-leukotrienes (cysLTs: LTC4, LTD4 and LTE4) have an important pathophysiological role in asthma. They are not only extremely potent bronchoconstrictors, but are also involved in the central mechanisms of the asthmatic inflammation and the subsequent remodelling of the airways. Allergen-induced bronchoconstriction as well as spontaneous exacerbations of asthma are associated with increased secretion of LTE4 in urine. This increase does not seem to be affected by high doses of inhaled or systemic corticosteroids. On the contrary, both in vivo and in vitro experiments indicate that corticosteroids to a certain degree may even upregulate the cysLTs synthesis. Moreover, inhaled medication may not get as far as the small airways, which are affected by inflammatory changes in asthma. Hence, the combination of an oral leukotriene receptor antagonist (LTRA) with an inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) seems a rational therapeutic approach to achieve a more complete control of the inflammatory mechanisms in asthma. The additive effects by combining an LTRA with an ICS have been investigated in adults as well as in children from 6-14 years of age. The addition of LTRA improves lung function, and reduces day and night time symptoms in all age groups. More importantly, the combination has also been found to decrease the exacerbation rates in all age groups. More recently, a few studies have compared the effect of additive therapy with LTRA and ICS versus long-acting beta 2-agonists (LABAs) and ICS in asthmatics. Depending on the patient and outcome parameters preselection, some studies found that addition of LABA to ICS resulted in a better lung function and a better overall disease control. Yet one--unsponsored-study, comparing the protective effects of LABA versus LTRA on inflammatory outcome parameters in asthma, found a significant protection against airway hyperresponsiveness to adenosine monophosphate (AMP), together with significant decreases in exhaled nitric oxide (NO) and sputum eosinophils following one week treatment with LTRA, whereas the initial protection by LABA on the AMP responsiveness was lost after one week, and no anti-inflammatory effects could be observed. Similar beneficial effects from LTRA therapy are expected in patients with nocturnal asthma, in whom a decreased responsiveness to corticosteroids has been demonstrated. The choice of either combination therapy has clinical implications. It seems that especially patients with a suboptimal lung function and a significant beta 2-agonist reversibility will benefit from the addition of a LABA, whereas asthmatics with mainly exercise-induced asthma, nocturnal symptoms, or a frequent worsening due to low tolerance to provocative stimuli, may mostly benefit by adding an LTRA to ICS. However, it remains to be determined which combination has the most profound effect on the inflammatory process and the structural changes in asthma.

The effect of montelukast (MK-0476), a cysteinyl leukotriene receptor antagonist, on allergen-induced airway responses and sputum cell counts in asthma.

BACKGROUND: Cysteinyl leukotrienes are capable of inducing chemotaxis of eosinophils in vitro and within the airways of animals and humans in vivo. OBJECTIVE: We hypothesized that montelukast (MK-0476), a potent cysLT1 receptor antagonist, would protect against allergen-induced early (EAR) and late (LAR) asthmatic responses by virtue of anti-inflammatory properties. Hence, we studied the effect of pretreatment with oral montelukast on allergen-induced airway responses. As an exploratory endpoint, changes in inflammatory cell differentials and eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) were evaluated in hypertonic saline-induced sputum. METHODS: Twelve asthmatic men (20-34 years, FEV1 79-109% predicted, histamine PC20FEV1 <4 mg/mL) with dual responses to inhaled house dust mite extract participated in a two-period, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study. Three oral doses of montelukast (10 mg) or matching placebo were administered 36 and 12 h before, and 12 h post-allergen. The airway response to allergen was measured by FEV1, and the EAR and LAR were expressed as the corresponding areas under the time-response curves (AUC0-3 h and AUC3-8h, respectively). During each study period, sputum was induced with 4.5% NaCl 24 h before and 24 h after a standardized allergen challenge. Processed whole sputum cytospins were stained with Giemsa, and cell counts expressed as percentage nonsquamous cells. ECP was measured by FEIA in sputum supernatants. RESULTS: All subjects completed the study. The changes in baseline FEV1 were not significantly different between the two pretreatments (P = 0.183). Montelukast significantly inhibited the EAR and LAR, reducing the AUC0-3h by 75.4% (P<0.001) and the AUC3-8h by 56.9% (P = 0.003) as compared with placebo. Sputa of nine subjects could be included in the analysis (<80% squamous cells). Allergen challenge significantly increased sputum eosinophils after placebo (mean change +/- SD: 4.8 +/- 5.8%, P = 0.038), with a similar trend after montelukast (mean change +/- SD: 4.1 +/- 5.4%; P = 0.056). The allergen-induced changes in sputum eosinophils and ECP, however, were not significantly different between the two pretreatments (P = 0.652 and P = 0.506, respectively). CONCLUSION: We conclude that oral montelukast protects against allergen-induced early and late airway responses in asthma. However, using the present dosing and sample size, this protection was not accompanied with changes in sputum eosinophil percentage or activity, which may require more prolonged pretreatment with cysLT1 receptor antagonists.

The effect of inhaled leukotriene D4 and methacholine on sputum cell differentials in asthma.

The cysteinyl leukotriene LTE4 has been shown to induce airway eosinophilia in asthmatics in vivo. This phenomenon has not yet been reported for LTD4. Hence, we examined the effect of inhaled LTD4 and a control bronchoconstrictor agent, methacholine, on cell differentials in hypertonic saline-induced whole sputum samples of 12 nonsmoking atopic asthmatic subjects (three women, nine men; 21 to 29 yr of age; FEV1, 74 to 120% pred; PC20FEV1 methacholine < 9.6 mg/ml). The study had a cross-over, placebo-controlled design consisting of 4 d separated by > or = 1 wk. On each randomized study day, the subjects inhaled five serial doses of either LTD4 (mean cumulative concentration: 95.7 microM) or methacholine (mean cumulative concentration: 542 mM) or five doses of their respective diluents (PBS/ethanol or PBS). The airway response was measured by FEV1, followed by sputum induction with 4.5% NaCl, 4 h postchallenge. Inflammatory cells (> or = 250) were counted twice on coded cytospins and expressed as percentages of nonsquamous cells. There was no significant difference in the maximal percent fall in FEV1 from baseline between LTD4 (mean +/- SEM, 49.5 +/- 4.4% fall) and methacholine (mean +/- SEM, 55.9 +/- 3.4% fall) (p = 0.11). LTD4 induced a significant increase in the percentage of sputum eosinophils as compared with its diluent (mean +/- SD, 26.6 +/- 21.3% and 10.2 +/- 8.8%, respectively; p = 0.025), whereas a similar trend for methacholine failed to reach significance (mean +/- SD, 19.1 +/- 22.9% and 7.8 +/- 5.8%, respectively; p = 0.11). There was no significant difference in the changes in the percentage of sputum eosinophils between LTD4 and methacholine (mean difference +/- SD, 7.5 +/- 12.5% eosinophils; p = 0.09). We conclude that LTD4 induces eosinophilia in sputum of asthmatic subjects 4 h after inhalation. Our data suggest that LTD4 recruits eosinophils into the airways of asthmatics in vivo, possibly by virtue of direct or indirect chemotactic properties, whereas an additional effect of vigourous airway narrowing per se cannot be excluded.

Role of neutral endopeptidase in exercise-induced bronchoconstriction in asthmatic subjects.

The membrane-bound metalloproteinase, neutral endopeptidase (NEP), is a degrading enzyme of both bronchoconstrictor and bronchodilator peptides within the airways. To examine the role of NEP in exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB) in asthmatic subjects, we used inhaled thiorphan, a NEP inhibitor, as pretreatment to a 6-min standardized exercise challenge. Thirteen clinically stable asthmatic subjects participated in this double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study that was performed on 2 days separated by 48 h. Thiorphan was administered by two inhalations of 0.5 ml containing 1.25 mg/ml. Subsequently, exercise was performed on a bicycle ergometer at 40-50% of predicted maximal voluntary ventilation while inhaling dry air (20 degrees C, relative humidity 6%). The airway response to exercise was measured by forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) every 3 min, up to 30 min postexercise challenge, and was expressed both as the maximal percent fall in FEV1 from baseline and as the area under the time-response curve (AUC) (0-30 min). The acute effects of both pretreatments on baseline FEV1 were not different (P > 0.2), neither was there any difference in maximal percent fall in FEV1 between thiorphan and placebo (P > 0.7). However, compared with placebo, thiorphan reduced the AUC by, on average, 26% [AUC (0-30 min, +/-SE): 213.6 +/- 47.7 (thiorphan) and 288.6 +/- 46.0%fall.h (placebo); P = 0.047]. These data indicate that NEP inhibition by thiorphan reduces EIB during the recovery period. This suggests that bronchodilator NEP substrates, such as vasoactive intestinal polypeptide or atrial natriuretic peptide, modulate EIB in patients with asthma.

The effect of inhaled thiorphan on allergen-induced airway responses in asthmatic subjects.

BACKGROUND: Neuropeptides are likely to be implicated in the pathophysiology of allergen-induced airway responses. However, upon release in the airways, neuropeptides are potentially inactivated by neutral endopeptidase (NEP). OBJECTIVE: We hypothesized that NEP-inhibition by inhaled thiorphan (TH) would increase allergen-induced early (EAR) and late (LAR) asthmatic responses, and allergen-induced airway hyperresponsiveness to histamine in asthmatic subjects in vivo. The dose and dosing intervals of TH were derived from previous pharmacokinetic and dose-finding studies. METHODS: Nine non-smoking, atopic, asthmatic men with dual asthmatic responses to inhaled house-dust mite extract participated in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over study. During each study period PC20 histamine was measured 24 h before, and 3 and 24 h post-allergen. TH (1.25 mg/mL, 0.5 mL) or placebo (P) were aerosolized pre-allergen, and three times at 2 h intervals post-allergen (total dose of TH: 2.5 mg). Forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) was recorded and expressed as percentage fall from baseline. The EAR (0-3 h) and the LAR (3-8 h) were defined as maximum percentage fall from the pre-allergen baseline and as corresponding areas under the time-response curves (AUC). RESULTS: As compared with P, TH failed to induce an acute effect on FEV1 at any of the timepoints (P > 0.08). There was no significant difference between P and TH in the EAR and the LAR: neither in terms of maximum percentage fall from baseline (mean +/- SEM: EAR: 22.3 +/- 4.7% (P) and 20.4 +/- 4.1% (TH), P = 0.75; LAR: 25.2 +/- 4.7% (P) and 26.4 +/- 5.8% (TH), P = 0.77) nor in terms of AUC (P = 0.76). Correspondingly, the changes in PC20 histamine were not different between the two treatments (P > 0.40). CONCLUSION: We conclude that four adequate doses of the inhaled NEP-inhibitor, thiorphan, failed to potentiate allergen-induced airway responses in asthma. These results suggest that either neuropeptides do not play a predominant role in allergen-induced airway responses, or that allergen challenge induces NEP-dysfunction in humans in vivo.

Effect of an inhaled neutral endopeptidase inhibitor, thiorphan, on airway responsiveness to leukotriene D4 in normal and asthmatic subjects.

Cysteinyl leukotrienes are potent inflammatory mediators that are considered to play a role in the pathophysiology of asthma. It can be postulated that leukotrienes exert their bronchoconstricting effects, in part, through secondary release of endogenous neuropeptides. We examined the effect of inhaled thiorphan, an inhibitor of a neuropeptide degrading enzyme, on the concentration-response curve to leukotriene D4 (LTD4) in a two-period, double-blind, cross-over and placebo-controlled study, in 16 nonasthmatic and 12 asthmatic subjects. Thiorphan or placebo were aerosolized and administered in two 0.5 ml doses of 1.25 mg.ml-1 each, 10 min prior to LTD4 inhalation. The airway response was measured by forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) and partial expiratory flow-volume curves (expiratory flow at 40% of forced vital capacity; V40p), and expressed as % fall from baseline. Complete concentration-response curves to inhaled LTD4 were recorded and characterized by their position (provocative concentration producing a 20% fall in FEV1 and a 40% fall in V40p; PC20FEV1 and PC40 V40p) and, in the nonasthmatics, also by the maximal-response plateau (MFEV1, MV40p). Post-pretreatment baseline values of FEV1 and V40p were not different between thiorphan and placebo pretreatment. In both groups of subjects, there was no significant difference in lnPC40V40p or lnPC20FEV1 to LTD4 between the two pretreatments mean difference +/- SD (in doubling concentrations): 0.12 +/- 0.73 and -0.19 +/- 1.23, respectively, in asthmatics; and 0.17 +/- 0.95 and -0.99 +/- 1.95, respectively, in nonasthmatics. The maximal-response plateau could not be obtained in the majority of the asthmatic subjects.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Hyponatremia, hyperkalemia and hypercalcemia after ileal conduit diversion.

In all types of urinary diversion interchange of electrolytes between blood and the urine in the lumen of the conduit may occur, resulting in electrolyte abnormalities. We describe a 67-year-old woman who developed hyponatremia, hyperkalemia and hypercalcemia following ureteroileocutaneostomy. The hyperkalemia and hypercalcemia were successfully treated with sodium polystyrene sulfonate.