Acid suppression increases rates of Barrett's esophagus and esophageal injury in the presence of duodenal reflux.

BACKGROUND: The contribution of gastric acid to the toxicity of alkaline duodenal refluxate on the esophageal mucosa is unclear. This study compared the effect of duodenal refluxate when acid was present, decreased by proton pump inhibitors (PPI), or absent. METHODS: We randomized 136 Sprague-Dawley rats into 4 groups: group 1 (n = 33) were controls; group 2 (n = 34) underwent esophagoduodenostomy promoting "combined reflux"; group 3 (n = 34) underwent esophagoduodenostomy and PPI treatment to decrease acid reflux; and group 4, the 'gastrectomy' group (n = 35) underwent esophagoduodenostomy and total gastrectomy to eliminate acid in the refluxate. Esophaguses were examined for inflammatory, Barrett's, and other histologic changes, and expression of proliferative markers Ki-67, proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA), and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). RESULTS: In all reflux groups, the incidence of Barrett's mucosa was greater when acid was suppressed (group C, 62%; group D, 71%) than when not suppressed (group B, 27%; P = 0.004 and P < .001). Erosions were more frequent in the PPI and gastrectomy groups than in the combined reflux group. Edema (wet weight) and ulceration was more frequent in the gastrectomy than in the combined reflux group. Acute inflammatory changes were infrequent in the PPI group (8%) compared with the combined reflux (94%) or gastrectomy (100%) groups, but chronic inflammation persisted in 100% of the PPI group. EGFR levels were greater in the PPI compared with the combined reflux group (P = .04). Ki-67, PCNA, and combined marker scores were greater in the gastrectomy compared with the combined reflux group (P = .006, P = .14, and P < .001). CONCLUSION: Gastric acid suppression in the presence of duodenal refluxate caused increased rates of inflammatory changes, intestinal metaplasia, and molecular proliferative activity. PPIs suppressed acute inflammatory changes only, whereas chronic inflammatory changes persisted.

The Extent of Axillary Lymph Node Clearance Required Following Detection of Sentinel Node Micrometastases.

Sentinel node (SN) micrometastases are an indication to proceed to axillary clearance. The aim of this study is to determine the extent and level of axillary clearance required for patients with SN micrometastases. All patients with SN micrometastases which were followed by axillary clearances from 1999 to 2007 were identified. Slides were reviewed by a histopathologist to detail characteristics of SN micrometastases including size and site. The SN micrometastases and primary tumor characteristics were correlated with the presence and level of non-SN micrometastases. Fifty patients who had micrometastases followed by axillary clearances were identified. Of those 18% (n = 9) had non-SN metastases.Seven patients had metastases to level I, one patient had metastases to level I and III and one patient had non-SN metastases to level III only. No patient had metastases to level II. Patients with non-SN metastases had very limited number of non-SNs involved (maximum 2 non-SNs). No variable, including site of the micrometastasis, was predictive of non-SN metastases. In patients with SN micrometastases, a limited level I axillary clearance can be justified in view of the low number of additional nodes involved and in particular, the low (4%) rate of spread to level II / III nodes.

The value of level III clearance in patients with axillary and sentinel node positive breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: The value of level III axillary clearance is contentious, with great variance worldwide in the extent and levels of clearance performed. OBJECTIVE: To determine rates of level III positivity in patients undergoing level I-III axillary clearance, and identify which patients are at highest risk of involved level III nodes. METHODS: From a database of 2850 patients derived from symptomatic and population-based screening service, 1179 patients who underwent level I-III clearance between the years 1999-2007 were identified. The pathology, surgical details, and prior sentinel nodes biopsies of patients were recorded. RESULTS: Eleven hundred seventy nine patients had level I-III axillary clearance. Of the patients, 63% (n = 747) were node positive. Of patients with node positive disease, 23% (n = 168) were level II positive and 19% (n = 141) were level III positive. Two hundred fifty patients had positive sentinel node biopsies prior to axillary clearance. Of these, 12% (n = 30) and 9% (n = 22) were level II and level III positive, respectively. On multivariate analysis, factors predictive of level III involvement in patients with node positive disease were tumor size (P < 0.001, OR = 1.36; 95% CI: 1.2-1.5), invasive lobular disease (P < 0.001, OR = 3.6; 95% CI: 1.9-6.95), extranodal extension (P < 0.001, OR = 0.27; 95% CI: 0.18-0.4), and lymphovascular invasion (P = 0.04, OR = 0.58; 95% CI: 0.35-1). Lobular invasive disease (P = 0.049, OR = 4.1; 95% CI: 1-16.8), extranodal spread (P = 0.003, OR = 0.18; 95% CI: 0.06-0.57), and having more than one positive sentinel node (P = 0.009, OR = 4.9; 95% CI: 1.5-16.1) were predictive of level III involvement in patients with sentinel node positive disease. CONCLUSION: Level III clearance has a selective but definite role to play in patients who have node positive breast carcinoma. Pathological characteristics of the primary tumor are of particular use in identifying those who are at various risk of level III nodal involvement.

Coassociation of estrogen receptor and p160 proteins predicts resistance to endocrine treatment; SRC-1 is an independent predictor of breast cancer recurrence.

PURPOSE: This study investigates the role of the p160 coactivators AIB1 and SRC-1 independently, and their interactions with the estrogen receptor, in the development of resistance to endocrine treatments. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: The expression of the p160s and the estrogen receptor, and their interactions, was analyzed by immunohistochemistry and quantitative coassociation immunofluorescent microscopy, using cell lines, primary breast tumor cell cultures, and a tissue microarray with breast cancer samples from 560 patients. RESULTS: Coassociation of the p160s and estrogen receptor alpha was increased in the LY2 endocrine-resistant cell line following treatment with tamoxifen in comparison with endocrine-sensitive MCF-7 cells. In primary cultures, there was an increase in association of the coactivators with estrogen receptor alpha following estrogen treatment but dissociation was evident with tamoxifen. Immunohistochemical staining of the tissue microarray revealed that SRC-1 was a strong predictor of reduced disease-free survival (DFS), both in patients receiving adjuvant tamoxifen treatment and untreated patients (P < 0.0001 and P = 0.0111, respectively). SRC-1 was assigned a hazard ratio of 2.12 using a Cox proportional hazards model. Endocrine-treated patients who coexpressed AIB1 with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 had a significantly shorter DFS compared with all other patients (P = 0.03). Quantitative coassociation analysis in the patient tissue microarray revealed significantly stronger colocalization of AIB1 and SRC-1 with estrogen receptor alpha in patients who have relapsed in comparison with those patients who did not recur (P = 0.026 and P = 0.00001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: SRC-1 is a strong independent predictor of reduced DFS, whereas the interactions of the p160 proteins with estrogen receptor alpha can predict the response of patients to endocrine treatment.

Cyclooxygenase-2 predicts adverse effects of tamoxifen: a possible mechanism of role for nuclear HER2 in breast cancer patients.

Cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) is associated with breast tumour progression. Clinical and molecular studies implicate human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) in the regulation of COX-2 expression. Recent reports raise the possibility that HER2 could mediate these effects through direct transcriptional mechanisms. The relationship between HER2 and COX-2 was investigated in a cohort of breast cancer patients with or without endocrine treatment. A tissue microarray comprising tumours from 560 patients with 10-year follow-up was analysed for HER2, ERK1/2, polyoma enhancer activator 3 (PEA3) and COX-2 expression. Subcellular localisation of HER2 was assessed by immunofluorescence and confocal microscopy. Expression of markers examined was analysed in relation to classic clinicopathological parameters and disease-free survival in the presence and absence of tamoxifen. COX-2 expression associated with both membranous and nuclear expression of HER2 (P=0.0033 and P<0.00001 respectively). No association was detected between COX-2 and either ERK1/2 or PEA3 (P=0.7 and P=0.3 respectively). None of the markers were found to be independently prognostic. Membrane HER2, nuclear HER2 and COX-2, however, were all found to predict poor disease-free survival in patients on endocrine treatment (P=0.0017, P=0.0003 and P=0.0202 respectively). Moreover, patients who were positive for COX-2 predicted adverse effects of tamoxifen (P=0.0427). These clinical ex vivo data are consistent with molecular observations that HER2 can regulate COX-2 expression through direct transcriptional mechanisms. COX-2 expression correlates with disease progression on endocrine treatment. This study supports a role for COX-2 as a predictor of adverse effects of tamoxifen in breast cancer patients.

Needle core biopsy characteristics identify patients at risk of compromised margins in breast conservation surgery.

Selection of patients for breast-conserving surgery relies on inexact parameters such as the preoperative estimation of lesion size. This study investigates the value of needle core biopsy findings, in particular, the relative quantity of DCIS, in improving patient selection for breast conservation. Patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery for invasive ductal carcinoma from 1999 to 2004 were identified. Only patients who had a preoperative diagnosis of carcinoma (DCIS and invasive) on core biopsy were included. All core biopsies were reviewed by a breast histopathologist to document the quantity and characteristics of the DCIS component. Of a total of 281 patients, 46% (n=129) had invasive disease on core biopsy (group 1) and 54% (n=152) had either invasive disease with an accompanying DCIS component or DCIS only on core biopsy (group 2). The compromised margin rate for group 1 was 23% compared to 39% for group 2 (P=0.004). The rate of compromised margins increased progressively as the core biopsy DCIS component increased until a rate of 75% (n=18/24) was reached in patients with DCIS only on core biopsy. In patients with a DCIS component on core biopsy, the presence of necrosis (P=0.002), solid type architecture (P=0.008), high grade DCIS (P=0.007), calcification (P=0.003), and the relative proportion of DCIS present (P<0.001) were associated with compromised margins on univariate analysis. On multivariate analysis of this subgroup, the proportion of DCIS in this subgroup (P=0.048) was an independent predictor of compromised margins. The presence and relative proportion of DCIS on core biopsy provides important information as to whether patients are at risk of compromised margins. Documentation of these parameters may assist patient selection for breast-conserving surgery or identify patients who may benefit from wider margins at the time of initial operation.

Analysis of patients with false negative mammography and symptomatic breast carcinoma.

AIM: False-negative mammograms may result in a delay in breast carcinoma diagnosis and have important implications for patient care. In this study, the characteristics of symptomatic patients with false-negative mammograms were analysed. METHODS: Patients with symptomatic breast carcinoma were identified over a 10-year period (1994-2004). One hundred and twenty-four patients had false-negative preoperative mammograms and 1241 patients had abnormal preoperative mammograms. Clinical presentation, diagnostic methods and pathology were analysed. False-negative mammograms were reviewed by a specialist breast radiologist. RESULTS: Following retrospective review, 42% of false-negative mammograms were re-categorised as suspicious. The most commonly misinterpreted lesion was architectural distortion/asymmetrical density. Adjuvant ultrasound, where performed (n = 27), raised the level of suspicion in 93% of cases. Patients with false-negative mammograms were more likely to be younger (P < 0.0001), present with nipple discharge (P = 0.002) and have smaller tumours (P < 0.0001). Their tumours were more frequently located outside the upper outer quadrant (P = 0.002). False-negative mammography led to a delay in diagnosis of >2 months in 12 patients. CONCLUSION: Symptomatic patients with false-negative mammograms often demonstrate definite abnormalities on imaging, the most common of which is architectural distortion/asymmetrical density. Those at particular risk were younger patients, those with nipple discharge, and patients with lesions located outside the upper outer quadrant.

Factors affecting successful breast conservation for ductal carcinoma in situ.

BACKGROUND: Successful breast-conserving therapy in DCIS is restricted by high rates of residual disease resulting in the need for radiotherapy and/or re-excision. This study identifies patients with DCIS who are most at risk of compromised margins and of residual disease. METHODS: All patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery for DCIS over a 6-year period were included. Method of diagnosis, mammographic size, pathological size, DCIS-margin distance and residual disease on re-excision were analysed. RESULTS: One hundred and thirty-five patients underwent initial breast-conserving surgery for DCIS. The compromised margin rate was 72%, and the rate of residual disease on re-operation was 54%. On univariate analysis, underestimation of pathological size by mammography by >1 cm occurred in 40% of those with compromised margins undergoing a therapeutic operation compared to only 14% of those with clear margins (P = 0.02). However, on multivariate analysis only pathological size (P < 0.0001, OR = 1.0,95% CI 1.037-1.128) and lack of a preoperative diagnosis by core biopsy (P < 0.0001, OR = 5.3,95% CI 1.859-15.08) were predictive of compromised margins. The presence of residual disease on re-excision was associated with increasing pathological size (P < 0.0001, OR = 1.085,95% CI 1.038-1.134) and decreasing DCIS-margin distance (P = 0.03, OR = 6.694,95% CI 1.84-37.855). Twenty-nine percent (n = 13/45) of lesions < or =3 cm compared to 84% (n = 27/32) of lesions >3 cm had residual disease on re-operation (P < 0.0001). Residual disease was present in 62% (n = 34/55), 64% (n = 7/11) and 17% (n = 2/12) of patients with DCIS-margin distances < or =1, 1-2 and 2-5 mm, respectively. CONCLUSION: Considerable underestimation of DCIS extent by mammography occurs in a high proportion of patients with compromised margins in breast conservation. Patients at particularly high risk of residual disease on re-excision are those with lesions >3 cm and those with DCIS-margin distances of < or = 2mm.

Predictive value of breast lesions of "uncertain malignant potential" and "suspicious for malignancy" determined by needle core biopsy.

BACKGROUND: The optimum management of patients whose needle core biopsy (NCB) results are of "uncertain malignant potential" (B3) or "suspicious for malignancy" (B4) is unclear. This study correlates B3 and B4 NCB findings with excision histology to determine associated rates of malignancy. METHODS: All NCBs categorized as B3 or B4 were identified from a series of 3729 NCBs. Results of biopsies were reported as normal/nondiagnostic (B1), benign (B2), uncertain malignant potential (B3), suspicious but not diagnostic of malignancy (B4), or malignant (B5) according to the B classification system. B3 lesions included atypical intraductal epithelial proliferations (AIEPs), lobular neoplasia, papillary lesions, radial scars, and potential phyllodes tumors. Histological concordance between NCB and excision specimen was analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 211 B3 lesions and 51 B4 lesions were identified during the study period. The open biopsy rate after a B3/B4 finding was 86% (n = 226). The overall rate of malignancy for B3 lesions after excision was 21%. The B3 lesion-specific rates of malignancy were 6% for radial scars, 14% for papillomas, 35% for AIEP, and 44% for lobular neoplasia. Of the patients with a B4 categorization, 90% (44 of 49) were diagnosed with carcinoma after surgery. Those that were "suspicious for ductal carcinoma-in-situ" and "suspicious for invasion" correlated accurately with excision findings in 81% and 89% of patients, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Management of lesions in the B3 categorization must be tailored to the patient because the specific lesion types are associated with highly variable rates of malignancy. A repeat biopsy or a therapeutic wide local excision should be undertaken in lesions with a B4 NCB categorization because such lesions are associated with a particularly high risk of malignancy at excision.

Needle core biopsy in the diagnosis of phyllodes neoplasm.

BACKGROUND: Accurate identification of phyllodes neoplasms without surgical intervention is difficult, reducing the ability to manage "benign" lumps non-operatively and impacting on the open benign biopsy rate. Needle core biopsy is considered to be a highly accurate technique in the diagnosis of breast carcinoma. Its accuracy in the diagnosis of phyllodes neoplasm has not been established. METHODS: A series of 3729 core biopsies performed between January 1999 and July 2005 were examined. All core biopsies followed by surgical excision were identified. Histologic concordance between core biopsy and excision specimen was analyzed. RESULTS: Twenty-three patients had phyllodes neoplasm on excisional biopsy with prior core biopsy findings as follows: phyllodes neoplasm (n=2), "equivocal" for phyllodes neoplasm (n=12), fibroadenoma (n=3), benign (n=6). The false negative rate for phyllodes neoplasm was therefore 39% (n=9/23). Of the total biopsy series, 35 patients had a core biopsy suggesting the possibility of phyllodes neoplasm. Of these, 32% (n=11) were found to be phyllodes neoplasm on excision, 3% (n=1) phyllodes neoplasm with breast carcinoma, 6% (n=2) breast carcinoma, and 3% (n=1) sarcoma. When a preference for phyllodes neoplasm (n=4) was stated on the equivocal core biopsies, excision correlated with the stated preference; this correlation also occurred in 90% (n=9/10) of core biopsies where fibroadenoma was favored. CONCLUSIONS: Needle core biopsy rarely produces a definite preoperative diagnosis of phyllodes neoplasm. A diagnosis of fibroadenoma or equivocal phyllodes neoplasm on core biopsy should not prevent excision if clinical suspicion remains.

The role of major duct excision and microdochectomy in the detection of breast carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: The association of nipple discharge with breast carcinoma has resulted in numerous women undergoing exploratory surgery to exclude malignancy. The aim of this study was to determine whether pre-operative factors can identify those patients that are most at risk of carcinoma. METHODS: All patients over a 14-year period (1991-2005) who had a microdochectomy or subareolar exploration for the evaluation of nipple discharge were assessed. Patient characteristics, pre-operative imaging and pathological findings were analysed. RESULTS: Of the 211 patients included in this study, 116 patients had pathological (unilateral, uniductal serous or bloody) discharge. On excision, 6% (n = 7) of patients with pathological discharge and 2.4% (n = 2) of patients with non-pathological discharge were diagnosed with carcinoma. Overall, major duct excision resulted in the diagnosis of carcinoma in 4.3% (n = 9), ADH/LCIS in 4% (n = 8), papilloma in 39% (n = 83), and duct ectasia or non-specific benign disease in 53% (n = 111) of patients. In the patients determined to have malignancy, 44% (n = 4) were premenopausal. No patient with a non-bloody discharge in the total population analysed (28%; n = 59/211), or in the population with a pathological discharge (21%; n = 24/116) was found to have carcinoma upon excision. CONCLUSION: Microdochectomy or major duct excision performed for nipple discharge resulted in a low rate of malignancy on excision. Conservative management of non-bloody nipple discharge can be considered in patients with no other clinical or radiological signs of malignancy.

Predictors of invasive disease in breast cancer when core biopsy demonstrates DCIS only.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Ductal carcinoma in-situ on core biopsy does not preclude invasive disease within the excision specimen, resulting in the need for further axillary surgery. We sought to identify predictors of invasion when DCIS is present on core biopsy. METHODS: From a database of 895 breast cancer patients, patients with DCIS on core biopsy who had subsequent surgical excision were identified. Their excision pathology and preoperative mammography were correlated with risk of invasion. RESULTS: Patients (93) with a preoperative diagnosis of DCIS on core biopsy were identified. On excision, 31 patients (33%) had invasive carcinoma and 13 patients (14%) had microinvasion. A preoperative finding of calcification only on mammogram was associated with DCIS on excision (P = 0.014), whereas the presence of other mammographic features increased the risk of invasion. Size > or =5 cm on excision pathology was associated with increased risk of invasion (P = 0.002). Forty-eight percent (n = 11/23) of those diagnosed by ultrasound-guided core biopsy had frank invasion on excision compared to 21% (n = 12/57) diagnosed by stereotactic techniques (P = 0.017). CONCLUSION: Mammographic features and tumor size can help predict invasion in patients who have DCIS on core biopsy. Patients who have features other than calcification on mammography or have tumor size > or =5 cm should be considered for a sentinel node biopsy.

A pathologic assessment of adequate margin status in breast-conserving therapy.

BACKGROUND: The definition of a clear margin in breast-conserving therapy is uncertain. The purpose of this study was to correlate the tumor-margin distance of the excision specimen with the presence of residual tumor at reoperation. We also analyzed predictors of compromised margins and of residual disease. METHODS: All patients who underwent breast-conserving therapy for invasive disease from 1999 to 2003 were reviewed. Pathologic characteristics and the precise tumor distance from the radial margin were recorded. A radial margin was compromised if invasive or (ductal) in situ carcinoma was <5 mm from the margin. RESULTS: Of the 612 patients who underwent breast conservation, 211 (34%) had compromised margins, and 39 had undetermined margins. Of the 161 patients who had a reoperation for compromised margins, 87 (54%) had residual disease. Residual disease after reoperation was present in 58% (56 of 96), 56% (9 of 16), and 45% (22 of 49) of those with tumor-margin distances <1 mm, > or =1 and <2 mm, and > or =2 and <5 mm, respectively. There was a progressive decline in residual disease for each millimeter until a rate of 22% for tumor-margin distances of > or =4 mm and <5 mm was reached. Pathologic size (P = .004), an extensive intraductal component (P = .002), referral from a symptomatic rather than a population-based screening program (P = .02), and the absence of a preoperative diagnosis by core biopsy (P < .0001) were predictive of compromised margins. Only young age (<45 years) was predictive of finding residual disease on reoperation (P = .02). CONCLUSIONS: A total of 45% of patients who had tumor 2 to 5 mm from the radial margin had residual disease on reoperation. Our results support a policy of requiring a 5-mm margin in patients undergoing breast-conserving therapy for invasive disease.

Identifying patients at risk of compromised margins following breast conservation for lobular carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: The association of invasive lobular carcinoma with high rates of compromised margins in breast conservation makes choice of operation for these patients difficult. We sought to identify patients at risk of compromised margins following breast conservation surgery. METHODS: We reviewed all patients with invasive lobular and invasive ductal carcinoma over a 5-year period (1999-2004). The imaging, pathology and surgical details of patients with invasive lobular carcinoma undergoing breast conservation were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 991 patients with invasive ductal carcinoma and 150 patients with invasive lobular carcinoma were identified. Lobular carcinomas had a compromised margin rate of 49% (n = 38/77) in breast conservation compared to 24% (n = 143/588) of ductal carcinomas (P < .0001). Mammographic size (P = .017), pathological size (P = .01), age (P = .03), multifocality (P < .0001), and lymphovascular invasion (P = .015) were significantly associated with compromised margins. CONCLUSION: Invasive lobular carcinoma has a 49% rate of compromised margins following breast conservation. Mammographic size greater than 1.5 cm and young age were preoperative factors predictive of compromised margins.

The accuracy of ultrasound, stereotactic, and clinical core biopsies in the diagnosis of breast cancer, with an analysis of false-negative cases.

OBJECTIVE: Preoperative core biopsy in breast cancer is becoming the standard of care. The aim of this study was to analyze the various methods of core biopsy with respect to diagnostic accuracy and to examine the management and outcome of those patients with false-negative biopsies. METHODS: All patients undergoing core biopsy for breast abnormalities over a 5-year period (1999-2003) were reviewed. The accuracy rates for each method of core biopsy, the histologic agreement between the core pathology and subsequent excision pathology, and the length of follow-up for cases of benign disease were studied. Patients whose biopsies were benign but who were subsequently diagnosed with cancer underwent detailed review. RESULTS: There were 2427 core biopsies performed over the 5-year period, resulting in a final diagnosis of cancer in 1384 patients, benign disease in 954 patients, and atypical disease in 89 patients. Biopsy type consisted of 1279 ultrasound-guided cores, 739 clinically guided cores, and 409 stereotactic-guided cores. The overall false-negative rate was 6.1%, with specific rates for ultrasound-, clinical-, and stereotactic-guided cores of 1.7%, 13%, and 8.9%, respectively. False-negative biopsies occurred in 85 patients, and in 8 of these patients the diagnosis was delayed by greater than 2 months. In all other false-negative cases, "triple assessment" review allowed prompt recognition of discordant biopsy results and further evaluation. CONCLUSION: Ultrasound guidance should be used to perform core biopsies in evaluating all breast abnormalities visible on ultrasound. Adherence to principles of triple assessment following biopsy allows for early recognition of the majority of false-negative cases.

Preoperative characteristics identify patients with hip fractures at risk of transfusion.

Routine cross-matching places substantial demands on limited blood resources. The primary objective of this study was to identify patients with hip fractures at risk of transfusion, which may allow implementation of a more selective cross-matching policy. We also sought to determine the hemoglobin level that triggered a transfusion, the rate of urgent (intraoperative) transfusions, and these patients' characteristics. We reviewed 124 consecutive patients admitted with hip fractures. Patients' clinical and radiologic details, transfusion rates, timing of transfusion, and preoperative and postoperative hemoglobin were reviewed. Older age, low admission hemoglobin, and peritrochanteric fractures were identified as risk factors for transfusion. Eighty-six percent of patients who received transfusions had two or more risk factors, compared with 48% of the total population. The mean hemoglobin that triggered a transfusion was 7.8 g/dL. Although 30% (37/124) of patients received transfusions, only 5% (six of 124) received transfusions intraoperatively, and the majority of these patients (five of six) had at least two risk factors of transfusion. Routine cross-matching for patients with hip fractures requiring surgery can safely be converted to cross-matching on demand in all but high-risk patients. Restrictive cross-matching policies would improve costs in healthcare delivery and prevent unnecessary use of blood resources.