Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
BMC Med Imaging ; 24(1): 30, 2024 Feb 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38302883

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Lung diseases, both infectious and non-infectious, are the most prevalent cause of mortality overall in the world. Medical research has identified pneumonia, lung cancer, and Corona Virus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) as prominent lung diseases prioritized over others. Imaging modalities, including X-rays, computer tomography (CT) scans, magnetic resonance imaging (MRIs), positron emission tomography (PET) scans, and others, are primarily employed in medical assessments because they provide computed data that can be utilized as input datasets for computer-assisted diagnostic systems. Imaging datasets are used to develop and evaluate machine learning (ML) methods to analyze and predict prominent lung diseases. OBJECTIVE: This review analyzes ML paradigms, imaging modalities' utilization, and recent developments for prominent lung diseases. Furthermore, the research also explores various datasets available publically that are being used for prominent lung diseases. METHODS: The well-known databases of academic studies that have been subjected to peer review, namely ScienceDirect, arXiv, IEEE Xplore, MDPI, and many more, were used for the search of relevant articles. Applied keywords and combinations used to search procedures with primary considerations for review, such as pneumonia, lung cancer, COVID-19, various imaging modalities, ML, convolutional neural networks (CNNs), transfer learning, and ensemble learning. RESULTS: This research finding indicates that X-ray datasets are preferred for detecting pneumonia, while CT scan datasets are predominantly favored for detecting lung cancer. Furthermore, in COVID-19 detection, X-ray datasets are prioritized over CT scan datasets. The analysis reveals that X-rays and CT scans have surpassed all other imaging techniques. It has been observed that using CNNs yields a high degree of accuracy and practicability in identifying prominent lung diseases. Transfer learning and ensemble learning are complementary techniques to CNNs to facilitate analysis. Furthermore, accuracy is the most favored metric for assessment.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Pneumopatias , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Humanos , Redes Neurais de Computação , Pneumopatias/diagnóstico por imagem , Aprendizado de Máquina , COVID-19/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias Pulmonares/diagnóstico por imagem
2.
Funct Integr Genomics ; 23(4): 333, 2023 Nov 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37950100

RESUMO

Hospitals and medical laboratories create a tremendous amount of genome sequence data every day for use in research, surgery, and illness diagnosis. To make storage comprehensible, compression is therefore essential for the storage, monitoring, and distribution of all these data. A novel data compression technique is required to reduce the time as well as the cost of storage, transmission, and data processing. General-purpose compression techniques do not perform so well for these data due to their special features: a large number of repeats (tandem and palindrome), small alphabets, and highly similar, and specific file formats. In this study, we provide a method for compressing FastQ files that uses a reference genome as a backup without sacrificing data quality. FastQ files are initially split into three streams (identifier, sequence, and quality score), each of which receives its own compression technique. A novel quick and lightweight mapping mechanism is also presented to effectively compress the sequence stream. As shown by experiments, the suggested methods, both the compression ratio and the compression/decompression duration of NGS data compressed using RBFQC, are superior to those achieved by other state-of-the-art genome compression methods. In comparison to GZIP, RBFQC may achieve a compression ratio of 80-140% for fixed-length datasets and 80-125% for variable-length datasets. Compared to domain-specific FastQ file referential genome compression techniques, RBFQC has a compression and decompression speed (total) improvement of 10-25%.


Assuntos
Compressão de Dados , Compressão de Dados/métodos , Algoritmos , Software , Sequenciamento de Nucleotídeos em Larga Escala/métodos , Genoma , Análise de Sequência de DNA/métodos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA