Clinical Validation of EndoPredict in Pre-Menopausal Women with ER-Positive, HER2-Negative Primary Breast Cancer.

PURPOSE: The EndoPredict prognostic assay is validated to predict distant recurrence and response to chemotherapy primarily in post-menopausal women with estrogen receptor-positive (ER+), HER2- breast cancer. This study evaluated the performance of EndoPredict in pre-menopausal women. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Tumor samples from 385 pre-menopausal women with ER+, HER2- primary breast cancer (pT1-3, pN0-1) who did not receive chemotherapy in addition to endocrine therapy were tested with EndoPredict to produce a 12-gene EP molecular score and an integrated EPclin score that includes pathologic tumor size and nodal status. Associations of molecular and EPclin scores with 10-year distant recurrence-free survival (DRFS) were evaluated by Cox proportional hazards models and Kaplan-Meier analysis. RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 9.7 years, both the EP molecular score and the molecular-clinicopathologic EPclin score were associated with increased risk of distant recurrence [HR, 1.33; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.18-1.50; P = 7.2 × 10-6; HR, 3.58; 95% CI, 2.26-5.66; P = 9.8 × 10-8, respectively]. Both scores remained significant after adjusting for clinical factors in multivariate analysis. Patients with low-risk EPclin scores (64.7%) had significantly improved DRFS compared with high-risk patients (HR, 4.61; 95% CI, 1.40-15.17; P = 4.2 × 10-3). At 10 years, patients with low-risk and high-risk EPclin scores had a DRFS of 97% (95% CI, 93%-99%) and 76% (95% CI, 67%-82%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The EPclin score is strongly associated with DRFS in pre-menopausal women who received adjuvant endocrine therapy alone. On the basis of these data, pre-menopausal women with EPclin low-risk breast cancer may be treated with endocrine therapy only and safely forgo adjuvant chemotherapy.

Development and validation of a cell cycle progression signature for decentralized testing of men with prostate cancer.

Aim: The 46-gene Prolaris® cell cycle progression test provides information on the risk of prostate cancer progression. Here we developed and validated a 16-gene kit-based version. Methods: RNA was extracted from prostate cancer biopsy tissue. Amplification efficiency, minimum tumor content, repeatability, reproducibility and equivalence with the 46-gene test were evaluated. Results: Amplification efficiencies for all genes were within the acceptable range (90-110%), and samples with ≥50% tumor content were appropriate for the 16-gene test. Results were repeatable (standard deviation: 0.085) and reproducible (standard deviation: 0.115). Instrument, operator and kit lot had minimal impact on results. Cell cycle progression scores from the 46- and 16-gene tests were highly correlated (r = 0.969; bias = 0.217). Conclusion: The 16-gene test performs consistently and similarly to the 46-gene test.

Prostate cancer does not always require aggressive treatment, and some men with low risk of disease progression may chose active surveillance. One way to measure the risk of disease progression is the Prolaris^® cell cycle progression test, which is performed at a commercial testing facility and measures the expression of 46 genes. However, certain European countries would prefer to run this test at a centralized testing facility. To this end we developed a streamlined kit measuring 16 genes to be used in these testing facilities, and showed that the cell cycle progression scores derived from the kit test are robust and equivalent to those obtained with the larger 46-gene test.

Analytical validation of a 12-gene molecular test for the prediction of distant recurrence in breast cancer.

AIM: To validate the analytical performance of a 12-gene molecular assay that predicts distant recurrence for early-stage ER+/HER2- invasive breast cancer as run within a central reference laboratory. MATERIALS & METHODS: Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded breast resections were evaluated by quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction for the expression of eight target genes, three housekeeper genes and one control gene to assess for DNA contamination. RESULTS: The assay results were highly correlated with a validated reference laboratory. The assay had a broad linear range for input RNA, with similar amplicon efficiencies for target and housekeeper genes. The assay test was highly reproducible, with comparable inter- and intrabatch precision to the reference laboratory. CONCLUSION: These studies demonstrate that the 12-gene molecular assay is highly robust and accurate.