Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Am J Emerg Med ; 30(1): 129-34, 2012 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21185674

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Acute upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage (UGIH) is a common reason for hospitalization with substantial associated morbidity, mortality, and cost. Differentiation of high- and low-risk patients using established risk scoring systems has been advocated. The aim of this study was to determine whether these scoring systems are more accurate than an emergency physician's clinical decision making in predicting the need for endoscopic intervention in acute UGIH. METHODS: Patients presenting to a tertiary care medical center with acute UGIH from 2003 to 2006 were identified from the hospital database, and their clinical data were abstracted. One hundred ninety-five patients met the inclusion criteria and were included in the analysis. The clinical Rockall score and Blatchford score (BS) were calculated and compared with the clinical triage decision (intensive care unit vs non-intensive care unit admission) in predicting the need for endoscopic therapy. RESULTS: Clinical Rockall score greater than 0 and BS greater than 0 were sensitive predictors of the need for endoscopic therapy (95% and 100%) but were poorly specific (9% and 4%), with overall accuracies of 41% and 39%. At higher score cutoffs, clinical Rockall score greater than 2 and BS greater than 5 remained sensitive (84% and 87%) and were more specific (29% and 33%), with overall accuracies of 48% and 52%. Clinical triage decision, as a surrogate for predicting the need for endoscopic therapy, was moderately sensitive (67%) and specific (75%), with an overall accuracy (73%) that exceeded both risk scores. CONCLUSIONS: The clinical use of risk scoring systems in acute UGIH may not be as good as clinical decision making by emergency physicians.


Assuntos
Técnicas de Apoio para a Decisão , Endoscopia Gastrointestinal , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/diagnóstico , Triagem/métodos , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Endoscopia Gastrointestinal/métodos , Endoscopia Gastrointestinal/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Sensibilidade e Especificidade
3.
Laryngoscope ; 113(11): 1977-82, 2003 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14603059

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: Bacterial biofilms, bacteria surrounded by a protective glycocalyx, have been demonstrated on bioimplants placed within and outside of the head and neck region. The presence of the biofilm often makes decontamination of an infected implant impossible, requiring removal of the implant. Infections attributable to biofilm formation within the facial skeleton after reconstruction with implants may result in delayed union, fibrous union, malunion, nonunion, and malocclusion. These complications often require removal of the implant and secondary surgery. Although the incidence of infections necessitating implant removal is relatively low, the increased numbers of implants being placed make this a growing problem. Previous work in the authors laboratory has demonstrated a resistance to biofilm formation on different types of pressure-equalizing tubes. The hypothesis evaluated in the study is that such resistance to biofilm formation is due to the inability of bacteria to adhere to the tubes because of the material's smoothness or surface charge. STUDY DESIGN: A controlled observational study. METHODS: Scanning electron microscopy was used to evaluate the formation of biofilms in vitro for a common strain of Staphylococcus aureus on four implantable materials. The implantable materials included titanium and polylactide resorbable plates. RESULTS: Consistent with the authors' prior findings, they were able to produce bacterial biofilm reliably on a silicone pressure equalizing tube but were unable to demonstrate biofilm formation on the titanium or resorbable implants. CONCLUSION: The absence of biofilm formation on these implants can best be explained by the surface charge or polarity properties of these materials. These findings are consistent with the relatively low incidence of infections among patients receiving these implants in maxillofacial applications.


Assuntos
Prótese Maxilofacial/microbiologia , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/microbiologia , Infecções Estafilocócicas/microbiologia , Staphylococcus aureus/fisiologia , Biofilmes/crescimento & desenvolvimento , Humanos , Técnicas In Vitro , Espectrofotometria/métodos , Infecções Estafilocócicas/imunologia , Staphylococcus aureus/imunologia , Titânio/imunologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA