STOP Signs: A Population-based Interrupted Time Series Analysis of Antibiotic Duration for Complicated Intraabdominal Infection Before and After the Publication of a Landmark RCT.

OBJECTIVE: To determine if the STOP-IT randomized controlled trial changed antibiotic prescribing in patients with Complicated Intraabdominal Infection (CIAI). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: CIAI is common and causes significant morbidity. In May 2015, the STOP-IT randomized controlled trial showed equivalent outcomes between four-day and clinically determined antibiotic duration. METHODS: This was a population-based retrospective cohort study using interrupted time series methods. The STOP-IT publication date was the exposure. Median duration of inpatient antibiotic prescription was the outcome. All adult patients admitted to four hospitals in Calgary, Canada between July 2012 and December 2018 with CIAI who survived at least four days following source control were included. Analysis was stratified by infectious source as appendix or biliary tract (group A) versus other (group B). RESULTS: Among 4384 included patients, clinical and demographic attributes were similar before vs after publication. In Group A, median inpatient antibiotic duration was 3 days and unchanged from the beginning to the end of the study period [adjusted median difference -0.00 days, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.37 - 0.37 days]. In Group B, antibiotic duration was shorter at the end of the study period (7.87 vs 6.73 days; -1.14 days, CI-2.37 - 0.09 days), however there was no change in trend following publication (-0.03 days, CI -0.16 - 0.09). CONCLUSIONS: For appendiceal or biliary sources of CIAI, antibiotic duration was commensurate with the experimental arm of STOP-IT. For other sources, antibiotic duration was long and did not change in response to trial publication. Additional implementation science is needed to improve antibiotic stewardship.

Retrieving organs from non-heart-beating organ donors: a review of medical and ethical issues.

PURPOSE: The increasing gap between numbers of individuals awaiting organ replacement surgery and the supply of organs available for transplant underpins attempts to increase the number of organs available. One practice, used in other countries, is the recovery of organs from non-heart-beating organ donors (NHBD). The purpose of this review is to discuss ethical issues surrounding the use of organs from these donors. SOURCE: Narrative review from selected Medline references, and other published reports. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: NHBD protocols have been established in many countries including the United States. Despite numerous publications, and extensive debate in the literature, significant ethical issues remain unresolved in the retrieval of organs from donors that have died from cessation of cardiac activity. The ethical concerns primarily arise in the determination of death, the tension between the time constraints on recovering organs viable for transplantation, and procedures to enhance organ viability. Despite a concerted effort in the United States, less than half of the organ procurement organizations have NHBD protocols. CONCLUSION: Canadian centres can learn from the difficulties encountered in other centres that have developed NHBD protocols. A moratorium on Canadian NHBD protocols should be considered until a National consensus reflecting Canadian values has been undertaken.