Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
World J Urol ; 42(1): 330, 2024 May 16.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38753035

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To compare the safety and efficacy of needle-perc-assisted endoscopic surgery (NAES) and retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for the treatment of 1- to 2-cm lower-pole stones (LPS) in patients with complex infundibulopelvic anatomy. METHODS: Between June 2020 and July 2022, 32 patients with 1- to 2-cm LPS and unfavorable lower-pole anatomy for flexible ureteroscopy were treated with NAES. The outcomes of these patients were compared with patients who underwent RIRS using matched-pair analysis (1:1 scenario). The matching parameters such as age, gender, body mass index, stone size, hardness, and pelvicalyceal anatomy characteristics including infundibular pelvic angle, infundibular length, and width were recorded. Data were analyzed using the Student's t-test, Mann-Whitney U test, and Fisher's exact test. RESULTS: The two groups had similar baseline characteristics and lower-pole anatomy. The stone burden was comparable between both groups. NASE achieved a significantly better initial stone-free rate (SFR) than RIRS (87.5% vs 62.5%, p = 0.04). The auxiliary rates for the NAES and RIRS groups were 12.5% and 31.3%, respectively (p = 0.13). Finally, the SFR after 1 month follow-up period was still higher for the NAES group than RIRS group (93.8% versus 81.3%), but the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.26). Concerning the operation duration, overall complication rates, and postoperative hospital stay, there were no differences between two groups. CONCLUSION: Compared to RIRS for treating 1- to 2-cm LPS in patients with unfavorable infundibulopelvic anatomy for flexible ureteroscopy, NAES was safe and effective with higher SFR and similar complication rate.


Assuntos
Cálculos Renais , Pelve Renal , Ureteroscopia , Humanos , Feminino , Masculino , Cálculos Renais/cirurgia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise por Pareamento , Pelve Renal/cirurgia , Ureteroscopia/métodos , Adulto , Resultado do Tratamento , Estudos Retrospectivos , Agulhas , Idoso , Rim/cirurgia , Rim/anatomia & histologia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Urológicos/métodos
2.
Sci Rep ; 12(1): 8366, 2022 05 19.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35589956

RESUMO

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is a minimally invasive procedure for removing renal calculi, while a large number of patients experience acute moderate-to-severe pain despite the analgesia provided. This study aimed to explore the risk factors for postoperative pain after PCNL, which may provide a novel perspective to refine the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) program and to improve clinical outcomes. The clinical data of 331 patients who underwent PCNL in our hospital from September 2020 to February 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. The pain intensity was assessed every 4 h until 24 h post-surgery. According to the visual analog scale (VAS) score, patients were divided into two groups: mild or no pain group (VAS score, 0-3) and moderate-to-severe pain group (VAS score, 4-10). The pre-, peri-, and post-operative data were collected and analyzed. The indicators with statistically significant differences were selected, and multivariate logistic regression analysis was employed to determine the risk factors for postoperative pain after PCNL. Among 331 patients, 221 patients had moderate-to-severe pain and the incidence rate was 66.77%. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the independent risk factors for moderate-to-severe pain after PCNL were the diameter of the renal calculus (odds ratio (OR) = 6.23, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.50-15.56, P = 0.001), the number of renal calculi (OR = 15.892, 95% CI 7.721-32.711, P < 0.01), the presence of residual calculi (OR = 1.780, 95% CI 0.897-3.533, P = 0.01), and operation time (OR = 1.033, 95% CI 1.020-1.046, P < 0.01). The diameter of the renal calculus, the number of renal calculi, the presence of residual calculi, and operation time were significant predictors of postoperative pain after PCNL.


Assuntos
Cálculos Renais , Nefrolitotomia Percutânea , Humanos , Cálculos Renais/etiologia , Nefrolitotomia Percutânea/efeitos adversos , Dor Pós-Operatória/etiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Resultado do Tratamento
3.
Urolithiasis ; 50(3): 349-355, 2022 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35179618

RESUMO

Our aim was to investigate the safety and efficacy of needle-perc-assisted percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) or retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS), namely, needle-perc-assisted endoscopic surgery (NAES), in a series of patients with large and/or complex renal stones. From May 2018 to August 2021, a total of 119 patients underwent NAES at our institute. Among them, 94 patients underwent needle-perc-assisted standard PCNL in prone position and 25 underwent needle-perc-assisted RIRS in the Galdakao-modified supine Valdivia position or prone split-leg position. Clinical factors including age, sex, medical history, and stone characteristics were collected. Intraoperative and postoperative outcomes were retrospectively evaluated. The patients' mean age ± standard deviation was 50.3 ± 14.3 years. The mean stone size was 7.6 ± 3.7 and 1.7 ± 0.8 cm for needle-perc-assisted PCNL and RIRS, respectively. Of the 119 patients, 51 had staghorn stones, 16 had solitary kidneys, 17 had a history of ipsilateral renal surgery, and 6 had calyceal diverticular stones. The mean operative time was 83.4 ± 25.9 min for needle-perc-assisted PCNL and 66.3 ± 21.8 min for needle-perc-assisted RIRS. The stone-free rate (SFR) for needle-perc-assisted PCNL was 77.7% after the first treatment and 88.3% after auxiliary treatments. The SFR for needle-perc-assisted RIRS was 88.0% and no auxiliary treatments were carried out in this group. Eleven (11.7%) patients who underwent needle-perc-assisted standard PCNL developed Clavien-Dindo grade I or II complications. Three (12.0%) patients who underwent needle-perc-assisted RIRS developed a fever (grade I). The overall complication rate for NAES was 11.8%, with no urosepsis, angioembolization, or other grade III to V complications. In conclusion, NAES is a safe and effective procedure for one-step complete resolution of large and/or complex renal stones with no additional procedure-related complications.


Assuntos
Cálculos Renais , Nefrolitotomia Percutânea , Nefrostomia Percutânea , Rim Único , Feminino , Humanos , Rim/cirurgia , Cálculos Renais/etiologia , Cálculos Renais/cirurgia , Masculino , Nefrolitotomia Percutânea/efeitos adversos , Nefrolitotomia Percutânea/métodos , Nefrostomia Percutânea/efeitos adversos , Nefrostomia Percutânea/métodos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA