Current treatment of symptomatic aortic stenosis in elderly patients: Do risk scores really matter after 80 years of age?

BACKGROUND: According to the guidelines, surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) is recommended in patients at low surgical risk (EuroSCORE II<4%), whereas for other patients, the decision between transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) and surgery should be made by the Heart Team, with TAVI being favoured in elderly patients. AIM: The RAC prospective multicentre survey assessed the respective contributions of age and surgical risk scores in therapeutic decision making in elderly patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis. METHODS: In September and October 2016, 1049 consecutive patients aged ≥ 75 years were included in 32 centres with on-site TAVI and surgical facilities. The primary endpoint was the decision between medical management, TAVI or SAVR. RESULTS: Mean age was 84±5 years and 53% of patients were female. The surgical risk was classified as high (EuroSCORE II>8%) in 18% of patients, intermediate (EuroSCORE II 4-8%) in 34% and low (EuroSCORE II≤4%) in 48%. TAVI was preferred in 71% of patients, SAVR in 19% and medical treatment in 10%. The choice of TAVI over SAVR was associated with older age (P<0.0001) and a higher EuroSCORE II (P=0.008). However, the weight of EuroSCORE II in therapeutic decision making markedly decreased after the age of 80 years. Indeed, 77% of patients aged ≥ 80 years were referred for TAVI, despite a low estimated surgical risk. CONCLUSIONS: The impact of risk scores depends strongly on age, and decreases considerably after 80 years, most patients being referred for TAVI, independent of their estimated surgical risk. Despite medical advancements, 10% of patients were still denied any intervention.

A novel personalized approach to cardiovascular prevention: The VIVOPTIM programme.

BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular diseases are a leading cause of mortality, but a substantial proportion are preventable. AIMS: The Mutuelle générale de l'éducation nationale (MGEN), a provider of private health insurance in France, has developed the VIVOPTIM programme, a novel digital approach to healthcare based on individualized, multiprofessional, ranked management of cardiovascular risk factors. METHODS: Between November 2015 and June 2016, eligible individuals (age 30-70 years) from two regions of France were invited to participate. Volunteers completed a questionnaire based on the Framingham Heart Study Risk Score and were assigned to one of three cardiovascular risk levels. VIVOPTIM comprises four components: cardiovascular risk assessment, instruction on cardiovascular diseases and associated risk factors, personalized coaching (telephone sessions with a specially trained healthcare professional to provide information on risk factors and disease management, set individual health targets, monitor progress and motivate participants), and e-Health monitoring. RESULTS: Data from 2240 participants were analysed. Significant benefits were observed on mean systolic blood pressure (-3.4mmHg), weight (-1.5kg), smoking (-2.2 cigarettes/day) and daily steps (+1726 steps/day (all P<0.0001)), though not on weekly duration of exercise (-0.2hours/week, P=0.619). CONCLUSION: As a result of the positive mid-to-long-term results of the pilot programme on weight, smoking, blood pressure, and uptake of physical activity, the VIVOPTIM programme was extend to the whole of France in 2018 and has the potential to have a genuine impact on patient care and organization of the healthcare system in France.

Patient exposure to X-rays during coronary angiography and percutaneous transluminal coronary intervention: results of a multicenter national survey.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate practices for the protection from radiation of patients during coronary angiography (CA) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), and to update reference values for the main radiation dose parameters. BACKGROUND: Few multicenter data from large populations exist on radiation doses to patients during CA and PCI. METHODS: RAY'ACT is a multicenter, nationwide French survey, with retrospective analysis of radiation parameters routinely registered in professional software from 33,937 CAs and 27,826 PCIs performed at 44 centers from January 1, through December 31, 2010. RESULTS: Kerma-area product (KAP) was registered in 91.7% (44/48) of centers and in 91.5% of procedures for CA (median, 27.2 Gy·cm(2) , interquartile range [IQR], 15.5-45.2) and 91.1% for PCI (median, 56.8 Gy·cm(2) , IQR, 32.8-94.6). Fluoroscopy time was registered in 87.5% (42/48) of centers and in 83.1% of procedures (median, 3.7 min, IQR, 2.3-6.3 for CA; 10.3 min, 6.7-16.2 for PCI). Variability across centers was high. Old equipment and routine left ventriculography were more common and number of registered frames and frame rate were higher in centers delivering high doses. The radial route was associated with lower doses than the femoral route (median KAP 26.8 Gy·cm(2) [15.1-44.25] vs. 28.1 [16.4-46.9] for CA, respectively; and 55.6 Gy·cm(2) [32.2-92.1] vs. 59.4 [24.6-99.9] for PCI, respectively; P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: This survey showed a very high rate of compliance with dose registration during CA and PCI in French nonacademic hospitals. Updated diagnostic reference values are established for the main dose parameters (KAP, 45 Gy·cm(2) for CA, 95 Gy·cm(2) for PCI).

A multicenter randomized trial comparing amphilimus- with paclitaxel-eluting stents in de novo native coronary artery lesions.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to demonstrate the noninferiority of polymer-free amphilimus-eluting stents (Cre8, CID, Saluggia, Italy) versus permanent-polymer paclitaxel-eluting stents (Taxus Liberté, Boston Scientific, Natick, Massachusetts) in de novo percutaneous coronary intervention. BACKGROUND: Although the efficacy of the drug-eluting stent has been well established, the risk-benefit balance is still suboptimal, and the safety of polymers remains uncertain. METHODS: Patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for de novo lesions were randomly assigned 1:1 to Cre8 or Taxus Liberté stents. Primary endpoint was 6-month angiographic in-stent late lumen loss (LLL) within a noninferiority scope. Six-month intravascular ultrasound was performed in 20% of the patients. All patients will be clinically followed up to 5 years. RESULTS: Out of 323 patients enrolled, 162 received Cre8 and 161 Taxus Liberté stents. In-stent LLL was significantly lower in Cre8 group (0.14 ± 0.36 mm vs. 0.34 ± 0.40 mm, p noninferiority <0.0001, p superiority <0.0001). Clinical endpoints (cardiac death, myocardial infarction, target lesion revascularization, and stent thrombosis) up to 12 months did not differ significantly between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: The Cre8 stent in de novo lesions showed significantly lower in-stent LLL at 6 months than the Taxus Liberté stent did, with a trend toward better 12-month clinical safety and efficacy results. (International Randomized Comparison Between DES Limus Carbostent and Taxus Drug-Eluting Stents in the Treatment of De Novo Coronary Lesions [NEXT]; NCT01373502).

Robotically-assisted coronary artery bypass grafting.

Objectives. Robotic surgery enables to perform coronary surgery totally endoscopically. This report describes our experience using the da Vinci system for coronary artery bypass surgery. Methods. Patients requiring single-or-double vessel revascularization were eligible. The procedure was performed without cardiopulmonary bypass on a beating heart. Results. From April 2004 to May 2008, fifty-six patients were enrolled in the study. Twenty-four patients underwent robotic harvesting of the mammary conduit followed by minimal invasive direct coronary artery bypass (MIDCAB), and twenty-three patients had a totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass (TECAB) grafting. Nine patients (16%) were converted to open techniques. The mean total operating time for TECAB was 372 +/- 104 minutes and for MIDCAB was 220 +/- 69 minutes. Followup was complete for all patients up to one year. There was one hospital death following MIDCAB and two deaths at follow up. Forty-eight patients had an angiogram or CT scan revealing occlusion or anastomotic stenoses (>50%) in 6 patients. Overall permeability was 92%. Conclusions. Robotic surgery can be performed with promising results.

Robotic coronary artery bypass grafting.

Robotically assisted surgery enables coronary surgery to be performed totally or partially endoscopically. Using the Da Vinci robotic technology allows minimally invasive treatments. We report on our experience with coronary artery surgery in our department: patients requiring single or double vessel surgical revascularization were eligible. The procedure was performed without cardiopulmonary bypass on a beating heart. From April 2004 to May 2008, 55 consecutive patients were enrolled in the study, and were operated on by a single surgical team. Operative outcomes included operative time, estimated blood loss, transfusions, ventilation time, intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital length of stay. Average operative time was 270 ± 101 min with an estimated blood loss of 509 ± 328 ml, a postoperative ventilation time of 6 ± 12 h, ICU stay of 52 ± 23 h, and a hospital stay of 7 ± 3 days. Nine patients (16%) were converted to open techniques, and transfusion was required in four patients (7%). Follow-up was complete for all patients up to 1 year. There was one hospital death (1.7%) and two deaths at follow-up. Coronary anastomosis was controlled in 48 patients by either angiogram or computed tomography scan, revealing occlusion or anastomotic stenoses (>50%) in six patients. Overall permeability was 92%. Major adverse events occurred in 12 patients (21%). One-year survival was 96%. Our initial experience with robotically assisted coronary surgery is promising: it avoids sternotomy and with a methodical approach we were able to implement the procedure safely and effectively in our practice, combining minimal mortality with excellent survival.

Future of cardiac surgery: minimally invasive techniques in sutureless valve resection.

Aortic valve replacement with mechanical or biological heart valves is the treatment of choice for aortic valve stenosis when it is symptomatic or with severe aortic stenosis (< or = 0.6 cm(2)/m(2)) or with left ventricular dysfunction. In an effort to improve the outcomes of patients with stented biological valves, stentless valves were introduced to clinical practices in the early 1990s. Theses valves were designed to be less obstructive, and thus result in a lower transvalvular gradient. Technically the implantations of these valves are more demanding resulting in longer cross clamp and bypass times. However, important comorbid conditions in elderly patients referred for aortic valve replacement require alternative treatment options with possible reductions of the extracorporeal bypass time and reliable hemodynamic features. In order to comply with these requirements, percutaneous valves and sutureless surgical valves have been developed. The percutaneous technique has the advantage of being performed without circulatory bypass but leaving the aortic calcifications in place, thereby resulting in a high degree of paravalvular insufficiency, atrioventricular block and strokes. The surgical approach has the advantage of removing all calcifications and the valves can be optimally implanted, resulting in minimal paravalvular leak with a low incidence of atrioventricular block and strokes; however, it requires cardiopulmonary bypass. In addition, it can be performed with a low mortality (<3% in isolated aortic replacement, even in older patients). This article reviews the various techniques, strength and limitations of these sutureless valves implanted in the aortic position.

Left main artery dissection during 4 French coronary angiography in elderly patient with severe aortic stenosis: "speedy recovery" using emergency primary stenting.

A 70-year-old woman was referred due to a symptomatic severe calcific aortic stenosis. An iatrogenic dissection of the left main artery with total occlusion and arrest (asystole) occurred during preoperative 4Fr coronography. "Speedy recovery" is achieved with a strategy of percutaneous primary stenting revascularization combined with cardiopulmonary maneuvers.

Beating heart revascularization with minimal extracorporeal circulation in patients with a poor ejection fraction.

BACKGROUND: Coronary artery bypass grafting with cardioplegia in patients with a low ejection fraction carries a risk of myocardial ischemia. Beating heart surgery is associated with hemodynamic changes when the heart is manipulated. We assessed an alternative: minimal extracorporeal circulation for coronary artery bypass grafting on a beating heart in patients with a poor ejection fraction. METHODS: From January 2000 to January 2002, 50 patients with an ejection fraction of less than 35%, who represented 10% of all patients undergoing coronary artery procedures, underwent revascularization on a beating heart with assistance. We used a closed cardiopulmonary bypass system with a centrifugal pump without reservoir, and the surgical strategy was modified to avoid aortic cross-clamping and to decrease bypass time. RESULTS: The main preoperative characteristics were: age (mean +/- SD) of 64 +/- 11.2 years (range, 41-87 years), 35 male patients (70%), mean left ejection fraction of 24.8% +/- 11.2%, and a mean EuroSCORE of 5.8 +/- 2.7. Revascularizations of 146 distal anastomoses (2.9 +/- 0.7 grafts/patient) were completed. Twelve percent were double bypass, 86% were triple bypasses, and 2% were quadruple bypasses; the mean bypass time was 64.2 +/- 26.2 minutes. The mean graft number was 2.9, and the hospital mortality was 2%. Perioperative hematocrit levels were 30.1%, and 26% of patients received transfusions. Postoperative data showed a median extubation time of 9 hours, a median intensive care unit stay of 48 hours, and a hospital stay of 8 +/- 2 days. Postoperative complications included inotropic support (14%), cerebrovascular events (2%), reoperation for homeostasis (4%), delayed sternal closure (2%), and mediastinitis (2%). Peak troponin Ic level remained a low 2.4 +/- 1.9 g/mL. Follow-up at 6 months was complete with 1 late mortality and with a mean ejection fraction of 30.5% +/- 10.8% for the survivors. CONCLUSIONS: Coronary revascularization on a beating heart with extracorporeal assistance can be done in patients with a low ejection fraction. It avoids the myocardial injury associated with aortic cross-clamping and allows safe and complete coronary revascularization.