Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
BMC Infect Dis ; 24(1): 444, 2024 Apr 26.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38671365

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales (CPE) are an important public health threat, with costly operational and economic consequences for NHS Integrated Care Systems and NHS Trusts. UK Health Security Agency guidelines recommend that Trusts use locally developed risk assessments to accurately identify high-risk individuals for screening, and implement the most appropriate method of testing, but this presents many challenges. METHODS: A convenience sample of cross-specialty experts from across England met to discuss the barriers and practical solutions to implementing UK Health Security Agency framework into operational and clinical workflows. The group derived responses to six key questions that are frequently asked about screening for CPE. KEY FINDINGS: Four patient groups were identified for CPE screening: high-risk unplanned admissions, high-risk elective admissions, patients in high-risk units, and known positive contacts. Rapid molecular testing is a preferred screening method for some of these settings, offering faster turnaround times and more accurate results than culture-based testing. It is important to stimulate action now, as several lessons can be learnt from screening during the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as from CPE outbreaks. CONCLUSION: Further decisive and instructive information is needed to establish CPE screening protocols based on local epidemiology and risk factors. Local management should continually evaluate local epidemiology, analysing data and undertaking frequent prevalence studies to understand risks, and prepare resources- such as upscaled screening- to prevent increasing prevalence, clusters or outbreaks. Rapid molecular-based methods will be a crucial part of these considerations, as they can reduce unnecessary isolation and opportunity costs.


Assuntos
Proteínas de Bactérias , Infecções por Enterobacteriaceae , Programas de Rastreamento , beta-Lactamases , Humanos , Infecções por Enterobacteriaceae/diagnóstico , Infecções por Enterobacteriaceae/microbiologia , Inglaterra , beta-Lactamases/metabolismo , beta-Lactamases/genética , Proteínas de Bactérias/genética , Proteínas de Bactérias/metabolismo , Programas de Rastreamento/métodos , Enterobacteriáceas Resistentes a Carbapenêmicos/isolamento & purificação , Hospitais , COVID-19/diagnóstico , SARS-CoV-2 , Enterobacteriaceae/enzimologia , Enterobacteriaceae/isolamento & purificação , Enterobacteriaceae/genética
2.
J Hosp Infect ; 103(2): 156-159, 2019 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31039383

RESUMO

Carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (CPE) are a growing problem in UK hospitals. Preventing transmission requires early detection. This study evaluates a new screening policy for patients with a history of blaKPC-associated CPE (KPC-CPE) in a higher incidence hospital. Previous policy assumed 'once positive always positive'. New policy uses rapid screening and risk assessment. Results show that most (76.5%) patients with a history of KPC-CPE do not have detectable KPC-CPE on readmission or during their subsequent hospital stay but that repeat screening after an initial negative result is required. The new policy takes a risk-based approach while prioritizing isolation facilities in a higher incidence trust.


Assuntos
Enterobacteriáceas Resistentes a Carbapenêmicos/isolamento & purificação , Transmissão de Doença Infecciosa/prevenção & controle , Infecções por Enterobacteriaceae/diagnóstico , Infecções por Enterobacteriaceae/microbiologia , Testes Diagnósticos de Rotina , Infecções por Enterobacteriaceae/epidemiologia , Infecções por Enterobacteriaceae/transmissão , Política de Saúde , Humanos , Incidência , Programas de Rastreamento , Readmissão do Paciente , Reino Unido/epidemiologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA