Innovative solutions? Belzutifan therapy for hemangioblastomas in Von Hippel-Lindau disease: A systematic review and single-arm meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) disease is a rare autosomal dominant disorder that predisposes patients to develop multiple cysts and tumors, such as hemangioblastomas (HBs) and clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC), due to mutations in the VHL tumor suppressor gene. While treatment of HBs varies based on their characteristics and has improved patient survival, it still involves high morbidity and mortality, leading to ongoing debates and studies to refine therapy strategies. Recent developments include the emergence of Belzutifan, a novel inhibitor targeting hypoxia-inducible factor 2α (HIF-2α), which has shown promising results in ongoing trials, particularly for patients not immediately requiring surgery. METHODS: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to comprehensively evaluate the efficacy and safety of Belzutifan for treating HBs associated with VHL disease. Search was conducted across Medline, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases. Statistical Analysis was performed, with proportions and 95 % confidence intervals. Statistical analyses were carried out using R Studio. RESULTS: Ten studies were selected, comprising 553 patients. The population mean age was 40 (24-65), and 50 % of the population was formed by males. In terms of proportion, 6 analyses were performed: Disease Stability of 31 % [95 %CI:14 %-47 %; I2 = 2 %]; Disease Progression of 2 %[95 %CI:0 %-9 %; I2 = 0 %]; Partial Response of 75 % [95 %CI:54 %-96 %; I2 = 58 %]. Complete response of 1 % [95 %CI:0 %-7 %; I2 = 0 %];and Side effects, anemia 81 % rate [95 % CI:54 %-100 %; I2 = 94 %], and fatigue rate of 79 % [95 % CI:54 %-100 %;I2 = 94 %]. CONCLUSION: Results indicate that Belzutifan effectively stabilizes disease, reduces tumor progression, and achieves significant therapeutic responses, although side effects like anemia and fatigue were noted.

Asleep versus awake GPi DBS surgery for Parkinson's disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Patients with Parkinson's Disease (PD) who receive either asleep image-guided subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (DBS) or the traditional awake technique have comparable motor outcomes. However, there are fewer studies regarding which technique should be chosen for globus pallidus internus (GPi) DBS. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to compare the accuracy of lead placement and motor outcomes of asleep versus awake GPi DBS PD population. METHODS: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane for studies comparing asleep vs. awake GPi DBS lead placement in patients with PD. Outcomes were spatial accuracy of lead placement, measured by radial error between intended and actual location, motor improvement measured using (UPDRS III), and postoperative stimulation parameters. Statistical analysis was performed with Review Manager 5.1.7. and OpenMeta [Analyst]. RESULTS: Three studies met inclusion criteria with a total of 247 patients. Asleep DBS was used to treat 192 (77.7 %) patients. Follow-up ranged from 6 to 48 months. Radial error was not statistically different between groups (MD -0.49 mm; 95 % CI -1.0 to 0.02; I2 = 86 %; p = 0.06), with a tendency for higher target accuracy with the asleep technique. There was no significant difference between groups in change on motor function, as measured by UPDRS III, from pre- to postoperative (MD 8.30 %; 95 % CI -4.78 to 21.37; I2 = 67 %, p = 0.2). There was a significant difference in postoperative stimulation voltage, with the asleep group requiring less voltage than the awake group (MD -0.27 V; 95 % CI -0.46 to - 0.08; I2 = 0 %; p = 0.006). CONCLUSION: Our meta-analysis indicates that asleep image-guided GPi DBS presents a statistical tendency suggesting superior target accuracy when compared with the awake standard technique. Differences in change in motor function were not statistically significant between groups.